:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺閩地區老人識字教育學習者特性之探討及其意涵
書刊名:高雄師大學報
作者:何青蓉 引用關係
作者(外文):Ho, Ching-jung
出版日期:1996
卷期:7
頁次:頁1-22
主題關鍵詞:臺閩地區老人識字教育
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:105
  • 點閱點閱:44
     本研究以實徵方法探究老人識字教育學習者的特性,希望藉而提供教 育實際改進之建議與理論建構之觀點。研究包括843名參與機構識字課程學 習之在學者及輟學者。主要發現包括:老人的參與以內在動機居多,是否 因之得到文憑則不是很重要。識字教育是一種喚醒老人對自我、生活及學 習興趣的工具,增強其獨立感與對生活的控制感。生理與意向因素相互作 用阻礙老年人參與識字之學習。用「自我滿足的觀點」比較能夠解釋老人 識字的意涵。研究建議老人識字教育絕不能窄化到以識字為唯一的目的, 可就發展任務或人文的角度思考教育設計。建議補校制度彈性化,廣闢、 整合學習途徑與資源。未來研究可比較兩性參與識字教育心理、探究社會 刻板印象對不識字者烙印效應、發展老人識字測量工具、進行不(低)識字 老人需求評估,及未參與機構學習之不(低)識字老人學習特性的研究。
     The purpose of this study is to understand older learners' characteristics in literacy programs and provide suggestions for future improvement in practice as well as perspectvies to construct theory. This research includes 843 older learners, including both program participants and dropouts. Main findings are as follows: Most learners were motivated by their inner motivations, and it was not important whether they got the diplomas accordingly. Literacy education was a means to awaken learners' interest in self, life, and learning; it enhanced their independence as well as a sense of self- control. Physical and dispositional factors interacted with each other to interfere their learning. It is suggested that literacy education for older adults should not be narrowed to focus on reading and writing only; literacy education can be designed based on learners' developmental tasks and a humanist perspective. Also, it is suggested that make the design of current supplementary educational system flexible, enlarge and integrate learning approaches as well as resources. Recommendations for future research include: studies of gender differences in the participation of literacy programs, exploration of the stigma of illiteracy on illiterates, development of measurements to learn older adults literacy, estimation of older illiterates' needs, and studies of nonparticipants' characteristics.
期刊論文
1.何青蓉(19940900)。從識字教育內涵檢視我國識字教育的發展。成人教育,21,44-51。  延伸查詢new window
2.Kasworm, C. E.、Median, R. A.(1989)。Perspective of literacy in the senior years。Educational Gerontology,15,65-79。  new window
3.Scribner, Sylvia(1984)。Literacy in three Metaphors。American Journal of Education,93(1),6-21。  new window
4.何青蓉(19950100)。「需求評估」概念的澄清與分析。成人教育,23,41-46。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃富順(19940900)。我國失學國民識字標準及識字字彙之研究。成人教育,21,35-43。  延伸查詢new window
6.Bean, R. M.、Partanen, J.、Writght, F.、Aaronson, J.(1989)。Attrition in urban basic literacy programs and strategies to increase retention。Adult Literacy and Basic Education,13(3),146-254。  new window
7.Beder, H.(1990)。Reaching ABE students: Lessons from the Iowa studies。Adult and Basic Education,14(1),1-17。  new window
8.Courtenay, B. C.、Stevenson, R. T.、Suhart, M. P.(1982)。Functional literacy among elderly: Where are(n't)。Educational Geronotology,8,339-352。  new window
9.Fingeret, A.(1983)。Social Network: A New Perspective on Independence and Illiterate Adults。Adult Education Quarterly,33(3),133-146。  new window
10.Hayes, E. R.(1988)。A typology of low-literate adults based on perceptions of deterrents to participation in adult basic education。Adult Education Quarterly,39(1),1-10。  new window
11.Forlizzi, L. A.(1990)。An assessment of the educational needs and interests of older, low-literate adults。Adult Literacy and Basic Education,14(3),204-211。  new window
12.Fisher, J. C.(1987)。The literacy level among older adults: Is it a problem?。Adult Literacy and Basic Education,11(1),41-51。  new window
13.Heisel, M.、Larson, G.(1984)。Literacy and social milieu: Reading behavior of the black elderly。Adult Education Quarterly,34,63-70。  new window
14.Kasworm, C. E.(1982)。Older learners in adult basic education。Adult Literacy and Basic Education,6(4),195-207。  new window
15.Rigg, P.(1985)。Petra: Learning to read at 45。Journal of Education,167(1),1。  new window
16.Ross, J. M.(1988)。Learning and coping strategies of learning disabled ABE students。Adult Literacy and Basic Education,12(2),78-90。  new window
17.Beder, H.(1991)。The Stigma of Illiteracy。Adult Basic Education,1(2),67-78。  new window
研究報告
1.何青蓉、何進財、蔡培村(1995)。從學習者特性論析我國成人識字教育之規劃。  延伸查詢new window
2.內政部(1994)。中華民國台閩地區人口統計。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.王瑞宏(1995)。成人基本教育教師教學型態與學生學習行為關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Beder, H.(1991)。Adult literacy: Issues for policy and practice。Malabar, FL:Krieger Publishing Company。  new window
2.Cross, K. P.(1981)。Adults as learners: Increasing participation and facilitating learning。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
3.黃富順(1989)。成人心理與學習。臺北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.邱天助(1991)。老人發展及其教育需求。老人教育。台北:教育部社會教育司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Harvey, R. L.、Cronan, T.(1992)。Psychological implications of literacy education for the older adult。Perspectives: From adult literacy to continuing education。Dubuque, IA:Wn. C. Brown Publishers。  new window
3.Fingeret, A.(1985)。ABE students as adult learners。North Carolina Adult Education Instructional Program Evaluation。Raleigh:Department of Adult and Community College Education, North Carolina State University。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE