:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:《解深密經》的真理觀
作者:包蕾
作者(外文):Lei Bao
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:哲學研究所
指導教授:蔡耀明
李賢中
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2017
主題關鍵詞:真理勝義諦三相三無自性性唯識truthultimate truth (paramārtha-satya)cognition-only (vijñaptimātra)three characteristics (trīṇi lakṣaṇāni)three types of lack of own-being (tri niḥsvabhāvatā)
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:117
摘 要
本論文所處理的主要議題是《解深密經》的真理觀,此立足於兩方面之探討:一是將「真理」問題的討論,作為貫穿於整個《解深密經》的核心內容和主要脈絡,重新來理解此經的基本思想和主要結構,此點有別於前人偏重從「唯識學」義理方面,如「三相」、「三無自性性」、「阿賴耶識」、「唯識」等問題的探討中去理解《解深密經》;二是基於《解深密經》所具有之過渡性特點,兼具經典與論典的組織結構,主要思想既受《般若經》的影響同時又被「唯識學派」作為基本經典不斷重新詮釋,來比照分析《解深密經》與《般若》經典及其他唯識學典籍在處理「真理」議題之異同,並由此重新審視「唯識學派」與「中觀學派」的相關爭議。
本文除緒論和結論外,共分為五個章節。論文第一章是有關真理問題的探究,此一章為論文進入主題討論的前置性說明與準備工作。共分為三節:第一節簡要概述西方哲學中有關真理問題的討論,包括基本概念的釐清、邏輯理路的推演、問題的反思、以及與本論文之關聯;第二節佛教真理觀的討論,從兩個方面予以簡要說明,一是「四諦」說,以阿含經典為代表,二是「二諦」說,以龍樹的《中論》為代表,由此彰顯佛教在處理真理問題時自身之特色;第三節「唯識學派」真理觀的討論,主要包括《瑜伽師地論•菩薩地》中對「真實義」的探討以及《辨中邊論•真實義品》中如何藉由「三相」說明多種真實。
論文第二章是《解深密經》中與真實相關概念之討論,是為基本概念的釐清與理路的貫通。共分為五節:第一至四節分別對應「勝義諦」、「空」、「真如」、「圓成實」四個語詞,說明其基本含義、在其他唯識學典籍中的使用及意涵、《解深密經》中如何說明及所具特色,第五節討論此四者之關係及如何貫通。
論文第三章是對〈勝義諦相品〉的解讀,此關聯於諸經主旨之一貫,由「勝義諦」所帶出的經由「止觀」和「波羅蜜多修行」達成解脫覺悟之通路,立足於「諸法」與「法性」間關係的討論。共分為五節:第一至四節分別對應「勝義諦」之「離言、無二相」、「超過尋思所行相」、「超過諸法一異性相」、「遍一切一味相」, 第五節討論此四者之關係及如何貫通。
論文第四章處理《解深密經》「三法相」系統中的真理觀,此關聯於本經作為「了義經」所打開的第一個通路。共分為三節:第一節分析「三相」和「三無自性性」之基本內涵,以及與之相關的「真實」議題,包括「增益執」與「損減執」、「勝義有」與「世俗有」、「存有論」與「認識論」;第二節分析《解深密經》如何討論「四諦」、「二諦」,以及「四諦」、「二諦」、「三相」間的差別與聯繫,並由此帶出「三時教」、「了義與不了義」、「一乘」的討論。
論文第五章處理《解深密經》「識」的體系中的真理觀,此關聯於本經作為「了義經」所打開的第二個通路。共分為四節:第一節討論〈心意識相品〉中「識」的功用、名稱、運轉模式及「如實不見」諸「心相」的論述方式所表達的真理意涵;第二節分析<分別瑜伽品>中「唯識」相關文本及有關真實性的討論;第三節分析「盡所有性」和「如所有性」中所涉及到的與真實相關議題。
Abstract
The subject of this paper is the theory of truth in the Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra.
The concept is based on two aspects of discussions: First is regarding the theory of truth as core content and main thread through Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra, to reconsider its basic ideas and structure. This concept is different from previous researches which mainly focus on solving issues in sūtra from perspectives of “three characteristics” (trīṇi lakṣaṇāni), “three types of lack of own-being” (tri niḥsvabhāvatā), and “cognition-only” (vijñaptimātra) in Mind-only School.
Second is since Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra has the features of both sūtra and Māṛkās, while its main concept is influenced by Prajñāpāramitā-sūtra, especially the theories of emptiness and ultimate truth, and also developed continuously by Yogācāra School or Mind-only School as a scriptural source, this sūtra therefore has a characteristic of transition. Thus by discussing “the truth”, the common theme of Buddhism, within Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra, dispute between Mind-only School and Mādhyamika School could be re-examined.
In addition to introduction and conclusion, this paper consists of five chapters:
The first chapter is the initial discussion of the theory of truth, which introduces the background of this paper. There are three parts in the first chapter: first of all, it is a brief overview of Western philosophy''s discussion of truth, “what is truth”, “how could we know the truth”, “how many theories of truth are there”, “what is the problem of them”, and so on. Second, the theory of truth in the Buddhism is expounded from both the theory of “four noble truths” (catvāri ārya-satya) and the theory of “two truths” (dvi satya), by using the text of Āgama, Abhidharma Mahāvibhāṣā Śāstra, and Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. Third, the theory of truth in the Yogācāra School is expounded from both the theory in the Yogācāra-bhūmi-śāstra and the theory of Madhyânta-vibhāga.
The second chapter is the discussion of concepts about the truth in Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra. Four concepts are discussed, including “ultimate truth” (paramārtha-satya), “emptiness” (śūnyatā), “suchness” (tathatā), and “the thoroughly established” (pariniṣpanna). Each of the four concepts is demonstrated in three aspects: “the meaning of the concept”, “understanding of the concept when used in context of Mind-only School”, and “understanding of the concept when used in Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra”. At last, the relationship of these concepts is discussed.
The third chapter is the discussion of the characters of ultimate truth. In this chapter, an interpretation is illustrated to help understanding the meaning of the second chapter of Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra. There are four parts in the chapter, each of which relate to the context of the questions from one Bodhisattva, which are: “the character of ultimate is inexpressible and non-dual”, “the character of ultimate transcends the sphere of argumentation”, “the character of ultimate transcends difference and non-difference” and “the character of ultimate is everywhere of one taste”.
The forth chapter is the discussion of the theory of truth about “dharma” in Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra. There are two parts in the chapter: the first is about “three characteristics of phenomena” (trīṇi lakṣaṇāni) and “three types of lack of own-being of phenomena” (tri niḥsvabhāvatā) in the sūtra, including their meanings are, and how they express the truth. And the second is about three different theories of truth in the sūtra, “four noble truths”, “two truths” and “three characteristics of phenomena”, “how could they be established in the same sūtra”, and “what are the relationship of the three different theories of truth”. “The three wheels of doctrine” turned by the Bhagavan and “the theory of one vehicle” is also be discussed in the second part.
The fifth chapter is the discussion of the theory of truth about “consciousness”(vijñāna)in Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra. There are three parts in this chapter, first is about the mind, thought and consciousness in the third chapter of the sūtra, “what they are”, “how could we understand their meanings and the mode of their operations”, “should the third chapter be thought as conventional truth”, etc. The second part is the discussion of “cognition-only” (vijñaptimātra) in the sixth chapter of the sūtra. The third part discusses the “what exists relatively” (yāvadbhāvikatā) and “what exists in fact” (yathāvadbhāvikatā) in the sixth chapter of the sūtra and in other contexts of Mind-only School.
參考書目
1、中文資料
(1)佛教經論
提婆譯,《中阿含經》六十卷,大正藏,冊1
提婆譯,《增一阿含經》五十一卷,大正藏,冊2
求那跋陀羅譯,《雜阿含經》五十卷,大正藏,冊2
玄奘譯,《大般若波羅蜜多經》六百卷,大正藏,冊5-8
曇無讖譯,《大般涅槃經》四十卷,大正藏,冊12
曇無讖譯,《大方等大集經》六十卷,大正藏,冊13
菩提流支譯,《入楞伽經》十卷,大正藏,冊16
實叉難陀譯,《大乘入楞伽經》七卷,大正藏,冊16
菩提流支譯,《深密解脫經》五卷,大正藏,冊16
玄奘譯,《解深密經》五卷,大正藏,冊16
真諦譯,《佛說解節經》一卷,大正藏,冊16
求那跋陀羅譯,《相續解脫地波羅蜜了義經》一卷,大正藏,冊16
求那跋陀羅譯,《相續解脫如來所作隨順處了義經》一卷,大正藏,冊16
地婆訶羅,《大乘密嚴經》三卷,大正藏,冊16
玄奘譯,《阿毗達磨大毘婆沙論》二百卷,大正藏,冊27
龍樹造,鳩摩羅什譯,《大智度論》一百卷,大正藏,冊25
龍樹造,青目釋,鳩摩羅什譯,《中論》四卷,大正藏,冊30
彌勒說,玄奘譯,《瑜伽師地論》一百卷,大正藏,冊30
護法等造,玄奘譯《成唯識論》十卷,大正藏,冊31
真諦,《轉識論》一卷,大正藏,冊31
無著造,真諦譯,《攝大乘論》三卷,大正藏,冊31
無著造,玄奘譯,《攝大乘論本》三卷,大正藏,冊31
世親造,真諦譯,《中邊分別論》二卷,大正藏,冊31
世親造,玄奘譯,《辯中邊論》三卷,大正藏,冊31
無著造,玄奘譯,《顯揚聖教論》二十卷,大正藏,冊31
無著造,玄奘譯,《大乘阿毘達磨集論》七卷,大正藏,冊31
安慧糅,玄奘譯,《大乘阿毘達磨雜集論》十六卷,大正藏,冊31
遁倫,《瑜伽論記》二十四卷,大正藏,冊42
圓測,《解深密經疏》九卷,續藏經,冊21
(2)中文書籍
呂澂,《印度佛学源流略讲》,上海市 : 上海人民出版社, 1979
呂澂,《中囯佛学源流略讲》,北京 : 中華出版 , 1979
太虛,《解深密經•如來成所作事品講錄》,太虛大师全书编委会编集,《太虛大师全书》冊8,北京市 : 宗教文化出版社,2005
太虛,《《解深密經•如來成所作事品》講錄》,《太虛大师全书》冊8,北京市 : 宗教文化出版社,2005
太虛,《深密綱要》,太虛大师全书编委会编集,《太虛大师全书》冊8,北京市 : 宗教文化出版社,2005
太虛,《《瑜伽真實義品》講要》,太虛大师全书编委会编集,《太虛大师全书》冊8,北京市 : 宗教文化出版社,2005
太虛,《《瑜伽師地論•菩薩地真實義品》親聞記》,太虛大师全书编委会编集,《太虛大师全书》冊8,北京市 : 宗教文化出版社,2005
太虛,《《辨中邊論》頌釋》,太虛大师全书编委会编集,《太虛大师全书》冊8,北京市 : 宗教文化出版社,2005
印順,《初期大乘佛敎之起源與開展》, 台北 : 正聞,1980
印順,《楞伽經親聞記》(法印集1),印海法師記述,台北:嚴寬祜基金會,2003
印順,《雜阿含经论会编》,北京市 : 中華書局, 2009
印順,《唯識學探源》,北京:中華書局,2011new window
法舫,《唯識史觀及其哲學》,台北:正聞出版社,1993
林鎮國,《空性與現代性》,臺北:立緖文化出版 ,1999
宗喀巴,《辨了不了義善說藏論》,釋法尊譯,臺北:大乘精舍印經會,1984
宗喀巴著,法尊法師譯,《辨了不了義善說藏論》,(《西藏佛敎敎義論集》,《現代佛教學術從刊》78) ,張曼濤主編 ; 現代佛敎學術叢刊編輯委員會編,台北 : 大乘文化,1979
周叔迦,《唯識哲學》,《周叔迦佛學論著全集》冊2,北京市 : 中华书局, 2006
周貴華,《唯識通論——瑜伽行學義詮》,北京:中國社會科學出版社,
周貴華,《唯識、心性與如來藏》,北京:宗教文化出版社,2006
周貴華,《唯識明論》,北京:宗教文化出版社,2011
吳汝鈞,《龍樹中論的哲學解讀》,台北:台灣商務印書館,1997new window
吳汝鈞,《唯識現象學》(一、二),臺北 : 臺灣學生, 2002
吳汝鈞,《佛學研究方法論》,臺北 : 臺灣學生, 2006new window
唐君毅,《哲學概論》,台北:臺灣學生,1993
唐仲容,《解深密經講義》,香港:中國佛教文化出版有限公司,1999
陳兵,《佛法真實論》,北京:宗教文化出版社,2007
程恭讓譯注,《解深密經》,台北:佛光,1988
談錫永主編,趙國森導讀,《佛教經論導讀4:解深密經》,北京:中國書店,2009
談錫永,《解深密經密意》,新北 : 全佛文化出版,2012
楊惠南,《龍樹與中觀哲學》,台北:東大圖書公司,1988new window
楊維中,《唯识无境 : 佛教唯识观》,北京 : 宗教文化, 2006
楊維中,《中國唯識宗通史》,南京:鳳凰出版社,2008
葉阿月,《葉阿月教授佛學論文集》,臺北 : 臺北市凈法界善友文教基金會, 2012
歐陽竟無,《筆記六編:唯識抉擇談》,台北:廣文書局,1977
歐陽竟無編,《藏要》冊2,上海:上海書店,1991
釋演培,《解深密經語體釋》,台北:中華大典編印會,1969
韓廷杰,《唯識學概論》,臺北市 : 文津, 1993
韓清凈,《解深密經分別瑜伽品略釋》,高雄:彌勒講堂,2011
霍韜晦,《絕對與圓融-佛教思想新論》,台北:東大,
《哲學大辭典》,上海:上海辭書出版社,1992
《哲學大辭典》(修訂本),上海:上海辭書出版社,2001
《外國哲學大辭典》,上海:上海辭書出版社,2008

(2)翻譯資料
布頓,《布頓佛教史》(《世界佛學名著譯叢》69-70),郭和卿譯,台北縣:華宇,1988
宇井伯壽等原編,《西藏大藏總目錄》(《現代佛學大系》59 , 藍吉富主編),台北縣新店市 : 彌勒, 1982
高崎直道等,《唯識思想》,李世傑譯,臺北縣中和市 : 華宇, 1985
高崎直道等著,《如來藏思想》(《世界佛學名著譯叢》68),台北:華宇出版社,1985
深浦正文,《中印唯識教理史》,印海法師譯,臺北市 : 嚴寬祜文教基金會, 2004
稻津纪三著 ;《世亲唯识学的根本性研究》,杨金萍、肖平译,北京市 : 宗教文化, 2013
野澤靜證,《大乘佛教瑜伽行研究 : 解深密經聖者慈氏章及疏之譯注》,李鳳媚譯,高雄市 : 彌勒講堂, 2014
梶山雄一著,《龍樹與中後期中觀學》,吳汝鈞譯,台北:文津出版社,2000
D. J. Kalupahana,《佛教哲學——一個歷史的分析》, 霍韜晦譯,《歐美佛學研究小史》,臺北縣中和市 : 華宇, 1985
Elizabeth Napper ,《緣起與空性 : 強調空性與世俗法之間相融性的藏傳佛教中觀哲學》,劉宇光譯,香港 : 志蓮淨苑文化部, 2003
Felipe Fernandez-Armesto著,《眞實、眞相、眞理:人類文化探索之旅》,蕭郁雯譯,臺北市 : 究竟, 2001
Janice Dean Willis ,《認識真實 : 無著〈菩薩地•真實義品〉》,呂賢度中譯,高雄市 : 彌勒講堂, 2012
彼得•A•安傑利斯著,《哲學辭典》,段德智、尹大貽、金常政譯,台北:貓頭鷹出版,1999
Robert Audi主編,《劍橋哲學辭典》,王思迅主編,台北:貓頭鷹出版社,2002
布魯格編著,《西洋哲學辭典》,項退結編譯,台北:華香園出版社,2004
T. R. V. Murti著,《中觀哲學》(《世界佛學名著譯叢》64、65),郭忠生譯,台北:華宇出版社,1985
齊碩姆著,《知識論》,鄒惟遠、鄒曉蕾譯,北京:三聯出版社,1988

(3)論文
林鎮國,〈初期大乘瑜伽行派真理與方法的問題〉,《現象學與佛家哲學會議》(2004),香港中文大學現象學與人文科學研究中心
林鎮國,〈解釋與解脫 -- 論《解深密經》的詮釋學性格〉,《政大文史哲論集》(1992):493 – 513new window
林鎮國,〈邏輯或解經學 -- 初期大乘瑜伽行派「四種道理」理論性格之研究〉,《臺大佛學研究》,n.14(2007):1 – 35new window
陳一標,〈「識」的詮釋——Vijñāna與Vijñapti〉,《圓光佛學學報》,n.2(1997):105-120
陳一標,〈有關阿賴耶識語義的變遷〉,《圓光佛學學報》,n.4(1999):76-106new window
曹志成,〈智藏與寂護的二諦思想以及對唯識思想的收攝之比較〉,《圓光佛學學報》,n.4(1999):25-56
葉阿月,〈“超越智慧的完成”之研究〉,《國立台灣大學文史哲學報》,n.30(1983): 91-145
葉阿月,〈 “vijñāna”(識)與“vijñapti”(表識)的研究——以唯識思想為中心〉,《國立台灣大學文史哲學報》,n.29(1980):57-118
葉阿月,〈「空性」的同義語〉,《哲學與文化》,n.23(1976):30-36new window
蔡耀明,〈以《雜阿含經》為依據探討「解開而認知世人」與「出離而超脫人世」在條理的一貫〉,《東海哲學研究集刊》,n17(2012):3-33new window
蔡耀明,〈《阿含經》和《說無垢稱經》的不二法門初探〉,《佛學研究中心學報》n7(2002):1-26new window
趙東明,〈析論《瑜伽師地論•菩薩地•真實品》之「空性」〉,《圓光佛學學報》,n.15(2009):99-141
梶山雄一,〈清辨、安慧與護法〉,《諦觀雜誌》,n.49(1987):1 – 24
Streng, F. J.,〈自緣起立場論龍樹之世俗諦與第一義諦的關係〉, 《諦觀雜誌》, n.50 (1987):75 – 95

2、日文資料
赤沼智善,《佛教教理之研究》,名古屋:破塵閣書房,昭和14年
宫本正尊編,《佛敎の根本眞理 : 佛敎における根本眞理の歷史的諸形態》,東京 : 三省堂, 1957,三版
結城令聞,《唯識學典籍志》,東京 : 大藏, 1985

3、其他外文資料
(1)專著
Buescher , John. B. Echoes from an empty sky : the origins of the Buddhist doctrine of the two truths. Ithaca : Snow Lion Publications, 2005
Burgess, Alexis. Truth. Princeton : Princeton University Press, 2011
Garfield, Jay(tr.). The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way: Nāgārjuna’s Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Hopkins,Jeffrey . Emptiness in the mind-only school of Buddhism . Berkeley : University of California Press, 1999
Hopkins,Jeffrey . Reflections on reality : the three natures and non-natures in the mind-only school . Berkeley : University of California Press, 2002
Hopkins,Jeffrey . Absorption in no external world : 170 issues in mind-only Buddhism . Ithaca, N.Y. : Snow Lion Publications, 2005
Inada, Kenneth K. (tr.). Nāgārjuna: A Translation of his Mūlamadhyamakakārikā with an Introductory Essay., Delhi: Sri Satguru, 1993.
Kalupahana, David. Mūlamadhyamakakārikā of Nāgārjuna: The Philosophy of the Middle Way -- Introduction, Sanskrit Text, English Translation and Annotation. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, 1991.
Lamotte, Etienne. Saṃdhinirmocana sūtra : L''Explication des mystères . Louvain:Bibliothèque de l''Universit́e,1935
Newland,Guy. Appearance and reality : the two truths in four Buddhist systems.Ithaca : Snow Lion Publications, 1999
Powers,John . Wisdom of Buddha : the Saṁdhinirmocana Sūtra. Berkeley : Dharma Pub., 1995
Powers,John . Hermeneutics and tradition in the Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra. Delhi : M. Banarsidass, 2004
Powers,John. Two Commentaries on the Saṃdhinirmocana-Sūtra by Asaṅga and Jñānagarbha. Lewiston : E. Mellen Press, 1992
Tachikawa ,Musashi(立川武藏). translated by Rolf. W. Giebel. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Nāgārjuna. Delhi : Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, 1997
Williams,Paul. Mahāyāna Buddhism : the doctrinal foundations .London: Routledge, 1989
Willis,Janice Dean. On knowing reality : the Tattvārtha chapter of Asanga''s ''Bodhisattvabhumi'' . Delhi : Motilal Banarsidass, 1982
White, Alan R. Truth . New York : Doubleday, 1970
(2)論文
Ueda, Yoshifumi. “Two Main Streams of Thought in Yogacara Philosophy”. Philosophy East and West,v.17(1967):155 – 165
Wayman, Alex . “Two Traditions of India: Truth and Silence”. Philosophy East and West,v.24 (1974):389 – 403
Wayman, Alex . “Yogacara and the Buddhist logicians”. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies,v.2(1979):65 – 80
Wayman, Alex . “A Defense of Yogacara Buddhism”. Philosophy East and West,v.46(1996):447 – 476
Yeh, Ah-yueh. “A Study of the Theories of yāvadbhāvikatā and yathāvadbhāvikatā in Abhidharmasamuccaya”. The Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies. vol. 7. No.2(1984): 185-207
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE