:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣暴力犯罪嚴重性指標與權重體系之建構
書刊名:花蓮師院學報
作者:林適湖
作者(外文):Lin, Shih-hu
出版日期:2000
卷期:10
頁次:頁197-230
主題關鍵詞:犯罪嚴重性暴力犯罪指標權重Crime seriousViolent crimeIndexWeightAHPS-W index
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:101
  • 點閱點閱:32
     本文旨在依據台灣官方犯罪統計數據,參考Sellin-Wolfgang index的犯 罪嚴重性建構模式,使用分析階層程序法(Analytic Hierarchy Process,AHP),建 構台灣暴力犯罪指標及其權重體系。整個研究分為兩個階段,第一階段為「暴力 犯罪嚴重性可用指標之調查」,共選取五類人員進行調查,包括:1.大學教授、 2.警政人員、3.調查人員、4.司法人員(只包括法官或檢察官)、5.中學校長老師, 總共有效樣本數為24人;第二階段之「暴力犯罪嚴重性指標之權重體系建構」, 共選取有效樣本數包括1.學者專家、2.法官、3.警政調查人員、4.家庭主婦、5. 大學生、6.中學校長、老師、7.監獄受刑人等七大類,有效樣本357份。研究結 果發現: 1.與「人身攻擊」相關暴力犯罪指標權重給分較一般暴力犯罪嚴重, 第一階層指標的排序及其權重值依次為故意殺人罪(47.3%)、擄 人勒贖罪(18.9%)、故意傷害罪(13.7%)、強盜罪(12.3%)及搶 奪罪(7.8%)。 2.由「犯罪使用工具」之給分分析,民眾認為「使用槍枝」犯罪是 最嚴重的罪行,其次為刀械鐵器,徒手犯罪一般認為罪行較輕微。 3.由「犯罪發生地點」之給分分析,整體排序前五名分別為「使用 槍枝在市街商店殺人」(排序1)、「使用槍枝在住宅殺人」(排序 2)、「使用刀械鐵器在市街商店殺人」(排序3)、「使用槍枝在市 街商店擄人勒贖」(排序4)、「使用槍枝在特定營業場所殺人」(排 序5),顯示出一般民眾認為使用槍枝在市街商店或是住宅做人身 攻擊(含殺害及傷害)之犯罪罪行較為嚴重。 4.除了「性別」一項外,其餘背景變項對於第一階層五項暴力犯罪 指標權重分配及排序的一致性分析均相當一致,而分析第二階層 「犯罪使用工具」及第三階層「犯罪發生地點」的結果也相當一 致。顯示不同社經地位填答者對於暴力犯罪嚴重性的認知大體而 言相當一致。 本研究並對後續研究提出建議。
     The purpose of this study was to utilize Analytic Hierarchy Process, (AHP). According to the official criminal statistics in Taiwan, it was used crime serious structure model of Sellin-Wolfgang index to establish Taiwan "Violent Crime Serious Index and Weight System".In addition, this study was to examine the differences between variances and "crime serious weight" scores. At the first phase, "the Investigation of Violent Crime Serious Index" was used in this study. The subjects were classified into five different categories including: 1. University professors; 2. Police officers; 3. Investigators; 4. Judicial officers (only Judges or Prosecutor); 5. High school principals and teachers. The totally sample was twenty-four subjects (N= 24). At the second phase, "the Structure of Violent Crime Serious Index and Weight System" was selected. The subjects were classified into seven different categories including: 1. Scholars and Specialists; 2. Judges; 3. Police officers and Investigators; 4. Housekeepers; 5. Undergraduate students; 6. High school principals and teachers; 7. Prisoners. The sample included three hundred and fifty seven subjects (N= 357). The following findings were presented for this study: 1. In relating to "Body Attack" is more serious in violent crime index and weight. The following rank and weight value in the first hierarchy index were Homicide (47.3%), Kidnapping (18.9%), Bodily Harm (13.7%), Robbery (12.3%), and Forceful (7.8%). 2. Based on the analysis of "tools for criminal use", the subjects think "use of guns" is the most serious crime. Then, "use of knives and ironware" is the second serious crime. The generality of subjects think "using bare hands" is the slight crime. 3. Based on the analysis of "criminal scenes", the following five criminal scenes were "killing people in streets and stores by guns" (Rank 1); "killing people in resident places by guns" (Rank 2); "killing people in streets and stores by knives and ironware" (Rank 3); "kidnapping people in streets and stores by guns" (Rank 4); and "killing people in specific business places by guns" (Rank 5). The results of this study indicated the generality of subjects think homicide in streets, stores, resident places, and specific business places by guns is the most serious crime. 4.Beside "sex", the other variables were consistent in the five violent crime index and weight distributions and ranks of the first hierarchy. Furthermore, the considerations of "tools for criminal use" in the second hierarchy and "criminal scenes" in the third hierarchy were also consistency. The results of this study indicated the perception of violent crime serious is quiete consistent no matter in what social status According to the findings from AHP, this study had deliberate explanations. On the other hand, this study provided several recommendations for further study.
期刊論文
1.Hoffman, P. B.、Hardyman, P. L.(1986)。Crime seriousness scale: Public perception and feedback to criminal justice policymakers。Journal of Criminal Justice,14(5),413-431。  new window
2.周震歐、趙碧華(199612)。青少年逃學逃家行為的社會心理因素分析。犯罪學期刊,2,79-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Thurstone, L. L.(1927)。The method of paired comparisons for social values。Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,21,384-400。  new window
4.臺灣省警務處刑事警察大隊研究發展小組(19770100)。暴力犯罪問題之研究。刑事科學,6/7,1-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.蔡墩銘(1986)。當心!暴力就在週遭。中國論壇,21(10)。  延伸查詢new window
6.Akman, D. D.、Normandeau, A.、Turner, S.(1967)。The measurement of delinquency in Canada。Journal of Criminal and Police Science,58(3),330-337。  new window
7.Bernhard, T. J.、Ritt R. R.(1991)。The Philadelphia birth cohort and selective incapacitation。Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,28(1),33-54。  new window
8.Blumstein, A.(1974)。Serious weights in an index of crime。American Sociological Review,39,854-864。  new window
9.Broadhurst, R.、Indermaur, D.(1982)。Crime seriousness rating the relationship of information accuracy and general attitudes in western Australian。Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology,15,219-234。  new window
10.Bryan, B.(1993)。Teaching about ments of crime seriousness。Teaching Sociology,21(1),33-41。  new window
11.Bursick, R.(1989)。Erickson could never have imagined: Recent extension of Birth cohort studies。Journal of Quantitative Criminology,5(4),389-396。  new window
12.Carroll, J. S.、Payne, J. W.(1977)。Crime seriousness, recidivism risk, andcausal attributions injudgements of prison term by students andexperts。Journal of Applied Psychology,62,595-602。  new window
13.Cullen, Francis T.、Link, Bruce G.、Polanzi, Craig W.(1982)。The seriousness of crime revisited。Criminology,19,83-102。  new window
14.Evans, S. S.、Scott, J. E.(1984)。The seriousness of crime cross culturally。Criminology,22,39-59。  new window
15.Gcbotys, R. J.、Roberts, J. V.、Dasgupta, B.(1988)。News media use add public perceptions of crime seriousness。Canadian Journal of Criminology,30,3-16。  new window
16.Goff, C.、Nason-clark, N.(1989)。Seriousness of crime in Frederiction, New Bruswick: perceptions toward white collar crime。Journal of Criminology,31,19-34。  new window
17.Green, G.(1984)。Adescriptive and comparative cohort analysis of high school delinquency in a small town。International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology,28(1),44-52。  new window
18.Hawkins, D.(1980)。Perception of crime。Deviant Behavior,2(1)。  new window
19.Hsu, M.(1973)。Culture and sexual differences on the judgment of criminal offenses: A replication study of the measurement of delinquency。The Journal of Criminal law & Criminology,64(3),348-353。  new window
20.Klinger, D. A.、Bridges, G. S.(1997)。Measure error in call-for-service of crime。American Society of Criminology,35,705-726。  new window
21.Levi, J. S.(1985)。Public and police perceptions of crime seriousness in England and Wales。British Journal of Criminology,25,234-250。  new window
22.Li, B.(1994)。Deviant fertility in china : A theoretical approach。Deveant Behavior,15(2),193-210。  new window
23.Miethe, T. D.(1982)。Public consensus on crime seriousness normative structure or methodological artifact。Criminology,20,515-526。  new window
24.Pontell, H. N.(1983)。White collar crime seriousness assessment by police chiefs and regulatory agency investigators。American Journal of Police,3(1),1-16。  new window
25.Ronald, K.(1982)。The continum of criminal offenses instrument: Futher development and modification of sellin and Wolfgang's original criminal index。Journal of Offender Counseling Service and Rehabilitation,7,33-53。  new window
26.Rossi, P. H.、Bose, C. E.、Berk, R. E.(1974)。The serious crime: Normative structure and indivicual difference。American Sociological Review,39,224-237。  new window
27.Roth, P.(1978)。Varieties of normative consenus。American Sociological Review,50,333-347。  new window
28.Roth, Jeffrey A.(1981)。Prosecutor perceptions of crime seriousness。Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology,69(2),232-242。  new window
29.Shoemaker, D. J.、Bryant, C. D.(1987)。Perceived seriousness of crime。Psychological Report,61,267-272。  new window
30.Steven, L.(1984)。Pattern in juvenile misbehavior。Crime and Delinquency,4(30),293-308。  new window
31.Thomas, C. W.、Cage, R. J.、Foster, S. C.(1976)。Public opinion of criminal law and legal sanctions: An examination of two conceptual models。Journal of Criminal law and criminology,67,110-116。  new window
32.Velez-Diaz, A.、Megargee, E. I.(1970)。An investigation of differences in value judgements between youthful offenders and non-offenders in Puer-to-Rico。Journal of Criminal law, Criminology and Police Science,61,549-553。  new window
33.Walker, M. A.(1978)。Measuring the seriousness of crimes。Criminal,18,348-364。  new window
34.Warr, M.、Meier, R. F.、Erikson, M. L.(1983)。Norms, theories of punishment, and publicly perferred penalties for crime。Sociological Quarterly,24,75-91。  new window
會議論文
1.林燦璋(1997)。犯罪測量與社會治安指標之製作。1996年度行政院國科會犯罪問題研究成果研究會,侯崇文主編 。行政院國科會。319-344。  延伸查詢new window
2.何英奇(1997)。我國青年的報應觀,公正世界信念與犯罪知覺的相關因素研究。犯罪問題研究成果研討會。台北:行政院國科會。  延伸查詢new window
3.侯崇文(1997)。犯罪問題研究成果研討會論文集。台北:行政院國科會。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳麗欣(1996)。從校園暴行之迷失談校園危機處理。化危機為轉機:校園危機處理的問題與對策研討會,國立教育資料館主辦 。台北:國立教育資料館。  延伸查詢new window
5.曾國雄、鄧振源、蕭再安、王日昌(1992)。我國大學入學誦度改革方案之評估-多目標決策之應用。1992年大學教育學術研討會。台北:台灣師大。  延伸查詢new window
6.Hou, C.(1988)。An empirical examination on the delinquent seriousness among juvenile。Conference on Social and Psychological Factors in Juvenile Delinquency。Taiwan:Department of psychology, National Taiwan University。  new window
研究報告
1.內政部警政署刑事警察局(1997)。台灣刑案統計。台北:內政部警政署刑事警察局。  延伸查詢new window
2.內政部警政署(1997)。警政統計年報。  延伸查詢new window
3.台灣高等法院(1997)。台灣司法統計專輯。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.譚宇隆(1999)。花蓮縣國民小學總務主任工作倦怠及其相關因素之研究--階層分析程序法之應用(碩士論文)。國立東華大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡蒼柏(1986)。暴力犯罪偵查因素之研究(碩士論文)。中央警察大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.蕭世璋(1983)。少年暴力犯與一般少年心理特質之比較分析(碩士論文)。中央警察大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳賢財(1991)。受刑人與大學生對當前犯罪嚴重性評估之研究(碩士論文)。中央警察大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.謝金青(1997)。國民小學學校效能評鑑指標與權重體系之建構(博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Sellin, Thorsten、Wolfgang, Marvin E.(1964)。The measurement of delinquency。New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
2.麥留芳(1991)。個體與集體犯罪。台北:巨流圖書。  延伸查詢new window
3.Toch, H.(1969)。Violent men。Chicago:Aldine。  new window
4.陳麗欣(1993)。國民中學學生被害恐懼感之研究。台北市:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳嫦娥、李祥媛、蔡麗滿(1996)。台北市少年犯罪空間分布之探討。台北市少年輔導會。  延伸查詢new window
6.法務部(1997)。中華民國八十五年犯罪狀況及其分析。  延伸查詢new window
7.郭振羽、羅伊菲(1985)。當代社會問題。台北:國立編譯館。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳沐全(1985)。暴力犯罪的偵查要領。桃園中央警官學校刊行。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳渙生(1989)。刑罰分則實用。台北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.Blum-West, S. R.(1985)。Decisions in the penal process。New York:Wiley。  new window
11.Golstein, J. H.(1975)。Aggression and crime of violence。N.Y.:Oxford University Press。  new window
12.Laue, R. H.(1982)。Some problems and the guilty of life。Iowa:Wm C. Brown Company Publishers。  new window
13.Wolfgan, M.、Figlio, R.、Sellin, T.(1987)。From boy to man: From fdelinquency to crime。University of Chicago press。  new window
14.Wolfgang, Marvin E.、Figlio, Robert M.、Sellin, Thorsten(1972)。Delinquency in a Birth Cohort。University of Chicago Press。  new window
其他
1.馬傳鎮(1998)。如何防治青少年犯罪,中央日報。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.黃富源(1997)。暴力犯罪背後。暴力失樂園。台北:時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.Rossi, P. H.、Henry, J. P.(1980)。Seriousness: A measure for all purposes。Handbook of Criminal Justice Evaluation。Beverly Hill, C.A.:Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE