This paper attempts to rebut the prevailing favorable view of Japanese colonial rule in Taiwan by analyzing the formative principles and the structure of the modernizing elements in the assimilationist Japanese educational policy in Taiwan. In particular, the paper attends to the system by which the Japanese implemented equality of educational opportunity and the large amount of material on Western civilization incorporated into the teaching curriculum. The main themes of the paper are the following. Taiwan's assimilationist "douka" policy came into being under the leadership of Isawashuji, creator of the Japanese-language education program in Taiwan. Its main content emphasized civilization, and the major medium for promulgating this content was Japanese-language education. The program employed "kokutai" as its main educational instrument and as the pivot of political rule, filling a role analogous to that played by Christianity in Western colonial environments, and took "becoming Japanese" and "moving toward ishodujim" as emblems of its assimilationist objectives. These guidelines became the prototype for Taiwan's assimilationist ("douka") educational program for half a century. However, the modernizing elements in this educational program also had an instrumental and intensely ideological character. For Isawashuji, he was convinced that only a broad education would enable the Taiwanese to genuinely understand the uniqueness and superiority of the Japanese state ("kokutai"). Isawashiuji was determined to use "kokutai" in ruling Taiwan mainly because the Japanese empire lacked a conlonial educational instrument comparable to that provided by the teachings of Christianity. Hence he attempted to use "kokutai" in place of religion in educating the Taiwanese. Under Isawashuji's rule, the Taiwanese were perhaps given the opportunity to establish a basis for modernization, as well as a basic direction for their later national identification as Taiwanese. However, these modernizing results were obtained mainly as by-products of a plan aimed at maintaining the equilibrium of the Japanese empire. They were not the results of an attitude of benevolence toward the people on Isawashuji's part, nor of a direct affirmation of the value of modernization.