資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.142.150.133)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
協同行動研究於實習教育上之應用:以二位實習教師為例
書刊名:
教育學刊
作者:
林素卿
作者(外文):
Lin, Su-ching
出版日期:
2001
卷期:
17
頁次:
頁281-308
主題關鍵詞:
行動研究
;
協同行動研究
;
反省性教學
;
專業成長
;
Action research
;
Practioner-researcher
;
Reflection teaching
;
Professional development
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
2
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
2
共同引用:0
點閱:28
杜威認為反省、探究、和教育是不能分開的,反省與探究會讓教師對教育有更廣、更深的瞭解,採取更明智的行動。因此,面對教學問題,教師必須透過反省、探究找出問題的原因,發展解決的策略。本研究旨在透過協同行動研究,讓參與本研究之實習教師對其教學的實際,及所遭遇的問題加以反省與改進。本研究成員包括二位國小代課抵實習之實習教師及二位師資培育者;研究方法,主要採用行動研究的步驟,包括尋求問題的起點、發現問題、澄清研究問題、發展行動策略並付諸實踐。研究結果發現實習教師,缺乏經驗,而一味遵循教科書所設計的活動,依樣畫葫蘆。然從參與行動研究的過程,實習教師一次又一次的投入與改進,面對教學上的問題,不斷的發展策略並付諸於實施,終於能拋開既定的、刻板的教學模式,走出技能操練的象牙塔,設計出更能適合自己班級的教學活動。本研究驗證了諸多信心與專業的成長。因此,筆者建議我國也能將行動研究融入師資培育的課程之中,要求職前教師,根據其興趣或關注的教育問題,從事行動研究。
以文找文
This study on action research projects conducted by student teachers focused on how action research improved the understanding of educational practices by practitioner-researcher themselves. This study attempted to achieve the following objectives:(1)to understand how the student teachers engaged in action research arrange their reflection in their teaching;(2)to understand how the student teachers engaged in action research develop the strategies to cope with the challenges and problems of their teaching;and (3)to suggest how to improve physical education by using action research in the future. Data was collected from a number of different sources:case studies written by the interns, direct observation notes by the researchers, semi-structure interviews, and seminars. Two student teachers of elementary schools in Taichung County participated in this study. Data analysis included three stages:organizing data, and analyzing and interpreting data. The results action research can bring education breadth and depth of understanding and result in more intelligent actions. Student teachers in this study agreed that action research was a good way to improve their teaching and promote professional development. Suggestions for improving pre-service teacher education program action research should bed stressed.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Ross, D. D.(1989)。Action research for preservice teachers: a description of why and how。Peabody Journal of Education,64(3),131-150。
2.
Hannay, L.、Ross, W.(1986)。Towards a Critical Theory of Reflective Inquiry。Journal of Teacher Education,37(4),9-15。
3.
Smyth, J.(1989)。Developing and sustaining critical reflection in teacher education。Journal of Teacher Education,40(2),2-9。
4.
Calhoun, E. F.(1993)。Action research: Three approaches。Educational Leadership,51(2),62-65。
5.
Adler, S.、Goodman, J.(1986)。Critical theory as a foundation for methods courses。Journal of Teacher Education,37(4),2-8。
6.
Gore, J. M.、Zeichner, K. M.(1991)。Action research and reflective teaching in preservice teacher education: A case study from the United States。Teaching and Teacher Education,7(2),119-136。
7.
Zeichner, Kenneth M.、Liston, Daniel P.(1987)。Teaching student teachers to reflect。Harvard Educational Review,57(1),23-48。
8.
van Manen, M.(1977)。Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical。Curriculum Inquiry,6(3),205-228。
9.
Adelman, C.(1993)。Kurt Lewin and the origins of action research。Educational Action Research,1(1),7-22。
10.
Beckman, D. R.(1957)。Student teacher learn by action research。Journal of Teacher Education,8(4),369-375。
11.
Buchmann, M.(1984)。The use of research knowledge in teacher education and teaching。American Journal of Education,92(4),421-439。
12.
Fueyo, V.、Neves, A.(1995)。Preservice teacher as researcher: A research context for change in the heterogeneous classroom。Action in Teacher Education,16(4),39-49。
13.
Goodman, J.(1986)。University education courses and the professional preparation of teachers。Teaching and Teacher Education,12(2),102-109。
14.
Keating, J.、Diaz-Greenberg, R.、Baldwin, W.、Thousand, J.(1998)。A collaborative action research model for teacher education program。Journal of Teacher Education,49(5),381-397。
15.
Kibble, B.(1999)。How Do You Picture Electricity?。Physics Education,34(4),226-229。
16.
Knudson, R. E.(1988)。Student teachers as collaborative researchers。Teacher Education Quarterly,15(3),33-38。
17.
Moore, R. A.、Bartlett, A.、Garrison, L.、Hagemo, K.、Mullaney, J.、Murfitt, A.、Smith, S.(1999)。Preservice teacher engaged in reflective classroom research。Teacher Educator,34(4),259-275。
18.
Perrodin, A. F.(1959)。Student teachers try action research。Journal of Teacher Education,10(4),471-474。
19.
Pultorak, E. G.(1993)。Facilitating Reflective Thought in Novice Teachers。Journal of Teacher Education,44(4),288-297。
20.
Stanulis, R. N.、Jeffers, L.(1995)。As a way of learning about teaching in a mentor/ student teacher relationship。Action in Teacher Education,16(4),14-24。
會議論文
1.
Herndon, K.、Fauske, J.(1994)。Facilitating teachers' professional growth through action research。0。
學位論文
1.
Knecht, A.(1997)。Action research and reflection in pre-service teacher education(博士論文)。Ohio State University,Columbus。
2.
Butt, K. L.(1989)。Four middle school physical education teachers' experiences during a collaborative action research staff development project,Greensboro。
3.
Kelly, T. E.(1993)。The impact of structured reflective practice on the teaching decision of in-service teachers(博士論文)。University of Massachusetts。
圖書
1.
Noffke, S. E.、Stevenson, R. B.(1995)。Educational action research: Becoming practically critical。New York, NY:Teachers College Press。
2.
Dewey, J.(1933)。How to think。Chicago:Henry Regnery。
3.
Altrichter, Herbert、Posch, Peter、Somekh, Bridget(1993)。Teachers investigate their work: An introduction to the method of action research。Routledge。
4.
Elliott, John(1992)。Action research for educational change。Milton Keynes:Open University Press。
5.
McKernan, J.(1991)。Curriculum action research: A handbook of methods and resources for the reflective practitioner。NY:St. Martin's Press。
6.
王秋絨(1997)。我國國中師資培育學程之建構。臺北:師大書苑。
延伸查詢
7.
饒見維(1996)。教師專業發展--理論與實務。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
延伸查詢
8.
Kemmis, S.、McTaggart, R.(1988)。The action research reader。Geelong, Victoria:Deakin University Press。
9.
Carr, Wilfred、Kemmis, Stephen(1986)。Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge, and Action Research。Falmer Press。
10.
Cruickshank, D. R.(1985)。Models for the preparation of American's teachers。Models for the preparation of American's teachers。Indiana。
11.
Wood, P. O.(1991)。The cooperating teacher's role in nurturing reflective teaching。Issues and practices in inquiry-oriented teacher education。Bristol, PA。
12.
Patton, Michael Quinn(1990)。Qualitative Evaluation & Research Methods。Beverly Hills, CA。
其他
1.
Tompkins, F. M.(1996)。Lessons learned from teachers' action research: Implications for K-12 setting and pre-service/ in-service teacher preparation,0。
2.
Viechnicki, K. J.(1997)。Action research in a school/ university partnership,0。
3.
Noffke, S. E.,Brennan, M.(1988)。Action research and reflective student teaching at UW - Madison: Issues and examples,0。
4.
Noffek, S. E.,Zeichner, K. M.(1987)。Action research and teacher thinking: The first phase of action research on action research project at the university of Wisconsin-Madison,0。
5.
Burnaford, G.(1999)。Teacher action research as professional development in schools: Four paths toward change. School wide inquiry: A self-study of an 'outside' teacher researcher,0。
6.
Holm, D. T.,Hunter, K.,Welling, J.(1999)。Supporting Systematic Change through Action Research,0。
7.
Lamson, S. L.(1995)。Action research: Reflective thinking model applied during student teaching,0。
8.
Menchaca, V.,Peterson, C. L.,Nicholson, S.(1999)。Supporting action research in a field - based professional development school,0。
圖書論文
1.
Grant, C. A.、Zeichner, K. M.(1984)。On becoming a reflective teacher。Preparing for reflective teaching。Boston:Allyn and Bacon。
2.
Holly, Mary Louise H.、Mcloughlin, Caven S.(1989)。Professional development and journal writing。Perspective on Teacher Professional Development。New York:The Falmer Press。
3.
Lanier, J. E.、Little, J. W.(1986)。Research on Teacher Education。Handbook of Research on Teaching。New York:Macmillan。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
以創作性戲劇教學啟發幼兒創造力之行動研究
2.
科學教學評量的反思與實踐:教師行動研究
3.
行動研究促進初任數學教師的教學成長
4.
課程行動研究--從「專業成長」剖析教師角色轉化的困境
5.
協同行動研究--以班級經營之常規改善為例
6.
小組探究教學結合網路學習成效初探
7.
協同行動研究與體育教學之改進
8.
一個幼兒教師在職進修課程的實驗與省思
1.
運用實踐社群於教保場域之行動研究
2.
精進國小教師的數學專業知能之行動研究
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
A Theoretical Study of Cognitive Development in Early Adolescence and Its Educational Application
2.
統計資料處理之原則
3.
高雄地區大學校院導師制度之研究
4.
光復後(1945-1960)臺灣師範學校課程與教學之研究
5.
國中師生對有效教學行為之意見調查研究
6.
國中實習教師教學反省的內容與層次之分析
7.
多元化師資培育制度下國民中學實習教師之教育實習成效--新、舊教育實習制度的比較評估
8.
比較研究與教育政策--實習教師制度及中小學教評會制度評析
9.
以德懷術(Delphi Method)評估臺灣省教育優先區補助政策實施成效之研究
10.
性別教育機會均等的分析、檢討與實踐
11.
高雄市公私立高中高職學生同儕影響與其婚前性行為與態度關係之研究
12.
從美國死亡教育的發展兼論我國實施死亡教育的準備方向
13.
近三十年來我國青少年性別角色研究的回顧與分析
14.
教專班學生學習型態之探討
15.
影響積差相關係數與α信度係數之因素
QR Code