本文討論了戰後誌書、漁業官僚和少數學者所撰寫的臺灣漁業史，以顯示不同的作者如何在其所置身的情境中，以各自的方式編纂歷史。誌書與漁業官僚所寫的漁業史以「客觀」的呈現方式為政治意識型態背書；而學者的興趣則多在漁民及漁村的風貌。儘管寫作的動機與風格有很大的差異，這些回響在歷史迴廊裡的聲音，卻是不同個人的群體的生命記錄。唯有在聆聽回音交響時，我們才能將日常生活當成是歷史記憶的工具箱，而不是將歷史冷陳在學院中，與世隔絕。，

　　　　　This paper examines historical documents related to fisheries written by scholars and bureaucrats involved in the administration of fisheries. The bureaucrats of fisheries tended to employ statistics, charts, and chronology to compose their stories. Despite the seemingly objective representation, their narratives are also ideologicaly charged; they attempt to legitimate the subjugating relationship between Taiwan and China after 1945. Scholarly works in this area focus more on the relationship between fishery practices and the life of fishermen. These different genres of writing emerge form various social fields, orchestrating various historical senses and facts arising from the multifarious experience of the writers. While these voices may echo or cancel each other, this paper does not intend to privilege any of them, in this way attempting to preserve the diversified historical experience of the agents. History, after all, is not a commemoration for the deceased but a toolkit for the living. The history of fisheries is no exception.