臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：績效制度設計的資訊問題：訊號、機制設計與代理成本
書刊名：行政暨政策學報
作者：陳敦源 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chen, Don-yun
出版日期：2002
卷期：35
頁次：頁45-69
主題關鍵詞：績效管理；制度設計；訊號；機制設計；代理成本；Performance management；Institutional design；Signaling；Mechanism design；Agency costs
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(15) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:174
  • 點閱點閱:143
　　績效管理是公共行政學界長久以來關注的焦點之一，然而，學界雖然熱衷於「控制」機制的設計與執行，但卻末將制度設計最重要的元素：「資訊」（infonnation）列為考量核心，因此，績效管理的研究當中，充滿了所謂的「行政諺語」。 　　近來理性選擇制度論（rational　choice institutionalism）的蓬勃發展，提供公共行政學界一條從「資訊」角度重新思考績效管理基礎理論的機會。本文從績效管理制度環境的討論開始，了解到績效制度設計，必須面對資訊不對稱、策略互動及缺乏價格系統的問題。接著藉由討論績效制度設計中三項資訊的議題，使我們從中學習到績效制度的三個基礎設計。 　　其一，在資訊不對稱環境中「分辨」的機制：公部門績效制度有處理資訊分化與不對稱問題的需要，其中尤以設計「分辨」機制最為重要；其二，在策略互動環境中的「誘因相容」機制：公部門績效制度有處理誘因相容問題的需要，其中文以績效制度能夠「自我執行」（self-enforcing）最為重要；其三，在價格系統不存在環境中「內化」代理成本的機制：績效制度設計必須注意資訊成本及其「內生性」（endogenaity）的問題，其中以處理績效制度設計本身資源排擠的問題為最重要。 　　最後，本文對於當代公共行政學界的績效管理風潮提出呼籲，學界發展績效管理各類「行政諺語」的同時，應該回到理論的原點，探討背後的誘因與機制設計問題，如此才能創造出新一代、更貼近績效制度設計者需求的績效管理制度。
　　Performance management has long been a research focus in the field of public administration for years. However, according to the view from Herbert A. Simon, this sub-field is filled with "administrative proverbs" where different recommendations to improve performance management usually conflict with each other. In this article, author tries to refocus the above issue toward theory-building in performance management. Based on rational choice institutionalism and concentrated on the problem of "information," the main arguments are as follows. 　　First, any performance management institution is operated under the environment where performance information is asymmetrically distributed, management intervention will induce strategic reactions, and a clear price system is not existed in public arena. Second, according to some newly developed theories in the field of game theory, mechanism design, and agency theory, this article concludes with three main recommendations on designing performance management institutions. A performance management institution must have (1) a "separating" mechanism to discrete subjects under an environment which performance information is asymmetrically distributed; (2) an "incentive-compatible" mechanism to induce subjects to follow the system without top-down authority in checking position all the time; (3) an "endogenized" mechanism to take into account the agency costs of the institution itself. 　　Lastly, according to arguments above, author proposes three vital principles for scholars in the field of public administration to redesign viable and effective performance management institutions in the future.
期刊論文
1.Alchain, A.、Demsetz, H.(1972)。Production, Information Costs and Economic Organization。American Economic Review，14，30-41。  new window
2.Baker, G. P.(1992)。Incentive Contracts and Performance Measurement。Journal of Political Economy，100(3)，598-614。  new window
3.郭昱瑩(20010800)。政府機關績效評估探討。研考雙月刊，25(4)=224，30-38。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳安妮(20000200)。績效評估之新方向。主計月報，530，43-52。  延伸查詢new window
5.施宗英(20000800)。計畫績效衡量的運用與推動策略。研考雙月刊，24(4)=218，44-53。  延伸查詢new window
6.施能傑(20010300)。建構行政生產力衡量方式之芻議。中國行政，69，15-46。  延伸查詢new window
7.Perry, M.、Reny, P. J.(1999)。A General Solution to King Solomon's Dilemma。Games and Economic Behavior，26，279-285。  new window
8.Milgram, R.、Roberts, J.(1987)。Informational Asymmetries, Strategic Behavior, and Industrial Organization。American Economic Review，77(2)，184-193。  new window
9.Glaze, J.、Ma, C. T.(1989)。Efficient Allocation of a 'Prize'--King Solomon's Dilemma。Games and Economic Behavior，1，222-233。  new window
10.Hurwicz, L.(1973)。The Design of Mechanisms for Resource Allocation。American Economic Review，63(2)，1-30。  new window
11.Dixit, A.(1997)。Power of Incentives in Private versus Public Organization。American Economic Review，87(2)，378-382。  new window
12.Milgrom, P.、Roberts, J.(1988)。An Economic Approach to Influence Activities in Organizations。American Journal of Sociology，94(S)，154-179。  new window
13.Simon, Herbert A.(1946)。The Proverbs of Administration。Public Administration Review，6(1)，53-67。  new window
14.李允傑(19991000)。公部門之績效評估。人事月刊，29(4)=170，4-9+11+13-14。  延伸查詢new window
15.陳敦源(19990600)。顧客導向的省思與再突破：尋找服務的誘因結構。空大行政學報，9，209-235。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Miller, Gary J.(2000)。Above Politics: Credible Commitment and Efficiency in the Design of Public Agencies。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory，10(2)，289-327。  new window
17.Rainey, H. G.、Backoff, R. W.、Levine, C. H.(1976)。Comparing Public and Private Organizations。Public Administration Review，36(2)，233-246。  new window
18.Farrell, Joseph、Rabin, Matthew(1996)。Cheap Talk。The Journal of Economic Perspectives，10(3)，103-118。  new window
19.Eisenhardt, Kathleen M.(1989)。Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review。The Academy of Management Review，14(1)，57-74。  new window
20.Hayek, Friedrich A.(1945)。The use of knowledge in society。The American Economic Review，35(4)，519-530。  new window
圖書
1.Przeworski, Adam、Stokes, Susan Carol、Manin, Bernard(1999)。Democracy, Accountability, and Representation。Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Agere, S.、Jorm, N.(2000)。Designing Performance Appraisals: Assessing Needs and Designing Performance Management Systems in the Public Sector。Management and Training Services Division of Commonwealth Secretariat。  new window
3.田國強(2000)。激勵、信息、與經濟機制。北京：北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Spence, A. M.(1974)。Market Signaling; Informational Transfer in Hiring and Related Screening Processes。New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Lynn, L. E.(1981)。Managing the Public's Business。New York：Basic Books。  new window
6.Gillespie, R.(1993)。Manufacturing Knowledge: A History of the Hawthorne Experiments。Cambridge, MA：Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Hughes, Owen E.(1994)。Public Management and Administration: An introduction。St. Martin's Press。  new window
8.Miller, G. J.(1992)。Managerial Dilemmas: The Political Economy of Hierarchy。Cambridge。  new window
9.Stigler, G. J.(1987)。The Theory of Price。New York：MacMillan Publishing Co.。  new window
10.Weimer, D. L.(1995)。Institutional Design。Boston：Kiuwer Academic Publishers。  new window
11.Dixit, A.、Skeath, S.(1999)。Games of Strategy。New York：W. W. Norton。  new window
12.Bozeman, Barry(1987)。All Organizations are Public: Bridging Public and Private Organizational Theories。Jossey Bass Publishers。  new window
13.Osborne, David、Gaebler, Ted(1992)。Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector。New York：Plume。  new window
14.Brickley, J. A.、Smith, C. W., Jr.、Zimmerman, J. L.(2001)。Managerial Economics and Organizational Architecture。Boston：McGraw-Hill：Irwin。  new window
15.Milgrom, Paul R.、Roberts, John(1992)。Economics, Organization and Management。Prentice-Hall International, Inc.。  new window
16.陳敦源(20020000)。民主與官僚：新制度論的觀點。臺北：韋伯文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Rasmusen, Eric(1989)。Games and Information: An Introduction to Game Theory。Basil Blackwell。  new window
18.Cox, Gary W.、McCubbins, Matthew D.(1993)。Legislative Leviathan。CA：University of California。  new window
19.Behn, Robert D.(2001)。Rethinking Democratic Accountability。Washington, DC：Brookings Institution Press。  new window
20.Brehm, John O.、Gates, Scott(1999)。Working, Shirking, and Sabotage: Bureaucratic Response to a Democratic Public。University of Michigan Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Allison, G. T. Jr.(1979)。Public and Private Management: Are They Fundamentally Alike in All Unimportant Respect?。Public Management: Public and Private Perspectives。Mountain View, CA：Mayfield。  new window
2.Lupia, A.(2001)。Institutions as Informational Crutches? Using Rational Choice Theory to Improve Civic Competence。Politics from Anarchy to Democracy。  new window
3.Banks, J. S.(1995)。The Design of Institutions: An Agency Theory Perspective。Institutional Design。Boston, MA：Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
4.洪永泰(1995)。數量分析與績效評估。行政績效評估專論選輯。台北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
5.Palfrey, T. R.(2002)。Implementation Theory。Handbook of Game Theory: with Economic Application。North-Holland。  new window
6.Groves, T.、Ledyard, J. O.(1987)。Incentive Compatibility Since 1972。Information, Incentives, and Economic Mechanisms: Essays in Honor of Leonid Hurwicz。Minneapolis, MN：University of Minnesota Press。  new window
7.Weingast, Barry R.(1996)。Political Institutions: Rational Choice Perspectives。A new handbook of political science。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：828（臺灣：814，外國：14） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1498098 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67291407
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上