:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:社會科學研究典範的流變
書刊名:教育研究資訊
作者:潘慧玲 引用關係
作者(外文):Pan, Hui Ling
出版日期:2003
卷期:11:1
頁次:頁115-143
主題關鍵詞:典範研究取徑質量方法ParadigmsResearch approachesQuantitative and qualitative methods
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(49) 博士論文(54) 專書(3) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:48
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:797
     社會科學研究隨著近百年湧現的社會思潮,產生世界觀的重新反思。實證主義獨尊的情景不再,今日呈現的是多元典範並存之局,而這正促使著社會科學研究者有必要釐清不同典範之流變及其重要內涵。研究者唯有從根本的本體論、知識論與方法論的議題檢視起,方能合宜地運用方法進行社會現象的探究。本文以此為前提,首先分析社會科學研究的不同典範;其次介紹量化與質性研究之取徑(approach);隨之探討研究者與被研究者在不同研究典範下所呈現的研究關係;最後則提出研究品質的評估規準。
     In accordance emerging branches of social thought, the opinions of social scientists have been changing. Positivism is not the dominant force anymore. Multiple-paradigms are able to coexist in today's world. This prompts social science researchers to understand the evolution and main concepts of different paradigms. Only after researchers investigate the fundamental issues of ontology, epistemology, and methodology, they can properly employ methods to explore social phenomenon. With this premise, this paper first illustrates different paradigms of social science research, then moves onto examine the approaches of quantitative and qualitative research and finally examines the relationships between researchers and research subjects. In conclusion, the criteria of research quality are analyzed.
期刊論文
1.LeCompte, M. D.、Goetz, J. P.(1982)。Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research。Review of Educational Research,52(1),31-60。  new window
2.Smith, D.(1992)。Sociology from women's perspective: A reaffirmation。Sociological Theory,10,88-97。  new window
3.Jacob, E.(1987)。Traditions of qualitative research : A review。Review of Educational Research,57,1-50。  new window
4.Wagner, J.(1997)。The unavoidable intervention of educational research: A framework for reconsidering researcher-practitioner cooperation。Educational Research,26(7),13-22。  new window
5.Lincoln, Y. S.、Guba, E. G.(1995)。Emerging Criteria for Quality in Qualitative and Interpretive research。Qualitative Inquiry,1(3),275-289。  new window
6.伍振鷟、陳伯璋(19851010)。我國近四十年來教育研究之初步檢討。中國論壇,21(1)=241,230-243。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃瑞琴(2005)。質的教育研究法。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Lancy, D. F.(1993)。Qualitative research in education: An introduction to the major traditions。Longman Publishing Group。  new window
3.Popkewitz, T. S.(1984)。Paradigm and ideology in educational research: The social functions of the intellectual。London:The Falmer Press。  new window
4.Bryman, Alan(1993)。Quantity and quality in social research。London:Routledge。  new window
5.Denzin, Norman K.、Lincoln, Yvonna S.(2000)。Handbook of Qualitative Research。Sage Publications。  new window
6.Glesne, C.、Peshkin, A.(1992)。Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction。White Plains, New York:Longman Publishing Group。  new window
7.Hammersley, M.(1992)。What's wrong with ethnography? Methodological exploration。Routledge。  new window
8.Hesse, E.(1980)。Revolutions and reconstructions in the philosophy of science。Bloomington, IN:Indiana University Press。  new window
9.Slife, B. D.、Williams, R. N.(1995)。What's behind the research? Discovering hidden assumptions in the behavioral sciences。Thousand Oaks, California:Sage。  new window
10.Strauss, A.(1987)。Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientist。Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.Stake, Robert E.(1995)。The Art of Case Study Research。Sage Publications。  new window
12.Spradley, J. P.(1980)。Participant observation。New York:Holt, Rinehart & Winston。  new window
13.Habermas, Jürgen、Shapiro, Jeremy J.(1968)。Knowledge and Human Interests。Boston:Beacon Press。  new window
14.Lather, Patti(1991)。Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy with/in the Post-Modern。New York:Routledge。  new window
15.Miles, Matthew B.、Huberman, A. Michael、Newman, G.(1994)。Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook。Sage Publications。  new window
16.Rossman, G. B.、Rallis, S. F.(1998)。Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research。Sage。  new window
17.Merriam, Sharan B.(1988)。Case study research in education: A qualitative approach。Jossey-Bass。  new window
18.Creswell, John W.(1998)。Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions。Sage Publications。  new window
19.Mishler, Elliot G.(1986)。Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative。Harvard University Press。  new window
20.Bogdan, Robert C.、Biklen, Sari Knopp(1998)。Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theory and methods。Allyn & Bacon。  new window
21.Lincoln, Yvonna S.、Guba, Egon G.(1989)。Fourth generation evaluation。Sage Publications。  new window
22.Lincoln, Yvonna S.、Guba, Egon G.(1985)。Naturalistic Inquiry。Sage。  new window
23.Kuhn, Thomas Samuel(1970)。The Structure of Scientific Revolutions。University of Chicago Press。  new window
24.Glaser, B. G.(1992)。Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence vs. Forcing。Sociology Press。  new window
25.Guba, E. G.(1990)。The Paradigm Dialog。Sage。  new window
26.Denzin, Norman K.、Lincoln, Yvonna S.(1994)。Handbook of Qualitative Research。Sage。  new window
27.Patton, Michael Quinn(1990)。Qualitative evaluation and research method。Sage。  new window
28.Glaser, Barney G.(1978)。Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory。Sociology Press。  new window
29.Glaser, Barney G.、Strauss, Anselm L.(1967)。The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research。Aldine。  new window
30.Strauss, Anselm L.、Corbin, Juliet M.(1990)。Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedure and techniques。Sage。  new window
其他
1.成虹飛(1999)。我為何要作行動研究?一種研究關係的抉擇,http://www.nttc.edu.tw/ige/論文集/成虹飛.htm。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.潘慧玲(1996)。教育研究。教育導論。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
2.Reason, P.(1994)。Three approaches to participative inquiry。Handbook of qualitative research。Sage。  new window
3.Wolcott, H. F.(1990)。On seeking-and rejecting-validity in qualitative research。Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate。New York:Teachers College Press。  new window
4.Spindler, G.、Spindler, L.(1992)。Cultural process and ethnography: An anthropological perspective。The handbook of qualitative research in education。New York:Academic Press。  new window
5.Altheide, D. L.、Johnson, J. M.(1994)。Criteria for assessing interpretative validity in qualitative research。Handbook of qualitative research。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
6.Denzin, N. K.、Lincoln, Y. S.(2000)。Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research。Handbook of qualitative research。Thousand Oaks, California:Sage Publications, Inc.。  new window
7.Stake, Robert E.(1994)。Case Studies。Handbook of Qualitative Research。Sage Publications。  new window
8.Richardson, L.(1994)。Writing: A method of inquiry。Handbook of qualitative research。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
9.胡幼慧(1996)。轉型中的質性研究:演變、批判和女性主義研究觀點。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北:巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.夏林清(1996)。實踐取向的研究方法。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
11.Penshkin, A.(1985)。Virtuous subjectivity: In the participant-observer's I's。Exploring clinical methods for social research。Sage。  new window
12.Denzin, N. K.(1994)。The art and politics of interpretation。Handbook of qualitative research。Sage。  new window
13.Guba, Egon G.、Lincoln, Yvonna S.(1994)。Competing paradigms in qualitative research。Handbook of qualitative research。Sage Publications。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE