臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：邁向多元典範的教科書研究方法論
書刊名：課程與教學
作者：周珮儀 引用關係／鄭明長 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chou, Pei-i／Cheng, Ming-chang
出版日期：2016
卷期：19:3
頁次：頁1-26
主題關鍵詞：典範；研究方法；混合研究；教科書研究；Paradigm；Research methods；Mixed methods；Textbook research
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:375
  • 點閱點閱:57
早期教科書研究常是規範性研究，很少深究方法與方法論。最近興起的科學化教科書研究取向提出教科書研究方法的理論架構，展現發展教科書研究典範的企圖；然而許多教科書研究問題仍無法涵蓋在其架構中。同時更廣泛、複雜、多元和彈性的教科書觀點和教科書研究取向也正在興起，一方面企圖與科學化教科書研究取向交流與論辯，另一方面促使傳統教科書研究發展系統化的研究架構和研究方法論。看待教科書的視角不同，關注的教科書問題就不同，所選擇的研究方法也不同，因此本研究從教科書觀點的改變分析教科書研究方法的發展，主張發展多元典範的教科書研究方法論，提供多元選擇和彈性運用的研究方法，以及各種混合設計的方式，俾利解決日趨複雜多元的教科書研究問題。
In the early stage, textbook-related research was often normative and its methodology issues were seldom addressed. Recently, there has been a trend where textbook research is regarded as scientific research and a theoretical framework for textbook research is proposed, manifesting its ambition to develop a scientific paradigm for textbook methodology. However, there are still many issues of textbook research that cannot be classified based on the theoretical framework. At the same time, more extensive, complex, multiple textbooks issues and textbook research are emerging. On one hand, the research attempts to interchange ideas with the scientific textbook research. On the other, it also aims to promote the traditional textbook research which lacks methodology to develop more refined and systematic theoretical framework and research methodology. Viewing textbooks from different perspectives means not only the different focuses of the problems in textbooks, but also the different choices of research methods. Because the latest perspectives on textbooks have changed from the traditional ones, the present study analyzed the development and the evolution of textbook research. With the claim of pluralistic paradigm in textbook methodology, the present study provided diverse and flexible research instruments and different types of mixed methods designs based on the features of textbooks, offering alternative solutions to the increasingly complicated and diverse problems in textbook research.
期刊論文
1.周珮儀、鍾怡靜(20130400)。書評：《聯合國教育科學文化組織教科書研究與教科書修訂指引》。教科書研究，6(1)，143-154。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Fuchs, E.(2011)。Current trends in history and social studies textbook research。Journal of International Cooperation in Education，14(2)，17-34。  new window
3.王雅玄(20121200)。當代歷史教科書中的他者論述。教科書研究，5(3)，131-138。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Repoussi, M.、Tutiaux-Guillon, N.(2010)。New trends in history textbook research: Issues and methodologies toward a school historiography。Journal of Educational Media, Memory & Society，2(1)，154-170。  new window
5.Foster, S.(2011)。Dominant traditions in international textbook Research and revision。Education Inquiry，2(1)，5-20。  new window
6.周珮儀、鄭明長(20110300)。我們培育孩子成為全球公民嗎？--從全球教育觀對國小社會教科書的論述分析。臺灣民主，8(1)，1-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Boostrom, R.(2001)。Essay review: Whither textbooks?。Curriculum Studies，33(2)，229-245。  new window
8.王麗雲、甄曉蘭(20090600)。社會學取向的教科書政策分析。教科書研究，2(1)，1-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.周珮儀(20051000)。我國教科書研究的分析：1979-2004。課程與教學，8(4)，91-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.王姿陵、曾議寬、邱美燕(20150800)。評析電子教科書對教與學的影響。教科書研究，8(2)，175-188。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.周珮儀(20151200)。書評：《教科書和學習教材發展的綜合策略》。教科書研究，8(3)，181-197。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.張芬芬(20120500)。半世紀臺灣教科書研究之概況與趨勢（1956-2010）。教育研究，217，5-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Chandler, D. G.、Brosnan, P. A.(1995)。A comparison between mathematics textbook content and a statewide mathematics proficiency test。School Science and Mathematics，95(3)，118-123。  new window
14.Cheng, M.-C.、Chou, P.-I.、Wang, Y.-T.、Lin, C.-H.(2015)。Learning effects of science textbooks designed with adapted cognitive process principles on grade 5 students。International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education，13(3)，467-488。  new window
15.Clerici, R.、Gola, G.、Cisco, E.(2013)。Quali-quant analysis of the statistical content in Italian primary school general books。International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches，7(1)，96-109。  new window
16.Fan, L.(2013)。Textbook research as scientific research: Towards a common ground on issues and methods of research on mathematics textbooks。ZDM Mathematics Education，45(5)，765-777。  new window
17.Lassig, S.(2009)。Textbooks and beyond: Educational media in context(s)。Journal of Educational Media, Memory and Society，1(1)，1-23。  new window
18.周珮儀(20110600)。促進國際理解和交流的教科書研究之旅--GEI短期研究心得。教科書研究，4(1)，115-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.周珮儀、鄭明長(20080100)。教科書研究方法論之探究。課程與教學，11(1)，193-222。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Fan, L.、Zhu, Y.(2007)。Representation of problem-solving procedures: A comparative look at China, Singapore, and US mathematics textbooks。Educational Studies in Mathematics，66(1)，61-75。  new window
21.Nicholls, J.(2003)。Methods in school textbook research。International Journal of Historical Learning, Teaching and Research，3(2)，11-26。  new window
22.Woyshner, C.、Schocker, J. B.(2015)。Cultural parallax and content analysis: Images of black women in high school history textbooks。Theory & Research in Social Education，43(4)，441-468。  new window
23.Pell, A. W.、Iqbal, H. M.、Sohail, S.(2010)。Introducing science experiments to rote-learning classes in Pakistani middle schools。Evaluation & Research in Education，23(3)，191-212。  new window
24.Nicholls, J.(2005)。The philosophical underpinnings of school textbook research。Paradigm: Journal of the Textbook Colloquium，3(1)，24-35。  new window
25.王雅玄(20050600)。社會領域教科書的批判論述分析：方法論的重建。教育研究集刊，51(2)，67-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Remillard, J. T.(2005)。Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula。Review of Educational Research，75(2)，211-246。  new window
27.周珮儀(20020900)。國小教師解讀教科書的方式。國立臺北師範學院學報. 教育類，15，115+117-137。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.潘慧玲(20030200)。社會科學研究典範的流變。教育研究資訊，11(1)，115-143。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.宋曜廷、潘佩妤(20101200)。混合研究在教育研究的應用。教育科學研究期刊，55(4)，97-130。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.郭秋永(20110300)。混和研究與質量爭議。東吳政治學報，29(1)，1-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Rezat, S.(2006)。A model of textbook use。The 30th annual conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education。Prague：PME。409-416。  new window
2.Weinbrenner, P.(1992)。Methodologies of textbook analysis used to date。The educational research workshop，(會議日期: 1990/09/11-1990/09/14)。Amsterdam：Lisse：Swets and Zeitlinger B. V.。21-34。  new window
研究報告
1.周珮儀(2011)。自然與科技領域教科書中圖表的設計、教學與學習 (計畫編號：NSC97-2511-S-110-002-MY3)。高雄：國立中山大學教育研究所。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Bao, J.(2002)。A comparative study on composite difficulty of Chinese and British school mathematics curricula(博士論文)。East China Normal University，Shanghai。  new window
圖書
1.Pingel, Falk(2010)。UNESCO Guidebook on Textbook Research and Textbook。Paris：UNESCO。  new window
2.Altbach, P. G.、Kelly, G. P.、Petrie, H. G.、Weis, L.(1991)。Textbooks in American society: Politics, policy and pedagogy。New York, NY：Teachers College Press：State University of New York。  new window
3.Avis, J.、Bloomer, M.、Esland, G.、Hodkinson, P.、Gleeson, D.(1996)。Knowledge and Nationhood: Education, Politics and Work。London：Cassell。  new window
4.Luke, A.、Luke, C.、De Castell, S.(1989)。Language authority and criticism: Reading on the school textbook。The Falmer Press。  new window
5.Creswell, John W.、Clark, Vicki L. Plano(2011)。Designing and conducting mixed methods research。Sage。  new window
6.林清山(2014)。心理與教育統計學。東華。  延伸查詢new window
7.Elliott, D. L.、Woodward, A.(1990)。Textbooks and schooling in the United States: Eighty-ninth yearbook of national society for the study of education。Chicago, ILL：University of Chicago Press。  new window
8.教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程教科書評鑑指標。臺北：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
9.Babbie, Earl R.、陳文俊(2005)。社會科學研究方法。臺北：雙葉書廊有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.Bauer, Martin W.、Gaskell, George、羅世宏、蔡欣怡、薛丹琦(2008)。質性資料分析：文本、影像與聲音。臺北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
11.Apple, M. W.、Christian-Smith, L. K.(1991)。The politics of the textbook。Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.。  new window
12.Creswell, John W.(2013)。Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches。Sage Publications, Inc.。  new window
13.Foster, S. J.、Crawford, K. A.(2006)。What shall we tell the children? International perspectives on school history textbooks。Greenwich, Connecticut：Information Age Publishing。  new window
14.Howson, G.(1995)。Mathematics textbooks: A comparative study of grade 8 texts。Vancouver：Pacific Educational Press。  new window
15.Johnsen, E. B.(2001)。Textbooks in the Kaleidoscope: A critical survey of literature and research on educational texts。Oslo：Scandinavian University Press。  new window
16.Lerner, R.、Nagai, A. K.、Rothman, S.(1995)。Molding the citizen: The politics of high school history textbooks。Westport, CT：Praeger。  new window
17.Nicholls, J.(2006)。School history textbooks across cultures: International debates and perspectives。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
18.UNESCO(2005)。A comprehensive strategy for textbooks and learning materials。Paris：UNESCO。  new window
19.Mikk, J.(2000)。Textbook: Research And Writing。Frankfurt/M.：Berlin：Bern：Brussels：New York：Oxford：Vienna：Peter Lang GmbH。  new window
20.Shadish, W. R.、Cook, T. D.、Campbell, D. T.(2002)。Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference。Belmont, MD。  new window
21.藍順德(2006)。教科書政策與制度。臺北：五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Apple, M. W.(1986)。Teachers and text: A Political economy of class and gender relations in education。Routledge and Kegan Paul。  new window
23.Apple, M. W.(1993)。Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age。New York, NY：Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
24.林生傳(2003)。教育研究法：全方位的統整與分析。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
25.Teddlie, Charles B.、Tashakkori, Abbas(2009)。Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences。Sage。  new window
26.Kuhn, Thomas Samuel(1970)。The Structure of Scientific Revolutions。University of Chicago Press。  new window
27.Denzin, Norman K.、Lincoln, Yvonna S.(1994)。Handbook of Qualitative Research。Sage。  new window
28.Patton, Michael Quinn(1990)。Qualitative evaluation and research method。Sage。  new window
29.Neuman, William Lawrence、朱柔若(2000)。社會研究方法：質化與量化取向。揚智文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
30.Alvesson, Mats、Sköldberg, Kaj、施盈廷、劉忠博、張時健(2011)。反身性方法論：質性研究的新視野。韋伯文化。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Apple, M. W.(1991)。The culture and commerce of the textbook。The politics of the textbook。New York, NY。  new window
2.Gilbert, R.(1989)。Text Analysis and Ideology Critique of Curricular Content。Language, Authority, and Criticism: Readings on the School Textbook。London：Falmer Press。  new window
3.Mikk, J.(2002)。Experimental evaluation of textbooks and multimedia。New educational media and textbooks。Estonia, Stockholm：Stockholm Institute of Education。  new window
4.Olson, D. R.(1989)。On the language and authority of textbooks。Language Authority and Criticism: Reading on the School Textbook。Falmer。  new window
5.Aronowitz, S.、Giroux, H. A.(1991)。Textual authority, culture, and the politics of literacy。The politics of the textbook。London。  new window
6.Teddlie, C.、Tashakkori, A.(2003)。Major Issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences。Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research。Sage。  new window
7.周佩儀(2003)。教科書研究的現況分析與趨勢展望。教科書之選擇與評鑑。高雄：復文。  延伸查詢new window
8.藍順德(2010)。教科書意識型態。教科書意識型態--歷史回顧與實徵分析。臺北：華騰。  延伸查詢new window
9.Tashakkori, A.、Teddlie, C.(2003)。The past and the future of mixed methods research: From data triangulation to mixed model design。Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage Publications。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：663（臺灣：643，外國：20） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1498098 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67298541
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上