By comparing two types of knowledge in the scientific microworld and lifeworld, this article indicates that the philosophy of science is indeed the foundation of scientific developments. In Western countries, there is an interdependent relationship between the development of various sciences and the philosophy of science: the development of sciences might provide materials for reflection on the philosophy of science; while the progress of the philosophy of science might inspire further developments of various sciences. Nevertheless, the relationship between these two sectors is often broken down in non-Western countries. Most researchers have only superficial or a literal understanding about western philosophy of science, and their inability to comprehend ethos of Western science may result in the long-term underdevelopment of scientific research. Taking Hu Shih's attempts of using a slogan to promote the understanding of scientific methods as an example, this article argues that a slogan might be helpful for the dissemination of scientific ideas, but it might also lead to the distortion of a researcher's understanding about the philosophy of science. Therefore, it is necessary to educate our intellectuals of the next generation so as to understand the ethos of the West's philosophy of science in order to enable them to use it as implicit knowledge for creative research work in their future academic career.