:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣地區族群交友界限之變遷:1970年與1997年的比較
書刊名:臺灣社會學刊
作者:黃毅志 引用關係章英華 引用關係
作者(外文):Hwang, Yih-jyhChang, Ying-hwa
出版日期:2005
卷期:35
頁次:頁127-179
主題關鍵詞:族群交友界限居住隔離鉅視結構變遷Ethnic friendship boundaryResidential segregationMacro-structural change
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(11) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:411
  • 點閱點閱:94
根據許多理論,隨著現代社會的變遷,由族群所構成交友的封閉性或階層界限將會減弱;然而事實上,在許多社會裏,族群間教育、職業分布不同的隔離增加,族群交友界限也增強。而台灣可說很特別,族群間教育、職業與居住隔離減弱;不過三十年來台灣地區的族群交友界限確實有明顯減弱嗎?這是族群間居住、教育與職業隔離減弱的鉅視結構變遷,增加族群接觸機會所造成的嗎?這些問題雖具有重要社會學意義,相關研究卻非常有限,仍有待於進一步的嚴格量化研究來探討。本研究則運用兩份分別於1970年與1997年進行調查的全國性樣本資料,採用對數線性與相乘分析,探討上述問題。研究發現顯示:族群交友界限有明顯減弱,這可歸因於族群間居住、教育與職業隔離的效應減弱;不過比起外省與閩南的交友,客家與外省、閩南交友相對機會一直偏低,這可歸因於客家居住地一直集中於桃竹苗地區,而與外省、閩南有較大的隔離。這些發現都可用Peter M. Blau所強調的「鉅視結構因素」 做解釋。
Results from studies on inter-ethnic relations indicate increases in educational and occupational segregation among ethnic groups and decreases in friendship choices across ethnic lines. Data also show that educational, occupational, and residential segregation in Taiwan has decreased dramatically among sub-ethnic groups based on provincial affiliations. We examined changes in friendship boundaries across ethnic lines using log linear and multiplicative analyses of island-wide surveys conducted in 1970 and 1997. Our findings show that choice of friends across sub-ethnic groups has actually increased substantially, with changing boundaries of ethnic friendships resulting from decreases in residential, educational, and occupational segregation. However, the data indicate that members of the Hakka ethnic group are less inclined to make friends with members of other sub-ethnic groups, perhaps due to their restricted distribution to a few Taiwanese counties. We use Blau's macro-structural factors to explain our findings.
期刊論文
1.Hout, Michael(1988)。More Universalism, Less Structural Mobility: The American Occupational Structure in the 1980s。American Journal of Sociology,93(6),1358-1400。  new window
2.Kalmijn, Matthijs(1994)。Assortative Mating by Cultural and Economic Occupational Status。American Journal of Sociology,100(2),442-452。  new window
3.Marsden, Peter V.(1987)。Core Discussion Networks of Americans。American Sociological Review,52(1),122-131。  new window
4.王甫昌(20050600)。由「中國省籍」到「臺灣族群」:戶口普查籍別類屬轉變之分析。臺灣社會學,9,59-117。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Mark, Noah P.(2003)。Culture and competition: Homophily and distancing explanations for cultural niches。American Sociological Review,68,319-345。  new window
6.陳端容、陳東升(20010600)。跨族群的社會連結:工具理性行動邏輯與社會結構的辯證。臺灣社會學刊,25,1-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Duncan, O. D.(1979)。How destination depends on origin in the occupational mobility table。American Journal of Sociology,84(4),793-803。  new window
8.Kalmijn, Matthijs(1998)。Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, and Trends。Annual Review of Sociology,24,395-421。  new window
9.Mare, Robert D.(1991)。Five Decades of Educational Assortative Mating。American Sociological Review,56(1),15-32。  new window
10.Marsden, P. V.(1988)。Homogeneity in confiding relations。Social Networks,10,57-76。  new window
11.Nielsen, Francois(198504)。Toward a Theory of Ethnic Solidarity in Modern Societies。American Sociological Review,50,133-149。  new window
12.Hechter, Michael(2004)。From Class to Culture。American Journal of Sociology,110(2),400-445。  new window
13.Wright, Erik Olin、Donmoon Cho(1992)。The Relative Permeability of Class Boundaries to Cross-Class Friendships--A Comparative Study of the United States, Canada, Sweden, and Norway。American Sociological Review,57(1),85-102。  new window
14.Tsai, Shu-Ling、Gates, Hill、Chiu, Hei-Yuan(1994)。Schooling Taiwan's Women: Educational Attainment in the Mid-20th Century。Sociology of Education,67,243-263。  new window
15.王甫昌(20021200)。族群接觸機會?還是族群競爭?:本省閩南人族群意識內涵與地區差異模式之解釋。臺灣社會學,4,11-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.蔡淑鈴、瞿海源(19930700)。Educational Attainment in Taiwan: Comparisons of Ethnic Groups。國家科學委員會研究彙刊. 人文及社會科學,3(2),188-202。  延伸查詢new window
17.王甫昌(19940400)。光復後臺灣漢人族群通婚的原因與形式初探。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,76,43-96。  延伸查詢new window
18.Emirbayer, Mustafa、Goodwin, Jeff(19940500)。Network analysis, culture and the problem of agency。American Journal of Sociology,99(6),1411-1454。  new window
19.黃清高(19850900)。都市居民社會網絡之研究。思與言,23(3),35-62。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.熊瑞梅(19940600)。影響情感與財務支持連繫的因素。人文及社會科學集刊,6(2),303-333。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.蔡淑鈴(19940600)。臺灣之婚姻配對模式。人文及社會科學集刊,6(2),335-371。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.吳乃德(20021200)。認同衝突和政治信任:現階段臺灣族群政治的核心難題。臺灣社會學,4,75-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.陳東升、陳端容(20021200)。跨族群政治討論網絡的形成及其影響因素。臺灣社會學,4,119-157。  延伸查詢new window
24.Blau, Peter M.(1977)。A Macrosociological Theory of Social Structure。American Journal of Sociology,83,26-54。  new window
25.Hout, Michael、Sobel, Michael E.、Duncan, Otis Dudley(1985)。Exchange, Structure, and Symmetry in Occupational Mobility。American Sociological Review,91,359-372。  new window
26.蔡瑞明(1996)。龍鳳配對?-臺灣夫妻間教育與階級的關係。行政院國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,6(2),258-277。  延伸查詢new window
27.Raftery, Adrian E.(1986)。Choosing Models for Cross-classifications。American Sociological Review,51,145-146。  new window
28.蔡淑鈴(1996)。臺灣婚姻配對之變遷:族群與教育的相對重要性。行政院國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,6(2),301-315。  延伸查詢new window
29.Verbruuge, Lois M.(1977)。The Structure of Adult Friendship Choices。Social Forces,56(2),576-597。  new window
30.Sekulic, Dusko、Massey, Garth、Hodson, Randy(1994)。Who Were the Yugoslavs?: Failed Sources of a Common Identity in the Former Yugoslavia。American Sociological Review,59(1),83-97。  new window
31.Kalmijn, Matthijs(1991)。Status Homogamy in the United States。American Journal of Sociology,97(2),496-523。  new window
32.Martin, Ruef、Aldrich, Howard E.、Carter, Nanvy M.(2003)。The Structure of Founding Teams: Homophily, Strong Ties, and Isolation among U.S. Entrepreneurs。American Sociological Review,68,195-222。  new window
33.Hout, Michael(1984)。Status, Autonomy, and Training in Occupational Mobility。American Journal of Sociology,89(6),1379-1409。  new window
34.Blau, Peter M.(1947)。Presidential Address: Parameters of Social Structure。American Sociological Review,39,615-635。  new window
35.Smits, Jeroen、Ultee, Wout、Lammers, Jan(1998)。Educational Homogamy in 65 Country: A Explanations of Differences in Openness Using Country-level Explanatory Variables。American Sociological Review,63,264-285。  new window
36.Hout, Michael、Gerber, Theodore P.(2004)。Tightening Up: Declining Class Mobility during Russia's Market Transition。American Sociological Review,69(5),677-703。  new window
37.Heckfeldt, Robert R.(1983)。Social Contexts, Social Networks and Urban Neiborhoods: Environmental Constraints on Friendship Choice。American Journal of Sociology,89(3),651-669。  new window
38.蔡勇美、章英華(2002)。The Impacts of Information Age on Urban Development and Transformation in Taiwan。American Journal of Chinese Studies,9(2),101-123。  new window
會議論文
1.章英華、黃毅志(1999)。婚配與朋友核心網絡之變遷 : 1970與1990年代的比較。臺灣社會的個人網絡 : 第三次社會變遷基本調查研討會。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳端容、陳東升(1999)。核心網絡的族群特色。  延伸查詢new window
3.蕭新煌、范綱華(2001)。臺灣政治大轉型中的族群集體心事。0。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.瞿海源(1998)。台灣社會變遷基本調查計劃:第三期第三次調查計劃執行報告 (計畫編號:NSC-86-2418-H-001-001-B1)。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
2.王甫昌(2000)。臺灣族群關係的社會基礎調查計劃執行報告。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.鄭宜仲(1998)。社經地位、友誼網絡與身分地位意識之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.臺灣戶口普查處(1969)。中華民國五十五年臺閩地區戶口及住宅普查報告書:第二卷.台灣省.第一冊.戶口總表及人口籍別、年齡、遷移。臺北:臺灣戶口普查處。  延伸查詢new window
2.Goldthorpe, John H.、Llewellyn, Catriona、Payne, Clive(1980)。Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
3.Hout, Michael(1983)。Mobility Tables。Beverly Hills, CA:Madison, WI:Sage Publications:Sage University Press。  new window
4.Grichting, Wolfgang(1971)。The Value System in Taiwan。Taipei。  new window
5.Blau, Peter M.、Duncan, Otis Dudley(1967)。The American Occupation Structure。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
6.Becker, Gary S.(1957)。The Economics of Discrimination。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。  new window
7.Knoke, David、Kuklinski, James H.(1982)。Network analysis: Basic concepts。Sage Publications Ltd.。  new window
8.Goodman, Leo A.(1984)。The Analysis of Cross-Classified Data Having Ordered Categories。Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University Press。  new window
9.黃毅志(1999)。社會階層、社會網絡與主觀意識:臺灣地區不公平的社會階層體系之延續。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Wilson, W. J.(1987)。The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass and Public Policy。Chicago:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
11.章英華(1993)。臺灣都市的內部結構:社會生態的與歷史的探討。臺北:巨流圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Blau, Peter M.(1977)。Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure。Free Press。  new window
13.Parsons, Talcott(1966)。Societies: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall。  new window
14.Fischer, Claude S.、Jackson, Robert Max、Stueve, Ann、Segerson, Kathleen、Jones, Lynne McGallister、Baldassare, Mark(1977)。Networks and Places: Social Relations in the Urban Setting。The Free Press。  new window
15.林南(2001)。Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action。Cambridge University Press。  new window
16.章英華、薛承泰、黃毅志(1996)。教育分流與社會經濟地位:兼論對技職教育改革的政策意涵。臺北:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
17.Featherman, David L.、Hauser, Robert M.(1978)。Opportunity and Change。New York:Academic Books。  new window
18.張維安(2000)。臺灣客家族群史產經篇訪談紀錄:產經篇。南投縣南投市:臺灣省文獻委員會。  延伸查詢new window
19.黃毅志(2001)。光復後人口階層變遷。六堆客家社會文化發展與變遷之研究. 社會篇。屏東:六堆文化教育基金會。  延伸查詢new window
20.Guest, Avery M.(1977)。Residential Segregation in Urban Areas。Contemporary Topics in Urban Sociology。Morristown, NJ。  new window
21.Hauser, Robert M.(1979)。Some Exploratory Methods for Modeling Mobility Tables and Other Cross-Classified Data。Sociological Methodology 1980。San Francisco, CA。  new window
其他
1.行政院戶口普查處(1992)。中華民國七十九年臺閩地區戶口及住宅普查報告,第一卷,上冊,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.胡克威(1997)。族群、家庭結構與教育取得:戰後臺灣各族在教育取得上的變動及其成因,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.陳東升、陳端容(2001)。台灣跨社會群體結構性社會資本的比較分析。社會轉型與文化變貌:華人社會的比較。香港:香港中文大學香港亞太研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.王甫昌(2001)。臺灣族群通婚與族群關係再探。社會轉型與文化變貌:華人社會的比較。香港:香港中文大學香港亞太研究所。  延伸查詢new window
3.章英華、蔡勇美(1997)。台灣的都市經驗。台灣的都市社會。台北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
4.孫清山、黃毅志(1997)。台灣階級結構:流動表與網絡表的分析。九〇年代的臺灣社會。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE