:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:中、小學生輔導與管教之探討
書刊名:醒吾學報
作者:許禎元 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsu, Chen-yuan
出版日期:2006
卷期:31
頁次:頁1-24
主題關鍵詞:輔導管教體罰學生申訴GuidanceFeruleCorporal punishmentStudent's grievance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:1519
  • 點閱點閱:28
1980年代末期,隨著戒嚴時期結束,社會自主意識抬頭,人權理念與價值漸受到重視,加上社會快速變遷,人心浮動,不乏各種價值思想衝突。1993年教育改革實施後,隨彙成12項「教育改革行動方案」,公布九年一員課程綱要,1995年教師法訂定,基於教學及紀律維持,重視學生人權及教師專業自主性,更課予教師輔導或管教學生的義務,惟在執行上有高度的爭議性,也容易引起與家長的衝突,特別是負責執行的基層教師,恆負有教學及維持教室秩序的責任,而導致行政懲處、刑事控訴及民事求償等,極待有效的解決途徑。總結本文研究,提出的具體建議如下;1)訂定校園職權行使法,將學校納入法治社會的軌道、2)確立管教分級制度,給予合於教育意義的不同程度之懲處、3)警察未得拒絕適用,使學生明白學校非治外法地,早日融入社會規範、4)建立 教師法徑素養,每年課予法學研習時數、及5)重視學校教師權益,現實與法律規範實未符合,將增加教師對法律的不信任,而影響法治文化之具體表現。
Since the end of 1980, there were various transforms such as the annulment of martial law、idea of individualism and value of humanitarianism in the Taiwan society. The authority proclaimed 12 items of educational reform acts in 1993 as well as the enactment of the teacher law in 1995 to imposed on the teacher the duty of guidance and ferule of student for the purpose of maintenance of classroom’s order. Essentially, teachers are obliged to maintain the function of teaching. But such doing however actually had resulted of many conflicts and even criminal or civil charge by parents. There must be have some necessary methods required for improvement. In conclusion, the essay suggest that; 1) To draw up the duty execution law on campus, and bring school into rule by law; 2) To define the clear steps and digress of punishment, as well as disciple by proportion; 3) To introduce the power of police to classroom if necessary; 4) To discipline teachers about idea of legality; impose on then the curriculum of jurisprudence every year; 5)To give weight to the rights and interests of teacher, by so doing they can convey the same passion and value to students.
期刊論文
1.林石猛(19971200)。從學生受退學處分之行政救濟,看我國特別權力關係之演變。公教資訊,1(3),54-63。  延伸查詢new window
2.林孟皇(20000800)。學校為達成教育目的之內部行為的程序保障。研習資訊,17(4),60-77。  延伸查詢new window
3.徐美鈴(20040700)。教師的難為及應為--談國中學生的輔導與管教問題。學生輔導,93,78-89。  延伸查詢new window
4.董保城(19951200)。論教師法「教師輔導與管教」。政大法學評論,54,117-133。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.顏厥安(19950800)。臺灣教育法制的檢討--建立以實踐基本權利為目的之教育法制。教改通訊,11,21-22。  延伸查詢new window
6.林佳範(20020600)。校園人權與人權教育--淺論「學生人權」的觀念。師友月刊,420,13-16。  延伸查詢new window
7.李介至、林美伶(20000400)。國中教師管教現況與問題。中等教育,51(2),67-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.林月盛(19990800)。從教育法學觀點論教師管教與學生懲戒的有關問題。研習資訊,16(4),47-54。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.莊繡霞(1996)。論學生基本權之保障:若干教育法制之憲法問題(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.李惠宗(2004)。教育行政法。臺北:元照。  延伸查詢new window
2.邢泰釗(2000)。教師法律手冊。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
3.秦夢群(2002)。教育行政--實務部份。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
4.Alexander, Kern、Alexander, M. David(2003)。The Law of Schools, Students and Teachers。Minnesota:West Group。  new window
5.Essex, Nathan L.(2004)。School Law and the Public Schools: A Practical Guide for Educational Leaders。Boston:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
6.Raskin, Jamin B.(2003)。We the student: Supreme court cases for and about students。Washington, D. C.:Cqpress。  new window
7.蔡震榮(1994)。行政法理論與基本人權之保障。三鋒出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.邢泰釗(1998)。校園法律實務。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳新民(2002)。行政法學總論。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.吳庚(2001)。行政法之理論與實用。吳庚。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.陳敏(2003)。行政法總論。臺北:陳敏。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.李建良(2002)。遭留校察看的私校學生。月旦法學教室3--公法學篇。臺北:元照。  延伸查詢new window
2.周志宏(2003)。析論我國學生懲戒制度之法律問題。教育法與教育改革。高等教育文化事業有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE