:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:大學甄選入學制度之潛在課程探究
書刊名:臺灣教育社會學研究
作者:王逸慧
作者(外文):Wang, I-huei
出版日期:2007
卷期:7:2
頁次:頁39-81
主題關鍵詞:大學甄選入學潛在課程多元入學方案Recommendation and screening systemHidden curriculumMultiple enrollment program
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:75
  • 點閱點閱:123
本文探討某一所高中之學生從甄選入學制度所學到的負面潛在課程,研究方法採焦點團體訪談,所得結論為:一、智育成績才是致勝關鍵;二、沒有錢等於輸在起跑點;三、階級化的學校分級;四、利益(功利)導向之校系抉擇;五、現實取向之學習心態;六、為達目的可不擇手段之造假價值觀;七、身為考生即可享有特權;八、錄取名校始屬為校爭光;九、競爭的同儕關係;十、「只要上榜其餘可談」之不公義規準;十一、要為秩序不佳負責之罪惡感;十二、投機與逢迎之應試技巧;十三、表面功夫的營造比實質內涵更重要與十四、特重英文之語言偏好。文末對教育行政機構、大學校系與高中學校提出建議,以做為制度修訂或升學輔導施為之參考。本文探討某一所高中之學生從甄選入學制度所學到的負面潛在課程,研究方法採焦點團體訪談,所得結論為:一、智育成績才是致勝關鍵;二、沒有錢等於輸在起跑點;三、階級化的學校分級;四、利益(功利)導向之校系抉擇;五、現實取向之學習心態;六、為達目的可不擇手段之造假價值觀;七、身為考生即可享有特權;八、錄取名校始屬為校爭光;九、競爭的同儕關係;十、「只要上榜其餘可談」之不公義規準;十一、要為秩序不佳負責之罪惡感;十二、投機與逢迎之應試技巧;十三、表面功夫的營造比實質內涵更重要與十四、特重英文之語言偏好。文末對教育行政機構、大學校系與高中學校提出建議,以做為制度修訂或升學輔導施為之參考。
This paper is probing into the hidden curriculum the students have learned from the Recommendation and Screening System of Higher Education Entrance Exam. To understand the mechanism behind the function of the Recommendation and Screening system, focus group interviews were conducted. The conclusions derived are as follows: 1.only academic achievement being deemed to be the key to success; 2.the poor students being disadvantaged in this system; 3.the schools being classified; 4.the students’ choices of universities and departments being interest-oriented; 5.the students’ attitude towards study being guided by practical concerns; 6.there emerging the pretentious values that the goal can be achieved even by fair means or foul; 7.one who is preparing for the exam having privileges; 8.the students being seen as winning honor when they are accepted by the famous universities; 9.peer relationship becoming competitive; 10.there emerging the unjust value that everything can be negotiated as long as one is accepted into a university; 11. there emerging the sense of guilt for the disorder in the classroom; 12.the students having acquired the fawning skills and attitudes towards the entrance examination; 13.the appearance preceding the essence; 14. the poor English being disadvantaged in this system. In the concluding paragraphs, attempts are made to provide some advices for the ministry of education, the departments of universities, and the senior high schools about the revision of the policies of the entrance system and the counseling of students entering university.
期刊論文
1.Martin, Jane R.(1976)。What Should We Do with a Hidden Curriculum When We Find One?。Curriculum Inquiry,6(2),135-151。  new window
2.蘇玉龍、葉連祺、吳京玲、陳恭(20060200)。大學甄選入學實施成果追蹤。教育資料與研究,68,101-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳伯璋(1984)。潛在課程研究的理論基礎。師大學報,29,53-91。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡文山(20021200)。社會批判理論與潛在課程研究。國民教育研究集刊,10,177-189+191。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.黃政傑(20031000)。入學考試的潛在課程分析。課程與教學,6(4),1-18+183。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.鄭玉卿(19990300)。學校制度中的潛在課程--反學校教育思潮的觀點。臺北市立師範學院學報,30,193-207。  延伸查詢new window
7.蕭次融、姚霞玲(19940300)。推薦甄選入學方式之研究。教育研究資訊,2(2),12-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Vallance, Elizabeth(1974)。Hiding the Hidden Curriculum: An Interpretation of the Language of Justification in Nineteenth Century Educational Reform。Curriculum Theory Network,4(1),5-21。  new window
9.秦夢群(20040800)。大學多元入學制度實施與改革之研究。教育政策論壇,7(2),59-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.黃光雄、朱秀芳(19890300)。潛在課程的概念。教育資料文摘,23(3)=134,102-112。  延伸查詢new window
11.黃政傑(19860600)。潛在課程概念評析。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊,28,左163-182。  延伸查詢new window
12.Gordon, D.(1982)。The Concept of the Hidden Curriculum。Journal of Philosophy of Education,16(2),195-196。  new window
13.陳伯璋(1993)。社會變遷、課程發展與潛在課程。教育資料文摘,32,110-128。  延伸查詢new window
14.洪福財(1998)。從潛在課程省思幼教教學的幾個議題。國教學報。  延伸查詢new window
15.歐用生(1979)。潛在課程概念之檢討。師友月刊,141,15-21。  延伸查詢new window
16.Simon, R. L.、Willinsky, J.(1980)。Behind a High School Literacy Policy: The Surfacing of a Hidden Curriculum。Journal of Education,162(1),111-121。  new window
會議論文
1.許維素(1995)。推薦甄選研討-高中組。0。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張瑞麟(2004)。考生對大學甄選入學制度之認知與因應策略之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.洪泰雄(2005)。我國大學甄選入學制度及其學生學習成就之探討--以台灣大學為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.林靜珊(2002)。大學甄試生選校決策因素之探討(碩士論文)。大葉大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.李昆翰(2003)。教師之學生分類架構,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.張玉成、賴慶三(1996)。84學年度推薦甄選追蹤調查研究-國立臺北師範學院。臺北市:財團法人大學入學考試中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.Jackson, P. W.(1968)。Life in classrooms。New York:Teachers College Press:Holt, Rinehart & Winston。  new window
3.陳伯璋(1987)。課程研究與教育革新。師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳伯璋(1985)。潛在課程研究。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.Ryan, K.、Bohlin, K. E.(1999)。Building character in schools: practical ways to bring moral instruction to life。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass。  new window
6.張春興(1996)。教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐。東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.Goodman, P.(1960)。Growing up Absured。London:Gollancz。  new window
8.黃嘉雄(1999)。課程。現代教育社會學。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.蕭次融,林秀紅,連正雄,姚霞玲(1999)。86學年度推薦甄選追蹤調查研究報告(摘要),0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Martin, J. R.(1983)。What should we do with a hidden curriculum when we find one?。The hidden curriculum and moral education。Berkeley, California:McCutchan Publishing Corporation。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE