臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：沒有階級認同的勞工運動：臺灣的自主工會與兄弟義氣的極限
書刊名：臺灣社會研究季刊
作者：何明修 引用關係
作者(外文)：Ho, Ming-sho
出版日期：2008
卷期：72
頁次：頁49-91
主題關鍵詞：勞工運動；階級認同；兄弟義氣；工會；Labor movement；Class identity；Brotherhood；Labor union
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:228
  • 點閱點閱:86
台灣自主工會運動的興起是依賴基層工人之間的兄弟義氣，而不是階級認同。兄弟義氣是一種強調工人互助觀的團結文化，它固然能夠強化內聚力，抗拒外來的打壓，但是卻無法清楚地界定工人群體邊界；以及其挑戰的對象。本文從一個台灣國營工會晚近十餘年來的發展，來探討這種兄弟義氣的極限。自從八○年代末期以來，基層的團結使得自主工會勢力能夠克服資方與黨國的聯手打壓，將工會組織真正還給工人。但是在九○年代中期以後，兄弟義氣的限制卻顯得越來越明顯。一方面，兄弟義氣排除了某些工會會員，也無法將工會與基層會員的關係清楚地定位於階級面向上，而擴大成為無所不包的會員服務。另一方面，面臨民營化與事業改革的壓力下，兄弟義氣的範圍迅速萎縮，甚至演變成不同生產單位之間的競爭。本文主張，有瑕疵的兄弟義氣導致了此個案工會的內訌，同時也解釋了晚近台灣工運的停滯現象。
The rise of Taiwan's independent labor union movement has been buttressed by rank-and-file workers’ brotherhood, rather than class identity. Brotherhood is an everyday culture of solidarity that strengthens the internal cohesion and makes possible collective action against an external threat but at the same time vaguely defines the boundary of workers themselves. This paper analyzes the evolution of brotherhood in a labor union. Since the late-1980s, grassroots solidarity has helped the nascent independent union to withstand the repression from management and the KMT. But beginning in the mid-1990s, the limitations of brotherhood became visible. On the one hand, brotherhood excluded certain members and failed to focus on class issues that were more directly related to union members. On the other hand, under the the pressure of privatization and enterprise reform, the scope of brotherhood was progressively narrowed. As a faulty mobilizing resource, brotherhood led to union's fratricide, which explained the reason why Taiwan's labor union movement stagnated as a whole.
期刊論文
1.Issac, Larry、Christiansen, Lars(2002)。How the civil rights movement revitalized labor militancy。American Sociological Review，67(5)，722-746。  new window
2.何明修(20031200)。工廠內的階級團結：連結石化工人的工作現場與集體行動。臺灣社會學，6，1-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.王振寰、方孝鼎(19921100)。國家機器､勞工政策與勞工運動。臺灣社會研究，13，1-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.何明修(20060600)。臺灣工會運動中的男子氣概。臺灣社會學刊，36，65-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Fantasia, Rick(1995)。From Class Consciousness to Culture, Action, and Social Organization。Annual Review of Sociology，21，269-287。  new window
6.何明修(20030900)。Democratization and Autonomous Unionism in Taiwan: The Case of Petrochemical Workers。Issues & Studies，39(3)，105-135。new window  new window
7.楊正陽(1995)。請民進黨莫把臺灣當捷克。公營事業民營化快訊，8，11-12。  延伸查詢new window
8.Kimeldorf, Howard、Stepan-Norris, Judith(1992)。Historical Studies of Labor Movement in the United States。Annual Review of Sociology，18，495-517。  new window
9.Clawson, Dan、Clawson, Mary Ann(1999)。What Has Happened to the US Labor Movement? Union Decline and Renewal。Annual Review of Sociology，25，95-119。  new window
10.李啟英(1997)。影響民間石化業的「中油幫」：中油流放在中間石化原料業的班底。財訊，47，130-134。  延伸查詢new window
11.何明修(2006)。Challenging the State Corporatism: The Politics of Taiwan's Labor Federation Movement。China Journal，56，107-127。  new window
12.Voss, Kim、Sherman, Rachel(2000)。Breaking the Iron Law of Oligarchy: Union Revitalization in the American Labor Movement。American Journal of Sociology，106，303-349。  new window
13.王振寰(2001)。Contesting Flexibility: The Restructuring of Taiwan's Labor Relations and Spatial Organization。International Journal of Urban and Regional Research，25(2)，346-363。  new window
14.趙剛(1993)。建立工人抗爭的次文化。臺灣工運，3(4)，121-122。  延伸查詢new window
15.Kimeldorf, Howard(1985)。Working Class Culture, Occupational Recruitment and Union Politics。Social Forces，64(2)，359-376。  new window
會議論文
1.邱毓斌(2004)。威權統治遺產下的臺灣工運：1988年至2004年。0。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳政亮(1996)。父權/兄弟關係--自主工會運作的個案研究(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.王時思(1995)。國家統合主義下的工會組織--統合主義在台灣(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃玟娟(1991)。區隔化之內部勞動力市場、社區與工會的自主和轉變(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳昱賢(1997)。「派系/分類」與政治運作--以台灣石油工會為個案的研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.邱毓斌(1994)。臺灣勞工運動的政治實踐，0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Gould, Roger V.(1995)。Insurgent Identities: Class, Community, and Protest in Paris from 1848 to the Commune。Chicago University Press。  new window
2.翠華公司(1981)。翠華廠史集。翠華廠史集。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
3.亞洲專訊中心、何雪影、鄭村棋、舒詩偉(1992)。台灣自主工會運動史1986-1989。台北：唐山。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Przeworski, Adam(1985)。Capitalism and Social Democracy。Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Bell, Daniel(1960)。The End of Ideology。Cambridge, Mass：Harvard University Press。  new window
6.謝國雄(19970000)。純勞動：臺灣勞動體制諸論。臺北：中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.張晉芬(20010000)。臺灣公營事業民營化：經濟迷思的批判。臺北市：中研院社研所。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.翠華工會第一分會(1998)。六週年彙編成刊。  延伸查詢new window
9.Fantasia, Rick、Voss, Kim(2004)。Hard Work: Remaking the American Labor Movement。Hard Work: Remaking the American Labor Movement。Berkeley, CA。  new window
10.陳政亮(2005)。全產總的「談判桌策略」。工運年鑑。0。  延伸查詢new window
11.Aronowitz, Stanley(1983)。Working Class Hero: A New Strategy for Labor。Working Class Hero: A New Strategy for Labor。New York, NY。  new window
12.Dubofsky, Melvyn(1975)。Industrialism and the American Worker, 1865-1920。Industrialism and the American Worker, 1865-1920。Arlington Heights, IL。  new window
13.Green, James(1980)。The World of the Worker: Labor in the Twentieth-century America。The World of the Worker: Labor in the Twentieth-century America。Toronto, Canada。  new window
14.陳奕奇、黃靜雯(2002)。New Bondage and Old Resistance: Realities and Challenges of Labour Movement in Taiwan。New Bondage and Old Resistance: Realities and Challenges of Labour Movement in Taiwan。Hong Kong。  new window
15.Brody, David(1980)。Workers in Industrial America: Essays on the 20th Century Struggle。Workers in Industrial America: Essays on the 20th Century Struggle。Oxford, UK。  new window
16.Katznelson, Ira(1986)。Working-class Formation: Constructing Cases and Comparison。Working-class Formation: Nineteenth Century Pattern in Western Europe and the United States。Princeton, NJ。  new window
17.Kimeldorf, Howard(1999)。Battling for American Labor: Wobblies, Craft Workers, and the Making of the Union Movement。Battling for American Labor: Wobblies, Craft Workers, and the Making of the Union Movement。Berkeley, CA。  new window
18.Fantasia, Rick(1988)。Cultures of Solidarity: Consciousness, Action and Contemporary Workers。Cultures of Solidarity: Consciousness, Action and Contemporary Workers。Berkeley, CA。  new window
19.Kimeldorf, Howard(1988)。Reds or Rackets: The Making of Radical and Conservative Unions on the Waterfront。Reds or Rackets: The Making of Radical and Conservative Unions on the Waterfront。Berkeley, CA。  new window
20.Mills, C. Wright(2001)。The New Men of Power。The New Men of Power。Urbana, IL。  new window
21.Lipset, Seymour Martin(1979)。The First New Nation: The United States in Historical and Comparative Perspective。The First New Nation: The United States in Historical and Comparative Perspective。New York, NY。  new window
22.Lenin, Vladimir(1960)。列寧選集，第五卷。列寧選集，第五卷。北京。  延伸查詢new window
23.邱毓斌(2003)。泛藍？泛綠？自主工會運動何時找到自己的顏色？。勞工運動與政治參與。0。  延伸查詢new window
24.翠華工會第一分會(1994)。二十四期彙編成刊。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.翠華工會第一分會(1996)。四週年彙編成刊，沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
2.翠華工會第一分會(1995)。批翠華組織改進及民營化宣導手冊，0。  延伸查詢new window
3.翠華公司(1993)。高雄煉油總廠廠史集第二集，0。  延伸查詢new window
4.監察院財政及經濟委員會(2003)。翠華股份有限公司經營管理績效檢討之調查報告，0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Touraine, Alain(1986)。Unionism as a Social Movement。Union in Transition: Entering the Second Century。San Francisco, CA：Institute for Contemporary Studies。  new window
2.何明修(2006)。Neo-centrist Labour Policy in Practice: The DPP and Taiwanese Working Class。What Has Changed? Taiwan before and after the Change in Ruling Party。Harrassowitz。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：703（臺灣：694，外國：9） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1541412 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67348628
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上