:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:SEM適配度指標的潛藏問題:最佳模式難求
書刊名:測驗統計年刊
作者:李茂能 引用關係
作者(外文):Li, Mao-neng
出版日期:2008
卷期:16(下)
頁次:頁17-29
主題關鍵詞:模式適配度對等模式原因指標效果指標SEMPLSModel fitEquivalent modelsCausal indicatorsEffect indicators
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(16) 博士論文(12) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:16
  • 共同引用共同引用:7
  • 點閱點閱:70
摘要 本文旨在利用模擬實徵資料闡釋SEM適配度指標的潛藏迷思,文中透過幾個 理論模式,具體說明「A good fit ≠ A good model」及「A good fit ≠ A causal link」, 以呼籲研究者切勿過份依賴適配度指標去判定測量或結構模式之優劣及因果關 係;文末並說明為何不佳之測量指標會扭曲結構參數之估計,因而測量模式的評 鑑應先於結構模式。
Abstract Several misconceptions or problems concerning the assessment of model fit in SEM are exemplified using simulated data and models. The author strongly argues that “A good fit ≠ A good model or a good fit ≠ A causal link” and the assessment of measurement models should precede the assessment of structural models to avoid inflated structural parameter estimates.
期刊論文
1.MacCallum, R. C.、Browne, M. W.(1993)。The Use of Causal Indicators in Covariance Structure Models: Some Practical Issues。Psychological Bulletin,114(3),533-541。  new window
2.Stelzl, I.(1986)。Changing a causal hypothesis without changing the fit: Some rules for generating equivalent path models。Multivariate Behavioral Research,21,309-331。  new window
3.Tomarken, A. J.、Waller, N. G.(2003)。Potential Problems with "Well Fitting" Models。Journal of Abnormal Psychology,112(4),578-598。  new window
4.MacCallum, R. C.、Wegener, D. T.、Uchino, B. N.、Fabrigar, L. R.(1993)。The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis。Psychological Bulletin,114,185-199。  new window
5.Tomarken, A. J.、Waller, N. G.(2005)。Structural equation modeling: Strengths, Limitations, and Misconceptions。Annual Review of Clinical Psychology,1,31-65。  new window
6.Cliff, N.(1983)。Some cautions concerning the application of causal modeling methods。Multivariate Behavioral Research,18,115-126。  new window
7.江哲光、侯傑泰(19970600)。應用結構方程模式之問題和謬誤。Education Journal,25(1),45-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Haenlein, M.、Kaplan, A. M.(2004)。A beginner's guide to partial least squares analysis。Understanding Statistics,3(4),283-297。  new window
9.Anderson, James C.、Gerbing, David W.(1988)。Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach。Psychological Bulletin,103(3),411-423。  new window
10.Jarvis, Cheryi B.、Mackenzie, Scott B.、Podsakoff, Philip M.(2003)。A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research。Journal of Consumer Research,30(2),199-218。  new window
11.Bollen, Kenneth、Lennox, Richard(1991)。Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective。Psychological Bulletin,110(2),305-314。  new window
12.Chin, Wynne W.(1998)。Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling。Management Information Systems Quarterly,22(1),vii-xvi。  new window
13.Hu, Li-tze、Bentler, Peter M.(1999)。Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives。Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,6(1),1-55。  new window
圖書
1.Bollen, K. A.(1989)。Structural Equations with Latent Variables。New York:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
圖書論文
1.Chin, W. W.、Newsted, P. R.(1999)。Structural equation modelling analysis with small samples using partial least squares。Statistical strategies for small sample research。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
2.Hu, L. T.、Bentler, P. M.(1995)。Evaluating model fit。Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications。Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE