臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：全觀型治理之研究
書刊名：公共行政學報
作者：韓保中 引用關係
作者(外文)：Han, Bao-chung
出版日期：2009
卷期：31
頁次：頁1-48
主題關鍵詞：碎裂化；棘手問題；協調；組織社會學；新涂爾幹理論；Fragmentation；Wicked problems；Coordination；Sociology of organizations；Neo-Durkheimian theory
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:189
  • 點閱點閱:95
全觀型治理是新一波的行政學說，該理論強調政府組織的整合關係，與電子化政府及主動型文官學說相結合下，成為具回應性與解決人民需求的治理學說。全觀型治理的奠基者－席克斯，在二○○○年後的相關著作中，屢屢提及新涂爾幹理論，著墨與闡釋組織多樣性問題，以及全觀型治理的組織社會學基礎。在全觀型治理運行過程中，協調是整合工作的第一步，而協調是個複雜的問題，與協調相關的概念，包括碎裂化政府與棘手問題，此三概念構成組織協調論題，是認識全觀型治理的重要基礎。新涂爾幹理論闡釋了協調論題的組織社會學基礎，其主張面對多元與複雜的組織關係，依據化異與求同兩原則，有容忍性制度、分立、互賴與妥協四種基本協調之法及解決之道，這體現協調工作必須採取多樣的方式。協調之法的多樣化，實與涂爾幹所述現代社會的分工特質有關，身處全球化、後現代及風險社會的今日，社會分工與分化的強度甚於過去，我們更應重視協調的意義與方式。而全觀型治理援用新涂爾幹理論及組織社會學分析，為當代行政學與社會學對話的代表之一，讓行政發展能因應社會的變遷與需求，此一研究途徑對現今公共行政學研究來說，實有深刻的啟發意義。
Holistic governance is a new theory in contemporary public administration studies. This theory stressess the integrated governmental organizations, when conjoining with theories of e-government and active bureaucracy, holistic governance would be the theory of responding and solving citizens’ needs. Perri 6, the founder of holistic governance, in his works after 2000 A.D., often mentioned the neo-Durkheimian theory, emphasized the complexity and plurality of organizations, and the foundations of sociology of organizations. In the working process of holistic governance, coordination is the first step toward integration. Coordination is a complex problem, other concepts relating to coordination, “fragmented government” and “wicked problems”, they compose the “interorganizational coordination thesis” which is the cornerstone for understanding holistic governance. The neo-Durkheimian theory discusses the interorganizational coordination thesis of the sociology of organizations. According to the principles of reducing dissimilarity and producing internal similarity drawn from the neo-Durkheimian theory, Dr. 6 puts forward four fundamental settlements for coordination: toleration of a specific set of institution, separation, mutual dependency and compromise. This reflects coordination requires various ways. The various ways of coordination are related with the characteristic of modern society, the characteristic which Emile Durkheim called the division of labor. In the age of globalization, postmodern and risky society, the intensity of division of labor and social differentiation is higher than ever. Facing the plural organizational types and complex interorganizational relations in contemporary society, we should put more emphasis on the coordination of organizations. The neo-Durkheimian theory and sociology of organizations as the analyzing tools of holistic governance that represents the interdisciplinary work between public administration and sociology, it makes the development of public administration well responding to the social transition and needs. And the enlightenment of the research approach of holistic governance is significant to the public administration studies today.
期刊論文
1.馬財專(20070900)。結構網絡的分析及其脈絡。政治科學論叢，33，1-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Christensen, Tom、Lægreid, Per(2007)。The Whole-of-Government Approach to Public Sector Reform。Public Administration Review，67(6)，1059-1066。  new window
3.李宗勳、陳欽春、史美強、謝立功(20080700)。建構全民反貪網絡促進廉能政治之研究--社會網絡分析觀點。中央警察大學學報，45，155-194。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.李逸洋(20040400)。數位時代之公務人力資源管理新方向。研考雙月刊，28(2)=240，55-66。  延伸查詢new window
5.6, Perri(2004)。Joined-up Government in the Western World in Comparative Perspective: A Preliminary Literature Review and Exploration。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory，14(1)，103-138。  new window
6.劉坤億、范祥偉(20030800)。第二回合的文官改革趨勢：從全觀型治理觀點談起。人事月刊，37(2)=216，7-16。  延伸查詢new window
7.廖興中、史美強(20001200)。論官僚組織在後現代社會中的困境與轉型。中國行政評論，10(1)，215-249。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.李長晏(20041000)。從全局治理論區域政府的設計。全球政治評論，8，131-152。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.黃鉦堤(20060600)。盧曼的風險社會學與政策制定。政治科學論叢，28，123-162。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Lawrence, Paul R.、Lorsch, Jay W.(1967)。Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations。Administrative Science Quarterly，12(1)，1-47。  new window
11.Wilson, Woodrow(1887)。The Study of Administration。Political Science Quarterly，2(2)，197-222。  new window
12.王中天(20030900)。社會資本（Social Capital）：概念、源起、及現況。問題與研究，42(5)，139-163。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.彭文賢(1999)。邁向後現代的組織理論。中國行政評論，8（4），63-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Jones, Bryan D.(1998)。Turf wars: How congressional committees claim jurisdiction。The American Political Science Review，92(2)，465-466。  new window
15.Patel, T.(2007)。The role of dynamic cultural theories in explaining the viability of international strategic alliances: A focus on indo-French alliances。Management Decision，45(10)，1532-1559。  new window
16.Simmons, Annette(2002)。Turf wars at work。Strategic Finance，84(2)，51-55。  new window
17.6 Perri(2002)。What is there to feel? A neo-Durkheimian theory of the emotions。The European Journal of Psychotherapy, Counselling & Health，5(3)，263-290。  new window
18.6, Perri(2003)。Institutional viability: A neo-Deukheimian theory。Innovation: the European Journal of Social Science Research，16(4)，395-415。  new window
19.6 Perri,、E. Peck(2004)。New labour’s modernisation in the public sector: A neo-Durkheimian approach and the case of mental health services。Public Administration，82(1)，83-108。  new window
會議論文
1.彭錦鵬(2003)。全觀型治理--理論與制度化策略。民主治理與台灣行政改革學術研討會，政治大學 1-32。  延伸查詢new window
2.Rhodes, R. A. W.(2001)。The diffenentiated polity: The case of the civil services of the UK。  new window
學位論文
1.高毓喬(2007)。從全觀型治理論政府組織再造策略—以經濟部工業局工業區服務中心為例(碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Sullivan, Helen、Skelcher, Chris(2002)。Working Across Boundaries。Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
2.Fowler, H. W.,、F. G. Fowler(1990)。The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English。Oxford：Clarendon Press。  new window
3.Fox, Charles J.、Miller, Hugh T.(1995)。Postmodern Public Administration: Toward Discourse。Sage Publication。  new window
4.吳庚(19930000)。韋伯的政治理論及其哲學基礎。臺北：聯經出版事業公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Durkheim, Émile、Simpson, George(1933)。The Division of Labor in Society。Free Press。  new window
6.Weber, Max、Henderson, A. M.、Parsons, Talcott(1947)。Max Weber: the theory of social and economic organization。Oxford University Press。  new window
7.Osborne, David、Gaebler, Ted(1992)。Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector。Addison-Wesley Publishing Company。  new window
8.Giddens, Anthony(1971)。Capitalism and Modern Social Theory: An Analysis of the Writings of Marx, Durkheim and Max Weber。Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Perri 6、Leat, D.、Seltzer, K.、Stoker, G.(1999)。Governing in the Round: Strategies for Holistic Government。London：Demos Publishing。  new window
10.Pierre, Jon、Peters, B. Guy(2000)。Governance, Politics and the State。London：New York：Hampshire：Macmillan Press：St. Martin's Press：Houndmills。  new window
11.周雪光(2003)。組織社會學十講。北京：社會科學文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.Leat, Diana、Seltzer, Kimberly、Stoker, Gerry(2002)。Towards Holistic Governance: The New Reform Agenda。Palgrave。  new window
13.Leach, Robert、Percy-Smith, Janie(2001)。Local Governance In Britain。Palgrave。  new window
14.Keohane, Robert O.(1984)。After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy。Princeton University Press。  new window
15.Beck, Ulrich、Giddens, Anthony、Lash, Scott(1994)。Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order。Stanford University Press。  new window
16.Habermas, Jürgen(1975)。Legitimation Crisis。Boston, MA：Beacon Press。  new window
17.Barnhart, C.,、R. K. Barnhart(1984)。The world book dictionary。Chicago。  new window
18.Burns, T.,、G. M. Stalker(1979)。The management of innovation。London。  new window
19.Eldridge, J. E. T.,、A. D. Crombie(1974)。A sociology of organizations。London：Allen and Unwin。  new window
20.Funk, I. K.(1953)。New standard dictionary of the English langauge。N.Y.。  new window
21.Hanks, P.(1979)。Collins dictionary of the English language。London。  new window
22.Harte, V.(2002)。Plato on Parts and Wholes: The Metaphysics of Structure。Oxford。  new window
23.Kerstholt, F.(1989)。Between rational choice and Durkheimian solidarity。Organization theory and class analysis: New approaches and new issues。New York。  new window
24.Mulgan, G.,、Perri 6(1996)。The new enterprise culture。New enterprise culture。London。  new window
25.Parsons, T.(1964)。Durkheim’s contribution to the theory of integration of social systems。Essays on Sociology and Philosophy。N.Y.。  new window
26.Peters, T. J.(1987)。Thriving on chaos: Handbook for a management revolution。New York。  new window
27.Peck, E.,、Perri 6(2006)。Beyond delivery: Policy implementation as sense-making and settlement。New York。  new window
28.Scott, W. R.(1994)。Organizational sociology。Vt.。  new window
29.6 Perri(1995)。Governing by cultures。Missionary government。London。  new window
30.6 Perri(2004)。Viable institutions and scope for incoherence。The Value of Inconsistency。Villa Margherita, nr Venice, Italy。  new window
31.6 Perri, S. Radstone, C. Squire,、A. Treacher(2007)。Public emotions。New York。  new window
32.6 Perri, N. Goodwin, E. Peck,、T. Freeman(2006)。Managing networks of twenty-first century organisations。New York。  new window
33.6 Perri,、G. Mars(2008)。The institutional dynamics of culture: The new durkheimians。VT.。  new window
圖書論文
1.顧忠華(200712)。風險、社會與倫理。第二現代--風險社會的出路？。台北：巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Gulick, Lather、Urwick, Lyndal(1937)。Notes on the Theory of Organization。Classics of Organization Theory。Institute of Public Administration of Columbia University。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1217（臺灣：1200，外國：17） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1563831 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67357131
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上