:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國精密器械製造業國際競爭力分析
書刊名:多國籍企業管理評論
作者:林彩梅呂煒琳
作者(外文):Lin,Tsai-meiLu, Wei-lin
出版日期:2009
卷期:3:2
頁次:頁17-43
主題關鍵詞:精密機械產業國際競爭力Precision instrumentsThe international competitiveness of industry
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:34
  • 點閱點閱:90
隨著國內高科技產業的發展,產品的精密度需求日益增加,精密器械遂成為重要的基礎產業,而精密儀器之需求與國家之工業發展關係密切;因此,藉由進一步了解產業之競爭力態勢後,方可針對產業之未來發展進行正確之投資方向設定及策略調整之產業現況◦ 本研究依據TSC分析我國精密器械之國際競爭力。2007年我國精密器械製造業進口額3,229億元,出口額844.8億元的整體而言國際競爭力亦是呈輸入特化,且為不具競爭力之垂直分工狀態。以2007年為基準,主要以「供計量或檢查半導體晶圓或裝置之儀器及器具」為第一大進口品,為提升未來我國半導體之國際競爭力之重要基礎。其次為「生產半導體晶圓用之掃描對準機」,兩者都高度依賴入,依據雙手併用功能理論(林彩梅,2006)應自日本、美國及德國積極引進其先進技術,以提升本國之技術水準以及產業競爭力。主要出口國以美國、中國大陸和香港為主要三大出口國。對於香港呈現相對較強的輸出特化之垂直分工的競爭力態勢,但逐年下降;中國大陸雖呈現競爭力逐漸提昇之態勢,但仍處於0.3以下水平分工之狀態。故依據雙手併用功能理論應對中國、香港等地積極進行技術移轉並增加投資以確保擴大國際市場。
The demand for precision instruments has closer relationship with national industrial development and national income. With the domestic high-tech industry development and increasing precision of product demand, precision instruments have become important basic industries. Therefore, through a better understanding of the competitiveness and advantages and disadvantages of this industry, we can get the future development direction of the correct settings, and the investment strategy of the industry to adjust the status of。 In this study, based on SWOT analysis, and further to diamond model theory proposed by scholars Porter,we analyze the current precision equipment manufacturing in the overall market in which the various relative environmental conditions and competition analysis by Trade Specialization Coefficient. In 2007, the import volume manufacturing of precision instruments of Taiwan is 322.9 billion Yuan, 84.48 billion yuan of total exports; in terms of international competitiveness is also a input specialization, and for non-competitive state of the vertical division of labor. According to "the functional hands theory" (Tsai-Mei Lin, 2006), to enhance their technical standards and industrial competitiveness we should introduce its advanced technology from Japan, the United States and Germany actively. On the other hand, the main three exporting countries is the United States, mainland China and Hong Kong as. Our country showed the relative strength to Hong Kong of the output of a vertical division of labor specialization competitive posture, but decreased year after year; although mainland China has gradually enhanced the competitiveness of the situation, it is still below the level of 0.3 division of the state. Therefore, based on "the functional hands theory" to deal with China, Hong Kong and other places actively carry out technology transfer and to increase investment in order to ensure that the expansion of the international market.
期刊論文
1.陳坤成、袁建中(20080900)。產業群聚與企業經營模式關聯性之探討--以臺灣精密機械產業為例。科技管理學刊,13(3),87-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Lee, J.(1995)。Comparative Advantage in Manufacturing as a Determinant of Idustrialization: The Korean case。World Development,23(7),1195-1214。  new window
3.Rodas-Martini, P.(1998)。Intra-Industry Trade and Revealed Comparative Advantage in the Central American Common Market。World Development,26(2),337-344。  new window
4.Yeats, Alexander J.(1985)。On the App. ropriate Interpretation of the Revealed Comparative Advantage Index: Implications of a Methodology Based on Industry SectorAnalysis。Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv,121(1),61-73。  new window
5.Bowen, H. P.(1983)。On the Theoretical Interpretation of Indices of Trade Intensity and Revealed Comparative Advantage。Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv,119,464-472。  new window
6.Nelson, R.(1992)。Recent Writings on Competitiveness: Boxing the Compass。California Management Review,34(2),127-137。  new window
7.Balassa, B.(1965)。Trade Liberalization and Revealed Comparative Advantage。Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies,33,99-117。  new window
8.尤敏君(19970400)。出口競爭力指標之研究--兼論我國出口產業競爭力。臺灣經濟研究月刊,20(4)=232,35-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Balassa, B.(1966)。Tariff Reductions and Trade in Manufactures among Industrial Countries。American Economics Review,56(3),466-473。  new window
10.袁建中、陳坤成、虞孝成、王明妤(20051200)。產業群聚對企業經營影響之因果檢定:以臺灣精密機械業為例。科技管理學刊,10(4),43-45+47-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳菁雯(2004)。產業環境對手機零組件廠商市場與產品策略之影響----個案研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.許書銘(2000)。產業國際競爭力之發展及其影響因素分析(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學,台北市。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.邱呈芳(20071100)。精密器械業景氣趨勢調查報告。台北:台灣經濟研究院。  延伸查詢new window
2.MIRL(1998)。Taiwan Yearbook of Machine Tools Research Report。Industrial Technology Research Institute。  new window
3.Francis, A.、Tharakan, P. K. M.(1989)。The Competitiveness of European Industry。Routledge。  new window
4.Hill, C. W. L.、Jones, G. R.(1998)。Strategic Management-An Integrated Approach。Houghton Mifflin Company。  new window
5.Porter, M. E.(1990)。The competitive advantage of nation。New York:London:Basingstoke:The Free Press:Macmillan。  new window
6.Porter, Michael E.(1990)。The Competitive Advantage of Nations。New York:Free Press。  new window
7.林彩梅(2006)。多國籍企業論。台北:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.Porter, Michael E.(1980)。Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors。Free Press。  new window
其他
1.產業界說(2006)。行政院主計處中華民國行業標準分類中華民國行業標準分類經濟部工業產品分類。  延伸查詢new window
2.邱桂霖(2004)。臺灣工具機產值2003年佔全球產值第六位。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE