本文主要在回應楊芳枝教授探討台灣傳播與性別研究成果的論文，本文認為楊教授的論文雖然提供了對於性別研究在傳播與文化研究學門中居於少數弱勢地位態勢的基本描繪，但卻缺乏與台灣過去相關研究文獻的對話和比較。本文因此選擇四篇從1990年代至今最為有關的文獻内容，就其研究方法、結果與建議加以說明，進而共同比較楊教授的論文和過去四篇論文的主要發現，並討論其中所具有的意涵。

This article is a response to professor Fang-chi Yang's paper which explores the development of media and gender studies in Taiwan. Although Yang's paper presents the picture of the underdevelopment of media and gender studies, it lacks the comparison and dialogue with other relevant local studies. Therefore, this article selects four most relevant local papers since 1990s, makes comparisons among them and Yang's study, and discusses the significant implications.