:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:為什麼行動?解決什麼問題?--以行動與問題為導向的通識課程理念與實踐
書刊名:通識教育學刊
作者:黃俊儒
作者(外文):Huang, Chun-ju
出版日期:2010
卷期:6
頁次:頁9-27
主題關鍵詞:行動學習問題導向學習通識教育科際整合Action learningProblem-based learningGeneral educationInterdisciplinary features
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(13) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:11
  • 共同引用共同引用:31
  • 點閱點閱:47
期刊論文
1.Sadler, T. D.、Chambers, F. W.、Zeidler, D. L.(2004)。Student Conceptualizations of the Nature of Science in Response to a Socioscientific Issue。International Journal of Science Education,26(4),387-409。  new window
2.李雪莉(2005)。學術壓榨--兩萬名教授長工的故事。天下雜誌,318,15-23。  延伸查詢new window
3.沈宗瑞(20070100)。通識教育的結構性課題--下一波的通識教育改革重點。通識在線,8,38-39。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃俊儒、簡妙如(20080800)。「科學家發明了什麼?!」--解析學生對於科學新聞中的科技產物意象。科學教育學刊,16(4),415-438。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Damon, W.、Phelps, E.(1989)。Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer interaction。International Journal of Educational Research,13,9-19。  new window
6.Hodson, D.(2003)。Time for action: science education for an alternative future。International Journal of Science Education,25(6),645-670。  new window
7.Albanese, M. A.、Mitchell, S.(1993)。Problem-based learning: A review of literature on its outcome and implementation issues。Academic Medicine,68(1),52-81。  new window
8.何寄澎(19940900)。從儒家教育的「博」與「約」論今日大學通識教育之方向。通識教育,1(3),1-10。  延伸查詢new window
9.Dillon, J. T.(1982)。Problem finding and solving。Journal of Creative Behavior,16(2),97-111。  new window
10.黃俊儒、簡妙如(20060100)。科學新聞文本的論述層次及結構分佈:構思另個科學傳播的起點。新聞學研究,86,135-170。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.楊坤原、張賴妙理(20050600)。問題本位學習的理論基礎與教學歷程。中原學報,33(2),215-235。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.朱敬一(2008)。「未來高等教育發展中,通識教育應有之定位」專題演講稿。第二屆全國通識教育發展會議。台中:東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Huang, C. -J.、Jian, M. -J.(20090903)。Can we learn science just like a science journalist can?-the construction of the theoretical background of socio-scientific issues teaching in Taiwan。The Conference of the ESERA。Istanbul。  new window
圖書
1.Marquardt, M. J.(1999)。Action learning in action- transforming problems and people for world class organizational learning。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
2.McGill, I.、Beaty, L.(1992)。Action learning - a practitioner’s guide。London:Kogan Page。  new window
3.Revans, R.(1982)。The Origins and Growth of Action Learning. Bratt Institute Fur Neues Lernen:。Chartwell-Bratt Ltd。  new window
4.Campbell, D. M.、Harris, L. S.(2001)。Collaborative theme building: How teachers write integrated curriculum。Allyn & Bacon。  new window
5.Lanson, J.、Fought, B. C.(1999)。News In a Century-Reporting in an age of converging media。CA:Pine Forge Press。  new window
6.Bridges, E. M.、Hallinger, P.(1992)。Problem-based learning for administrators。Eugene:ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management, University of Oregon。  new window
7.金耀基(2003)。大學之理念。臺北:時報文化出版企業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.Sternberg, Robert J.、Sternberg, Karin(1999)。Cognitive psychology。Harcourt Brace & Company。  new window
9.Bereiter, C.、Scardamalia, M.(1993)。Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implication of expertise。Open Court。  new window
10.McGill, I.、Brockbank, A.(2004)。The action learning handbook: powerful techniques for education, professional development and training。Routledge Falmer。  new window
11.Jones, B. F.、Rasmussen, C. M.、Moffitt, M. C.(1997)。Real-life problem solving: A Collaborative approach to interdisciplinary learning。American Psychological Association。  new window
12.Kuhn, Thomas Samuel(1970)。The Structure of Scientific Revolutions。University of Chicago Press。  new window
其他
1.呂立翔(2006)。如何與助教共同經營一門課--以「科學、新聞與生活」課程爲例,桃園:長庚技術學院教學助理工作坊。  延伸查詢new window
2.美聯社(20030816)。美加大停電五千萬人受影響。  延伸查詢new window
3.張錦弘,李名揚,林怡婷(20050824)。「學術長工」超時私校更嚴重。  延伸查詢new window
4.聯合晚報社論(20040927)。教授不須都是「埃及人」。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.鄒川雄(2006)。當前通識教育理論之反省與批判--從現代性的反身性觀點出發。通識教育與經典詮釋--一個教育社會學的反省。嘉義:南華大學教育社會學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.Millar, R.(1997)。Science education for democracy: What can the school curriculum achieve?。Science today: Problem or crisis?。London:Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE