臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：「保母適任性量表」之編製
書刊名：教育與心理研究
作者：黃寶園 引用關係
作者(外文)：Huang, Bao-yuan
出版日期：2011
卷期：34:4
頁次：頁97-127
主題關鍵詞：保母；專業素養；適任性；適任特質；Child care providers；Professional literacy；Suitability；Suitable trait
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:104
  • 點閱點閱:64
本研究旨在發展保母適任性量表，以探討保母人員的適任性。研究者依據文獻分析及實務經驗，編製包含專業素養與適任特質二分量表的量表初稿，內容隨後再經四位保母人員進行內容檢核，進行試題初步的刪減與修正。量表信度與探索性因素分析的樣本來自臺灣中部四縣市402位幼保系學生、保母人員與托兒所教師；驗證性因素分析的樣本則為臺中市295位保母人員。結果顯示：量表之Cronbach's α係數介於為 .666至 .923之間，表示本量表具有頗佳的內部一致性；兩個分量表之探索性因素分析則各抽取五個及七個因素；驗證性因素分析則顯示量表的理論模式與實際資料之間是相適配的。上述結果顯示本研究所編製的保母適任性量表品質頗佳，可用以評估保母人員的適任性程度。
The purpose of the research was to develop a scale to investigate the suitability of child care providers. Using both a review of the existing literature and personal practical experience, the researcher firstly developed a draft for the scale measuring two domains: professional literacy and suitable traits. The contents were then examined by four child care providers, leading to the removal and amendment of the preliminary questions. A test of scale reliability and exploratory factor analysis came from a sample of 402 students from the Department of Early Childhood Care and Education, child care providers and nursery teachers in four counties in central Taiwan; the confirmatory factor analysis came from a sample of 295 child care providers in Taichung city. The result showed that the Cronbach's α coefficient was between .666 and .923 leading to the conclusion that the instrument had a reasonably good internal consistency. Five and seven factors were obtained from the two domains by the exploratory factor analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the theoretical model of the scale and the actual data obtained fitted well. These results revealed that the child care provider suitability scale tested in the research could be useful in evaluating the suitability of child care providers.
期刊論文
1.王靜珠(20000200)。嬰幼兒托育服務的意義與倫理。國教輔導，39(3)=335，2-4。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡延治(19980500)。保母技術士檢定簡介。就業與訓練，16(3)，21-24。  延伸查詢new window
3.Bradley, R. H.、Caldwell, B. M.、Corwyn, R. F.(2003)。The child care home inventories: Assessing the quality of family child care homes。Early Childhood Research Quarterly，18(3)，294-309。  new window
4.楊秋仁(20020600)。現代專業保母。蒙特梭利雙月刊，41，29-33。  延伸查詢new window
5.蔡嫦娟、張碧如(20030200)。家長對家庭保母之選擇及關係之建立--兼談證照與非證照保母之比較。兒童福利期刊，4，133-155。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Smith, A. P.、Endsley, R. C.(1996)。Comparison of accredited and non-accredited family child care programs on program quality, provider professionalism, and family support。Child & Youth Care Forum，25(6)，353-378。  new window
7.黃芳銘、楊金寶、許福生(20051000)。在學青少年生活痛苦指標發展之研究。師大學報．教育類，50(2)，97-119。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Bagozzi, Richard P.、Yi, Youjae(1988)。On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models。Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science，16(1)，74-94。  new window
9.蘇怡之(20000200)。保母托育服務的支持與管理--系統面的策略。福利社會，76，17-25。  延伸查詢new window
10.白秀雄、郭耀東(19880331)。鄰里服務托兒方案試辦研究報告。社區發展，41，21-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.王紹媛(2002)。一點一滴的累積--親保母不親自己挽救策略。育兒生活，159，192-195。  延伸查詢new window
12.黃婉玲(2002)。假日父母育兒祕訣--寶寶跟保母比較親。嬰兒與母親，313，168-172。  延伸查詢new window
13.Weaver, R. H.(2002)。Predictors of quality and commitment in family child care: Provider education, personal resources, and support。Early Education and Development，13(3)，265-282。  new window
14.McBride, B. A.、Schoppe, S. J.、Rant, T. R.(2002)。Child characteristics, parenting stress, and parental involvement: Fathers versus mothers。Journal of Marriage and the Family，64，998-1011。  new window
15.Owens, E.、Ring, G.(2007)。Difficult children and difficult parents: Constructions by child care providers。Journal of Family Issues，28(6)，827-850。  new window
16.Seibel, N. L.、Gillespie, L. G.、Temple, T.(2008)。The role of child care providers in child abuse prevention。Zero to Three，28(6)，33-40。  new window
17.Washburn, P. V.(1985)。The four roles of the family day care provider。Child Welfare，547-554。  new window
18.Bailey, S.、Osbome, S.(1994)。Provider perspectives on the content and delivery of training for family day care。Child & Youth Care Forum，23(5)，329-338。  new window
19.Baker-Ericzen, M. J.、Mueggenborg, M. G.、Shea, M. M.(2009)。Impact of trainings on child care providers’ attitudes and perceived competence toward inclusion: What factors arc associated with change?。Topics in Early Childhood Special Education，28(4)，196-208。  new window
20.Bromer, J.、Henly, J. R.(2009)。The work-family support roles of child care providers across settings。Early Childhood Research Quarterly，24(3)，271-288。  new window
21.Ceglowski, D.、Bacigalupa, C.(2002)。Four perspectives on child care quality。Early Childhood Education Journal，30(2)，87-92。  new window
22.Deyampert, E.、County, W.、Michigan, D.(1994)。Family day care: What keeps parents coming?。Young Children，50(6)，60-78。  new window
23.Freeman, R. G.、Vakil, S.(2007)。The pedagogical experiences and practices of family child care providers。Early Childhood Education Journal，35(3)，269-276。  new window
24.Kontos, S.、Fiene, R.(1989)。Child care quality: The role of material employment。Developmental Psychology，26，285-291。  new window
25.Nielsen, D. M.(2002)。The journey from babysitter to child care professional: Military family child care providers。Young Children，57(1)，9-14。  new window
研究報告
1.馬祖琳、楊琇媄(2003)。家庭托育專業發展需求之研究--以高雄市為例。屏東縣。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.洪敏中(2003)。台灣保母專業化之研究(碩士論文)。世新大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.薛慧平(2005)。我國保母證照制度對保母人員專業素質影響之研究(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.郭育祺(2004)。雙薪家庭幼兒母親知覺和保母的養育參與、共養育及養育品質之研究(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.張娟華(2001)。社會、文化與自我：家庭托育的個案分析(碩士論文)。南華大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳倩慧(1997)。家庭托育服務的品質：家庭保母的角色、家庭系統、及與家長互動關係之探討(碩士論文)。台灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.曾清保(2006)。在宅保母家庭托育工作經驗之探討(碩士論文)。屏東科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.李慧娟(1989)。家庭保母訓練方案之評估研究--以臺北家庭扶助中心鄰里托兒服務方案為例(碩士論文)。中國文化大學，台北。  延伸查詢new window
8.王哲源(2006)。我國推動「社區保母支持系統」對提供子女照顧影響之初探(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.武素萍(1994)。臺北市職業婦女對家庭式嬰幼兒照顧品質期望與評價之研究(碩士論文)。文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.高仁華(2006)。保母之個人特質、工作特性與保母證照制度關係之研究--9個個案之分析(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Kadushin, A.、Matin, J. A.(1998)。Child welfare services。New York：Macmillan。  new window
2.武藍蕙(2000)。職業道德。台北：啟英。  延伸查詢new window
3.Bredekamp, Sue、Copple, Carol、洪毓瑛(2000)。幼教綠皮書：符合孩子身心發展的專業幼教。和英出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Hair, J. F.、Anderson, R. E.、Tatham, R. L.、Black, W. C.(1995)。Multivariate data analysis with readings。Upper Saddler River, NJ：Prentice-Hall。  new window
5.Whitebook, M.、Sakai, L.、Kipnis, F.、Lee, Y.、Belm, D.、Almaraz, M. et al(2006)。California early care and education workforce study: Licensed child care centers。Statewide 2006。Berkeley, CA ; San Francisco, CA。  new window
其他
1.行政院主計處(2006)。婦女婚育與就業調查報告，http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/data/dgbas04/bc4/wtable4.xls， 20100801。  延伸查詢new window
2.周欣怡，翁士杰(2005)。兇殘保母滾水倒女童殺人罪羈押，http://www.tvbs.com.tw/news/news_list.asp?no=sucomedy20050809070020， 20100406。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊美紅(2006)。送回女娃屍，外祖父驚見。  延伸查詢new window
4.Joreskog, K. G.，Sorbom, I.(2001)。LISREL (Version 8.51)，Chicago, IL：Scientific Software International。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：407（臺灣：395，外國：12） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1669892 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67477840
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上