:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:漢語母語自閉障礙患童與青少年的主謂賓語句型理解與心智理論縱貫研究
書刊名:教育心理學報
作者:林慧麗 引用關係楊書沛楊欣諭李霈璿
作者(外文):Lin, Hui-liYang, Shu-peiYang, Shin-yuLi, Pei-hsuan
出版日期:2015
卷期:46:3
頁次:頁401-423
主題關鍵詞:心智理論自閉障礙兒童動詞主謂賓語句型漢語Autistic spectrum disordersChildrenChinese languageSentential complementTheory of mind
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:34
  • 點閱點閱:25
心智理論的發展異常是自閉障礙患者主要的功能缺損之一。了解語言能力在此發展歷程中所扮演的角色,具有病理與實務的雙重意義。本實驗旨在探討以漢語為母語的自閉障礙患童與青少年之主謂賓語句法發展與心智理論能力發展間的關係。追蹤42名自閉障礙患童與青少年大約一年的時間,測量其第一時間點的心智與溝通動詞主謂賓語句法理解力,以及心智理論能力作業之表現;相隔一年之後再測一次相同的兩類型作業。結果顯示,若控制生理年齡與一般語言產出能力,並控制初始的心智理論作業表現,動詞主謂賓語句法的能力可獨立預測一年後心智理論作業的表現,另一方面,第一年的心智理論表現無法預測第二年的心智理論表現。因此推論自閉障礙患童與青少年對於動詞主謂賓語句型的理解會影響其心智理論能力的發展。不過,本研究的發現在四種不同的動詞主謂賓語個別獨立預測力的結論上與過去研究並不完全一致。研究最後討論可能導致此差異的因素,並提出對於未來研究方向的建議。
Theory of mind (ToM) has been known as one of the main developmental deficits in individuals with autistic spectrum disorders (ASDs). It is therefore both theoretically and practically important to observe how the two concepts correlate with each other in individuals with ASDs. The current study aimed to longitudinally investigate this issue in Mandarin-speaking children and adolescents with ASDs. Forty-two children and adolescents were followed for about a year and tested at two time points approximately a year apart. Theory of mind scores at time 1 and time 2 were measured with both verbal and non-verbal ToM tasks. Comprehension of sentential complements (SC) was also tested at the two time points with cognition ("think") and communication ("say") verbs of both true and false complementation. Our findings show that SC at time 1 can successfully predict ToM at time 2 while controlling for chronological age, general language production abilities and ToM at time 1. However, ToM at time 1 cannot successfully predict SC at time 2 given the same controlled conditions. Thus, the results suggest that the comprehension of sentential complements should play a causal role in ToM development in Mandarin-speaking children and adolescents with ASD. However, our findings regarding how each of the fourtypes of SC independently contributes to ToM abilities a year later are not totally consistent with past research done with English-speaking participants. Some possible reasons for the differences have been discussed. Suggestions for future studies have also been proposed.
期刊論文
1.張欣戊(19980600)。騙與受騙:學前兒童的欺瞞能力。中華心理學刊,40(1),1-13。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.曹峰銘、蔡佩君、王加恩、呂信慧(20120900)。高功能自閉症學齡兒童的心智理論與口語敘說。中華心理學刊,54(3),365-383。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.簡淑真、周育如(20050600)。幼兒心智理論發展與語言發展之關係--漢語心智動詞與補語句法之檢視。教育心理學報,36(4),357-373。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Flavell, J. H.、Flavell, E. R.、Green, F. L.(1983)。Development of the appearance-reality distinction。Cognitive Psychology,15(1),95-120。  new window
5.Liu, David、Wellman, Henry M.、Tardif, Twila、Sabbagh, Mark A.(2008)。Theory of mind development in Chinese children: A meta-analysis of false-belief understanding across cultures and languages。Developmental Psychology,44(2),523-531。  new window
6.Aichhorn, M.、Perner, J.、Weiss, B.、Kronbichler, M.、Staffen, W.、Ladurner, G.(2008)。Temporo-parietal junction activity in Theory-of-Mind tasks: Falseness, beliefs, or attention。Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,21(6),1179-1192。  new window
7.Astington J. W.、Gopnik, A.(1991)。Theoretical explanations of children’s understanding of the mind。British Journal of Developmental Psychology,9,7-31。  new window
8.Call, J.、Tomasello, M.(1999)。A nonverbal false belief task: The performance of children and great apes。Child Development,70,381-395。  new window
9.Hobson, R. P.(1991)。Against the theory of "theory of mind”。British Journal of Developmental Psychology,9,33-51。  new window
10.Macintosh, K. E.、Dassanayake, C.(2004)。Annotation: The similarities and differences between autistic disorders and Asperger’s disorder: A review of the empirical evidence。Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,45,421-434。  new window
11.Perner, J.、Leekam, S.、Wimmer, H.(1987)。Three-year olds’difficulty with false belief: The case for a conceptual deficit。British Journal of Developmental Psychology,5,125-137。  new window
12.Pratt, C.、Bryant, P.(1990)。Young children understand that looking lead to knowing (as long as they are looking into a single barrel)。Child Development,61,973-982。  new window
13.Scarborough, H. S.(1990)。Index of productive syntax。Applied Psycholinguistics,11,1-22。  new window
14.Slaughter, V.、Gopnik, A.(1996)。Conceptual coherence in the child's theory of mind: Training children to understand belief。Child Development,67(6),2967-2988。  new window
15.鄒啟蓉(20050900)。學齡前幼兒「錯誤信念」發展研究。特殊教育研究學刊,29,25-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Baron-Cohen, S.(1988)。Social and pragmatic deficits in autism: Cognitive or affective?。Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,18(3),379-402。  new window
17.Lohmann, H.、Tomasello, M.(2003)。The role of language in the development of false belief understanding: A training study。Child Development,74(4),1130-1144。  new window
18.Milligan, K.、Astington, J.、Dack, L.(2007)。Language and theory of mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding。Child Development,78,622-646。  new window
19.鄒啟蓉、張顯達(20070900)。高功能自閉症兒童說故事能力與相關影響因素研究。特殊教育研究學刊,32(3),87-109。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Baron-Cohen, S.、Leslie, A. M.、Frith, U.(1985)。Does the autistic child have a "theory of mind"?。Cognition,21(1),37-46。  new window
21.Wimmer, H.、Perner, J.(1983)。Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and the containing function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception。Cognition,13(1),103-128。  new window
22.De Villiers, J. G.、Pyers, J. E.(2002)。Complements to cognition: A longitudinal study of the relationship between complex syntax and false-belief understanding。Cognition Development,17,1037-1060。  new window
23.Wellman, H. M.、Cross, D.、Watson, J.(2001)。A meta-analysis of theory of mind development: The truth about false belief。Child Development,72(3),655-684。  new window
24.Premack, D.、Woodruff, G.(1978)。Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?。Behavioral and Brain Sciences,1(4),515-526。  new window
25.Pillow, B. H.(1989)。Early understanding of perception as a source of knowledge。Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,47(1),116-129。  new window
26.Hale, C. M.、Tager-Flusberg, H.(2003)。The Influence of Language on Theory of Mind: A Training Study。Developmental Science,6,346-359。  new window
27.Munnich, E.、Landau, B.、Dosher, B. A.(2001)。Spatial Language and Spatial Representation: A Cross-linguistic Comparison。Cognition,81,171-207。  new window
會議論文
1.Chang, C. C.、Lin, H. L.(2011)。Mandarin-speaking preschoolers’ understanding of sentential complements and development of theory of mind: A training study。The biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development。Montreal, Canada。  new window
2.Chen, S.、Cheung, H.(2010)。Measuring productive syntax in Mandarin-speaking children with specific language impairment。The 13th Meeting of the International Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics Association。Oslo, Norway。  new window
3.Tsai, M. J.、Lin, H. L.(2013)。A training study on Mandarin-speaking preschoolers’ theory of mind: Does marker of communicative verb sentential complements play a role。The biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development。Seattle, WA。  new window
學位論文
1.王映淳(2008)。以動詞補語句型訓練心智理論之研究(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.保心怡(2003)。幼兒對於心智理解作業的理解情形及運用故事活動介入的效果研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Li, Charles N.、Thompson, Sandra A.、黃宣範(2008)。漢語語法。台北:文鶴書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.Doherty, M.(2009)。Theory of mind: How children understand others’ thoughts and feelings。New York, NY:Psychology Press。  new window
3.Gentner, D.、Goldin-Meadow, S.(2003)。Language in mind: Advanced in the study of language and thought。Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press。  new window
4.Karmiloff-Smith, A.(1997)。Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
5.Nelson, K.(1996)。Language in cognitive development: The emergence of the mediated mind。New York, NY:Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Saxe, R.、Baron-Cohen, S.(2007)。Theory of mind: A special issue of social neuroscience。Hove, England:Psychology Press。  new window
7.Wellman, H.(1992)。The child’s theory of mind。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
8.Carter, R.、McCarthy, M.(2006)。Cambridge grammar of English: A comprehensive guide。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Mayer, Mercer(1969)。Frog, where are you?。New York, NY:Dial Press。  new window
10.Langdon, F. J.、Lunzer, J. L.、Piaget, J.、Inhelder, B.(1956)。The Child’s Conception of Space。London, England:Routledge and Kegan Paul。  new window
11.Whorf, Benjamin Lee、Carroll, John B.(1956)。Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings。MIT Press。  new window
12.陳榮華、陳心怡、Wechsler, D.(2007)。魏氏兒童智力量表第四版(中文版)技術和解釋手冊。台北:中國行為科學社。  延伸查詢new window
13.Vygotsky, Lev S.(1962)。Thought and language。Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press。  new window
單篇論文
1.林慧麗,張秋茜,蔡孟蓉,王映淳。以SC 訓練中文母語學齡前幼兒之心智理論。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Astington, L. W.、Baird, J. A.(2005)。Introduction: Why language matters。Why language matters for theory of mind。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
2.de Villiers, J.(2000)。Language and theory of mind: What are the developmental relationships。Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience。Oxford, England:Oxford University Press。  new window
3.de Villiers, J.(2005)。Can language acquisition give children a point of view?。Why language matters for theory of mind。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
4.de Villiers, J. G.、de Villiers, P. A.(2003)。Language for thoughts: Coming to understand false beliefs。Language in mind: Advanced in the study of language and thought。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
5.de Villiers, P. A.(2005)。The role of language in Theory-of-Mind development: What deaf children tell us。Why language matters for theory of mind。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
6.Leslie, A. M.、Roth, D.(1993)。What autism teaches us about metarepresentation。Understanding other minds: Perspectives from autism。Oxford, England:Oxford University Press。  new window
7.Perner, J.、Zauner, P.、Sprung, M.(2005)。What does “that” have to do with point of view? Conflicting desires and “want” in German。Why language matters for theory of mind。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
8.Tager-Flusberg, H.、Joseph, R. M.(2005)。How Language facilitates the acquisition of false-belief understanding in children with autism。Why language matters for theory of mind。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
9.Gopnik, A.、Wellman, H. M.(1994)。The Theory Theory。Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture。New York, NY:Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press。  new window
10.Tager-Flusberg, Helen(2000)。Language and Understanding Minds: Connections in Autism。Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience。Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE