:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:電腦輔助系統對排球裁判執法判決之影響
書刊名:運動教練科學
作者:陳進發李晨鐘 引用關係林詠章鄭金昌
作者(外文):Chen, Chin-faLi, Chen-chungLin, Iuon-changChang, Cheng-chin
出版日期:2015
卷期:40
頁次:頁75-87
主題關鍵詞:比賽情境影像訓練判決知能Competition simulationVideo trainingJudgment of perceptual skill
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:40
  • 點閱點閱:97
目的:探討電腦輔助系統之評估及訓練系統對排球裁判臨場執法表現之影響。方法:使用該電腦輔助系統為工具,公開徵召國內排球裁判共62位為研究對象,分兩組分別操作評估與訓練系統,每週3次,每次30分鐘。兩組分別進行裁判執法表現前、後之測試,以成對樣本t檢定檢驗前後執法表現成績差異,二因子共變數分析檢驗組別及級別的影響。結果:本研究發現,兩組前、後測執法表現分數均達顯著差異,B級以上裁判執法表現分數顯著高於C級裁判。結論:排球裁判臨場執法判決之知覺技能,藉由操作電腦輔助評估系統,對於臨場執法之表現,可達到提升之效果。建議未來本系統可應用於運動裁判之訓練,以提升運動裁判的執法技術。
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the computer-aided system in assessment and training for volleyball referees executive judgment. Method: To recruit 62 volleyball referees used the computer-aided system. All participants were divided two groups, operating assessment and training system respectively for three times a week, every 30 minutes. Used t-test to test the intervention effect on referees judgment performance. Two factors ANCOVA was used to test the effect for groups and referee license level. Result: The study found that the result of two groups both presents the significant difference for the referees' executive judgment. The level B and above referees had a higher score on judgment performance than level C. Conclusion: The development of this system can be as an assist tool to assess and train volleyball referees' perceptual skill and judging performance. We suggest that Computer-aided system should be extended to other sports for enhancing the implementation of the various sports referee judged performance.
期刊論文
1.Adolphe, R. M.、Vickers, J. N.、Laplante, G.(1997)。The effects of training visual attention on gaze behavior and accuracy: A pilot study。International Journal of Sport Vision,4(1),28-33。  new window
2.廖妤珮、楊志鴻、黃娟娟(2010)。排球裁判專業能力與流暢經驗之研究。排球教練科學,15,50-59。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊紀瑜(20051200)。籃球裁判壓力來源之研究。國立體育學院論叢,16(3),17-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Tayler, M. A.、Davids, K.、Burwitz, L.(1994)。Coaching perceptural strategy in badminton。Journal of Sport Science,12,213。  new window
5.陳明達、陳進發、陳鵬仁、黃建松(20080600)。排球裁判執法判決電腦輔助評估系統之研發。體育學報,41(2),83-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.鍾政憲(20070500)。心理技能對籃球裁判員執法工作之探討。輔仁大學體育學刊,6,362-370。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Franks, I. M.、Hanvey, T.(1997)。Cues for goalkeepers: High-tech methods used to measure penalty shot response。Soccer Journal,1997(May/June),30-38。  new window
8.李晨鐘(20100900)。排球裁判專業素養量表之編製。大專體育學刊,12(3),44-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.張厥煒、楊清瓏(20071200)。視覺化運動資訊系統之探討。中華體育季刊,21(4)=83,75-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.陳明達、何全進、陳鵬仁、陳進發(20090900)。籃球裁判執法判決能力電腦輔助系統之開發研究。運動教練科學,15,53-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.黃晉揚(20010600)。排球資訊系統之演進與探討。中華體育季刊,15(1)=57,62-69。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.潘倩玉(19980300)。TEP電腦版本在體育教學系統觀察法上的應用。中華體育季刊,11(4)=44,44-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.黃瑞宏(2009)。我國排球裁判注意力與狀態焦慮對執法表現影響之研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE