:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:返復/反覆:魏德聖《賽德克.巴萊》的歷史與再現政治
書刊名:中外文學
作者:劉芳礽 引用關係
作者(外文):Liu, Fang-jeng
出版日期:2016
卷期:45:3=454
頁次:頁75-98
主題關鍵詞:霧社事件歷史再現文化記憶賽德克族Musha IncidentHistoryRepresentationCultural memoryThe Seediq
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:23
  • 點閱點閱:27
魏德聖以《賽德克.巴萊》引導二十一世紀的台灣觀眾重返霧社事件的現場。從原住民的敘事角度出發,影片強調事件肇始於賽德克族為捍衛部落的嘎亞文化,而奮起抵抗入侵者的行動。不過,分析影片中重複出現的特定場面與主題,可發現這些反覆的呈現,除了不免俗地呈現原始與文明的對立,即殖民者與被殖民者間的衝突,更刻意凸顯賽德克族的內部紛爭,以及他們各自對於殖民者懷有的矛盾認同。於是,不同於其他霧社事件再現中,因為國族、社群或是性別身份差異而產生的對立,《賽德克.巴萊》以反覆的場景與主題揭示了衝突以外的互惠關係。最後一幕裡,當觀眾看到彩虹橋上一群履行了嘎亞儀式的賽德克戰士正自豪地唱著賽德克歌曲,理所當然地以為從屬者終能發聲,史碧瓦克卻提示著這一切看似美好浪漫的歷史再現背後,可能持續運作的再現政治。
Wei Te-Sheng's Warriors of the Rainbow: Seediq Bale (2011) represents the Musha Incident, a violent event when the Seediq, a tribe of Taiwanese aborigines, rose in revolt against their Japanese colonizers. Reviewing the tragedy exclusively from the scope of the tribe, Wei demonstrates that the incident was not so much caused by the colonization as most historical, cultural and visual texts represent it, as it was the result of a realization of Gaya, an ancient custom that every Seediq was disciplined to follow. Battle scenes, images of cherry blossom and the use of voice-over repetitively appear in the film. The repetition not only illuminates the significance of Gaya but also indicates that conflict could lead to collaboration. An analysis of the battle scenes, for instance, shows that the conflict was not always between the colonizers and the colonized but sometimes among the Seediq themselves. Out of self-interest, some of the Seediq choose to conspire with their invaders. Through portraying such conspiracy, Wei emphasizes the differences among the Seediq as individuals. However, perceiving the body and voice of the Seediq, we should pay attention to the intervention of the director. In the final scene, a group of Seediq warriors realize the ascent to a promised rainbow bridge. Romanticizing the Gaya practice, the director shows that these once-silenced aborigines eventually could articulate themselves in public realms. Yet, such romantic portrayal of the historical moments could incite "epistemic violence" against the aborigines, as Spivak may suggest.
期刊論文
1.Yang, Che-ming(2012)。The Postcolonial Paradox in the (Self-)Orientalization of Taiwanese History in Wei Te-sheng's Action Saga。Theory and Practice in Language Studies,2(6),1114-1119。  new window
2.Wu, Chia-rong(2014)。Re-Examining Extreme Violence: Historical Reconstruction and Ethnic Consciousness in Warriors of the Rainbow: Seediq Bale。ASIA Network Exchange,21(2),24-32。  new window
3.Lee, Tzu-yi Elaine(2016)。The Subtitling of Indigenous Values in the Film Seediq Bale。Other Modernities,15,58-67。  new window
4.史書美、楊露迻、張錦忠(20150700)。關係的比較學。中山人文學報,39,1-19。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.周婉窈(20100900)。試論戰後臺灣關於霧社事件的詮釋。臺灣風物,60(3),11-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.邱若龍(2010)。《Gaya》與《賽德克‧巴萊》:非政治角度看霧社事件的二部影片。霧社事件八十周年國際學術研討會,行政院原住民族委員會、成功大學人文社會科學中心、國立臺灣歷史博物館、暨南國際大學人類學研究所合辦 (會議日期: 2010/10/25-2010/10/26)。台南:成功大學。1-15。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.郭明正(2008)。賽德克正名運動。花蓮:國立東華大學原住民民族學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.郭明正(2011)。真相.巴萊:《賽德克.巴萊》的歷史真相與隨拍札記。台北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
3.Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty、張君玫(20060800)。後殖民理性批判--邁向消逝當下的歷史。臺北:群學。  延伸查詢new window
4.Barry, Michael(2008)。A History of Pain: Trauma in Modern Chinese Literature and Film。New York:Columbia University Press。  new window
5.Taylor, John Russell(1976)。A Dictionary of the Theatre。New York:Penguin。  new window
6.Jung, Carl Gustav、Hull, R. F. C.(1980)。The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
7.邱若龍(2011)。漫畫‧巴萊:台灣第一部霧社事件歷史漫畫。台北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
8.大貫惠美子、堯嘉寧、周俊宇(2014)。被扭曲的櫻花:美的意識與軍國主義。台北:聯經出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.郭明正(2012)。又見真相:賽德克族與霧社事件--66個問與答,面對面訪問霧社事件餘生遺族。臺北:遠流出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.荊子馨、鄭力軒(2006)。成為「日本人」:殖民地台灣與認同政治。臺北:麥田。  延伸查詢new window
11.Freud, Sigmund、Crick, Joyce(1999)。The Interpretation of Dreams。Oxford University Press。  new window
12.Lyotard, Jean-François、Bennington, Geoff、Massumi, Brian(1984)。The postmodern condition: a report on knowledge。Manchester:Manchester University Press。  new window
13.Campbell, Joseph(1968)。The Hero with a Thousand Faces。Princeton University Press。  new window
14.Brown, Melissa J.(2004)。Is Taiwan Chinese? The Impact of Culture, Power, and Migration on Changing Identities。University of California Press。  new window
其他
1.魏德聖(2008)。海角七號,臺北:果子電影有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.魏德聖(2011)。賽德克.巴萊,台北:果子電影有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Inkster, Ian(20120308)。Seediq Bale and Pride in Taiwan。  new window
4.魏德聖,馬家輝(20110820)。魏德聖導演《賽德克‧巴萊》文化講座@香港Part 1 2015/06/12。  延伸查詢new window
5.荊暘睿(20120507)。公義未要回,抗爭不停歇:回顧2011年阿美族的土地爭議與行動 2015/07/10。  延伸查詢new window
6.家明,楊泳森(20110925)。魏德聖訪問:帶根帶土的藝文故事 2015/05/25。  延伸查詢new window
7.林泰瑋(20110910)。《賽德克‧巴萊》郭明正:試試看,和長輩用他們的語言聊他們的生活,http://okapi.books.com.tw/article/804, 2016/07/31。  延伸查詢new window
8.邱若龍(2011)。Gaya--1930年的霧社事件與賽德克族,新北市:昇龍數位科技。  延伸查詢new window
9.王嬿妮(2011)。『賽德克‧巴萊』:未盡之路,台北:果子電影。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Spivak, Chakravorty Gayatri(1999)。History。A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present。Cambridge, MA:Harvard UP。  new window
2.Doane, Mary Ann(1986)。The Voice in the Cinema: The Articulation of Body and Space。Narrative, Apparatus, Ideology: A Film Theory Reader。New York:Columbia UP。  new window
3.Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty(1994)。Can the Subaltern Speak?。Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory: A Reader。New York:Columbia University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE