:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:最不喜歡工作伙伴量表的因素結構及其與刻板印象、自我概念之關係
書刊名:中華心理學刊
作者:林邦傑
作者(外文):Lin, Pang-chieh
出版日期:1978
卷期:20:2
頁次:頁41-52
主題關鍵詞:領導方式領導效率最不喜歡工作伙伴量表因素結構刻板印象自我概念關係LPC量表His least prefered coworkerLPC
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(12) 博士論文(0) 專書(2) 專書論文(3)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:11
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:162
     Fiedler的領導方式和領導情境交互影響的理論是目前心理學上最重要的領導理論之一,而最不喜歡工作伙伴(LPC)量表則是 Fiedler賴以衡量一個領導者之領導方式最重要的工具。本研究的目的係以499名我國現職教育行政人員及教師為對象,探討LPC量表的幾個特徵。研究結果發現:(1)LPC量表是由三個因素所組成的,而非如Fiedler所隱示的是由一個單一因素所組成,(2)我國受試者每四個人就有一個他所評定的LPC,不是真實人物而是刻板印象,(3)刻板印象者不但使受試者各種 LPC分數過分偏低,而且容易使LPC分數與其他各變項之相關,產生偏差。(4)刻板印象出現之比率女多於男;無行政職務者多於有行政職務者;年輕的多於年長的。這些比率的差異主要可能歸因於領導經驗的多寡,(5)非刻板印象者自我概念愈佳,其對LPC的能力和信心的評價愈低。 針對上述現象,本研究提出了幾個改進LPC量表的辦法,藉以解決 Fiedler領導效率理論在目前所遭遇的困難。
     Fiedler's contingency model is one of the most important theories of leadership effectiveness in modern psychology. According to this model, the leader's contribution to group effectiveness is dependent upon both the leadersip style and the situation. The leadership style is measured by the Least Preferred Coworker (LPC) Scale. The present study was to investigate several characteristics of the LPC scale. A total of 499 Chinese school administrators and school teachers served as subjects. The major findings are as flollows: (1) There are three dimensions in the LPC scale instead of one. (2) About 1"> of the sample had not rated a real person on the LPC scale, but had, instead, rated a stereotyped object. (3) The percentage of the stereotypers varies with the kind of groups. The female was higher than the male; the school teacher was higher than the school administrator; and the younger was higher than the older. The differences between these percentages may be due to leadership experiences. (4) The stereotyper obtained lower LPC scores than then on stereotyper. There were differential effects of sex, age, possession of administration position upon the LPC scores for these two groups. (5) For the nonstereotyper, the better the self concept,the lower his rating about his LPC's abilities and self-confidence.
期刊論文
1.Fiedler, F. E.(1971)。Validation and extension of the contingency model of leadership effectiveness: A review of empirical findings。Psychological Bulletin,76,128-148。  new window
2.Kaiser, H. F.(1958)。The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis。Psychometrika,23(3),187-200。  new window
3.Ashour, A. S.(1973)。Further Discussion of Fiedler's Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness。Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,9,369-376。  new window
4.Larson, L. L.、Rowland, K. M.(1973)。Leadership style, Stress and Behavior in Task Performance。Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,9,407-420。  new window
5.Chemers, M. M.、Skrzypek, G. J.(1972)。An experimental test of the contingency model of leadership effectiveness。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,24,172-177。  new window
6.Vecchio, R. P.(1977)。An empirical examination of the validity of Fiedler's model of leadership effectiveness。Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,19,180-206。  new window
7.林邦傑(1978)。田納西自我概念量表的內容及其在輔導應用時應注意事項。測驗與輔導,6(6),406-407。  延伸查詢new window
8.Graen, G. B.、Orris, J. B.、Alvares, K. M.(1971)。Contingency model of leadership effectiveness: Some experimental results。Journal of Applied Psychology,55(3),197-201。  new window
9.Hendrickson, A. E.、White, P. O.(1964)。Promax: A quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure。British Journal of Statistical Psychology,17,65-70。  new window
10.Bolton, B.(1976)。Factorial validity of the Tennessee Self-concept Scale。Psychological Reports,39(3),947-954。  new window
11.Fiedler, F. E.(1965)。Engineer the job to fit the manager。Harvard Business Review,1965(Sep.),115-122。  new window
12.Fiedler, F. E.(1972)。The effects of leadership training and experience: A contingency model interpretation。Administrative Science Quarterly,17(4),453-470。  new window
13.Yukl, G.(1970)。Leader LPC scores: Attitude dimensions and behavioral correlates。The Journal of social psychology,80(2),207-212。  new window
14.Shima, H.(1968)。The relationship between the leader's modes of interpersonal cognition and the performance of the group。Japanese Psychological Research,10(1),13-30。  new window
15.Shiflett, S. C.(1974)。Stereotyping and esteem for one's least preferred co-worker。The Journal of Social Psychology,93(1),55-65。  new window
16.Mitchell, T. R.(1970)。Leader complexity and leadership style。Journal of personality and social psychology,16(1),166-174。  new window
17.Michaelsen, L. K.(1973)。Leader orientation, leader behavior, group effectiveness and situational favorability: An empirical extension of the contingency model。Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,9(2),226-245。  new window
18.Gruenfeld, L. W.、Rance, D. E.、Weissenberg, P.(1969)。The behavior of task-oriented (low LPC) and socially oriented (high LPC) leaders under several conditions of social support。The Journal of social psychology,79(1),99-107。  new window
19.Green, S. G.、Nebeker, D. M.、Boni, M. A.(1976)。Personality and situational effects on leader behavior。Academy of management journal,19(2),184-194。  new window
20.Green, S. G.、Nebeker, D. M.(1977)。The effects of situational factors and leadership style on leader behavior。Organizational behavior and human performance,19(2),368-377。  new window
研究報告
1.Bass, A. R.、Fiedler, F. E.、Krueger, S.(1964)。Personality correlates of assumed similarity and related scores。Urbana:Group Effectiveness Research Laboratory, University of Illinois。  new window
2.Fishbein, M.、Landy, E.、Hatch, G.(1965)。Some determinants of an individual's esteem for his least preferred co-worker: An attitudinal analysis。Urbana:Group Effectiveness Research Laboratory, University of Illinois。  new window
3.Posthuma, A. B.(1970)。Normative data on the least preferred co-worker (LPC) and the Group Atmosphere (GA)。Seattle:University of Washington, Advanced Research Projects Agency。  new window
圖書
1.Rummel, R. J.(1970)。Applied Factor Analysis。Evanston, Illinois:Northwestern University Press。  new window
2.Kerlinger, F. N.(1973)。Foundations of Behavioral Research。New York:Holt, Rinehart & Winston Company。  new window
3.Fitts, W. H.(1965)。Manual for the Tennessee self concept scale。Nashville, TN:Counselor Recordings and Tests。  new window
4.Buros, O. K.(1975)。Personality Tests and Reviews。Highland Park, New Jersey:Gryphon Press。  new window
5.Draper, N. R.、Smith, H.(1966)。Applied regression analysis。New York:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
6.Wrightsman, L. S.(1972)。Social Psychology in the Seventies。Brooks/Cole Publishing Company。  new window
7.Fiedler, Fred E.(1967)。A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
單篇論文
1.林邦傑。因素分析。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE