參考文獻
一、中文部份
Borich, G. D.（2007）。有效教學法（郝永崴等譯）。臺北市：五南。
Freire, P.（2003）。受壓迫者教育學。臺北市：巨流。
Gagne', R. M.（1997）。學習與教學（趙居蓮譯）。臺北市：心理。
Heinich, R., Molenda, M., & Russell, J. D.（2002）。教學媒體與學習科技（李文瑞等譯）。 臺北市：雙葉書廊。
Severin, W. J., & James W. Tankard, J.（2010）。傳播理論：起源、方法與應用（羅世宏譯）. 臺北市：五南。
方吉正（2003）。訊息處理理論與教學應用。在張新仁編著，學習與教學新趨勢。臺北市：心理。
方裕民（2003）。人與物的對話 : 互動介面設計理論與實務。臺北市：田園城市文化事業有限公司。
王文科（2007）。課程與教學理論。台北市：五南。
王曉璿（1999）。資訊科技融入各科教學探究。菁莪季刊，10（4），7-24。
朱敬先（1993）。教學心理學。臺北市：五南。
余民寧（2006）。潛在變項模式 simplis的應用。臺北市：高等教育。
吳明隆（2003）。班級經營與教學新趨勢。臺北市：五南。
吳明隆、張毓仁（2010）。結構方程模式實務應用秘笈。臺北市：五南。
周成虎、黃俊榮、許瑞益（2003）。數位多媒體概論。台北市：正中書局。
林進材（2000）。教學理論與方法。臺北市：五南。
林進材（2004）。教學原理。臺北市：五南。
高博銓（2007）。教學論: 理念與實施。臺北市：五南。
張世忠（2000）。教學原理—統整與應用。臺北市：五南。
張春興（1997）。教育心理學。臺北市：東華書局。
張宵亭、朱則剛（1998）。教學媒體。臺北：五南。
陳奎憙、王淑俐、單文經、黃德祥（1996）。師生關係與班級經營。台北市：三民。
陳烜之（2007）。認知心理學。臺北市：五南。
陳慧娟（1998，）。情境學習理論的理想與現實。教育資料與研究，25，47-55。
黃芳銘（2004）。社會科學統計方法學：結構方程模式。臺北市：五南。
黃芳銘（2007）。結構方程模式：理論與應用。臺北市：五南。
黃政傑（1977）。團體歷程理論及其在教學上的應用。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所集刊，20，563-567。
詹仕鑫、郭重吉（1990）。我國國民中學科學教師教學風格之研究。科學教育，1，77-94。
詹棟樑（2003）。教育社會學。臺北市：五南。
歐用生（2004）。課程領導：議題與展望。臺北市：高等教育。
蕭文龍（2007）。多變量分析最佳入門實用書 spss+lisrel（sem）。臺北市：碁峰資訊。
顏榮泉（1996）。全球資訊網在教學與學習上之應用探討。教學科技與媒體，25，33-41。魏明通（1997）。科學教育。臺北市：五南。
鐘樹椽（1993）。互動性在電腦輔助教學設計上之必要性。教學科技與媒體，12，15-20。二、英文部份
Alessi, S. M., & Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning:Methods and Development. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Armstrong, V., Barnes, S., Sutherland, R., Curran, S., Mills, S., & Thompson, I. (2005). Collaborative research methodology for investigating teaching and learning: the use of interactive whiteboard technology. Educational Review, 57(4), 457.
Atkinson, R., & Shiffrin, R. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.
Azevedo, R., & Jacobson, M. J. (2008). Advances in scaffolding learning with hypertext and hypermedia: a summary and critical analysis. Education Tech Research Dev, 56, 93-100.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structure equations models. Academic of Marketing Science, 16(1), 76-94.
Barnard, C. I. (1968). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Univ. Press.
Baudrillard, J. (1998). The Consumer Society: Myths and Structures (C. Turner, Trans.). London.
Beauchamp, G. (2004). Teacher Use of the Interactive Whiteboard in Primary Schools:towards an effective transition framework. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(3), 327-348.
Beauchamp, G., & Parkinson, J. (2005). Beyond the 'wow' factor: developing interactivity with the interactive whiteboard. School Science Review, 86(316), 97-103.
Beeland, W. D. (2002). Student Engagement, Visual Learning and Technology: Can Interactive Whiteboards Help? Action Research Exchange, 1(1).
Betcher, C., & Lee, M. (2009). The interactive whiteboard revolution: Teaching with IWBs. Camberwell, Vic: ACER Press.
Botturi, L., & Loh, C. S. (2008). Once Upon a Game: Rediscovering the Roots of Games in Education. In C. T. Miller (Ed.), Games: Purpose and Potential in Education. New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Brophy, J. E. (1999). Teaching. Brussels: International Academy of Education.
Brown, C. (2007). Learning Through Multimedia Construction-A Complex Strategy. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16(2), 93-124.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
Brown, L. (1961). Communicating facts and ideas in business. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall.
Brunner, & Tally. (1999). The New Media Literacy Handbook : An Educator's Guide to Bringing New Media into the Classroom. N.Y.: Anchor.
Buehl, M. M., & Fives, H. (2009). Exploring Teachers' Beliefs About Teaching Knowledge: Where Does It Come From? Does It Change? The Journal of Experimental Education, 77(4), 367-407.
Burns, C., & Myhill, D. (2004). Interactive or inactive? A consideration of the nature of interaction in whole class teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education, 34(1), 35-49.
Campbell, J., Kyriakides, L., Muijs, D., & Robinson, W. (2004). Assessing teacher effectiveness : developing a differentiated model. London: Routledge Falmer.
Chambers, J. A., & Sprecher, J. W. (1980). Computer Assisted Instruction: Current Trends and Critical Issues. Communications of the ACM, 23(6), 332-342.
Clancey, W. J. (1997). Situated cognition: on human knowledge and computer representations. Cambridge, Angleterre: Cambridge University Press.
Cook, J. (2002). The role of dialogue in computer-based learning and observing learning: an evolutionary approach to theory. Retrieved April 9, 2009, from www-jime.open.ac.uk/2002/5
Cooper, T. C. (2001). Foreign Language Teaching Style and Personality. Foreign Language Annals, 34(4), 301-317.
Cox, M., Webb, M., Abbott, C., Blakeley, B., Beauchamp, T., & Rhodes, V. (2003). ICT and pedagogy : A review of the research literature. Retrieved October 11, 2008, from http://publications.becta.org.uk/download.cfm?resID=25813
Coyle, Y., Yan˜ez, L., & Verdu´, M. (2010). The impact of the interactive whiteboard on the teacher and children's language use in an ESL immersion classroom. System, 38, 614-625.
Cunningham, M., Kerr, K., McEune, R., Smith, P., & Harris, S. (2003). Laptops for Teachers: An Evaluation of the First of the Initiative. Retrieved May 25, 2009, from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20101102103654/http://publications.becta.org.uk/download.cfm?resID=25838
Dalton, S. S. (2007). Five standards for effective teaching : how to succeed with all students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1990). The systematic design of instruction. Glenview: Brown Higher Education.
Donaldson, J. A., & Knupfer, N. N. (2002). Education, Learning, and Technology. In P. L. Rogers (Ed.), Designing Instruction for Technology-enhanced Learning. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
Elston, C. (2007). Using ICT in the primary school. London: Sage.
Englert, C. S. (1983). Measuring special education teacher effectiveness. Exceptional Children, 50(3), 247-254.
Erdogan, I., & Campbell, T. (2008). Teacher Questioning and Interaction Patterns in Classrooms Facilitated with Differing Levels of Constructivist Teaching Practices. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1891-1914.
Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Teacher Technology Change: How Knowledge, Confidence, Beliefs, and Culture Intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284.
Evans, C. (2004). Exploring the relationship between cognitive style and teaching style. Educational Psychology, 24(4), 509-530.
Evans, C., Harkins, M. J., & Young, J. D. (2008). Exploring Teaching Styles and Cognitive Styles: Evidence from School Teachers in Canada. North American Journal of Psychology, 10(3), 567-582.
Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T. (1990). Cognitive psychology: A student's handbook. Hove: Erlbaum.
Firth, G., Berry, R., & Irvine, C. (2010). A reflective glossary of intensive interaction. London Jessica Kingsley.
Fosnot, C. T. (1996). Constructivism : theory, perspectives, and practice. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gadbois, S. A., & Haverstock, N. (2012). Middle Years Science Teachers Voice Their First Experiences With Interactive Whiteboard Technolog. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics & Technology Education, 12(1), 121-135.
Gadbois, S. A., & Haverstock, N. (2102). Middle Years Science Teachers Voice Their First Experiences With Interactive Whiteboard Technolog. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics & Technology Education, 12(1), 121-135.
Galton, M., Hargreaves, L., Comber, C., Wall, D., & Pell, A. (1999). Changes in patterns of teacher interaction in primary classrooms: 1976-96. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 23-37.
Garrison, D. R. (1993). A cognitive constructivist view of distance education: An analysis of teaching-learning assumptions. Distance Education, 14(2), 199-211.
Gilbert, L., & Moore, D. R. (1998). Building interactivity into web courses: tools for social and instructional interaction. Educational Technology, 38(3), 29-35.
Gillen, J., Staarman, J. K., Littleton, K., Mercer, N., & Twiner, A. (2007). A 'learning revolution'? Investigating pedagogic practice around interactive whiteboards in British primary classrooms. Learning, Media, & Technology, 32(3), 243-256.
Glatthorn, A. A. (2000). The principal as curriculum leader: shaping what is taught and tested. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
Glover, D., & Miller, D. (2001). Running with technology: the pedagogic impact of the large-scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary school. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(3), 257-277.
Goodison, T. A. (2002). Learning with ICT at primary level: pupils' perceptions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(3), 282-295.
Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 104-137.
Graham, L. (1999). The principles of interactive design. NY: Delmar.
Grossman, P. L. (1995). Teachers' knowledge. In L. W. Anderson (Ed.), International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education. Oxford: Pergamon.
Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (2007). What Is Instructional Design. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology.
Hürst, W., & Mohamed, K. A. (2007). Human Computer Interaction for Computer-Based Classroom Teaching. In E. McKay (Ed.), Enhancing learning through human computer interaction. Hershey: Idea Group Reference.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., & Babin, B. J. (2010). Multivariate data analysis : a global perspective. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Education.
Hair, J. F., Tatham, R. L., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. (1988). Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hall, I., & Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students' perceptions of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 102-117.
Handler, M. G., & Dana, A. S. (1998). Hypermedia as a student tool : a guide for teachers. Englewood, Colo: Libraries Unlimited
Hargreaves, L., Moyles, J., Merry, R., Paterson, F., Pell, A., & Esarte-Sarries, V. (2003). How do primary school teachers define and implement 'interactive teaching' in the National Literacy Strategy in England. Research Papers in Education 18(3), 217-236.
Harris, J., & Koehler, M. (2009). What Is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
Harris, S. (2002). Innovative pedagogical practices using ICT in schools in England. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(4), 449-458.
Harwood, P. G., & Asal, V. (2007). Educating the first digital generation. Westport, Conn: Praeger.
Hayes, E. (1989). Effective teaching styles. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Heidt, E. U. (1980). Differences Between Media and Differences Between Learners: Can We Relate Them? instructional Science, 9, 365-391.
Hennessy, S. (2011). The role of digital artefacts on the interactive whiteboard in supporting classroom dialogue. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(6), 463-489.
Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., & Ruthven, K. (2005). Emerging teacher strategies for mediating 'Technology-integrated Instructional Conversations' : a socio-cultural perspective. Curriculum Journal, 16(3), 265-292.
Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., & Ruthven, K. (2006). Situated Expertise in Integrating Use of Multimedia Simulation into Secondary Science Teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 28(7), 701-732.
Hennessy, S., Wishart, J., Whitelock, D., Deaney, R., Brawn, R., Velle, L. l., et al. (2007). Pedagogical approaches for technology-integrated science teaching. Computers & Education, 48(1), 137-152.
Higgins, S., Beauchamp, G., & Miller, D. (2007). Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 213-225.
Hilmes, M. (2006). The television history book. London: BFI Publ.
Horton, W. (2001). Leading e-learning. Alexandria, VA: ASTD.
Hunt, G., Wiseman, D., & Touzel, T. J. (2009). Effective teaching : preparation and implementation. Springfield, Ill: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.
Ingram, M. J., Sagoe, L. A., Sosabowski, M. H., Long, A. J., & Moss, G. P. (2007). Pharmacy student perceptions of educational media tools. Pharmacy Education, 7(1), 77-82.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modelling with SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, Ill: SSI Scientific Software International.
Jonassen, D. H. (1996). Computers in the classroom: Mindtools for critical thinking. New Jersey: Merrill: Englewood Cliffs.
Kafai, Y. B. (1995). Minds in play: computer game design as a context for children's learning. Hillsdale, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Kamla, R. (2009). Dimensions of Communication as Predictors of Effective Classroom Interaction. Studies on Home and Community Science, 3(1), 57-61.
Kennewell, S. (2008). Reflections on the interactive whiteboard phenomenon:a synthesis of research from the UK. Retrieved October 15, 2008, from http://www.aare.edu.au/06pap/ken06138.pdf
Kennewell, S., Tanner, H., Jones, S., & Beauchamp, G. (2008). Analysing the use of interactivetechnology to implement interactive teaching. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(1), 61-73.
Kent, P. (2004). e-Teaching – The Elusive Promise. Retrieved May 23, 2009, from http://practicalinteractivity.edublogs.org/files/2008/04/eteaching_-_the_elusive_promise.pdf
Kirshner, D., & Whitson, J. A. (1997). Situated cognition: social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum.
Kovalchick, A., & Dawson, K. (2004). Education and technology : an encyclopedia. Santa Barbara, Calif.: ABC-CLIO.
Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179–211.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1997). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge [u.a.]: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Lee, M., & Boyle, M. (2003). The Educational Effects and Implications of the Interactive Whiteboard Strategy of Richardson Primary School: A Brief Review. Retrieved May 23, 2009, from http://www.richardsonps.act.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/
0020/83117/RichardsonReview_Grey.pdf
Lee, M., & Winzenried, A. (2009). The use of instructional technology in schools: Lessons to be learned. Camberwell, Vic: ACER Press.
Lefoe, G. (1998). Creating Constructivist Learning Environments on the Web: The Challenge in Higher Education. Paper presented at the ascilite Conference.
Levy, P. (2002). Interactive whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield schools: a developmental study. Retrieved May,25, 2008, from http://dis.shef.ac.uk/eirg/projects/
wboards.htm
Luckin, R. (2008). The learner centric ecology of resources: A framework for using technology to scaffold learning. Computers & Education, 50(2), 449-462.
Massé, M. H., & Popovich, M. N. (2006). He said, she said: A national study of gender differences in the teaching of writing. Retrieved May 15, 2009, from http://jdwritingctr.
iweb.bsu.edu/Gender.html
Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1-19.
Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 125-139.
Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., DeLeeuw, K. E., & Ayres, P. (2007). Creating retroactive and proactive interference in multimedia learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 795-809.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learning & Instruction, 12(1), 107-119.
Mayes, T. (2006). Theoretical perspectives on interactivity in e-learning. In C. Juwah (Ed.), Interactions in online education implications for theory and practice. London: Routledge.
McLellan, H. (1996). Situated learning: multiple perspectives. In H. McLellan (Ed.), Situated Learning Perspectives (pp. 5-17). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Educational Technology Publications.
McLeod, S. (2007). Multi Store Model of Memory - Atkinson and Shiffrin, 1968. Retrieved May,5, 2009, from http://www.simplypsychology.org/multi-store.html
Merrett, S., & Edwards, J. A. (2005). Enhancing mathematical thinking with an interactive whiteboard. Micromath, 21(3), 9.
Miller, D., Glover, D., & Averis, D. (2004). Matching technology and pedagogy in teaching mathematics: understanding fractions using a 'virtual manipulative' fraction wall. Retrieved October 20, 2008, from http://www.keele.ac.uk/depts/ed/iaw/docs/
BERA%20Paper%20Sep%202004.pdf
Mills, S. (2004). Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI). In A. Kovalchick & K. Dawson (Eds.), Education and technology: An encyclopedia. Santa Barbara, Calif: ABC-CLIO.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. . Teachers College Record, 108, 1017-1054.
Moersch, C. (1995). Levels of technology implementation: A framework for measuring classroom technology use. Learning and Leading with Technology, 23(3), 40-42.
Mohanna, K., Chambers, R., & Wall, D. (2008). Your teaching style : a practical guide to understanding, developing, and improving. New York: Radcliffe.
Money, S. M. (1992). What is Teaching Effectiveness? A Survey of Student and Teacher Perceptions of Teacher Effectiveness. Humber Coll. of Applied Arts and Technology, Etobicoke (Ontario). North Campus. Canada Ontario: Geographicsrce./ country of publication.
Moreno, R. (2006). Does the modality principle hold for different media? A test of the method-affects-learning hypothesis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(3), 149-158.Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309-326.
Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2005). Effective teaching : evidence and practice. London SAGE Publications.
Myhill, D. (2006). Talk, talk, talk: teaching and learning in whole class discourse. Research Papers in Education, 21(1), 19-41.
Myhill, D., Jones, S. M., & Hopper, R. (2006). Talking, listening, learning: Effective talk in the primary classroom. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press.
Nijhof, W., & Kommers, P. (1985). An analysis of cooperation in relation to cognitive controversy. In R. Slavin, S. Sharan, S. Kagan, R. H. Lazarowitz, C. Webb & R. Schmuck (Eds.), Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn. New York: Plenum.
Norman, D. A. (1986). Cognitive Engineering. In D. A. Norman & S. Draper (Eds.), User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Oliver, R., & Herrington, J. (2003). Exploring technology-mediated learning from a pedagogical perspective. Journal of Interactive Learning Environments, 11(2), 111-126.
Park, I., & Hannafin, M. J. (1993). Empirically-based guidelines for the design of interactive multimedia. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(3), 63-85.
Pelgrum, W. J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers & Education, 37(2), 163-178.
Poole, H. W., Lambert, L., Woodford, C., & Moschovitis, C. J. P. (2005). The Internet: A historical encyclopedia. Santa Barbara, Calif: ABC-CLIO.
Priest, J., Coe, R., Evershed, B., & Bush, N. (2004). An Exploration of the Use of ICT at the Millennium Primary School, Greenwich. Retrieved October 20, 2008, from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/1602/1/becta_2004_greenwichschool_report.pdf
Reiser, R. A. (2007). A History of Instructional Design and Technology. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J. V. (2002). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Robbins, P., & Aydede, M. (2009). The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Robison, S. (2000). Math classes for the 21st century. Media and Methods, 36(4), 10-11.
Rogers, P. (2003). Designing instruction for technology enhanced learning. Hershey, Pa: Idea.
Rothwell, W. J. (2008). Adult learning basics. Alexandria, Va.: ASTD Press.
Schmid, E. C. (2008). Potential pedagogical benefits and drawbacks of multimedia use in the English language classroom equipped with interactive whiteboard technology. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1553-1568.
Schwarz, B., Dreyfus, T., & Hershkowitz, R. (2009). Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction. London: Routledge.
Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2009). Learning in a sheltered Internet environment: The use of WebQuests. Learning and Instruction, 19(5), 423-432.
Selim, H. M. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: ConWrmatory factor models. Computers & Education, 49, 396-413.
Serengul, S. A. (2006). Human-computer interaction. London: Thomson.
Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). A Mathematical Model of Communication. rbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Sharan, S., & Shachar, H. (1988). Language and learning in the cooperative classroom. New York: Springer.
Shenton, A., & Pagett, L. (2007). From 'bored' to screen : the use of the interactive whiteboard for literacy in six primary classrooms in England. Literacy, 41(3), 129-136.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundation of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
Smith, F., Hardman, F., & Higgins, S. (2006). The impact of interactive whiteboards on teacher-pupil interaction in the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies. British Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 443-457.
Smith, F., Hardman, F., Wall, K., & Mroz, M. (2004). Interactive whole class teaching in the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies. British Educational Research Journal, 30(3).
Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 91-101.
Smith, L. B., & Jones, S. S. (1993). Cognition without Concepts. Cognitive Development, 8, 181-188.
Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of Cognitive Load Theory for Multimedia Learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 19-30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sweller, J., Merrienboer, J. J. G. V., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296.
Türel, Y. K., & Johnson, T. E. (2012). Teachers' Belief and Use of Interactive Whiteboards for Teaching and Learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 381-394.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
Tanner, H., Jones, S., Kennewell, S., & Beauchamp, G. (2005). Interactive Whole Class Teaching and Interactive White Boards. Paper presented at the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australia Conference. Retrieved October 25, 2008, from http://www.merga.net.au/documents/RP832005.pdf
Thomas, M., & Schmid, E. C. (2010). Interactive whiteboards for education: Theory, research and practice. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
Thompson, A. D., & Mishra, P. (2007). Breaking News: TPCK Becomes TPACK! Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 24(2), 38.
Thompson, J., & Flecknoe, M. (2003). Raising attainment with an interactive whiteboard in Key Stage 2. Management in Education, 17(3), 29-33.
Thompson, K., & Bordwell, D. (2010). Film history : an introduction. New York, NY McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Twining, P. (2004). The Computer Practice Framework: a tool to enhance curriculum development relating to ICT. In M. Monteith (Ed.), ICT for Curriculum Enhancement. Bristol: Intellect Books.
Vaughn, L. M., & Baker, R. C. (2008). Do Different Pairings of Teaching Styles and Learning Styles Make a Difference? Preceptor and Resident Perceptions. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 20(3), 239-247.
Veer, R. v. d. (2007). Lev Vygotsky. London: Continuum.
Volery, T., & Lord, D. (2000). Critical success factors in online education. The International Journal of Educational Management, 14(5).
Vries, E. d. (2003). Educational Technology and Multimedia From a Cognitive Perspective: Knowledge From Inside the Computer, Onto the Screen, and Into Our Heads? In H. v. Oostendorp (Ed.), Cognition in a digital world. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Winston, B. (1998). Media technology and society: A history : from the telegraph to the Internet. London: Routledge.
Wood, R., & Ashfield, J. (2008). The use of the interactive whiteboard for creative teaching and learning in literacy and mathematics: a case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 84-96.
Wubbels, T., Levy, J., & Brekelmams, M. (1997). Paying attention to relationships. Educational Leadership, 54(7), 82-86.
Wubbels, T., Levy, J., & Hooymayers, H. (1993). The Model for Interpersonal Teacher Behaviour. In T. Wubbels & J. Levy (Eds.), Do you know what you look like? Interpersonal relations in education (pp. 13-28). London: Falmer Press.
Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R. O., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2006). Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information & Management, 43, 15-27.
Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482-515.