:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小學童自然科知識結構之測量
書刊名:教育與心理研究
作者:陳嘉甄
作者(外文):Chen, Chia-chen
出版日期:2001
卷期:24(下)
頁次:頁327-343
主題關鍵詞:知識結構路徑蒐尋錯誤概念Knowledge structurePathfinderMisconception
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:59
  • 點閱點閱:65
知識結構即代表著概念的組織交結形式,亦可視同為某種形式的心理模式或基模。本研究使路徑蒐尋技術測量三年級學生的自然科學知識結構。樣本分高、中、低成就組,分別取自三班,含專家對照組共45人,以該校自然科學課程中的二天單元作為施測範圍。結果顯示:專家組的知識結構較有系統,而中低成就組學生則多半呈現混亂的概念組織方式;其次,自量化指數的分析也顯示,高成就組學生的PFC、PRX、GTD指數都高於中、低成就組學生。最後,研究中利用徑路圖,進行學生的錯誤概念分析,發現中、低成就組學生在此二單元中,錯誤概念多於高成就組學生。顯見錯誤概念確實是造成學童科學學習時的重要障礙。
This study examined the scientific knowledge structure of 3th grade students by using Pathfinder. The results indicated the knowledge structure of an expert group is more organized than amid-or low achievement group. In addition, the indexes of PFC, PRX and GTD also revealed that a high achievement group is higher than a mid-or low achievement group. Furthermore, we analyzed student misconceptions about these two topics by using Pfnet. The finding suggested misconceptions of mid-and low achievement groups are greater than with the high achievement group. Therefore, misconception is the main barrier for learning scientific knowledge.
期刊論文
1.鍾聖校(19940600)。不同教學法對錯誤概念修正的影響。臺北師院學報,7,169-203。  延伸查詢new window
2.Egan, D. E.、Schwartz, B. J.(1979)。Chunking in recall of symbolic drawings。Memory and Cognition,7(2),149-158。  new window
3.宋德忠、林世華、陳淑芬、張國恩(19981200)。知識結構的測量:徑路搜尋法與概念構圖法的比較。教育心理學報,30(2),123-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Goldsmith, T. E.、Johnson, P. J.、Acton, W. H.(1991)。Assessing structural knowledge。Journal of Educational Psychology,83(1),88-96。  new window
5.Acton, W. H.、Johnson, P. J.、Goldsmith, T. E.(1994)。Structural knowledge assessment: comparison of referent structures。Journal of Educational Psychology,86(2),303-311。  new window
6.Gomez, Rebecca L.、Hadfield, O. D.、Housner, Lynn D.(1996)。Conceptual maps and simulated teaching episodes as indicators of competence in teaching elementary mathematics。Journal of Educational Psychology,88(1),572-585。  new window
7.Rumelhart, D. E.、McClelland, J. L.(1985)。Distributed Memory Representation。Journal of Experimental Psychology, General,25,1-75。  new window
8.Anderson, R. C.、Spiro, R. J.、Anderson, M. C.(1978)。Schemata as scaffolding for The representation of information in connected discourse。American educational research journal,15(3),433-440。  new window
9.王春展(19970300)。專家與生手間問題解決能力的差異及其在教學上的啟示。教育研究資訊,5(2),80-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.陳義勳(1994)。國小高年級學生自然科學中力學單元迷思概念之探討。臺北市立師範學院學報,27,83-104。  延伸查詢new window
11.Chase, W. G.、Simon, H. A.(1973)。Perceptions in chess。Cognitive Psychology,4,55-81。  new window
12.Lawson, A.、Renner, J. W.(1989)。Piagetian theory and biology teaching。American Biology Teacher,37(6),336-343。  new window
學位論文
1.林曉芳(1999)。數學低成就國中生在代數概念學習之評量研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.江淑卿(1997)。知識結構的重要特性之分析暨促進知識結構教學策略之實驗研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.張春興(2002)。現代心理學。臺北市:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.Branaghan, R. J.(1990)。Pathfinder Networks and Multidimensional Spaces: Relative Strengths in Representing Strong Associates。Pathfinder Associative Networks: Studies in Knowledge Organization。New Jersey。  new window
3.Schvaneveldt, R. W.、Durso, F. T.(1985)。Pathfinder: Scaling with network structures。Memorandum in Computer and Cognitive Science。沒有紀錄。  new window
圖書論文
1.Chi, M. T. H.、Glaser, R.、Rees, E.(1982)。Expertise in problem solving。Advances in the psychology of human intelligence。Erlbaum。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE