:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國民中學學生網路使用知識結構與寫作品質的關係
書刊名:教育與心理研究
作者:陳秋雯
作者(外文):Chen, Chiou-wen
出版日期:2001
卷期:24(下)
頁次:頁345-365
主題關鍵詞:知識結構評量網路使用知識寫作品質路徑蒐尋網路分析Assessment of knowledge structuresKnowledge about network usageArticle qualityPathfinder network analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:64
  • 點閱點閱:39
認知和教育心理學開始透過知識導出、知識表徵和參照專家結構等步驟評定學習表現,研究發現:組織良好的知識庫有助於引導學習者產出文章,缺乏某概念理解或存在誤解則影響知識論述的品質。本研究以路徑蒐尋網路分析(pathfinder network analysis)測量29名國三學生網路使用知識結構,在控制一般語文能力情況下,企圖瞭解特定領域知識與寫作品質間的關係。結果發現:盡管t考驗結果僅支持部分研究假設,但是從參照專家路徑蒐尋網路概念結構圖的個案分析,仍暗示受試的知識結構、實際網路使用經驗和寫作完成動機與特定主題結構化論述表現有關。本研究建議未來多次評量或延伸不同知識領域進一步探究知識評量的效度,並協助教師使用路徑蒐尋網路分析診斷學生的概念理解發展語文表達能力。
This cognitive and educational psychology researcher began to assess achievement with the following steps:knowledge induction、knowledge representation, and referencing experts. The finding was that a well-organized knowledge base is the foundation of learner writing. On the other hand, if the learner lacks a key concepts, having some misconceptions, he wont’ finish writing. Controlling linguistic ability, we assessed twenty-nine students’ knowledge structure by using a network with pathfinder network analysis. The findings are :First, the assessment of the group of low linguistic ability supports only one hypothesis;and Shouldrit the hypothesis be mentioned second, the case analysis supports the relation of subjects’ knowledge structure and motivation with writing quality. Finally, the suggestion is the thesis that in the future the validity of knowledge construction assessments are with more assessments and the alternative domain, and helping teachers to find the misconceptions of students with pathfinder network analysis.
期刊論文
1.Voss, J. F.、Vesonder, G. T.、Spilich, G. J.(1980)。Text generation and recall by high-knowledge and low-knowledge individuals。Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,19,651-667。  new window
2.McCutchen, D.(1986)。Domain knowledge and linguistic knowledge in the development of writing ability。Journal of Memory and Language,25(4),431-444。  new window
3.鄭郁卿(19980300)。寫作能力之檢驗與聯考作文存廢芻議。臺北科技大學學報,31(1),305-343。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.葉靖雲(19990600)。五種作文能力測驗的效度研究。特殊教育學報,13,331-366。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Goldsmith, T. E.、Johnson, P. J.、Acton, W. H.(1991)。Assessing structural knowledge。Journal of Educational Psychology,83(1),88-96。  new window
6.Shavelson, R. J.(1972)。Some aspects of the correspondence between content structure and cognitive structure in physics instruction。Journal of Educational Psychology,63(3),225-234。  new window
7.王萬清(1995)。寫作教師之寫作教學內容知識偏好與結構研究。初等教育學報(臺南師院),8,53-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.吳裕益、陳英豪、王萬清(1989)。兒童寫作能力測驗編製報告。初等教育學報(臺南師院),2(5),1-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Diekhoff, G. M.(1983)。Testing through relationship judgements。Journal of Educational Psychology,75(2),227-233。  new window
10.Stanners, R. F.、Brown, L. T.、Price, J. M.、Holmes, M.(1983)。Concept comparisons, essay examinations, and conceptual knowledge。Journal of Educational Psychology,75(6),857-864。  new window
11.Stanners, R. F.、Price, J. M.、Painton, S.(1982)。Interrelationships among text elements in fictional prose。Applied Psycholinguistic,3,95-107。  new window
學位論文
1.林曉芳(1999)。數學低成就國中生在代數概念學習之評量研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.江淑卿(1997)。知識結構的重要特性之分析暨促進知識結構教學策略之實驗研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.羅素貞(1993)。寫作之觀念產出歷程研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.劉雨(19950300)。寫作心理學。高雄:復文圖書。  延伸查詢new window
2.國立臺灣師範大學教育研究中心(2000)。我國中小學國語文基本學力指標系統規劃研究「作文學力評量」之結果報告。我國中小學國語文基本學力指標系統規劃研究成果報告。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.曾志朗(1990)。網路的科學教育,0。  延伸查詢new window
2.Johnson, P. J.,Goldsmith, T. E.(1992)。Structural assessment of knowledge and skill,Albuquerque, NM。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE