:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從法國法論獨立行政機關的設置緣由與組成爭議:兼評司法院釋字第613號解釋
書刊名:國立臺灣大學法學論叢
作者:陳淳文 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Chwen-wen
出版日期:2009
卷期:38:2
頁次:頁235-292
主題關鍵詞:獨立行政機關獨立機關行政一體原則層級原則責任政治原則司法院釋字第613號人事任命權行政保留行政權之核心領域Independent administrative agencyIndependent agencyThe principle of administrative unityThe principle of hierarchyThe doctrine of political accountabilityJ.Y. interpretation no.613The power to appoint personnelAdministrative reserveThe core areas of the executive power
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:1562
  • 點閱點閱:42
為創設獨立行政機關,在我國曾引起極為激烈的憲政爭議,大法官也針對此問題作出司法院釋字第613號解釋。但在該號解釋作出之後,一方面在實際政治運作中並沒有真正平息爭議;另一方面在解釋內容上,也有諸多可以檢討之處。本文即以該解釋之核心爭議為討論焦點,深入探討獨立行政機關的組成問題,及其與行政一體及責任政治的相互關係。 從比較法的觀點來看,西方民主國家也都有設置獨立行政機關的需要,並因不同的憲政體制而產生不同的爭議問題。本文以與我國現行憲法最為接近的法國憲政體制為比較檢討對象,分析法國憲法實務針對獨立行政機關問題所作出的解決途徑。而人事任命權不僅不曾成為法國法上的爭議核心,法國法甚且發展出多元的人事任命模式。 具體的法制實務固然可以增廣視野,但對問題背景與其發展趨勢的分析;更有助於全面瞭解爭議問題。故本文於文首特別介紹獨立行政機關的設置背景與其組織特徵,並進一步指出我國現行獨立行政機關的設置爭議,主要是停留在民主權力競爭之場域裹。然而促使獨立行政機關發展的因素,卻還有諸如提升國際競爭力與強化人權保障等其他價值之追求;這是我國迄今仍缺乏,且未來亟待體認的部分。
The institution of independent administrative agencies in Taiwan has been a subject of intense controversy, with the Justices penning Interpretation No. 613 in response. But the interpretation did not seem have its affect on quelling disputes that arises in practical operation of politics, and its contents seems to be lacking at various points. This article will focus on the core controversies of this interpretation, with problems in the composition of independent administrative agencies, the principle of administrative unity, and the doctrine of political accountability. From the perspective of comparative law, Western democracies, in their need to establish independent administrative agencies, are also plagued with various difficulties due to their respective constitutionalism. This article will take France, as their constitutional make-up closest resembles ours, and discuss their solution to the application of independent administrative agencies under the constitution. Under the French constitution, there had never been any controversies over the power to appoint personnel; they even developed multiple models of appointment. Although concrete institutions may broaden our perspectives, the analysis of backgrounds and developmental trends would be more helpful in grasping the entire scope of controversies. Therefore this article will begin with the introduction of institutional backgrounds and organizational characteristics of the agencies then proceed to point out present disputes over the establishment of independent administrative agencies, which is mainly the contention for democratic power. Other areas, such as pursuit of international competitiveness and the protection of human rights, are still wanting for the development of independent administrative agencies in the future.
期刊論文
1.黃錦堂(20080900)。德國獨立機關獨立性之研究--以通訊傳播領域為中心並評論我國釋字第613號解釋。中研院法學期刊,3,1-55。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳新民(20060600)。試論NCC組織法的違憲性問題。臺灣本土法學雜誌,83,1-30。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳淑芳(20061000)。獨立機關之設置及其人事權--評司法院大法官釋字第六一三號解釋。月旦法學,137,41-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Majone, G.(2001)。Nonmajoritarian Institutions and the Limits of Democratic Governance: A Political Transaction-cost approach。Journal of Theoretical and Institutional Economics,157(1),57-78。  new window
5.蘇永欽(20060900)。沒有方法的解釋只是一個政治決定--簡評司法院第六一三號解釋。月旦法學,136,6-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.石世豪(20061000)。通傳管制機關立法實驗喊停:釋字第六一三號解釋待續。臺灣本土法學雜誌,87,80-83。  延伸查詢new window
7.石世豪(20060900)。趕不上歷史腳步的憲法釋義--簡評大法官釋字第六一三號解釋。月旦法學,136,21-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.劉孔中(20060900)。怪哉!以鞏固行政權為職志的六一三號解釋。月旦法學,136,28-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.江耀國(2008)。通傳會組織法違憲案鑑定意見書暨釋字第613號解釋評。世新法學,1(2),38-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.行政院(2006)。「國家通訊傳播委員會的組織法」釋憲案補充理由書。臺灣本土法學雜誌,82,117-136。  延伸查詢new window
11.李念祖(2006)。司法院大法官釋字第六一三號解釋評論。臺灣本土法學雜誌,87,84-86。  延伸查詢new window
12.李惠宗(2006)。國家通訊傳播委員會組織法違憲性的探討:司法院大法官釋字第六一三號解釋評釋。臺灣本土法學雜誌,86,58-78。  延伸查詢new window
13.汪平雲(2006)。照妖鏡與魔界傳奇:釋字第六一三號解釋的深度解讀。月旦法學雜誌,137,75-87。  延伸查詢new window
14.周志宏(2006)。釋字第六一三號解釋與獨立機關的未來。月旦法學雜誌,137,5-24。  延伸查詢new window
15.林明鏘(2006)。正當性與相當性原則下評大法官釋字第六一三號解釋。臺灣本土法學雜誌,86,79-83。  延伸查詢new window
16.廖元豪(2006)。釋字六一三後,獨立機關還剩多少空間?。臺灣本土法學雜誌,87,87-92。  延伸查詢new window
17.劉靜怡(2006)。釋字第六一三號解釋後的獨立機關:NCC傳奇簡評。月旦法學雜誌,137,25-40。  延伸查詢new window
18.蔡秀卿(2006)。又是權力鬥爭的犧牲品:試評大法官釋字第六一三號解釋。月旦法學雜誌,137,60-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Gazier, F.、Cannac, Y.(1983)。Etudes sur les autorités administratives indépendantes。Études et documents du Conseil d'État,35,13-。  new window
20.Chevallier, J.(1986)。Réflexions sur l'institution des autorité administratives indépendantes。J.C.P.,3254-3254。  new window
21.Autin, J. L.(1998)。Autorités administratives indépendantes。J.C.P. Administratif,75-75。  new window
22.Duprat, J. P.(1994)。L'indépendance de la Banque de France: aspects constitutionnels et européens。L.P.A,20-25。  new window
23.Levy, Brian、Spiller, Pablo, T.(1994)。The Institutional Foundations of Regulatory Commitment: A Comparative Analysis of Telecommunications Regulation。Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization,10(2),201-246。  new window
24.Sabourin, P.(1983)。Les autorités administratives Indépendantes。Actualités juridiques - Droit administratif,275-。  new window
會議論文
1.孫煒(2007)。由授權理論分析獨立機關:兼論對我國政府改造的啟示。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.馬丁.烏斯汀(2001)。保護監察體制的誠正性與獨立性:全球觀點。臺北。11-32。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.許慶復(1993)。行政委員會組織與功能之研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Horn, Murray J.、浩平、蕭羡一(2003)。公共行政之政治經濟學--公部門的制度選擇。台北:商周。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳庚(200508)。行政法之理論與實用。臺北:三民書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.蘇永欽(20080000)。尋找共和國。臺北市:元照出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Constant, Benjamin、Grange, Henri(1991)。Fragments d'un ouvrage abandonné sur la possibilité d'une constitution républicaine dans un grand pays。Paris:Aublier。  new window
5.D'Etat, Conseill(2002)。Rapport public 2001。Rapport public 2001。Paris, France。  new window
6.Braun, D.、Gilardi, F.(2006)。Delegation in Contemporary Democracies。Delegation in Contemporary Democracies。New York, NY。  new window
7.Gilardi, F.(2005)。Evaluating Independent Regulators。Designing Independent and Accountable Regulatory Authorities for High Quality Regulation。  new window
8.Vedel, G.、Delvolvé, P.(1990)。Droit administratif, tome 2。Droit administratif, tome 2。Paris, France。  new window
9.Majone, Giandomenico(2005)。Strategy and Structure the Political Economy of Agency Independence and Accountability。Designing Independent and Accountable Regulatory Authorities for High Quality Regulation。  new window
10.Guédon, Marie-José(1991)。Les autorités administratives indépendantes。Les autorités administratives indépendantes。Paris, France。  new window
11.Delvolvé, P.(1998)。Droit public de l'économie。Droit public de l'économie。Paris, France。  new window
12.Chapus, R.(1993)。Droit administratif Général, tome 1。Droit administratif Général, tome 1。Paris, France。  new window
13.Jacobzone, S.(2005)。Independent Regulatory Authorities in OECD Countries: An Overview。Designing Independent and Accountable Regulatory Authorities for High Quality Regulation。  new window
14.Trocsken, W.(1996)。Why Regulate Utilities。Why Regulate Utilities。Ann Arbor, MI。  new window
其他
1.Frison-Roche, Marie-Anne(2006)。Rapport sur les autorités administratives indépendantes。  new window
2.Gélard, Patrice(2006)。Rapport sur les autorités administratives indépendantes。  new window
3.Théodore Fortsakis, Grèce(2006)。Etude de droit comparé sur les autorités administratives indépendantes。  new window
圖書論文
1.陳淳文(2007)。中央政府體制改革的謎思與展望。憲法解釋之理論與實務。中央研究院法律學研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
2.林子儀(1993)。美國總統的行政首長權與。當代公法理論翁岳生教授六秩誕辰祝壽論文集。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE