:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:學校本位倫理核心價值的建構與實踐
書刊名:教育學報
作者:李琪明 引用關係
作者(外文):Lee, Angela Chi-ming
出版日期:2008
卷期:36:1/2
頁次:頁77-95
主題關鍵詞:價值教育倫理核心價值品德校園
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:53
  • 點閱點閱:19
變遷社會中價值教育的重點乃在「亂中求序」以及「異中求同」,而該「序」與「同」須立基於倫理核心價值的基本規範,才能促進人們自由自律地展開多元創新和容忍、尊重的豐富生活。本文藉由「品德校園」的理念,一則賦予倫理核心價值在當前價值教育的轉化意涵;二則強調學校須以民主多元的參與方式,建立學校本位及其特色的倫理核心價值及行為準則,並透過校園中的各類課程(包括正式、非正式與潛在課程),運用各種創新的策略加以實踐。此外,筆者亦以台灣國中與國小各一所學校的實驗研究為例,舉出其建構與實踐學校本位倫理核心價值的歷程與結果,包括校園成員代表的討論、親師生票選核心價值、建立行為準則、積極宣導、教師專業培訓、進而融入課程與校園生活,以及評鑑檢核其成效等。本文期望藉由揭櫫品德校園的理念與實踐,彰顯當前價值教育中倫理核心價值的嶄新思維與創意策略,並為教育界致力於優質與永續校園發展提供參考。
A central priority of modern values education is to present certain core ethical values to serve as a standard in a changing society, which is subject to great variance in both moral judgment and action. These core ethical values represent certain basic societal order and consensus and may offer people living in the same community a better life with justice, caring, and autonomy. “Character-based school culture” (CBSC) model, which has clear rationale and multiple strategies, focuses on how to construct and implement core ethical values in schools. The main purpose of this article is to introduce how the author applied the idea of CBSC model into one Taiwanese elementary school and one junior high school for two years. First, in cooperation with these two schools, the author helped to construct their core ethical values of school through a democratic process, which included meetings and participation of staff, students, and parents. Second, teachers took part in a number of workshops held by the author in order to improve their professional skills and better enable them to learn to fuse core ethical values into formal, informal, and hidden curricula with creative strategies. Finally, the author used both qualitative and quantitative research methods to evaluate the effectiveness of the experimentation. This article revealed that the construction and implementation of school-based core ethical values can improve values education of schools with high quality and sustainable development.
期刊論文
1.李琪明(2003)。正義、關懷與紀律─國小校園道德生活與氣氛之個案研究。公民訓育學報,13,21-46。  延伸查詢new window
2.Power, F. C.、Makogon, T. A.(1996)。The Just-Community approach to care。Journal for a Just and Caring Education,2(1),9-24。  new window
3.Saha, L. J.(2001)。Durkheim's sociology of education: A critical reassessment。Education and Society,19(2),21-23。  new window
4.李琪明(20070200)。品德教育面臨轉型的解構與重建。研習資訊,24(1),33-41。  延伸查詢new window
5.李琪明(2006)。將品德帶進教室,把民主融入校園。教師天地,142,22-30。  延伸查詢new window
6.Jorgensen, G.(2006)。Kohlberg and Gilligan: Duet or duel?。Journal of Moral Education,35(2),179-196。  new window
7.李琪明(20040400)。我國國中小校園道德氣氛之調查研究。師大學報:教育類,49(1),1-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.李琪明(20040200)。品德本位校園文化之營造--美國推動經驗與啟示。臺灣教育,625,30-38。  延伸查詢new window
9.李琪明(20060400)。新品德教育的興起與發展--美國經驗在臺灣的反思與轉化。課程與教學,9(2),55-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.李琪明(20070700)。中小學品德校園之實施策略與評鑑方式探析。教育研究,159,33-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.李琪明(20020400)。道德社群之檢視--一所國中校園道德生活與氣氛之俗民誌研究。師大學報. 教育類,47(1),83-105。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.李琪明(20040500)。品德教育之課程設計理念及其教學模式。學生輔導,92,8-23。  延伸查詢new window
13.李琪明(20081200)。國中小品德校園文化營造實徵研究。師大學報. 教育類,53(3),153-178。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.李琪明(2003)。教師道德發展與學校環境─職前與在職國中小教師之比較研究 (計畫編號:NSC91-2413-H-003-006)。台北:台灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.李琪明(2001)。道德社群之營造─我國國民中小學校園道德氣氛之俗民誌研究 (計畫編號:NSC89-2413-H-003-078)。台北:台灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.李琪明(2002)。我國國民中小學校園道德氣氛之調查研究 (計畫編號:NSC90-2413-H-003-007)。台北:台灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.李琪明(2004)。教師道德發展與學校環境─職前與在職國中小教師之比較研究 (計畫編號:NSC92-2413-H-003-003)。台北:台灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.李琪明(2007)。建構道德社群--我國國中小品德本位校園文化營造之規劃、執行與評鑑(2005.8-2007.7二年計畫) (計畫編號:NSC94-2413-H-003-006)。台北:台灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.李琪明(2008)。學校品德教育推動策略及評鑑指標。台北:台灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hinman, L. M.(1994)。Ethics: A pluralistic approach to moral theory。New York:Harcourt Brace。  new window
2.Power, F. Clark、Higgins, Ann、Kohlberg, Lawrence(1989)。Lawrence Kohlberg's approach to moral education。New York:Columbia University Press。  new window
3.Gilligan, C.(1993)。In a different voice: Psychology theory and women's development。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
4.Noddings, Nel(2002)。Educating Moral People: A Caring Alternative to Character Education。Teacher College, Columbia University。  new window
5.Lukes, S.(1973)。Emile Durkheim, his life and work: A historical and critical study。New York:Penguin。  new window
6.Lickona, T.(1991)。Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility。New York, NY:Harper & Row:Bantam Books。  new window
其他
1.McDonnell, S.(2008)。What is CHARACTERplusR?,http://www.stltoday.com/characterplus/about, 2008/12/28。  new window
2.教育部(2006)。教育部品德教育促進方案,http://ce.naer.edu.tw/index3-1.html, 2008/12/15。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Higgins, A.(1995)。Educating for justice and community: Lawrence Kohlberg's vision of moral education。Moral development: An introduction。Boston:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE