:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:建構主義取向之國語文作業指導原則與技巧
書刊名:教育實踐與研究
作者:潘世尊 引用關係
作者(外文):Pan, Thie-tzuen
出版日期:2012
卷期:25:1
頁次:頁29-66
主題關鍵詞:建構主義國語文作業指導國語文教學ConstructivismGuidance of Mandarin assignmentsMandarin teaching小學教師課後照顧教保人員
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:108
  • 點閱點閱:68
國語文作業指導,乃小學教師及課後照顧機構教保人員,重要工作項目之一。本文以建構主義取向國語文作業指導原則與技巧為探究焦點。除參考相關文獻,筆者還反思自我的實踐經驗,並透過文件蒐集、觀察及訪談等方式,取得相關資料。後者,資料蒐集對象為一所運用建構主義之原理進行作業指導之小學,一到六年級教師之作業指導實務。筆者分析潛隱於這些資料之中的建構主義取向作業指導原則與技巧。總結本文研究結果:首先,針對兒童作業可能出現的問題類型-含「未經思考或不知其意的抄寫」、「做錯」、「不會而空白」及「寫得不完整或可再精簡」四類,提出建構主義取向國語文作業指導原則與技巧。其次,就這四類問題類型之共通性指導原則與技巧,加以闡明。綜合言之,教師在作業指導過程中,可彈性運用理解性、質問性及提示性的提問,若有需要,再進行講解、說明或示範之教學活動。再者,教師宜讓兒童有思考探究及自行發現與解決問題之空間,且可引導兒童先說出自我的想法,再進行書寫之活動。這些指導原則與技巧之運用,不但可協助學生改正錯誤與解決問題,還可讓其發展出較高層次心理能力,且有益學生主動探究與認真習寫態度之培養。
Guiding Mandarin assignments is a vital task for elementary school teachers and practitioners of after-school care and education programs. This paper focused on the guiding principles and skills of the constructivist approach for Mandarin assignments. In addition to citing relevant literature, the author reflected on his own experience and obtained related data through document collection, observation, and interviews. An elementary school where instructors employ the theories of constructivism in guiding students’ assignments has served as the data collection site; the assignment guiding practices of the instructors from grade one through six were gathered. The author then analyzed the assignment guiding principles and skills of the constructivist approach implicated in these data. This paper concludes by proposing guiding principles and skills for Mandarin assignments, targeting four types of inadequacies students commonly demonstrate: “thoughtless and meaningless copying,” “mistakes,” “inability to accomplish,” and “incomplete or could be condensed.” To summarize, teachers may flexibly use comprehensive, interrogative, and prompted questions in the process of guiding assignments. Explanation and demonstration could also be used if necessary. Meanwhile, teachers must create opportunities for pupils to think and explore as well as discover and solve problems independently. Moreover, teachers may guide and encourage pupils to voice their thoughts aloud before writing. These guiding principles and skills may not only assist students in correcting their inadequacies and solving their problems, but may also help develop higher-level mental functions. Such principles and skills are also beneficial in cultivating the attitudes of inquiring actively and writing seriously.
期刊論文
1.許家驊(20031200)。從鷹架教學中介觀點探討動態評量在促進及評估個體學習潛能上之基礎與設計。彰化師大教育學報,5,87-113。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Powell, K. C.、Kalina, C. J.(2009)。Cognitive and social constructivism: Developing tools for an effective classroom。Education,130(2),241-250。  new window
3.陳昇飛(2006)。從教室言談看學童語文知識之建構─Vygotsky社會建構取向。當代教育研究季刊,14(4),103-144。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Boghossian, P.(2006)。Behaviorism, constructivism, and socratic pedagogy。Educational Philosophy and Theory,38(6),713-722。  new window
5.Kaufman, D.(2004)。Constructivist issues in language learning and teaching。Annual Review of Applied Linguistics,24,303-319。  new window
6.陳昇飛(2004)。社會建構主義在國小語文教學上的實踐與省思。教育研究資訊,12(6),3-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.許朝信(2000)。高屏地區國小教師教室內教學困擾之研究。教育與心理研究,23,47-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Winter, R.(2002)。Truth or fiction: Problems of validity and authenticity in narratives of action research。Educational Action Research,10(1),143-154。  new window
9.Cobb, Paul、Wood, Terry、Yackel, Erna(1990)。Classrooms as Learning Environments for Teachers and Researchers。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph,125-146+195-210。  new window
10.潘世尊(20020300)。教學上的鷹架要怎麼搭。屏東師院學報,16,263-293。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.吳英長(19980400)。國民小學國語故事體課文摘寫大意的教學過程之分析。臺東師院學報,9,149-184。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.馬祖琳、陳蓓薇、陳淑華、蘇怡萍、謝惠如(20000100)。課後托育機構服務內容之個案研究。醫護科技學刊,2(1),1-11。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.黃怡瑾(20000600)。臺南市國小學齡兒童課後托育情形之初探。臺南師院學報,33,233-262。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.郭實渝(20081200)。教學建構主義的哲學基礎。臺東大學教育學報,19(2),119-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Wood, David J.、Bruner, Jerome S.、Ross, Gail(1976)。The role of tutoring in problem solving。The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,17(2),89-100。  new window
16.李宏才、許雅惠(2010)。課後托育服務品質現況研究--以三之三安親課輔連鎖機構為例。長庚科技學刊,12,83-100。  延伸查詢new window
17.張玉成(1994)。國小國語習作內容之思考技巧內涵分析。教育研究資訊,2(2),103-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.陳相因(1962)。寫字作業指導和訂正的商榷。臺灣教育,134,18-19。  延伸查詢new window
19.羅秋昭(1996)。國語教師的作業指導與教學藝術。北師語文教育通訊,4,53-67。  延伸查詢new window
20.Marin, N.、Benarroch, A.、Gomez, E. J.(2000)。What is the relationship between social constructivism and Piagetian constructivism? An analysis of the characteristics of the ideas within both theories。International Journal of Science Education,22(3),225-238。  new window
21.van de Pol, J.、Volman, M.、Beishuizen, J.(2010)。Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research。Educational Psychology Review,22(3),271-296。  new window
22.Zarei, G. R.(2008)。The effect of constructivist language teaching/learning on students' conceptions of L2 reading。Iranian Journal of Language Studies,2(2),281-298。  new window
23.Davis, E. A.、Miyake, N.(2004)。Explorations of scaffolding in complex classroom systems。The Journal of the Learning Sciences,13(3),265-272。  new window
會議論文
1.張新仁(200811)。臺灣地區中文寫作研究的回顧與展望--1979~2008。華人社會的課程與教學改進研討會,澳門大學 。澳門:澳門大學教育學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.張新仁(2005)。國科會教育學門-「學習策略」主題研究成果之綜合分析。台南。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.鄭蕤(1995)。海峽兩岸國小國語科習作內容及習作教學之比較研究。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.沈珠帆(2008)。國民小學國語習作大意練習的內容分析(碩士論文)。國立臺東大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.孫碧霞(2005)。國小高年級學童國語習作語法錯誤類型研究(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.王思秦(2004)。國民小學九年一貫課程國語習作內容之分析研究。國立台中師範學院,台中。  延伸查詢new window
4.林雅琪(2010)。一位國小教師班級經營之行動研究--以作業指導和整潔工作為例。國立台中教育大學,台中。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.曾榮祥、吳貞宜(2004)。課後托育理論與實務。台北:華騰。  延伸查詢new window
2.Von Glasersfeld, E.(1995)。Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning。London:The Falmer Press。  new window
3.羅秋昭(1999)。國小語文科教材教法。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Carr, W.(1995)。For education: Towards critical educational inquiry。Buckingham。  new window
5.Vygotsky, Lev Semenovich、Cole, Michael、John-Steiner,‎ Vera、Scribner, Sylvia、Souberman, Ellen(1978)。Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes。Harvard University Press。  new window
6.Anderson, J. R.(2010)。Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications。New York,:Worth Publishing。  new window
7.康軒文教事業(2012)。國小國語教師手冊(6下)。新北。  延伸查詢new window
8.南一書局(2012)。國語備課指引(6下)。台南。  延伸查詢new window
9.Piaget, J.、Cook, M.(1937)。The construction of reality in the child。New York。  new window
10.陸怡琮、李燕芳、馮心怡(2010)。摘要策略。閱讀理解策略教學手冊。台北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
11.Cowey, S.(2005)。A first-year teacher implements literature-based/whole-language program in a fourth-fifth grade。Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice。New York。  new window
12.Gould, J. S.(2005)。A constructivist perspective on teaching and learning in the language arts。Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice。New York。  new window
其他
1.教育部(2010)。97年國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要,http://www.edu.tw/eje/content.aspx?site_content_sn=15326, 20100227。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Collins, A.、Brown, J. S.、Newman, S. E.(1987)。Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics。Learning, knowing, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
2.潘世尊(2003)。建構主義學習理論與教學應用。學習與教學新趨勢。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
3.Wertsch, J. V.(1984)。The Zone of Proximal Development: Some Conceptual Issues。Children’s Learning in the "Zone of Proximal Development"。San Francisco, CA:Jossey Bass。  new window
4.von Glasersfeld, Ernst(1984)。An introduction to radical constructivism。The invented reality: How do we know what we believe we know? Contributions to constructivism。W. W. Norton & Company。  new window
5.Hirst, P. H.(1983)。Educational theory。Educational theory and its foundation disciplines。Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE