參考文獻
方金雅、鍾易達、邱上真（1998）。國小學童閱讀摘要能力評定規範之發展。台南師院測驗發展中心主編：國小教學評量的反省與前瞻，頁123-137。台南：台南師範學院。
王宏喜（1992）。文章結構舉要。北京市：經濟管理出版社。
王瓊珠（2010）。故事結構教學與分享閱讀。台北：心理。
朱國振（1997）。文章結構的把握。北京市：語文出版社。
吳英長(1998)。國民小學國語故事體課文摘寫大意的教學過程之分析。臺東師院學報 ， 9，149-184 。
吳敏而(1994)。摘取文章大意的教材教法。輯於國民小學國語科教材教法研究第三輯，93-107。
吳應天（1988）。文章結構學。北京市：北京人民大學出版社。
沈義雄（2003）。閱兩種說明文結構對國中生閱讀策略使用之影響研究。國立成功大學外國語文學系碩士論文，未出版，台南。
周何主編(1998)。國語活用辭典。台北：五南。
官美媛(1999)。國小學生摘取文章大意策略之教學研究－以五年級說明文為例。國立東華大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，花蓮。
岳修平譯(2008)。Gagné, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., &; Yekovich, F. R.著。教學心理學–學習的認知基礎。台北：遠流。(原出版年1993)。
林世偉（2006）。閱讀科學書籍與摘要策略對國小六年級學童科學創造力之影響。 高雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄。
林秀娟（2009）。故事結構合作學習對國小五年級學童閱讀理解能力的影響。國立臺南教育大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，臺南市。
林俊賢（2004）。小學國語文摘寫大意的教學過程分析-以議論文為例。台東大學教育學報，15(2)，123-162。林建平（1995）。國小學童的閱讀動機、理解策略與閱讀成就之相關研究。台北巿立師範學院學報，26，267-294。
林素珍（2009）。歷屆學測國文新型寫作提析論。逢甲人文社學報。19，11-50。林淑萍（2009）。運用故事結構教學增進國小二年級學生閱讀理解能力之研究。國立臺中教育大學課程與教學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台中。
林清山（1991）。心理與教育統計學。台北：東華。
林清山(譯)（1996）。教育心理學–認知取向。台北：遠流。
林蕙君(1995)。閱讀能力、說明文結構對國小高年級學生的閱讀理解及閱讀策略使用之影響研究。國立新竹師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文。
邱上真（1991）。學習策略教學的理論與實際。特殊教育與復健學報，1，1-49。邱上真、洪碧霞(1999)。中文閱讀成分與歷程模式之建立及其在實務上的應用：評量與診斷、課程與教材、學習與教學－國語基本能力檢定診斷與協助系統之發展。(國科會專案報告，計劃編號：NSC88-2614-H-017-004-F18)。
柯華葳（2010）。閱讀理解研習工作坊。桃園縣：國立中央大學學習與教學研究所。
柯華葳、陳冠銘（2004）。文章結構標示與閱讀理解 – 以低年級學生為例。教育心理學報，36(2)，185-200。柯華葳、詹益綾、張建妤、游婷雅（2008）。台灣四年級學生閱讀素養PIRLS2006報告。行政院國家科學委員專題研究成果報告（編號：NSC 96-MOE-S-008-002）。桃園縣：國立中央大學學習與教學研究所。
洪裕欣（2008）。國小兒童摘要能力與學業成就之相關研究。臺北市立教育大學課程與教學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
洪碧霞（2007）。臺灣15歲學生閱讀、數學和科學素養調查研究：教育品質和均等議題（PISA 2009）。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫（編號：NSC-97-2522-S-024-001），未出版。
涂志賢(1998)。相互教學法對國小六年級學童國語科閱讀理解、後設認知、自我效能影響之研究。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，花蓮。
涂振隆（2007）。「閱讀摘要」策略於課文大意教學之應用。國立新竹教育大學人資處語文教學碩士班碩士論文，未出版，新竹。
高碧玉(2011)。摘要策略對國中二年級學生閱讀態度影響之研究。高雄師範大學國文教學碩士班碩士論文，未出版，高雄。
國語日報（2010）。2011.9.28取自：http://blog.yam.com/ilovechinese/article/34507682
張卉姍（2008）。尋找故事中的結構。高雄：讀你我閱讀寫作工作坊。
張玉英（2010）。愛上寫作的八堂課(一)。台北：龍騰。
張春興（1996）。教育心理學：三化取像的理論與實踐。台北市：東華。
張國恩、蘇宜芬、宋曜廷（2000）。閱讀理解輔助系統之設計及其應用效果研究─以閱讀障礙學生為例：統整式教學策略的設計。國科會輔助研究計劃，NSC89-2614-S-003-003。
張莉珍（2003）。故事構圖策略與摘要策略對增進國小六年級低閱讀能力學生閱讀理解之比較研究。中原大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，中壢市。
張貴琳、黃秀霜、鄒慧英（2009）。從國際比較觀點探討台灣學生PISA 2006閱讀素養表現特徵。課程與教學季刊，13(1)，1-26。張雅萍（2000）。摘要策略對網路化學習成效之研究。國立台灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文。
張碧容、鄒慧英（2005）。國小四年級學童閱讀摘要實作表現及自我評量之研究。南大學報，39（1），149-174。莊景益（2007）。心智繪圖結合摘要教學法與寫作教學法對國小四年級學生閱讀理解與寫作能力之行動研究。國立屏東教育大學教育科技研究所碩士論文，未出版，屏東。
許意苹(2007)。國小高年級學生網路資訊搜尋課程發展與成效之研究。淡江大學教育科技學系碩士在職專班碩士論文，未出版，台北。郭佩慧 (2006)。中文閱讀摘要學習系統的發展與應用。國立台南大學測驗統計研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南。
陳文安 (2006)。國小學生摘要策略之教學研究---以六年級為例。國立屏東教育大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文，未出版，屏東。
陳李綢(1991)。認知發展與輔導。台北市：心理。
陳佳君（2001）。從章法談國小作文運材教學—以幾種常用於論說文的章法為例。人文與社會學科教學通訊，12(4)，131 -154。
陳欣希、柯雅卿、周育如、陳明蕾、游婷雅(2011)。問好問題。台北市：天衛文化。
陳海泓（2011）。說明文體的閱讀理解教學。教師天地，172，28-36。
陳茹玲（2010）。三種閱讀策略教學課程對低閱讀能力大學生閱讀策略運用與摘要表現影響之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系博士論文，未出版，台北。陳淑絹(1995）。「指導─合作學習」教學策略增進國小學童閱讀理解能力之實徵研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文，未出版，台北。陳滿銘（1999）。文章結構分析：以中學國文課文為例。台北：萬卷樓出版社。
陳滿銘（2003）。章法學綜論。台北：萬卷樓出版社。陸怡琮(2011)。摘要策略教學對提升國小五年級學童摘要能力與閱讀理解的成效。教育科學研究期刊，56(3)，1-28。(TSSCI)
陸怡琮、李燕芳、馮心怡（2010）。摘要策略。載於國立中央大學學習與教學研究所（主編）：閱讀理解策略教學手冊（頁42-94）。台北：教育部。
彭聃齡、張必隱(2003)。認知心理學。台北市：東華。
曾佩芬（2008）。閱讀理解能力對學科能力測驗國文非選擇題作答之影響。考試學刊，5，53-87。黃千玲（2008）。故事結構教學在國小一年級實施成效之行動研究。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義。
黃玉佳 (2003)。概念構圖與摘要策略對不同性別學生學習成效之影響。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南。
黃瓊儀（2003）。不同閱讀理解策略教學對國小閱讀理解障礙學生教學成效之研究。國立臺北師範學院特殊教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。塗絲佳（2004）。國中國文「閱讀」教學研究。國立高雄師範大學國文系碩士論文，未出版，高雄。
楊智雯（2007）。故事結構教學對國小一年級學生閱讀理解能力之影響。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義。
楊韻平 (1993)。兒童摘取文章大意的能力。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
路君約、盧欽銘、歐滄和(1994)。多因素性向測驗指導手冊。台北：中國行為科學社。
廖晉斌（2003）。國文閱讀理解策略教學對增進國中生閱讀理解能力、閱讀策略運用及學業成就效果之研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系碩士論文，未出版，彰化。
齊若蘭(2005)。ＯＥＣＤ調查：哪個國家學生閱讀能力最強？天下雜誌，263，海闊天空教育網。取自http://www.lcenter.com.tw/inter/GermanyDetail.asp?no=21
劉兆文（1999）。從閱讀的認知歷程談有效教學策略。教師天地，102，75-85。
潘麗珠（2004）。從學測閱卷談我對閱讀的一些看法。國文天地，227，28-33。蔡雅泰（2005）。概念構圖融入國語教學對國小五年級學童閱讀理解、大意摘要能力與語文學習態度影響之研究。高雄師範大學教育系博士論文，未出版，高雄。蔡銘津（1996）。文章結構分析策略教學對增進兒童閱讀理解與寫作成效之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系未出版博士論文，未出版，高雄。蔡銘津（1998）。文章結構分析策略教學對學童寫作成效之影響。課程與教學季刊，1 (2)，139-160。鄭妃玲（2003）。說明文結構對國小六年級學童閱讀理解的影響。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義。
鄭紹薰(1982)。怎樣指導學生摘取課文大意。中國語文，50(5)，45-47。
鄭麗玉（2000）。認知與教學。臺北 : 五南。蕭怡文（2010）。故事結構分析策略在國中讀寫結合教學之應用研究。高雄師範大學國文教學碩士班碩士論文，未出版，高雄。
賴麗珍(譯)（2007）。教學生做摘要：五十種改進各種學科學習的教學技術。台北：心理。
謝孟璋（2007）。運用摘要教學策略改善國小學童網路搜尋過程之關鍵詞使用與資訊選取能力。國立台南大學數位學習科技學系教學碩士論文，未出版，台南。
藍慧君（1991）。學習障礙兒童與普通兒童閱讀不同結構文章之閱讀理解與理解策略的比較研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。顏若映（1992）。教科書內容設計與閱讀理解之認知研究。教育與心理研究，1 5 ，101-128。魏靜雯（2004）。心智繪圖與摘要教學對國小五年級學生閱讀理解與摘要能力之影響。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
羅秋昭（2001）。創思的閱讀教學。全國兒童閱讀種子教師研習會手冊。教育部。
蘇月華等編（1998）。中文閱讀理解能力訓練。香港：香港中文大學、香港教育研究所。
PISA（2008）。閱讀素養應試指南。台南：國立台南大學PISA國家研究中心。
PISA（2010）。Pisa閱讀素養。編譯自http:www.pisa.oecd.org/pisa/read.htm。
Alexander, P. A., &; Jeffon, J. L. (1994). Contrasting instructional and structural importance: The seductive effect of teacher questions.Journal of Reading Behavior, 26, 19-45.
Alexander, P.A., Murphy, P. K., Woods, B. S., Duhon, K. E., &; Parker, D. (1997).College instruction and concomitant changes in students’ knowledge, interest, and strategy use: A study of domain learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology,22, 125-146.
Alexander, P.A., Murphy, P. K., Woods, B. S., Duhon, K. E., &; Parker,D. (1997). College instruction and concomitant changes in students’ knowledge, interest, and strategy use: A study of domain learning.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 125-146.
Amold, M. T.(1981).Teaching theme, thesis, topic senaences and clinchers as related concepts. Journal of Reading , 24(5), 373-76.
Anderson, V., &; Hidi, S. (1989). Teaching students to summarize. Educational Leadership, 46(4), 26-28.
Angelo, T. A., &; Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Armbruster, B. B. (1986). Schema theory and the design of content-area textbook. Educational Psychologist, 21, 253-267.
Armbruster, B. B., &; Anderson, T. H. (1984). Mapping : Representing informative text diagrammatically. In C. D. Holley &; D. F. Dansereau (Eds.), Spatial learning strategies: Techniques, applications, and related issues. New York : Academic Press.
Armbruster, B. B., Anderson, T. H., &; Ostertag, J. (1987). Does text structure/ summarization instruction facilitate learning from expository text? Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 331-346.
Asha, K. J., H., M. K., &; Yan, P. X. (2000). Enhancing main idea comprehension for students with learning problems: The role of a summarization strategy and self-monitoring instruction. The Journal of Special Education, 34(3), 127-139.
Baumann, J . F. (1986). The direct instruction of main idea comprehension ability. In J . F. Baumann(Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehension (pp.133-178). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Block,C., Parris, S., Read, K., Whiteley, C., &; Cleveland, M.（2009）.Instructional approaches that significantly increase reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101（2）, 262-281.
Broer, N. A., Aarnoutse, C. A. J., Kieviet, F. K., &; Van Leeuwe, J. F. J.(2002). The effect of instructing the structural aspect of texts. Educational Studies, 28, 213–238.
Brown, A. L., &; Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,22, 1-14.
Brown, A . L., Day, J. D., ＆ Jones, R. S. (1983). The development of plans for summarizing text. Child Development, 54, 968-979.
Brown, A. L, Smiley, S. S. &; Lawton, S. C.（1978）. The effects of experience on the selection of suitable retrieval cues for studying text. Child Development, 49, 829-835.
Brown, A. L., &; Smiley, S. S. (1977). Rating the importance of structural units of prose passages: A problem of metacognitive development. Child Development, 48, 1–8.
Brown, A.L., (1980) .Metacognitive development and reading. In R.J. Spiro, B.C. Bruce &; W. F. Brewer (Eds.). Theoretical issues in reading comprehension, (pp. 453-481) , Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Chambliss, J. M. &; Calfee, R. C. (1998). Textbooks for learning: Nurturing children’s minds.Malden, MA : Blackwell.
Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., &; Chen, S. F. (2002). The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. Journal of Experimental Education, 71, 5-24.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Cook, L.,K., &; Mayer,R. E.(1988)Teaching readers about the structure of scientific Text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 488-456.
Davis, F. (1995).Introducing Reading .Lodon: Penguin English.
Day, J. D. (1986). Teaching summarization skills: Influences of student ability level and strategy difficulty. Cognition &; Instruction, 3(3), 193-210.
Dewitz, P., Jones, J., &; Leahy, S. (2009). Comprehension strategy instruction in core reading program. Reading Research Quartely, 44(2), 102-126.
Dole, J. A., Duffy, G.G, Roehler, L.R., &; Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new : Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61, 239-264.
Duke, N. K., Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practice for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup &; S. J. Samuels (Eds.) What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 205-242).
Englert, C. S., &; Hiebert, E. H. (1984). Children's developing awareness of text structures in expository materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(1), 65-74.
Englert, C. S., Stewart, S. R., ＆ Hiebert, E. H. ( 1988). Young writers’ use of text structure in expository text generation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 143-151.
Frances, S. M., &; Eckart, J. A. (1992). The effects of reciprocal teaching on comprehension. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED 350572).
Gagné, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., &; Yekovich, F. R. (1993). Cognitive psychology of school learning. Harper Collins College Publishers.
Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (4th Ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Gajria, M., &; Salvia, J.(1992).The effect of summarization instruction on text comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Expcetional Children, 58(6), 508-516.
Garner, R. (1982). Efficient text summarization: Costs and benefits. Journal of Educational Research, 75(5), 275-279.
Garner, R. (1985). Text summarization deficiencies among older students: Awareness or production ability? American Educational Research Journal, 22, 549-560.
Ghabanchi,Z, &; Mirza, F. H.（2010）. The effect of summarization on intermediate EFL learners' reading comprehension and their performance on display, referential and inferential questions. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 7,(9),53-60.
Gillet, J. W. &; Temple, C. (1986). Understanding reading problems: Assessment and instruction (2nd ed.). Boston: Littl, Brown and Company.
Graesser A.C. (2007). An introduction to strategic reading comprehension (pp.3-26) In D. S. McNamara (Ed.). Reading comprehension strategies : Theory, interventions, and technologies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hahn, A. L., &; Garner, R. (1985). Synthesis of research on students’ ability to summarize text. Educational Leadership, 42(5), 52-55.
Hare, V. C. (1992). Summarizing text. In J. W. Irwin &; M. A. Doyle(Eds.) Reading/Writing connections: Learning from research. Newark, Del.: IRA
Hare, V. C., &; Borchardt, K. M. (1984). Direct instruction of summarization skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(1), 62-78.
Hare, V. C., Rabinowitz, M., Schieble, K. M. (1989). Text effects on main idea comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 72-88.
Head, M. H., Readence, J. E., ＆ Buss, R. R. ( 1989). An examination of summary writing as a measure of reading comprehension. Reading Research and Instruction, 28(4), 1-11.
Hidi, S. ＆ Anderson, V. ( 1986). Producing written summaries: Task demands, cognitive operations and implications for instruction. Review of Education Research, 56(4), 473-493﹒
Holmes, G. A., &; Leitzel, T. C. (1993). Evaluating learning through a constructivist paradigm. Performance and Instruction, 32(8), 28-30.
Hyde, A.A.,&; Bizar, M.（1989）.Thinking in context: Teaching cognitive process across the elementary school curriculum. NY : Longman.
Jitendra, A. K., Cole, C. L., Hoppes, M. K., ＆ Wilson, B. (1998). Effects of a direct instruction main idea summarization program and self-monitoring on reading comprehension of middle school students with learning disabilities. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 14(4),379-396.
Johnson, N. (1983). What do you do if you can’t tell the whole story? The development of summarization skills. In K. E. Nelson(Ed.), Children’s language(vol. 4),(pp. 315-383). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kintsch, E. (1990). Macroprocess and microprocess in the development of summarization skill. Cognition and Instruction, 7(3), 161-195.
Kintsch, E., Steinhart, D., Stahl, G.., Kintsch, W., Landauer, T., Paula, R. D., et al. (2000).Developing summarization skills through the use of LSA-based feedback. Interactive Learning Environments, 8(2), 87-109.
Kintsch, W., ＆ Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
Kletzien, S. B. (1992). Proficient and less proficient comprehenders’ strategy use for different top-level structures. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24, 191-215.
Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., &; Boardman, A. （2007）. Teaching reading comprehension to students with learning disabilities. New York: Guilford Press.
Lauer, K. D. (2002). The effect of text structure, content familiarity, and reading ability on second-graders’ comprehension of text. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University.
Leon, J. A., &; Carretero, M. (1995). Intervention in comprehension and memory strategies: Knowledge and use of text structure. Learning and Instruction, 5(3), 203-220.
Linda L.（1991）. Summarizing: It ‘s More than Just Finding the Main Idea. A six-phase plan for teaching summarization. Intervention in School and Clinic. 27, (1), 25-30.
Malone, L. D. &; Mastropieri, M. A.(1992). Reading comprehension instruction : Summarization and self-monitoring training for students with learning disabilities. Expectional Children, 58(3), 270-279.
Mandler, J. M. &; Johnson, N. S. (1977). Remembrance of things passed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111-151.
Mani, I., &; Maybury, M. (Eds.). (1999). Advances in automated text summarization. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Marinak, B., &; Gambrell L. B. (2008).Elementary information text instruction: A research review. The International Journal of Learning, 15(9), 75-83.
Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., &; Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
Mason, J., &; Au, K. (1986). Reading Instruction for Today. Urbana, IL: Scott, Foresman.
Mayer , R. E. (1987). Educational Psychology : A Cognitive Approach. New York: Harper Collins.
Mayer, R.E. (1996). Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: The SOI model for guiding three cognitive processes in knowledge construction. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 357-371.
Meyer B.F, Wijekumar K., Middlemiss W., Higley K., Lei P.W., Meier C., &; Spielvogel J.（2010）.Web-based tutoring of the structure strategy with or without elaborated feedback or choice for fifth- and seventh-grade readers. Reading Research Quarterly ,45(1) , 62–92.
Meyer, B. J. F.(1975). The organization of prose and its effect on memory. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Meyer, B. J. F., &; Freedle, R. O. (1984). Effects of discourse type on recall. American Educational Research Journal, 21,121-143.
Meyer, B.F., &; Poon, L. W. (2001). Effects of structure strategy training and signaling on recall of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 141-159.
Meyer,B.J.F., Brandt, D. M., &; Bluth, G. J.（1980）.Use of top level structure in the text：Key for reading comprehension of ninth grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 72-103.
Mokhtari, K., &; Reichard, C.A. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249-259.
Nancy, F., Douglas, F, ＆ Ted, H. (2003). “What’s the gist”: Summary writing for struggling adolescent writers. Academic ResearchLibrary,11(2), 43-49.
Nist, S.L., &; Simpson, M. (2002, April). College studying. Reading Online, 5(8). Retrieved May 29, 2004, from the World Wide Web : http://www.readingonline.org/articles/art_index.asp?HREF=handbook/ nist/index.html
OECD (2006). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006. Paris: Author.
Pressley, M. (2006). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Pressley, M., Borkowski, J. G., &; O'Sullivan, J. T. (1985). Children's metamemory and the teaching of memory strategies. In D. L. Forrest-Pressley, G. E.MacKinnon, &; T. G. Waller (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition, and human performance (Vol. 1, pp. 111-149). New York: Academic Press.
Pressley, M., Goodchild, F., Fleet, J., Zajchowski, R., &; Evans, E. D. (1989). The challenges of classroom instruction. Elementary School Journal, 89, 301-342.
Radev., D. R., Hovy., E. &; McKeown., K. (2002). Introduction to the special issue on summarization. Computational Linguistics, 28(4), 399-408.
Reutzel, D. R., Smith, J. A., &; Fawson, P. C. (2005). An evaluation of two approaches for teaching reading comprehension strategies in the primary years using science information texts. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 20, 276–305.
Rinehart, S. D., Stahl, S. A., ＆ Erickson, L. G. (1986). Some effects of summarization training on reading and studying. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 422-438.
Roller, C. M. (1990). The interaction between knowledge and structure variables in the processing of expository prose. Reading Research Quarterly, 25(2), 79-89.
Rosenshine, B. (1986). Synthesis of research on explicit teaching. Educational Leadership, 43, 60-69.
Ruddle, B. R. ＆ Unrau, J. N.( Eds.)(2004). Theoretical models of processes of reading(4th ed.). New York: International Reading Association.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, &; W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognition psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence and education, (pp. 33-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum Associates.
Rumelhart, D. E., &; Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In R. C. Anderson, J. R. Spiro, &; W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp.99-136). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rumelhart, D. J. (1975). Notes on a schema for stories, In D. G. Bobrow &; A. Collins (Eds.), Representation and understanding, , N. Y.: Academic Press.
Scardamalia , M. and C. Bereiter (1984). Development of strategies in text processing. In H. Mandl, N. L. Stein and T. Trabasso (Eds.) Learning and Comprehension of Text. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
Taylor, B. M. (1980). Children's memory for expository text after reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 399–411.
Taylor, B., &; Samuels, S. J. (1983). Children's use of text structure in the recall of expository material. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 517–528.
Thorndyke, P. W. (1977). Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory for narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 77-110.
Tovani, C. (2000). I read it, but I don’t get it: Comprehension strategies for adolescent reader. Portland, Maine: Stenhouse.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1985). Semantic discourse analysis. In T.A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis : Disciplines of discourse (vol.2, pp. 103-136). London: Academic Press.
Wade, S.E., &; Thrathen, W. (1989). Effect of self-selected study methods on learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 40-47.
Wilder, A, A &; William, J. P. (2001). Students with severe learing disabilities can learn higher order comprehension skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 268-278.
Williams, J. P., Taylor, M. B., ＆ DeCani, J. S. ( 1984). Constructing macrostructure for expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(6), 1065-1075.
Williams, J. P., Taylor, M. B., &; Ganger, S. (1981). Text variations at the level of the individual sentence and the comprehension of simple expository paragraphs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 851–865.
Wiograd, P N. &; Hare, V.C. (1988).Direct instruction and reading comprehension strategies : The nature of teacher explanation. In C.E.Weinstein &; E.T. Goetz (Eds.) Learning and Study Stratrgies. N.Y.: Acamatic.
Wong, B. Y. L., &; Jones , W. (1982). Increasing meta comprehension in learning disabled and normally achieving students through training. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 228-240.
Wormeli, R. (2005). Summarization in any subject: 50 techniques to improve student learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
Zimmerman, S., &; Hutchins, C. (2003). 7 Keys to comprehension: How to help your kids read it and get it. NY: Three Rivers Press.