:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國中校園學生霸凌現象之個案研究:以丁丁國中為例
書刊名:區域與社會發展研究
作者:林雅萍任慶儀
作者(外文):Lin, Ya PingJen, Chin-i
出版日期:2011
卷期:2
頁次:頁247-282
主題關鍵詞:校園霸凌霸凌方式國中生霸凌School bullyingBullying methodsJunior-high school bullying
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:107
  • 點閱點閱:31
雖然校園霸凌事件是長期存在的問題,但是受限於過去封閉式的資訊管道、學校和家長的態度,始終未能成為教育重要的議題,也沒有得到教育主管機構的重視。但是2010 年臺灣桃園縣八德國中學校霸凌事件卻成為引爆全國對校園霸凌事件討論的導火線。本文即是針對台中市丁丁國中一至三年級的學生進行調查,以了解該校之學生霸凌情況,作為該校解決學生霸凌問題之基礎。每個年級隨機各抽取二個班級,總共有182 位學生參與問卷調查。問卷調查以發現霸凌與被霸凌的比率、方式、原因、對象、時間、地點以及應付策略為目的。以卡方考驗和百分比統計其問卷,結果發現:(1)被霸凌和霸凌的男生多於女生,年級愈高被霸凌的人數比例愈高,但是霸凌人數的比例在國三時降低;(2)被霸凌與霸凌的型式都是以語言霸凌為最高,其次為社會性霸凌和身體霸凌;(3)年級與被語言霸凌的方式、被網路霸凌的方式具有顯著性關聯;(4)性別和被社會性霸凌的方式、身體霸凌的方式具有顯著性關聯;(5)被霸凌和霸凌別人的時間都以下課時間居多;(6)被霸凌和霸凌別人的地點都以校園內居多;(7)被霸凌和霸凌者大都是同班同學;(8)被霸凌和霸凌別人的次數呈現兩極化,從少於三次以及多於十次都有;(9)大多數被霸凌者不知道被霸凌的理由,但是霸凌者的理由卻以好玩居多;(10) 尋求社會支援與內在化是被霸凌的學生所採取的因應策略。針對本研究之發現,研究者提出對霸凌與被霸凌學生之輔導建議,也提出對學校如何預防霸凌事件之建議。
Although bullying problems have been existed in all levels of schools for years, they were eventually ignored by the government as well as the schools, due to a closed access to the regarding information and passive attitudes of schools and parents. It has not been an issue in the field of education until 2010, the bullying event of Ba-deh Junior-high School was revealed by public press, which immediately attracted a nation-wide attention. As a result, the prevalence of bully investigations was begun. The purpose of this study was to investigate the bullying problems in a junior-high school in Taichung, Taiwan. The subjects were drawn from 7 - 9 grades, totally there were 171 students involved in this study. The results by chi-square test and percentile showed that: (1) males were more likely to be the victims as well as the bullies than females; victims increased with grade, however, bullies decreased at 9th grade; (2) verbal bullying, social bullying and physical bullying were the major types of bullying, respectively; (3) a significant difference existed in language and cyber bullying for different graders among victims; (4) a significant difference existed in social bullying among male and female victims and physical bullying among male and female bullies; (5) most bullying events were initiated during the class recess; (6) school ground was the target place for bullying events; (7) most bullies and victims were classmates; (8) the frequency of being bullied and bullying varied from less than 3 times and more than ten times for victims and bullies; (9) most victims were unaware of the reason for being bullied, however, the bullies hold an attitude as being for fun; (10) seeking social support and internalization were the coping strategies for the victims. The researcher provided some suggestions for school administrators and teachers as to prevent bullying problems in the school.
期刊論文
1.Solberg, M. E.、Olweus, D.、Endresen, I. M.(2007)。Bullies and victims at school: Are they the same pupils?。British Journal of Educational Psychology,77(2),441-464。  new window
2.鄧煌發(20071000)。校園安全防護措施之探討--校園槍擊、校園霸凌等暴行事件之防治。中等教育,58(5),8-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Gini, G.、Pozzoli, T.、Hauser, M.(2011)。Bullies have enhanced moral competence to judge relative to victims, but lack moral compassion。Personality and Individual Differences,50(5),603-608。  new window
4.邱靖惠、黃炤宏(20061100)。特別報導.霸凌:臺灣校園的恐怖分子。張老師月刊,347,52-68。  延伸查詢new window
5.Olweus, D.(1994)。Annotation: bullying at school: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program。Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,35(7),1171-1190。  new window
6.Whitney, I.、Smith, P. K.(1993)。A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in junior/middle and secondary schools。Educational Research,35(1),3-25。  new window
7.吳武典(19970900)。國中偏差行為學生學校生活適應之探討。教育心理學報,29,25-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.盧雪梅(20091200)。校園安全觀感與學習成就:PIRLS和TIMSS告訴我們什麼。研習資訊,26(6),39-50。  延伸查詢new window
9.Beran, T. N.(2005)。A closer look at the relationship between bullying and behavior problems: A syndrome of misconduct。Exceptionality Education Canada,15(3),41-55。  new window
10.Boulton, M. J.(1996)。Bullying in mixed sex groups of children。Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology,16(4),439-443。  new window
11.Bradshaw, C.、O'Brennan, L. M.、Sawyer, A. L.(2008)。Examining variation in attitudes toward aggressive retaliation and perceptions of safety among bullies, victims, and bully/victims。Professional School Counseling,12(1),10-21。  new window
12.Cullingford, C.、Morrison, J.(1995)。Bullying as a formative influence. The relationship between the experience of school and criminality。British Educational Research Journal,21(5),547-560。  new window
13.Estevez, E.、Murgui, S.、Musitu, G.(2009)。Psychological adjustment in bullies and victims of school violence。European Journal of Psychology of Education,24(4),473-483。  new window
14.Kochenderfer, B. J.、Ladd, G. W.(1997)。Victimized children's responses to peers' aggression: Behavior associated with reduced versus continued victimization。Development and Psychopathology,9,59-73。  new window
15.Ross, S. W.、Horner, R.(2009)。Bully prevention in positive behavior support。Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,43(4),747-759。  new window
16.Smith, P. K.、Sue, S.(2000)。What good schools can do about bullying: Findings from a survey in English schools after a decade of research and action。Childhood,7,193-212。  new window
17.洪福源(20030600)。校園欺凌行為的本質及其防治策略。教育研究月刊,110,88-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.邱珍琬(20010900)。國小校園欺凌行為與教師對應策略。屏東師院學報,15,41-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.邱珍琬(20050400)。國中欺凌行為實際初探。國民教育學報,1,97-119。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Kristensen, S. M.、Smith, P. K.(2003)。The use of coping strategies by Danish children classed as bullies, victims, bully/victims, and not involved, in response to different (hypothetical) types of bullying。Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,44(5),479-488。  new window
21.Bijttebier, P.、Vertommen, H.(1998)。Coping with peer arguments in school-age children with bully/victim problems。British Journal of Educational Psychology,68,387-394。  new window
22.Salmivalli, C.、Karhunen, J.、Lagerspetz, K. M. J.(1996)。How do the victims respond to bullying?。Aggressive Behavior,22,99-109。  new window
研究報告
1.鄭英耀、黃正鵠(2010)。校園暴力霸凌現況調查與改進策略實施計劃。台北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.胡瑋潔(2005)。國中學生社會技巧、欺凌行為與學校適應之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.賀欣音(2010)。學生知覺學校支持與學生霸凌行為關係之研究--以臺南市國中為例(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.林士力(2009)。國中生霸凌行為與學校適應相關之研究以中部地區為例(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.林和男(2004)。國中生校園暴行被害經驗與特性之研究--以台中縣為例(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.張秀如(2007)。國中生欺凌受害經驗之分析研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Smith, P. K.、Morita, Y.、Junger-Tas, J.、Olweus, Dan、Catalano, R.、Slee, P.(1999)。The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective。Routledge。  new window
2.Olweus, Dan(1993)。Bullying At School: What We Know and What We Can Do。Wiley-Blackwell。  new window
其他
1.兒童福利聯盟文教基金會(2004)。國小兒童校園霸凌(bully)現象調查報告,臺北:兒童福利聯盟文教基金會。,http://www.children.org.tw/database_report.php?id=153&;typeid=34。  延伸查詢new window
2.兒童福利聯盟文教基金會(2011)。2011年台灣校園霸凌(bully)現象調查報告,兒童福利聯盟文教基金會。,https://www.children.org.tw/research/detail/69/236。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育部學生軍訓處(2011)。霸凌行為應付之法律責任,http://140.111.1.88/law/。  延伸查詢new window
4.新頭殼Newtalk(20110331)。法國校園霸凌報告出爐,自承落後加國30年,http://blog.xuite.net/leni925/SepShallow?st=c&w=2272579&p=1。  延伸查詢new window
5.Constitutional Rights Foundation(2011)。Causes of school violence,http://www.crf-usa.org/。  new window
6.Maddox, D.(20100421)。What's changed from Columbine shootings to Deer Creek Middle School 11 years later?,http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2916292/columbine_11th_anniversary_arrives.html?cat=9。  new window
圖書論文
1.邱上真(2005)。Bandura社會學習理論與教學應用。學習與教學新趨勢。台北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
2.Roland, E.(1989)。Bullying: Scandinavian research tradition。Bullying in schools。Stoke- on-Trent:Trentham。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE