:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:兒童的課程理解--以自然與生活科技學習領域為例
書刊名:教育資料與研究
作者:陳美如 引用關係郭昭佑 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Mei JuGuo, Chao Yu
出版日期:2013
卷期:109
頁次:頁139-170
主題關鍵詞:九年一貫課程科學課程課程理解學童Nine-year consistent curriculumScience curriculumCurriculum understandingStudent
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:29
  • 點閱點閱:92
學童的課程理解是指學童在學習的過程中對學習過程、內容、 他人、自己與環境等五個面向的認知與覺察。本研究透過問卷調查探 討臺灣不同背景兒童對於自然科學課程的理解。抽樣部分採分層隨機 抽樣,依臺灣北、中、南、東四個區域各抽取3 所學校,每所學校三 至六年級各年級的第一個班級接受施測。共有12 所學校48 個班級共 1,257 位學童參與問卷調查,共回收有效問卷1,166 份,有效問卷比 率為92.8%。主要研究發現如下:學生對自然課程內容的理解主要受 教師教學及教科書內容影響。學生對自然課程教學過程的理解多為實 驗、觀察與授課,而較少主動探索、問題思考、合作與討論。學生所 理解自然課程中的自己,自信較低,自我效能感不足,年級愈高,成 績愈低,正向態度也愈低。研究建議學生的科學學習應多增加探究與 討論的學習形式,並提升學生科學興趣與正向態度。
The curriculum understanding means students’cognition and awareness on the five aspects: learning process, content, others, themselves and the environment.By means of questionnaires and random sampling, this study discusses the science curriculum understanding of different backgrounds students in Taiwan. Three schools, each from the north, central, south and east are selected; while the first class from the third to sixth grade are surveyed. In sum, 12 schools (with 48 classes and 1,257 students) are taken for survey. A great number of 1,166 effective questionnaires are returned with 92.8% recorded. The main findings are as follows: understanding of science curriculumt is affected by teachers’ teaching and textbooks. Despite a good understanding of science curriculum through experiment, observation and teachers’ teaching, students still lack of exploring initiatively, thinking, questioning and discussing cooperatively. Students lack of learning confidence, positive attitude and low in self-efficacy. This is reflected by the fact that the higher grades they are the lower scores they get. A strong connection between positive attitude toward learning and better science understanding. The study suggests that students’ science learning approach should increase inquiry and discussion, improving students’ interest and positive attitude about science curriculum.
期刊論文
1.李克雄(199807)。人盡其才的中小學科學教育。現代化研究,15,77-81。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳文典(200306)。「自然與生活科技」學習領域之課程及其實施。中等教育,54(3),4-19。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.蘇育任(200506)。英國中小學的科學教育。教育資料與研究,64,60-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Crag, C. E.、Dunning J.、Elli, J.(2008)。Teacher and student behaviors in face-to-face and on-line course。Journal of Distance Education,22(3),115-128。  new window
5.傅麗玉(20060900)。在部落生活與學習:一門多元文化教育課。通識在線,6,60-61。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉怡昕、Tytler,Russel(20050600)。澳洲科學教育創新計畫。教育資料與研究,64,41-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Dale, R. S.(2009)。The relation of classroom environment and school belonging to academic self-efficacy among urban forth-and fifth grade students。Elementary School Journal,109(3),267-281。  new window
8.House, J. D.(2008)。Effects of classroom instructional strategies and self-beliefs on science achievement of elementary-school students in Japan: results from the TIMSS 2003 assessment。Education,129(2),259-266。  new window
9.House, J. D.(2003)。Instructional activities and interest in science learning for adolescent student in Japan and United States: finding from the third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS)。International Journal of Instructional Media,30,429-442。  new window
10.Howes, E. V.、Lim, M.、Campos, J.(2009)。Journeys into inquiry-based elementary science: Literacy practices, questioning, and empirical study。Science Education,93(2),189-217。  new window
11.Hillard, A. G. III(1991)。Why We Must Pluralize the Curriculum。Educational Leadership,49(4),12-16。  new window
12.邱美虹、周金城(20050600)。美國百年科學教育的發展。教育資料與研究,64,19-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.佘曉清(19980400)。科學教育與性別差異的省思。兩性平等教育季刊,2,51-57。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Meier, D.(1995)。The power of their ideas: Lessons for America from a small school in Harlem。Boston:Beacon Press。  new window
2.Pinar, W. F.、Reynolds, W. M.、Slattery, P.、Taubman, P. M.(1995)。Understandingcurriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourse。York, NY:Peter Lang。  new window
3.Rubin, B. C.、Silva, E. M.(2003)。Critical Voice in school reform。New York:Routledge Falmer。  new window
4.Steinberg, S. R.、Kincheloe, J. L.(1995)。Curriculum development in a postmodern era. Series editors’ instruction。New York:London:GARLAND PUBLISHING, Inc.。  new window
5.McCarthy, E. Doyle(1996)。Knowledge as Culture: The New Sociology of Knowledge。Routledge。  new window
6.Doll, W. E. Jr.(1993)。A post-modern perspective on curriculum。New York:Teachers College, Columbia University。  new window
7.Leicester, M.(1989)。Multicultural education: from theory to practice。NFER-NELSON。  new window
8.陳美如(20070000)。課程理解:教師取向之研究。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Westbury, Ian(1994)。Deliberation and the improvement of schooling。Deliberation in education and society。Norwood, NJ:Ablex。  new window
其他
1.(2008)。臺灣國中小數理超會考卻超不愛,http://tw. news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/081211/57/1 azl5.html。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉佩修(2009)。OECD跨國競爭力調查--臺灣是第四名的孩子,http://www. businessweekly.com.tw/article.php?id=35901。  延伸查詢new window
3.(2006)。決定樣本大小,http://www.lis.ntu_edu.tw/ 〜pnhsieh/epapers/no33.htm。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE