:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:潛在構念測量研究長期被忽視的細節:臺灣運輸相關研究之回顧
書刊名:運輸學刊
作者:張新立 引用關係梁竣凱
作者(外文):Chang, Hsin-liLiang, Jyun-kai
出版日期:2014
卷期:26:3
頁次:頁287-327
主題關鍵詞:潛在構念測量批判實在論認識關聯測量模式Latent construct measurementCritical realismEpistemic correlationMeasurement model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:285
  • 點閱點閱:106
潛在構念測量程序的前半部分-理論視角、構念定義與測量模式設定並沒有受到足夠的重視;然而,此三個步驟卻是潛在構念實徵研究是否可信的關鍵。本研究以「批判實在論」及「認識關聯」的角度出發,闡釋此三個步驟在潛在構念測量程序中的重要性,按著回顧「運輸計劃季刊」與「運輸學刊」於2001年至2012年間所刊登之33篇相關研究內的182個構念,檢視其是否適切地遵循潛在構念測量程序。研究結果顯示,有58.2%直接引用西方理論為理論視角,39%無理論基礎;51.6%沿用西方定義,31.9%無定義;26.4%校估與定義不合。本研究揭櫫潛在構念測量程序之議題,並提出相關之結論與建議,提供國內運輸研究者日後進行潛在構念測量相關研究時之參考。
Following the correct procedure of latent construct measurement is a key step to get reliable empirical research results. Three key steps of latent construct measurement often neglected by transportation psychologists-theoretical background, construct definition and measurement model specification, are addressed. This study indicates the importance of these three steps by drawing on Critical Realism and Epistemic Correlation. A total of 33 relevant articles with 182 latent constructs published in Transportation Planning Journal Quarterly and Journal of the Chinese Institute of Transportation during 2001 to 2012 are inspected to see whether their latent constructs were designed properly. The study results show that 58.2% of the constructs are implanted with western theories; 26.4% of which have no theoretical background. 51.6% of the definitions of constructs are given by western research; 31.9% of which lacks definition. 26.4% of the constructs are not properly manipulated due to inconsistency between construct definition and validation. The importance of designing latent constructs discreetly is emphasized and some useful conclusions and suggestions are also raised for reference.
期刊論文
1.MacCallum, R. C.、Browne, M. W.(1993)。The Use of Causal Indicators in Covariance Structure Models: Some Practical Issues。Psychological Bulletin,114(3),533-541。  new window
2.Henrich, Joseph、Heine, Steven J.、Norenzayan, Ara(2010)。Most people are not WEIRD。Nature,466(7302)。  new window
3.Edwards, J. R.(2010)。The Fallacy of Formative Measurement。Organizational Research Methods,14(2),370-388。  new window
4.MacKenzie, S. B.(2003)。Dangers of Poor Construct Conceptualization。Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,31(3),323-326。  new window
5.Roy, S.、Tarafdar, M.、Ragu-Nathan, T. S.、Marsillac, E.(2012)。The Effect of Misspecification of Reflective and Formative Constructs in Operations and Manufacturing Management Research。The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods,10(1),34-52。  new window
6.Stevens, S. S.(1968)。Measurement, Statistics, and the Schemapiric View。Science,161(3844),849-856。  new window
7.Bacharach, Samuel B.(1989)。Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation。The Academy of Management Review,14(4),496-515。  new window
8.Edwards, J. R.,、Bagozzi, R. P.(2000)。On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs。Psychological Methods,5(2),155-174。  new window
9.Edwards, R. M.(2001)。Multidimensional constructs in organizational behavior research: An integrative analytical framework。Organizational Research Methods,4(2),144-192。  new window
10.Law, K. S.、Wong, C. S.(1999)。Multidimensional constructs in structural equation analysis: An illustration using the job perception and job satisfaction。Journal of Management,25(2),143-160。  new window
11.Lin, C. H.、Sher, P. J.、Shih, H. Y.(2005)。Past Progress and Future Directions in Conceptualizing Customer Perceived Value。International Journal of Service Industry Management,16(3/4),318-336。  new window
12.Henrich, J.、Heine, S. J.、Norenzayan, A.(2010)。Beyond WEIRD: Towards a broad-based behavioral science。Behavioral and Brain Sciences,33(2/3),111-135。  new window
13.Tsui, A. S.、Pearce, J. L.、Porter, L. W.、Tripoli, A. M.(1997)。Alternative Approaches to the Employee-organization Relationship: Does Investment in Employees Pay off?。Academy of Management Journal,40(5),1089-1121。  new window
14.Barney, J. B.、張書軍(2009)。The future of Chinese management research: A theory of Chinese management versus a Chinese theory of management。Management and Organization Review,5(1),15-28。  new window
15.Wong, C. S.、Law, K. S.、Huang, G. H.(2008)。On the importance of conducting construct-level analysis for multidimensional constructs in theory development and testing。Journal of Management,34,744-764。  new window
16.Chan, David(1998)。Functional Relations Among Constructs in the Same Content Domain at Different Levels of Analysis: A Typology of Composition Models。Journal of Applied Psychology,83(2),234-246。  new window
17.Locke, Edwin A.(1969)。What is job satisfaction?。Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,4(4),309-336。  new window
18.Jarvis, Cheryi B.、Mackenzie, Scott B.、Podsakoff, Philip M.(2003)。A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research。Journal of Consumer Research,30(2),199-218。  new window
19.MacKenzie, Scott B.、Podsakoff, Philip M.、Jarvis, Cheryl Burke(2005)。The Problem of Measurement Model Misspecification in Behavioral and Organizational Research and Some Recommended Solutions。Journal of Applied Psychology,90(4),710-730。  new window
20.Henrich, Joseph、Heine, Steven J.、Norenzayan, Ara(2010)。The weirdest people in the world?。Behavioral and Brain Sciences,33(2/3),61-83。  new window
21.Law, Kenneth S.、Wong, Chi-Sum、Mobley, William H.(1998)。Toward a Taxonomy of Multidimensional Constructs。Academy of Management Review,23(4),741-755。  new window
圖書
1.陳衛平(1993)。科學的進步與問題。臺北:桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃光國(2013)。拉會存學的遂路。臺北:心理出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Achinstein, P.、Barker, S. F.(1969)。The legacy of logical positivism: Studies in the philosophy of science。Baltimore:The Johns Hopkins Press。  new window
4.Alien, M. J.、Yen, W. M.(2001)。Introduction to Measurement Theory。Long Grove:Waveland Press。  new window
5.Delamater, J.(2003)。Handbook of Social Psychology。Boston:Springer。  new window
6.Huang, Xu、Bond, Michael Harris(2012)。Handbook of Chinese Organizational Behavior: Integrating Theory, Research and Practice。Edward Elgar Publishing。  new window
7.Northrop, F. S. C.(1947)。The Logic of the Sciences and the Humanities。London:Macmillan。  new window
8.Bhaskar, R.(1979)。The Possibility of Naturalism。New Jersey:Humanities Press。  new window
9.Kline, Rex B.(2010)。Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling。New York, NY:The Guilford Press。  new window
10.Spearman, C.(1927)。The Abilities of Man。MacMillan。  new window
11.Pedhazur, E. J.、Schmelkin, L. P.(1991)。Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
12.Bollen, K. A.(1989)。Structural Equations with Latent Variables。New York:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
13.Bhaskar, Roy(1978)。A Realist Theory of Science。Harvester Press。  new window
14.黃光國(20090000)。儒家關係主義:哲學反思、理論建構與實徵研究。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.黃光國(20110000)。心理學的科學革命方案。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.楊國樞、文崇一(19820000)。社會及行為科學研究的中國化。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.國家發展委員會(2007)。人本交通運輸系統規劃及示範案例一大型城鎮層級,臺南市。  延伸查詢new window
2.(2012)。臺灣博碩士論文加值系統,http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw, 2013/07。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.梁建、樊景立(2008)。理論構念的測量。組織與管理研究的實證方法。臺北:華泰文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃光國(2008)。建構華人管理學理論的機會與挑戰。組織與管研究的實證方法。臺北:華泰文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.羅勝強、姜燕(2008)。單維構念與多維構念的測量。組織與管理研究的實證方法。臺北:華泰文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Shweder, R. A.、Goodnow, J. J.、Hatano, G.、LeVine, R. A.、Markus, H. R.、Miller, P. J.(1998)。The Cultural Psychology of Development: One Mind, Many Mentalities。Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
5.劉仲冬(2008)。量與質社會研究的爭議及社會研究未來的走向及出路。質性研究 : 理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。巨流。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE