:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣、芬蘭、新加坡國小數學教科書幾何教材之比較
書刊名:教科書研究
作者:徐偉民 引用關係柯富渝
作者(外文):Hsu, Wei-minKo, Fu-yu
出版日期:2014
卷期:7:3
頁次:頁101-141
主題關鍵詞:內容分析國小數學教科書幾何教材數學問題Content analysisElementary mathematics textbooksGeometry materialsMathematical problems
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:42
  • 點閱點閱:64
本研究旨在探討臺灣、芬蘭、新加坡國小數學教科書中,幾何教 材內容呈現的異同。以臺灣康軒數學、芬蘭WSOY 版LASKUTAITO in English、和新加坡MCE 版My Pals are Here! Maths 為對象,採內容分析法, 以數學問題為分析單位,依問題的類型、表徵與情境來進行分析,以 瞭解三國國小幾何教材呈現的特色。結果發現,三國幾何問題的類型 均以無連結程序型問題為主,作數學型問題最少;問題情境以無情境 為主,問題表徵以視覺型態表徵為主。三國幾何教材較大的差異在例 題的呈現上,臺灣和新加坡呈現較詳細的思考歷程,而芬蘭則直接呈 現單一解法。另外,在例題與練習題的比例上,臺灣與新加坡約為1:3, 而芬蘭約為1:25。
The purpose of this study is to compare geometry content of instructional materials in elementary mathematics textbooks of Taiwan, Finland, and Singapore. The instructional materials reviewed were Kang-Hsuan Mathematics, the WSOY LASKUTAITO in English, and the MCE My Pals are Here! Maths, textbooks used to teach mathematics in Taiwan, Finland, and Singapore, respectively. Content analysis was used and mathematical problems were the unit of analysis. These were classified based on their cognitive types, representational forms, and contexts. The findings of this study show that most of the problems were classified as ‘procedure without connection’ with only a few problems belonging to the category of ‘doing mathematics’. Most of the problem contexts and representative forms in all three countries were non-contextual problems and visual forms. The significant differences among three countries were on the presentation of example problems and the ratio between example and practice problems. On the presentation of the example problems, Taiwan and Singapore provided more detailed thinking and a guided process to help in problem solving, but brief descriptions and demonstrations were presented in Finland. The ratio between example and practice problems was about 1:3 in Taiwan and Singapore and 1:25 in Finland.
期刊論文
1.Gutstein, E.(2003)。Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban, Latino school。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,34(1),37-73。  new window
2.Henningsen, M.、Stein, M. K.(1997)。Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroombased factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,28(5),524-549。  new window
3.Silver, E. A.、Mesa, V. M.、Morris, K. A.、Star, J. R.、Benken, B. M.(2009)。Teaching mathematics for understanding: An analysis of lessons submitted by teachers seeking NBPTS certification。American Educational Research Journal,46(2),501-531。  new window
4.徐偉民、黃皇元(20120700)。臺灣與芬蘭國小數學教科書分數教材內容之分析。課程與教學,15(3),75-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Zhu, Y.、Fan, L. H.(2006)。Focus on the representation of problem types in intended curriculum: A comparison of selected mathematics textbooks from Mainland China and the United States。International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,4(4),609-626。  new window
6.Tarr, J. E.、Reys, R. E.、Reys, B. J.、Chávez, Ó.、Shih, J.、Osterlind, S. J.(2008)。The impact of middle-grades mathematics curricula and the classroom learning environment on student achievement。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,39(3),247-280。  new window
7.徐偉民(20130900)。國小數學教科書數學問題類型與呈現方式之比較分析--以臺灣、芬蘭、新加坡為例。科學教育學刊,21(3),263-289。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Ding, M.、Li, X.(2010)。A comparative analysis of distributive property in U.S. and Chinese elementary mathematics textbooks。Cognition and Instruction,28(2),146-180。  new window
9.Grouws, D. A.、Tarr, J. E.、Chávez, Ó.、Sears, R.、Soria, V. M.、Taylan, R. D.(2013)。Curriculum and implementation effects on high school students' mathematics learning from curricula representing subject-specific and integrated content organizations。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,44(2),416-463。  new window
10.Tarr, J. E.、Grouws, D. A.、Chávez, Ó.、Soria, V. M.(2013)。The effects of content organization and curriculum implementation on students' mathematics learning in second-year high school courses。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,44(4),683-729。  new window
11.左台益(200206)。van Hiele模式之國中幾何教材設計。中等教育,53(3),44-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.吳麗玲、楊德清(20070300)。臺灣、新加坡與美國五、六年級分數教材佈題呈現與知識屬性差異之研究。國立編譯館館刊,35(1),27-40。  延伸查詢new window
13.徐偉民(20130300)。國小教師數學教科書使用之初探。科學教育學刊,21(1),25-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.徐偉民、董修齊(20120900)。國小幾何教材內容之比較:以臺灣與芬蘭為例。當代教育研究,20(3),39-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.徐偉民、林美如(20091200)。臺灣、中國與香港國小數學教科書幾何教材之內容分析。彰化師大教育學報,16,47-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Charalambous, C. Y.、Delaney, S.、Hsu, H. Y.、Mesa, V.(2010)。A Comparative Analysis of the Addition and Subtraction of Fractions in Textbooks from Three Countries。Mathematical Thinking and Learning,12(2),117-151。  new window
17.徐偉民(20110400)。數學課程實施--一位國小資深教師的個案研究。科學教育學刊,19(2),101-122。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.徐偉民、徐于婷(20091200)。國小數學教科書代數教材之內容分析:臺灣與香港之比較。教育實踐與研究,22(2),67-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Nicol, C. C.、Crespo, S. M.(2006)。Learning to teach with mathematics textbooks: How preservice teachers interpret and use curriculum materials。Educational Studies in Mathematics,62,331-355。  new window
20.徐偉民(20110600)。三位六年級教師數學課程實施之比較。教育研究集刊,57(2),85-120。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Remillard, J. T.(2005)。Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula。Review of Educational Research,75(2),211-246。  new window
22.楊德清、施怡真、徐偉民、尤欣涵(20110400)。臺灣、美國和新加坡小一數學教材內容之比較研究。課程與教學,14(2),103-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.陳仁輝、楊德清(20100200)。臺灣、美國與新加坡七年級代數教材之比較研究。科學教育學刊,18(1),43-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Posner, G. J.(1989)。Marking sense of diversity-The current state of curriculum studies。Journal of Curriculum and Superision,4(4),340-361。  new window
25.Son, J. W.、Senk, S. L.(2010)。How reform curricula in the USA and Korea present multiplication and division of fractions。Educational Studies in Mathematics,74(2),117-142。  new window
會議論文
1.Blanton, M.、Kaput, J.(2002)。Developing elementary teachers' algebra “eyes and ears" Understanding characteristics of professional development that promote generative and self-sustaining change in teacher practice。Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association。New Orleans, LA。  new window
圖書
1.陳之華(2010)。成就每一個孩子:從芬蘭到臺北,陳之華的教育觀察筆記。天下雜誌股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Lee, Y. C.、Yong, Y. S.(2008)。My pals are here! Maths。Singapore:Marshall Cavendish。  new window
3.Ling, L. Y.(2008)。My pals are here! Maths。Singapore:Marshall Cavendish。  new window
4.Saarelainen, P.(2009)。Laskutaito 3A in English。Helsinki, Finland:WSOY。  new window
5.Saarelainen, P.(2010)。Laskutaito 6A in English。Helsinki, Finland:WSOY。  new window
6.Barton, B.(2009)。The language of mathematics: Telling mathematical tales。Springer。  new window
7.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(2002)。Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003。Paris, France:Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development。  new window
8.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(2003)。Education at the glance。Paris, France:Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development。  new window
9.Lesh, R.、Lemon, S. J.(1992)。Assesment of authentic performance in school mathematics。Washington, DC:American Association for the Advancement of Science。  new window
10.Kheong, F. H.、Ramakrishnan, C.、Wah, L. P.(2010)。My pals are here! Maths。Singapore:Marshall Cavendish Education。  new window
11.OECD(2008)。PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow's world。Paris, France:OECD publishing。  new window
12.OECD(2013)。PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do-Student performance in mathematics, reading and science。Paris:OECD。  new window
13.Saarelainen, P.(2010)。Laskutaito 5A in English。Helsinki, Finland:WSOY。  new window
14.Curriculum Planning and Development Division(2006)。Mathematics syllabus primary。Ministry of Education。  new window
15.OECD(2010)。PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do: Student Performance in Reading, Mathematics and Science。OECD Publishing。  new window
16.Mullis, I. V. S.、Martin, M. O.、Foy, P.、Olson, J. F.、Preuschoff, C.、Erberber, E.、Arora, A.、Galia, J.(2008)。TIMSS 2007 international mathematics report: Findings from IEA's trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades。Chestnut Hill, MA:TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College。  new window
17.OECD(2001)。Knowledge and Skills for Life: First result from PISA 2000, Programme for International Student Assessment。Paris:OECD Publications。  new window
18.王文科(2002)。教育研究法--教育研究的理論與實際。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
19.Mullis, I. V. S.、Martin, M. O.、Foy, P.、Arora, A.、Stanco, G. M.(2012)。TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics。Chestnut Hill, MA:TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College。  new window
20.National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(2000)。Principles and standards for school mathematics。Reston, Virginia:National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
21.Stein, M. K.、Smith, M. S.、Henningsen, M. A.、Silver, E. A.(2000)。Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development。New York, NY:Teachers College Press。  new window
22.王石番(1996)。傳播內容分析法--理論與實證。台北:幼獅。  延伸查詢new window
23.National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(1989)。Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics。Reston, VA:National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
24.van Hiele, Pierre M.(1986)。Structure and Insight: A Theory of Mathematics Education。Academic Press。  new window
25.Mullis, I. V. S.、Martin, M. O.、Gonzalez, E. J.、Chrostowski, S. J.(2004)。TIMSS 2003 International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA's Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grades。TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College。  new window
其他
1.翁秉仁(2003)。臺灣中小學數學教育的問題,http://www.wfu.edu.tw/~math/course/92-s-05-05.doc。  延伸查詢new window
2.Pehkonen, E.(2007)。Problem solving in mathematics education in Finland,http://www.unige.ch/math/EnsMath/Rome2008/WG2/Papers/PEHKON.pdf。  new window
3.National Board of Education(2004)。National core curriculum for basic education 2004,http://www.oph.fi/english/publications/2009/national_core_curricula, 2010/02/14。  new window
圖書論文
1.National Research Council(2004)。Framework for evaluating curricular effectiveness。On evaluating curricular effectiveness: Judging the quality of K-12 mathematics evaluations。Washington, DC:National Academies Press。  new window
2.Stein, M. K.、Remillard, J.、Smith, M. S.(2007)。How curriculum influences student learning。Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning。Information Age。  new window
3.Anderson, C. W.(2003)。How can schools support teaching for understanding in mathematics and science?。Transforming: how schools and districts can support change。NY:Teacher College。  new window
4.Ensign, J.(2005)。Helping teachers use students' home cultures in mathematics lessons: Developmental stages of becoming effective teachers of diverse students。Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms: Promising strategies for transformative pedagogy。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
5.Lesh, R.、Post, T.、Behr, M.(1987)。Representation and translation among representation in mathematics learning and problem solving。Problem of presentation in teaching and learning of mathematics。Hillsdale, NJ:Laurence Erlbaum。  new window
6.歐用生(2000)。內容分析法。教育研究法。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
7.Grouws, D. A.、Smith, M. S.、Sztajn, P.(2004)。The preparation and teaching practice of U. S. Mathematics teachers: Grades 4 and 8。The 1990 through 2000 mathematics assessments of the National Assessment of Educational Progress: Results and interpretations。Reston, VA:NCTM。  new window
8.Clements, D. H.、Battista, M. T.(1992)。Geometry and spatial reasoning。Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning。Macmillan publishing Company。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE