:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「公民與政治權利國際公約」與「經濟、社會與文化權利國際公約」在我國最高法院與最高行政法院適用之研究
書刊名:國立臺灣大學法學論叢
作者:徐揮彥 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsu, Hui-yen
出版日期:2014
卷期:43:特刊
頁次:頁839-909
主題關鍵詞:國際人權法典公民與政治權利國際公約經濟社會與文化權利國際公約條約法維也納條約法公約一致性解釋國內法院自動履行效力直接效力間接效力International Bill of Human RightsInternational Covenant on Civil and Political RightsInternational Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural RightsLaw of treatiesVienna Convention on the Law of TreatiesConsistent interpretationDomestic courtsSelf-executingDirect effectIndirect effect
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(12) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:11
  • 共同引用共同引用:1788
  • 點閱點閱:59
締約國對於國際人權公約規範之實施,應全方面地在國內立法層面、行政執行層面及司法層面進行。法諺云:「有權利,必有救濟。」透過司法層面對於國際人權公約之實現,不僅是個人公約權利具體化之重要途徑,更是審視締約國對國際人權公約義務落實方式及程度的指標。本文之研究目的,係以國際法角度探究兩項人權公約之國內法化問題,以及其國內法化後在我國國內法之效力、位階及應如何適用與解釋之。另外,本文亦在探索相關兩項人權公約締約國國內法院適用該公約之經驗後,就我國批准上開公約迄今五年多期間,最高法院及最高行政法院適用兩項人權公約之案件予以分析,並基於此分析對於我國法院及檢察體系之司法機關人員應如何適用兩項人權公約及其他被國內法化的核心人權公約提出建議。
The Contracting Parties of international human rights conventions are obliged to enforce the norms provided by the conventions in all realms of governmental organs. As a motto goes ubi jus ibi remedium, a judicial remedy to the conventional rights is an important means of enforcement. Furthermore, the situations of the application of domestic courts to international human rights conventions reflect the degree of implementation of Contracting Parties’ obligations directly. The objective of the article is to explore the issues and situations of Supreme Courts on the application and interpretation to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on the Economic, Social and Cultural Rights which were just ratified by the R.O.C. Government on 14th May 2009. Concluding suggestions and observations are given for further implementation of the two Covenants by the two Supreme Courts.
期刊論文
1.陳清雲(20070700)。立法院對條約案之議決。法學叢刊,52(3)=207,117-154。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Vazquez, Carlos Manuel(1995)。The Four Doctrines of Self-Executing Treaties。American Journal of International Law,89(4),695-723。  new window
3.張文貞(20071200)。跨國憲政主義的合縱與連橫--歐洲人權法院及內國憲法法院關係初探。月旦法學,151,57-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.廖福特(20111200)。日本實踐聯合國兩人權公約之分析--國內法院適用及國際審查報告。臺灣國際法季刊,8(4),109-161。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.廖宗聖(20110600)。公民與政治權利國際公約在我國的效力--以最高及高等法院刑事裁判為研究中心。中華國際法與超國界法評論,7(1),75-127。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.廖福特(20111200)。法院應否及如何適用《經濟社會文化權利國際公約》。臺灣人權學刊,1(1),3-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Winter, J. A.(1972)。Direct application and direct effect: two distinct and different concepts in community law。Common Market Law Review,9(4),425-438。  new window
8.許耀明(2012)。未內國法化之國際條約與協定在我國法院之地位。司法新聲,104,20-27。  延伸查詢new window
9.鄧衍森(20101215)。人權保障的規範理論:序曲。臺灣法學雜誌,166,123-130。  延伸查詢new window
10.鄧衍森(20100300)。從國際法論人權的保障與實踐。全國律師,14(3),13-22。  延伸查詢new window
11.鄧衍森(2012)。國際法的規範向度。司法新聲,104,7-19。  延伸查詢new window
12.Bradley, C. A.(2008)。Intent, Presumptions, and Non-Self-Executing Treaties。American Journal of International Law,102(3),540-551。  new window
13.Francioni, F.(2001)。International law as a common language for national courts。Taxes International Law Journal,36,587-598。  new window
14.Roberts, Anthea(2011)。Comparative international law? The role of national courts in creating and enforcing international law。International & Comparative Law Quarterly,60(1),57-92。  new window
15.Schreuer, C. H.(1971)。The interpretation of treaties by domestic courts。British Yearbook of International Law,45,255-301。  new window
16.Shany, Y.(2006)。How supreme is the supreme law of the land? Comparative analysis of the influence of international human rights treaties upon the interpretation of constitutional texts by domestic courts。Brooklyn Journal of International Law,31,341-404。  new window
17.Jackson, John H.(1992)。Status of treaties in domestic legal system: a policy analysis。American Journal of International Law,86(2),310-340。  new window
18.Lauterpacht, H.(1949)。Restrictive interpretation and the principle of effectiveness in the interpretation of treaties。British Yearbook of International Law,26,48-84。  new window
19.廖福特(20101101)。法院應否及如何適用公民與政治權利國際公約。臺灣法學雜誌,163,45-65。  延伸查詢new window
20.廖福特(20091100)。批准聯合國兩個人權公約及制訂施行法之評論。月旦法學,174,223-229。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.李念祖(20010700)。論我國憲法上外國人基本人權之平等保障適格。憲政時代,27(1),80-100。  延伸查詢new window
22.張文貞(20120600)。演進中的法:一般性意見作為國際人權公約的權威解釋。臺灣人權學刊,1(2),25-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.周志宏(19830700)。論立法院的條約議決權--兼論制定「條約締結法」的必要性。法政學報,1,51-87。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.蕭富山(19850800)。從條約之意義與批准制度論釋字第三二九號解釋及成效。律師通訊,191,55-63。  延伸查詢new window
25.俞寬賜(19990600)。我國「條約締結法」之擬議。政治科學論叢,10,227-244。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.鄧衍森(201001)。「兩公約」內國法化後相關問題之探討。第65屆司法節學術研討會,司法院、法務部(主辦) 。台北。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.陳隆志、廖福特、行政院研究發展考核委員會、臺灣新世紀文教基金會(2003)。國際人權公約國內法化之方法與策略。臺北:行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.總統府人權諮詢委員會(201204)。作為簽約國報告組成部分的核心文件。台北:總統府人權諮詢委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.McNair, A. D.(1961)。The Law of Treaties。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
3.立法院公報處(2009)。立法院公報。台北:立法院。  延伸查詢new window
4.Corten, Olivier、Klein, Pierre(2011)。The vienna conventions on the law of treaties: a commentary。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Iwasawa, Y.(1998)。International law, human rights, and japanese law。Oxford, England:Clarendon Press。  new window
6.Jennings, R.、Watts, A.(2008)。Oppenheim’s international law。Oxford, England:Oxford University Press。  new window
7.Nollkaemper, A.(2012)。National courts and the international rule of law。Oxford, England:Oxford University Press。  new window
8.Ramcharan, B. G.(2005)。Judicial Protection Of Economic, Social And Cultural Rights: Cases And Materials。Martinus Nijhoff Publishers。  new window
9.黃異(201012)。國際法。台北:新學林書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.Gardiner, Richard K.(2008)。Treaty Interpretation。Oxford University Press。  new window
11.Jacobs, Francis Geoffrey、Roberts, Shelley、United Kingdom National Committee Of Comparative Law(1987)。The effect of treaties in domestic law。London, England:Sweet & Maxwell。  new window
12.Sinclair, Sir Ian(1984)。The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties。Manchester:Manchester University Press。  new window
13.Harris, David J.(2010)。Cases and Materials on International Law。London:Sweet & Maxwell。  new window
14.Steiner, Henry J.、Alston, Philip、Goodman, Ryan(2007)。International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics and Morals。NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
15.丘宏達、陳純一(2012)。現代國際法。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
16.吳庚(2012)。行政法之理論與實用。臺北:吳庚。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.吳庚、陳淳文(2013)。憲法理論與政府體制。臺北:三民書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.俞寬賜、國立編譯館(2002)。國際法新論。臺北:啟英文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
19.姜皇池(2008)。國際公法導論。臺北:新學林股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.陳治世(19920000)。條約法公約析論。臺北:臺灣學生書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Malanczuk, Peter(1997)。Akehurst's Modern Introduction to International Law。Routledge。  new window
22.Dixon, Martin(2007)。Textbook on International Law。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
其他
1.The Presidential Office Human Rights Consultative Committee(20130301)。Review of the Initial Reports of the Government of Taiwan on the Implementation of the International Human Rights Covenants--Concluding Observations and Recommendations Adopted by the International Group of Independent Experts,Taipei。,https://www.humanrights.moj.gov.tw/media/12484/33516305719.pdf?mediaDL=true。  new window
2.法務部(2009)。法務部對「國際公約內國法化的實踐」委託研究報告之對案建議,https://www.humanrights.moj.gov.tw/media/14975/%E6%B3%95%E5%8B%99%E9%83%A8%E5%B0%8D-%E5%9C%8B%E9%9A%9B%E5%85%AC%E7%B4%84%E5%85%A7%E5%9C%8B%E6%B3%95%E5%8C%96%E7%9A%84%E5%AF%A6%E8%B8%90-%E5%A7%94%E8%A8%97%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A-%E4%B9%8B%E5%B0%8D%E6%A1%88%E5%BB%BA%E8%AD%B0.pdf?mediaDL=true。  new window
圖書論文
1.Ҫali, B.(2013)。Specialized Rules of Treaty Interpretation: Human Rights。The Oxford Guide To Treaties。Oxford, England:Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Conforti, B.(1997)。National courts and the international law of human rights。Enforcing international human rights in domestic court。Hague, Netherland:Martinus Nijhoff Publishers。  new window
3.Frowein, J. A.(1987)。Federal Republic of Germany。The effect of treaties in domestic law。London, England:Sweet & Maxwell。  new window
4.Higgins, R.(1987)。United kingdom。The effect of treaties in domestic law。London, England:Sweet & Maxwell。  new window
5.Higgins, R.(1997)。The role of domestic courts in the enforcement of international human rights: the United Kingdom。Enforcing international human rights in domestic court。Hague, Netherland:Martinus Nijhoff Publishers。  new window
6.Iwasawa, Y.(1997)。International human rights adjudication in Japan。Enforcing international human rights in domestic courts。Hague, Netherland:Martinus Nijhoff Publishers。  new window
7.Jackson, J. H.(1987)。United States of America。The effect of treaties in domestic law。London, England:Sweet & Maxwell。  new window
8.Ratner, S. R.、Slaughter, A. -M.(2006)。Appraising the methods of international law: a prospectus for readers。The methods of international law。Getzville, NY:W. S. Hein。  new window
9.Simma, Bruno、Khan, Daniel-Erasmus、Zockler, Markus、Geiger, Rudolf(1997)。The role of German courts in the enforcement of international human rights。Enforcing international human rights in domestic courts。Hague:Martinus Nijhoff Publishers。  new window
10.Sloss, D.(2009)。United States。The Role of Domestic Courts in Treaty Enforcement: A Comparative Study。Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.張文貞(2009)。國際人權法與內國憲法的匯流:台灣施行兩大人權公約之後。台灣法學新課題。台北:台灣法學會。  延伸查詢new window
12.張文貞(2009)。憲法與國際人權法的匯流:兼論我國大法官解釋之實踐。憲法解釋之理論與實務。中央研究院法律學研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
13.李建良(2014)。論國際條約的國內法效力與法位階定序:國際條約與憲法解釋之關係的基礎課題。憲法解釋之理論與實務。中央研究院法律學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE