本文以司法院大法官解釋、重要立法與重大之憲政事件觀察2013年之憲法發展。2013年大法官僅作成九號解釋，全數為人民聲請之憲法解釋，且並無政府體制爭議。本文針對釋字第708、709、710、711、712號解釋略作個別分析。2013年可說是延續興盛之公民運動、「風起雲湧」的一年，從核四公投爭議、兩岸服貿協議之簽訂、大埔徵收事件之風波、到引發25萬人上街的洪仲丘事件推動了軍審法之修正，而雖然有諸多改革之司法院大法官審理案件法修正草案已經送進立法院，但由於9月政爭之發生，尚未完成修法。另外，政爭也連帶了倒閣案的提起。整體而言，2013年之憲法發展可以看出憲政體制的問題已然浮現，然而可以處理的機制尚不明確，隱憂繼續存在。

As the encounter of academic study and legal practice sets forth the robust developments in administrative law, legal practice remains the focal point of administrative law studies in 2012-13. This article, on the one hand, provides an analysis of significant laws and procedures in the previous two years, including laws concerning organizational reform of the Executive Yuan, the Personal Information Protection Act, and the 2011 amendment to Administrative Litigation Act. On the other hand, this article evaluates judicial decisions in the time frame that represent rising issues, such as extinctive prescription in public law, preliminary injunction, state compensation, the implementation of Article 14 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Act, and the distinction between adverse actions of a punitive nature and of a non-punitive nature. Setting the judicial decisions in the developments of basic principles, of the tasks and the acting of the public administration, and of administrative litigation, this article predicts challenges of administrative law that lie ahead and suggests future trajectories of administrative law studies.