:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:彰化縣國民中學技藝教育學程實施成效之滿意度調查
書刊名:人文暨社會科學期刊
作者:蕭揚基 引用關係蕭太偉
作者(外文):Shiau, Young-keyHsiao, Tai-wei
出版日期:2014
卷期:10:1
頁次:頁29-46
主題關鍵詞:國民中學技藝教育學程執行滿意度學習滿意度彰化縣Technical education programs for junior high schoolsThe satisfaction of implementationThe satisfaction of learningChanghua County
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:27
  • 點閱點閱:185
本文旨在探討彰化縣國民中學技藝教育學程實施成效之情形。採用問卷調查法,以分層隨機抽樣方式,選取執行彰化縣國民中學技藝教育學程的相關教師148位,與完整選讀國中技藝教育學程的學生488位為研究樣本。調查所得資料以描述統計、單一樣本t考驗、二因子多變量變異數分析、單因子多變量變異數分析、Scheffe'事後比較法等進行統計分析。經過實證研究後所獲得之結論如下:(1)相關教師對國中技藝教育學程整體執行滿意度達滿意程度;(2)教師是否兼職行政職務與不同年資的教師,在執行滿意度上呈現顯著的交互效應。其中年資在5年以下的高職教師兼職行政,在「課程與教學」的構面上,其滿意度顯著優於國中教師兼職行政,也優於高職專任教師;在「環境與設備」的構面上,高職教師兼職行政,其滿意度顯著優於高職專任教師;(3)國中技藝教育學程學生在整體學習滿意度也達到滿意程度;(4)不同性別與不同學程開辦方式的學生,在學習滿意度上呈現顯著的交互效應,其中不同開辦方式的男生與女生在「課程與教學」、「環境與設備」與「學生輔導」等三個構面上,合作式皆優於自辦式;不同性別的合作式學生在「課程與教學」、「環境與設備」、「學生輔導」等三個構面上,女生滿意度皆優於男生;(5)學生的學習滿意度,不因其學業成績、家庭結構、家長教育程度的不同而有所差異。根據上述之研究結論提出具體建議,以利主管教育機關、學校、教師、學生及家長之參考。
The purpose of this study is to explore the effectiveness of Technical Education Programs for junior high schools in Changhua County. The way to investigate is to circulate the questionnaire with stratified random sampling among the 148 target teachers and 488 students who have completed the Technical Education Programs for junior high school. The collected data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, one-sample t-test, two-way MANOVA, one-way MANOVA, and Scheffé post hoc test. The empirical study conclusions are as follows: 1. The satisfaction of the related teachers on the implementation of technical Education Programs is above average. 2. The satisfaction on the implementation of the programs have interaction effects between the teachers at different positions and with different experiences. In the "Curriculum and Instruction" part, senior high school teachers holding consuming post as administrative management with less than 5 years experiences have higher satisfaction than junior high school teachers with administrative tasks and those full-time teachers in senior high school. In the "Environment and Equipment" part, senior high school teachers with administrative tasks have higher satisfaction than full-time senior high school teachers. 3. The learning satisfaction of junior high school students in Technical Education Programs is above average. 4. The learning satisfaction of the programs have interaction effects between different genders and different processing modes of students. In these three dimensions: "Curriculum and Instruction", "Environment and Equipment" and "Students Guidance", the Cooperative Technical Education Programs (CTEP) is better than Self-handled Technical Education Programs (STEP). Students of different genders in STEP show no obvious differences in these three dimensions. Girls' satisfaction is higher than boys' in these three dimensions in CTEP. 5. The satisfaction of learning effectiveness shows no differences from their different academic achievements, family structure, and educational backgrounds parents' occupation. Based on the purpose of research, literature review, and data analysis results, this study provides suggestions respectively on the institute of educational administration, school, teachers, students, parents and future studies.
期刊論文
1.Benson, C. S.(1997)。New vocationalism in the United States: Potential problems and outlook。Economics of Education Review,16(3),201-212。  new window
2.邱維城(1980)。國中自願就業學生的輔導問題。測驗與輔導,9(4),657-660。  延伸查詢new window
3.Benevot, A.(1983)。The rise and decline of vocational Qducation。Sociology of Education,56,63-76。  new window
4.Jaeger, Richard M.(1978)。About educational indicators: Statistics on the conditions and trends in education。Review of Research in Education,6,276-315。  new window
5.Lillis, K.、Hogan, D.(1983)。Dilemmas of diversification: Problems associated with vocational education in developing countries。Comparative Education,19(1),89-107。  new window
6.譚以敬、吳清山(20091200)。臺北市弱勢學生教育政策的現況及其未來因應措施之研究。教育行政與評鑑學刊,8,77-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Lam, Y. L. J.、Wong, A.(1974)。Attendance regularity of adult learners: an examination of content and structural factors。Adult Education,14(2),130-142。  new window
8.楊朝祥(20100900)。美國技職教育發展的沿革、現況與展望。教育資料集刊,47,135-164。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Swain, R.(1984)。Easing the transition: A career planning course for college students。Personnel and Guidance Journal,62(9),529-532。  new window
會議論文
1.鍾怡慧、李佳昕(2011)。推動國民中學技藝教育專案編班政策之研究。2011技職教育永續發展學術研討會。臺北:國立臺北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所。1-12。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.徐華助(2007)。新竹縣國中生涯發展教育與技藝教育學程實施現況之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.尤智誠(2009)。澎湖縣國中技藝教育實施現況與成效之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.李佳玄(2007)。合作式國中技藝教育學程教師效能、學生學習態度與學生學習滿意度關係之研究(碩士論文)。雲林科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.周宗正(2006)。中彰投四縣市國中階段技藝教育學程〈班〉實施現況與改進方向之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。  延伸查詢new window
5.林秀真(2009)。國民中學技藝教育專案編班實施現況與學生學習滿意度之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃崇維(2010)。嘉義縣國中技藝教育學生知覺教學效能、學習互動與學習動機之關係(碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。  延伸查詢new window
7.李明杉(1998)。國中技藝教育班學生學業學習困擾技藝學習滿意度之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.戴駿文(2009)。影響國中學生選讀技藝教育學程因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。  延伸查詢new window
9.李怡靚(2012)。國中合作式技藝教育學程學生學習滿意度之研究--以花蓮縣為例(碩士論文)。國立東華大學,花蓮縣。  延伸查詢new window
10.林國華(2007)。臺北市國中學生選讀合作式技藝教育學程之相關因素研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
11.徐文臨(2003)。國中技藝教育改革實施之研究--以雲林縣為例(碩士論文)。雲林科技大學,雲林縣。  延伸查詢new window
12.徐良鎮(1997)。台北市職業學校與國民中學教育人員對規劃實施國民技藝教育之意見調查研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
13.葉有富(2006)。桃園縣國中技藝教育學程實施現況之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
14.蕭耀煜(2009)。臺北市國中技藝教育學程學生學習滿意度之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
15.楊雅文(1998)。台南市國中技藝教育班學生職業成熟及其相關因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立成功大學,台南市。  延伸查詢new window
16.劉石輝(2007)。花蓮縣國中技藝教育學程實施現況之研究(碩士論文)。國立東華大學,花蓮縣。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Womack, J. P.、Jones D. T.、Roos, D.(1991)。The Machine That Changed the World : The Story of Lean Production。New York, NY:Harper Perennial。  new window
2.教育部(2008)。加強國民中學技藝教育辦法。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
3.Denison, E. F.(1985)。Trends in American Economic Growth, 1929-1982。Washington, DC:Brookings Institution。  new window
4.田振榮、張晉昌(2004)。技藝教育改革方案--綜合規劃組專案計畫期末報告。臺北市:教育部技職司。  延伸查詢new window
5.江文雄、田振榮(1997)。高職實用技能班實施成效與學習策略之研究。臺北市:教育部技職司。  延伸查詢new window
6.行政院青年輔導委員會(2011)。青少年政策白皮書。臺北市:行政院青年輔導委員會。  延伸查詢new window
7.杜正勝(2007)。全國技藝教育績優人員優良事蹟專輯。台北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
8.教育部(1993)。發展與改進國民中學技藝教育方案--邁向十年國教目標。臺北市:教育部技職司。  延伸查詢new window
9.教育部(2012)。全國公私立高級中等學校101學年度辦理實用技能學程概況手冊。臺北市:教育部中部辦公室。  延伸查詢new window
10.Lauglo, J.、Lillis, K.(1988)。Vocationalizing education: An international perspective。Oxford:Pergamum Press。  new window
11.Middleton, J.、Ziderman, A.、Adams, A. V.(1993)。Skills for productivity: Vocational education and training in developing countries。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
12.Psacharopoulos, G.、Loxley, W.(1985)。Diversified secondary education and development: Evidence from Colombia and Tanzania。Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
13.教育部教育研究委員會(2011)。中華民國教育報告書:黃金十年、百年樹人。教育部教育研究委員會。  延伸查詢new window
14.Holland, J. L.(1985)。Making vocational choice: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall。  new window
15.Jarvis, P.(1985)。The sociology of adult and continuing education。Croom Helm。  new window
16.Gardner, Howard(1999)。Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences theory into 21th century。New York:Basic Books。  new window
17.UNESCO(1990)。Trends and Development of Technical and Vocational Education。Paris:The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization。  new window
其他
1.國際21世紀教育委員會(2013)。教育:財富蘊藏其中,http://www.un.org/chinese/esa/education/lifelongleaming/8_4.html, 2013/07/05。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2007)。2015年經濟發展願景一大溫暖社會福利套案第一階段三年衝刺計畫,http://english.moe.gov.tw/public/Attachment/8121216121771.doc, 2012/11/01。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育部(2012)。國中與高中職學生生涯輔導實施方案,http://www.edu.tw/files/plannews—content/B0042/國中與高中職學生生涯輔導實施方案(1000812新修正版)_l.doc, 2012/11/01。  延伸查詢new window
4.(2012)。NCLB No Child Left Behind-ED.gov.,http://www.ed.gov/ndb/landing.ihtml7srd, 2012/10/10。  new window
圖書論文
1.黃麗華(2008)。臺北市合作式國中技藝教育學程成本效益分析之研究。臺北市第9屆教育專業創新與行動研究高職組成果集。  延伸查詢new window
2.Super, D. E.(1972)。Vocational development theory: Persons, positions, and processes。Perspectives on vocational development。American Personnel and Guidance Association。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE