臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：大學生團隊創意競賽表現模式之驗證性分析
書刊名：科技博物
作者：王裕宏／張美珍 Chang, Mei-chen)／劉佳儒
作者(外文)：Wang, Yu-hung／Liou, Jia-ru
出版日期：2014
卷期：18:4
頁次：頁21-53
主題關鍵詞：創意競賽；團隊溝通；知識創作；團隊創意表現模式；Creative competition；Team communication；Knowledge innovation；Team creative performance model
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:99
  • 點閱點閱:6
現今各公私立社教機構因經費與資源有限，與民間企業共同合辦活動儼然成為一種趨勢，由科學博物館與綠能科技公司成立的基金會共同主辦的「太陽能光電應用設計創意競賽」，提供大學生們一個激發創意，且具動手實驗與創意實踐的平台，期激發學生們的創造力，更企圖及早發現具創造力的人才與團隊。本研究以 2011年至 2014年參與競賽的大學生團隊成員為研究對象，使用 AMOS軟體進行結構方程模式分析，探究大學生團隊參加創意競賽的團隊組成、知識運用、知識創作以及競賽表現間的關係，建構影響大學生參與創意競賽表現之模式。研究發現（1）研究模式適配度理想，適用大學生團隊創意競賽表現模式；（2）整體模型中「團隊溝通」及「知識運用」、「團隊溝通」及「競賽表現」、「知識運用」及「知識創作」、「知識創作」及「競賽表現」兩兩構面間具有相關且顯著正向影響；（3）大學生團隊的組成仍以同校學生最多，且多半具有參加活動及競賽的經驗；（4）競賽活動中「團隊溝通」是「團隊組成」因素中唯一構面因素且會直接影響競賽表現；（5）大學生團隊的「知識運用」受到「團隊溝通」及「知識創作」等因素的影響，但無法直接影響其競賽的表現。
Nowadays, both public and private social education institutions are limited with funds and resource, cooperating with enterprises to hold educational projects, therefore, has become a trend. ‘Motech Award: Creative Design Competition using Solar Cell’ is a competition based on this idea. Held by the Foundation of Green Energy Company and National Science and Technology Museum, this competition provides a platform for college students to explore new ideas, trial and error and finally work out their final product. It’s expected to motivate college students’ creativities and, for a further vision, to discover outstanding people or teams betimes. The subjects of this study were college students in teams who participate in the contests from year 2011 to 2014. The study investigated the relationships between the four factors (students’ background, knowledge application, knowledge innovation, creative outcome), and then established a model of college students team creative competition performance. Major findings of this study suggested that: (1) the fitness of model was well, suitable for the model of college student creative competition; (2) according to the model, the factors related and impacted with significantly positively between ‘team communication’ and ‘knowledge application’, ‘team communication and ‘creative outcome’, knowledge application’ and ‘knowledge innovation’, ‘knowledge innovation’ and ‘creative outcome’; (3) most teams were recruited from the same school, and mostly have the experience of participating contests; (4) ‘team communication’ was the only perspective factor of ‘students’ background’, and will directly influence ‘creative outcome’; (5)‘knowledge application’ was impacted by ‘team communication’ and ‘knowledge innovation’, but couldn’t apparently affect ‘creative outcome’.
期刊論文
1.McCade, J.(1990)。Problem solving: Much more than just design。Journal of Technology Education，2(1)，1-13。  new window
2.陳辰洧(2005)。創意、設計與科技。生活科技教育月刊，38(8)，57-72。  延伸查詢new window
3.Feldhusen, J. F.、Goh, B. E.(1995)。Assessing and assessing creativity: An integrative review of theory, research, and development。Creativity Research Journal，8(3)，231-247。  new window
4.Christiaans, H.、Venselaar, K.(2005)。Creativity in design engineering and the role of knowledge: Modelling the expert。International Journal of Technology and Design Education，15，217-236。  new window
5.Christiaans, Henri H. C. M.(2002)。Creativity as a design criterion。Creativity Research Journal，14(1)，41-54。  new window
6.Sellwood, P.(1989)。The role of problem solving in developing thinking skills。The Technology Teacher，49(3)，3-10。  new window
7.楊坤原(20010500)。創造力的意義及其影響因素簡介。科學教育，239，3-12。  延伸查詢new window
8.王思峰、黃家齊、鄭俐敏(20020100)。團隊知識轉換與知識創造的實驗研究--知識螺旋理論的驗證。管理與系統，9(1)，29-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Milliken, F. J.、Martins, L. L.(1996)。Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups。Academy of Management Review，21(2)，402-433。  new window
10.吳靜吉(19890300)。適當的創造動機。創造思考教育，1，13-14。  延伸查詢new window
11.Nonaka, I. N.、Toyama, R.(2002)。A firm as a dialectical being: Towards a dynamic theory of a firm。Industrial and Corporate Change，11(5)，995-1009。  new window
12.王裕宏、張美珍、黃俊夫(20110300)。高中生參與博物館科技創意競賽的創作歷程與成效影響因素。科技博物，15(1)，63-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.葉家良、張美珍、朱耀明、黃俊夫(20070600)。高中學生參與科技競賽的動機及其與競賽成績之相關性研究。科技博物，11(1/2)，5-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.葉蓉樺(20071000)。高中生動手作研習架構發展初探︰以國立自然科學博物館「高中生史特林引擎模型組裝研習」為例。科學教育，303，2-16。  延伸查詢new window
15.魏明通(19811000)。發現、發明與科學教育。科學教育，43，6-8。  延伸查詢new window
16.Bollen, K. A.、Stine, R. A.(1992)。Bootstrappin goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models。Sociological Methods and Research，21，205-229。  new window
17.Campbell, D. J.、Campbell, K. M.、Chia, H.(1995)。Innovation through performance analysis: Teambuilding and the development of performance indicators。Creativity and Innovation Mangement，4(3)，160-171。  new window
18.Fornell, C.、Larcker, D. F.(1981)。Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement erroes。Journal of Marketing Research，18(2)，39-50。  new window
19.Kirschner, P.、Van Vilstercn, P.、Hummel, H.、Wigman, M.(1997)。The design of a study environment for acquiring academic and professional competence。Studies in Higher Education，22，151-171。  new window
20.Kratzer, J.、Leenders, R. Th. A. J.、Engelen, J. M. L.(2006)。Team polarity and creative performance in innovation teams。Creativity and Innovation management，15(1)，96-104。  new window
21.Kurtzberg, T. R.、Amabile, T. M.(2000)。From Guilford to creativite synergy: Opening the black box of team-level creativity。Creativity Research Journal，13(3/4)，285-294。  new window
22.Lovelace, J. B.、Hunter, S. T.(2013)。Charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders' influence on subordinate creative performance across the creative process。Creativity Research Journal，25(1)，59-74。  new window
23.Nemeth, C. J.(1995)。Dissent as driving cognition, attitudes, and judgments。Social Cognition，13，273-291。  new window
24.Nonaka, I.、Toyama, R.(2005)。The theory of the knowledge-creating firm: Subjectivity, objectivity and synthesis。Industrial and Corporate Change，14(3)，419-436。  new window
25.Rich, G. J.(2000)。On Jack Nasar's design by competition: Making design competition work。Creativity Research Journal，13(2)，241-243。  new window
26.Riley, T. L.(2011)。Competitions for showcasing innovative and creative talents。Gifted and Talented International，26(1)，63-70。  new window
27.Snaydon, R. W.(1991)。Replacement or additive designs for competition studies?。Journal of Applied Ecology，28，930-946。  new window
28.蔡啟通、高泉豐(20041000)。動機取向、組織創新氣候與員工創新行為之關係：Amabile動機綜效模型之驗證。管理學報，21(5)，571-592。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.Nonaka, I.、Konno, N.(1998)。The Concept of ''Ba'': Building a foundation for Knowledge Creation。California Management Review，40(3)，40-54。  new window
30.Baughman, Wayne A.、Mumford, Michael D.(1995)。Process-Analytic Models of creative Capacities: Operations Influencing the Combination-and-Reorganization Process。Creativity Research Journal，8(1)，37-62。  new window
31.張美珍、朱耀明(20040600)。九年一貫「自然與生活科技」領域課程活動方案的發展：以博物館為學習的場域。科技博物，8(2)，15-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.Doll, William J.、Xia, Weidong、Torkzadeh, Gholamreza(1994)。A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument。Management Information Systems Quarterly，18(4)，453-461。  new window
33.Renzulli, J. S.、Reis, S. M.(1991)。The Assessment of Creative Products in Program for Gifted and Talented Students。Gifted Child Quarterly，35(3)，128-134。  new window
34.Kappel, T.、Rubsenstein, A. H.(1999)。Creativity in Design: The Contribution of Information Technology。IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management，46(2)，132-143。  new window
學位論文
1.洪毓孜(2003)。個人玩興與團隊玩興氣氛對團隊創造力績效之影響(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾婉芬(2003)。研發主管管理才能與部門績效之研究(碩士論文)。國立中山大學，高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳振明(2004)。影響高一學生科學創造力的因素之研究(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.陳玫伶(2007)。知識於創意設計中的角色(碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學，臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
5.錢毓琦(2002)。影響團隊創造力因素之研究--以廣告業為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，台北。  延伸查詢new window
6.McCoy, J. M.(2000)。The creative work environment: The relationship of the physical environment and creative teamwork at a state agency- A case study(博士論文)。Universtity of Wisconsin，Milwaukee, WI。  new window
圖書
1.張偉豪(2011)。SEM論文寫作不求人。三星統計服務有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.官政能(1995)。產品物徑--創意之生成發展與應用。台北市：藝術家出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Nonaka, Ikujiro、Takeuchi, Hirotaka、楊子江、王美音(1997)。創新求勝--智價企業論。臺北市：遠流出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Hair, J. F. Jr.、Black, W. C.、Babin, B. J.、Anderson, R. E.、Tatham, R. L.(2006)。Multivariate data analysis。Pearson Prentice Hall。  new window
5.葉玉珠(2006)。創造力教學：過去、現在與未來。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.Amabile, Teresa M.(1996)。Creativity In Context: Update To The Social Psychology Of Creativity。Routledge。  new window
7.吳明隆、涂金堂(2005)。SPSS與統計應用分析實務。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Riley, T. L.、Karnes, F.(2007)。Competitions for gifted and talented students: Issues of excellence and equity。Serving gifted learners beyond the traditional classroom。  new window
2.Riley, T. L.、Karnes, F.(2009)。Competitions。Encyclopedia of giftedness, creativity, and talent。Thousands Oaks, CA：SAGE Pub。  new window
3.Sadler, P. M.、Coyle, H. P.、Schwartz, M.(2000)。Engineering Competitions in the Middle School Classroom: Key Elements in Developing Effective Design Challenges。The Journal of the Learning Sciences。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：608（臺灣：601，外國：7） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2071125 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67865299
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上