:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:高雄市民之文化資本對藝文看法與藝文發展評估之影響
書刊名:藝術學報
作者:陳志賢 引用關係
出版日期:2016
卷期:5
頁次:頁68-88
主題關鍵詞:文化資本經濟資本階級認同文化區異文創產業Pierre BourdieuCultural capitalEconomic capitalClass identityDistinctionCultural industries
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:97
  • 點閱點閱:40
立基於Bourdieu的文化區異觀點,本研究以大高雄地區電話問卷調查為基礎,實證檢驗文化資本如何影響民眾對藝文發展的認知與態度,希望凸顯文化美學的階級權力運作面向。統計結果發現,文化資本與階級認同確實影響民眾對文化區異的看法,也導致民眾對政府推廣文創產業的作法抱持不同的立場,經濟資本則幾乎毫無影響力。整體而言,民眾肯定高雄的藝文發展有明顯的進步,但是多半評估南北的藝文差距並未縮小,因此期待高雄市政府未來將文創產業的推動列為重要的施政目標。
Focusing upon the impacts of cultural capital and class identity, this study uses the case of Kaohsiung to explore into the ways of Kaohsiung residents to see art and cultural development. Data have been collected through a city-wide telephone random survey and analyzed from the perspective of Pierre Bourdieu to sort out the causes and consequences of different viewpoints regarding cultural issues. Statistic analyses show that, to some extent, cultural standpoints have been the result of the symbolic violence of class power. Higher cultural and social capitals, according to regression analyses, are more likely to encourage local art production and consumption, as well as grant priority and support to municipal policies of cultural industries. However, those who pay little attention to the importance of cultural development tend to be younger and higher class identification. Overall speaking, Kaohsiung residents recognize cultural progress which had been made in these years, but still feel unsatisfied with the status quo and the cultural gap between Taipei and Kaohsiung.
期刊論文
1.Erickson, Bonnie H.(1991)。What is good taste good for?。Canadian Review of Sociology,28(2),255-278。  new window
2.DiMaggio, Paul、Mukhtar, Toqir(2004)。Arts Participation As Cultural Capital in the United States, 1982-2002: Signs of Decline?。Poetics,32(2),169-194。  new window
3.謝宏仁、謝玉玲、賴榮平(20060500)。高高屏地區民眾參與展演藝術活動現況與設施需求分析。藝術教育研究,11,77-111。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.劉宜君、王俐容(20120600)。臺灣文化權落實之研究:以文化參與實證調查為例。國家與社會,12,45-99。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Gayo-Cal, M.、Savage, M.、Warde, A.(2006)。A cultural map of the United Kingdom, 2003。Cultural Trends,15(2/3),213-237。  new window
6.Holt, D.(1997)。Distinction in America? Recovering Bourdieu'€™s theory of tastes from its critics。Poetics,25,93-120。  new window
7.Erickson, B. H.(1998)。Does cultural capital structure American consumption。Journal of Consumer Research,25(1),1-25。  new window
8.Kraaykamp, G.、Nieuwbeerta, P.(2000)。Parental background and lifestyle differentiation in eastern Europe: Social, political, and cultural intergenerational transmission in five former socialist societies。Social Science Research,29(1),92-122。  new window
9.Le Roux, B.、Rouanet, H.、Savage, M.、Warde, A.(2008)。Class and cultural division in UK。Sociology,42(6),1049-1071。  new window
10.Lopez-Sintas, J.、Katz-Gerro, T.(2005)。From exclusive to inclusive elitists and further: Twenty years of omnivorousness and cultural diversity in arts participation in the USA。Poetics,33(5/6),299-319。  new window
11.Shildrick, T.(2011)。Hardship in lands of plenty: Poverty and inequality in Britain and the United States。Sociology,45(2),343-348。  new window
12.DiMaggio, Paul(1987)。Classification in art。American Sociological Review,52(4),440-455。  new window
13.Erickson, B. H.(1996)。Culture, Class, and Connections。American Journal of Sociology,102(1),217-251。  new window
14.Mark, Noah P.(2003)。Culture and competition: Homophily and distancing explanations for cultural niches。American Sociological Review,68,319-345。  new window
15.Peterson, Richard A.(1992)。Understanding Audience Segmentation: From Elite and Mass to Omnivore and Univore。Poetics: Journal of Empirical Research on Literature,21(4),243-258。  new window
16.Peterson, Richard A.(2005)。Problems in comparative research: The example of omnivorousness。Poetics,33(5/6),257-282。  new window
17.Peterson, Richard A.、Kern, Roger M.(1996)。Changing Highbrow Taste: From Snob to Omnivore。American Sociological Review,61(5),900-907。  new window
18.黃毅志(20001000)。文化資本、社會網絡與階層認同、階級界限。國立政治大學社會學報,30,1-42。  延伸查詢new window
19.Katz-Gerro, T.(2002)。Highbrow Cultural Consumption and Class Distinction in Italy, Israel, West Germany, Sweden, and the United States。Social Forces,81(1),207-229。  new window
20.Lawler, S.(2005)。Introduction: Class, culture and identity。Sociology,39(5),797-806。  new window
學位論文
1.鄭瓊月(1991)。高雄市勞工生活目標取向輿文化活動參輿之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.許嘉猷(2011)。藝術之眼:布爾迪厄的藝術社會學理論及其在臺灣之量化與質化研究。臺北:唐山。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Pakulski, J.、Waters, M.(1996)。The death of social class。London:Sage。  new window
3.Fiske, J.(1987)。Television culture。London:Rutledge。  new window
4.Bennett, Tony、Savage, Mike、Silva, Elizabeth Bortolaia、Warde, Alan、Gayo-Cal, Modesto、Wright, David(2010)。Culture, Class, Distinction。London。  new window
5.Bourdieu, P.(1991)。On symbolic power in Language and symbolic power。Cambridge:Polity Press。  new window
6.Wimmer, Roger D.、Dominick, Joseph R.、李天任、藍莘(1995)。大眾媒體研究。亞太圖書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.Bourdieu, Pierre、Nice, Richard(1984)。Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste。London:Routledge and Kegan Paul。  new window
8.Bourdieu, P.(1998)。Practical reason。Polity Press。  new window
9.Bourdieu, P.(1993)。The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature。New York:Columbia Press。  new window
10.Blau, Peter Michael、Duncan, Otis Dudley(1967)。The American Occupational Structure。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
11.蕭阿勤(20120000)。重構臺灣:當代民族主義的文化政治。臺北:聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Coulangeon, P.、Lemel, Y.(2009)。The homology thesis: Distinct revisited。Quantifying theory: Pierre Bourdieu。New York:Springer。  new window
2.Erickson, B. H.(2008)。The crisis in culture and inequality。Engaging art: The next great transformation of America's cultural life。New York:Routledge。  new window
3.Garnham, N.(1993)。Bourdieu, the cultural arbitrary, and television。Bourdieu: Critical perspectives。Chicago:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE