:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:善治的追求:中小學教師評鑑政策工具分析
書刊名:教育研究月刊
作者:孫志麟
作者(外文):Sun, Chih-lin
出版日期:2019
卷期:299
頁次:頁21-38
主題關鍵詞:政策工具教師評鑑教師專業發展善治Policy instrumentsTeacher evaluationTeacher professional developmentGood governance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:28
  • 點閱點閱:10
政策工具是政策目標和政策結果之間的橋梁,選擇適當的政策工具對政策實施具有關鍵的影響作用。本研究從政策工具的角度切入,探討中小學教師評鑑政策執行的樣貌,據以提出相關建議,以作為教師評鑑治理之參考。根據政策文本分析發現,中小學教師評鑑政策工具呈現多樣化的特徵,使用了法令強制、因勢利導、能力培植、系統變革、勸告說服等五個類型的政策工具,初步構成一個政策治理的雛形。然而,中小學教師評鑑政策工具的使用卻欠缺系統整合與永續發展。隨著政策轉變成另一種教師專業發展實踐方案的支持系統,教師評鑑政策的治理效果亦有待進一步檢視與評估,期能達到善治之境界。
Policy instruments serve as a bridge between policy goals and policy results, and the selection of appropriate policy instruments has a critical impact on the policy implementation. The purpose of this study is to analyze the policy instruments for teacher evaluation in the elementary and secondary schools. Research results showed there are many different strategies and identifies five types of policy instruments in the implementation of teacher evaluation policy. These five generic classes of policy instruments include mandates, inducements, capacity-building, system change and persuasion. It seems to constitute a prototype of policy governance. However, the use of teacher evaluation policy instruments lacks system integration and sustainable development. As the policy is transformed into another practice program for teacher professional development, the governance effect of teacher evaluation policy needs to be further examined and strengthened. Based on these results, policy implications for the good governance of teacher evaluation are proposed.
期刊論文
1.Hannaway, J.、Woodrofife, N.(2003)。Policy instruments in education。Review of Research in Education,27(1),1-24。  new window
2.Hood, Christopher C.(2007)。Intellectual Obsolescence and Intellectual Makeovers: Reflections on the Tools of Government after Two Decades。Governance: An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions,20(1),127-144。  new window
3.Bressers, Hans Th. A.、O'Toole, Laurence J. Jr.(1998)。The Selection of Policy Instruments: A Network-based Perspective。Journal of Public Policy,18(3),213-239。  new window
4.Schneider, Anne L.、Ingram, Helen M.(1990)。Behavioral Assumptions of Policy Tools。Journal of Politics,52(2),510-529。  new window
5.Mcdonnell, L. M.、Elmore, R. F.(1987)。Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,9(2),133-152。  new window
6.Norton, S.、Milat, A.、Edwards, B.、Giffin, M.(2016)。Narrative review of strategies by organizations for building evaluation capacity。Evaluation and Program Planning,58,1-19。  new window
7.McDonnell, L. M.(1994)。Assessment policy as persuasion and regulation。American Journal of Education,102(4),394-420。  new window
8.Howlett, M.(2004)。Beyond good and evil in policy implementation: Instrument mixes, implementation styles and second generation theories of policy instruments choice。Policy & Society,23(2),1-17。  new window
9.孫志麟(20171000)。一個臺灣,兩個世界?大學與中小學教師評鑑政策之比較研究。教育政策與管理,2,1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.潘慧玲(20140300)。中小學教師專業發展評鑑方案之影響評估。當代教育研究季刊,22(1),47-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.孫志麟(20080900)。學校本位教師評鑑的實踐與反思。教育實踐與研究,21(2),63-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.趙志揚、黃曙東、楊寶琴、賴虹霖(2008)。我國高級中等學校試辦教師專業發展評鑑之成效評估。  延伸查詢new window
2.趙志揚(2010)。97學年度我國高級中等學校試辦教師專業發展評鑑之成效評估。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
3.潘慧玲(2007)。高級中等以下學校試辦教師專業發展評鑑之後設評鑑規劃研究。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
4.潘慧玲(2010)。試辦中小學教師專業發展評鑑之方案評鑑(第二期)結案報告。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
5.潘慧玲、王麗雲、張素貞(2007)。試辦中小學教師專業發展評鑑之方案評鑑。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
6.潘慧玲、張素貞、鄭淑惠、陳文彥、劉君雅、賴姿妤、沈舒婷(2010)。教育部試辦中小學教師專業發展評鑑之後設評鑑諮詢輔導及執行計畫報告。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Peters, B. Guy、Van Nispen, Frans K. M.(1998)。Public Policy Instruments: Evaluating the Tools of Public Administration。Cheltenham, U. K.:Edward Elgar。  new window
2.Bemelmans-Videc, M. L.、Rist, R. C.、Vedung, E.(1998)。Carrots, Sticks and Sermons: Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation。New Brunswick, NJ:Transaction。  new window
3.Salamon, Lester M.、Elliott, Odus V.(2002)。The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance。Oxford University Press。  new window
4.The New Teacher Project(2010)。Teacher evaluation 2.0。Brooklyn, NY:The New Teacher Project。  new window
5.Hood, Christopher C.(1983)。The Tools of Government。Macmillan。  new window
6.教育部(2011)。中華民國教育報告書:黃金十年、百年樹人。教育部。  延伸查詢new window
7.Fowler, F. C.(2012)。Policy studies for educational leaders: An introduction。Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
8.教育部(2011)。走著。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
9.教育部(2015)。教育部104年中小學典範縣市暨典範學校頒獎典禮暨成果發表會手冊。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
10.教育部(2015)。攜手走向專業:教學輔導教師的故事。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
11.教育部(2014)。教育部人才培育白皮書。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
12.教育部(2012)。中華民國師資培育白皮書。教育部。  延伸查詢new window
13.教育部(2006)。試辦中小學教師專業發展評鑑宣導手冊。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.教育部(2015)。匯聚智慧、展現專業:103學年度中小學教師專業發展評鑑優良教學檔案徵選活動頒獎暨成果發表會紀實,臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾憲政(2008)。規劃教師專業發展評鑑人才培育進階課程,臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Linder, S. H.、Peters, B. G.(1998)。The study of policy instruments: Four schools of thought。Public policy instruments: Evaluating the tools of public administration。Edward Elgar Publishing Company。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE