:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:學校本位教師評鑑的實踐與反思
書刊名:教育實踐與研究
作者:孫志麟 引用關係
作者(外文):Sun, Chih-lin
出版日期:2008
卷期:21:2
頁次:頁63-94
主題關鍵詞:教師專業發展教師評鑑學校本位評鑑School-based evaluationTeacher evaluationTeachers' professional development
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(16) 博士論文(5) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:15
  • 共同引用共同引用:202
  • 點閱點閱:76
教師評鑑是增進教師專業發展的可行途徑,也是確保學生學習成就的重要機制。本研究從學校本位的觀點切入,選擇台北縣偏遠地區的一所國民小學為場域,歷經約一年的時間,探討教師評鑑的實踐歷程與結果,同時進行理論層次和行動層次的反思。研究結果發現:教師從參與教師評鑑的過程,增加了評鑑知識理解與專業成長,以及持續進行反思並建立自信。此外,學校也經由教師評鑑的推展,開啟了專業對話的學習文化。亦即學校本位教師評鑑機制對教師發展和學校改進均有正面的影響。顯示:學校本位教師評鑑的理論觀點在實際的教育情境中實踐的可能性,值得推廣至其他同樣以促進教師專業發展為訴求的學校。不過,在推展學校本位教師評鑑時,可能也會遇到若干問題,包括評鑑觀念的重建、教師工作負荷與時間管理、評鑑文化創生、賦權增能評鑑的可行性等等,必須予以正視並謀求對策。最後,本研究亦討論學校本位教師評鑑實踐所帶來的啟示。
Teacher evaluation is an important mechanism for enhancing teacher professional development and student learning achievement. The main purpose of this study was to create a framework focused on school-based viewpoints to improve teacher evaluation in a remote elementary school in Taipei County. It also reflected the possibilities and challenges of school-based teacher evaluation from both theoretical and practical perspectives. Results indicated that teachers enhanced evaluation understanding and professional growth after participating in the processes of teacher evaluation. Secondly, teachers could continue to reflect on their teaching practice and build self-confidence. Furthermore, the case school established a professional learning culture through the implementation of teacher evaluation. Overall, the school-based teacher evaluation mechanism had positive effects on teachers’ development and school improvement, with the creation of a link between theory and practice. These results should be generalized and implemented in other schools in the quest to enhance teachers’ professional development. However, there were some problems in school-based teacher evaluation, including: reconstruction of the evaluation concept, heavy workload and the lack of time management, establishment of the evaluation culture, and the feasibility of empowerment evaluation. Finally, some implications initiated from the practice of school-based teacher evaluation were discussed.
期刊論文
1.Goldstein, J.(2007)。Easy to dance to: Solving the problems of teacher evaluation with peer assistance and review。American Journal of Education,2007(5)=113,475-508。  new window
2.潘世尊(20020300)。參與、溝通、協同的學校教學評鑑系統。國民教育研究學報,8,225-248。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Alvik, Trond(1995)。School-Based Evaluation: A Close-Up。Studies in Educational Evaluation,21(3),311-343。  new window
4.陳美如(20020400)。當教師遇見課程評鑑--轉變與成長。師大學報.教育類,47(1),17-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Nevo, D.(1994)。Combining Internal and External Evaluation: A Case for School-based Evaluation。Studies in Educational Evaluation,20,87-98。  new window
6.孫志麟(2003)。把專業找回來:學校本位教學評鑑。國民教育,43(3),7-13。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.潘慧玲、王麗雲、簡茂發、孫志麟、張素貞、張錫勳、陳順和、蔡濱如(2004)。發展國民中小學教師教學專業能力指標之研究。臺北:國立臺灣師範大學教育研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.余榮仁(2000)。學校本位教師評鑑制度之研究--評鑑者與被評鑑者間之反省性合作行動探究(碩士論文)。臺南師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.(2002)。School-based Evaluation: An International Perspective。New York, NY:Elsevier Science。  new window
2.(2005)。Empowerment Evaluation: Principles in Practice。New York, NY:Guilford Press。  new window
3.Stronge, J. H.(1997)。Evaluating Teaching: A Guide to Current Thinking and Best Practice。Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press。  new window
4.Freire, Paulo、Ramos, Myra Bergman(1993)。Pedagogy of the oppressed。New York:Continuum。  new window
5.張德銳、吳武雄、許籐繼、李俊達、洪寶蓮、王美霞、陳偉泓、曾美惠、常月如、曾政清、黃春木、白師舜、曾燦金(20040000)。中學教師教學專業發展系統。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Nevo, David(1995)。School-based evaluation: A dialogue for school improvement。Tel Aviv:Masada。  new window
7.Danielson, C.、McGreal, T. L.(2000)。Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice。Alexandria, Virginia:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD)。  new window
8.Peterson, K. D.(2000)。Teacher evaluation: A comprehensive guide to new directions and practice。Thousand Oaks, California:Crowin Press, Inc:A Sage Publications Company。  new window
9.Danielson, C.(1996)。Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching。Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
10.陳美如、郭昭佑(20030000)。學校本位課程評鑑:理念與實踐反省。臺北市:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Lincoln, Yvonna S.、Guba, Egon G.(1989)。Fourth generation evaluation。Sage Publications。  new window
12.郭昭佑(20000000)。學校本位評鑑。臺北市:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Gitlin, A.、Smyth, J.(1990)。Teacher Evaluation: Educative Alternatives。London:Falmer Press。  new window
14.Green, H.(2004)。Professional Standards for Teachers and School Leaders: A Key to School Improvement。New York, NY:Routledge Falmer。  new window
15.孫志麟(2004)。學校本位觀點的教師評鑑。教育政策與評鑑研究:追求卓越。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Iwanicki, E. F.(1990)。Teacher evaluation for school improvement。The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers。Newbury Park, California:Sage Publications。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE