臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：「教師評鑑2.0」：美國的經驗與對臺灣之啟示
書刊名：教育研究與發展期刊
作者：方朝郁／方德隆 引用關係
作者(外文)：Fang, Chao-yu／Fang, Der-long
出版日期：2017
卷期：13:1
頁次：頁31-61
主題關鍵詞：教師評鑑；教師專業發展；零件效應；教師專業發展評鑑；Teacher evaluation；Teacher professional development；Widget effect；Teacher evaluation for professional development；TEPD
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:131
  • 點閱點閱:31
期刊論文
1.王瑞壎(20091000)。第一年參與試辦教師專業發展評鑑之歷史回顧。教師之友，50(4)，16-29。  延伸查詢new window
2.方朝郁(20121200)。六年之後--教師專業發展評鑑的成效、問題與展望。臺灣教育，678，38-41。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃嘉莉(20080800)。NCATE師資培育認證制度問題之探討。教育政策論壇，11(3)，113-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.張新仁(20120200)。臺灣中小學教師專業發展的推動策略。教育人力與專業發展，29(1)，13-24。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳麗君、楊先芝(20090800)。教師專業發展評鑑的文化故事。教育資料與研究，89，89-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.黃琇屏(20090800)。教師專業發展評鑑試辦現況、困境與因應策略。教育資料與研究，89，71-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.李奉儒(20060900)。國中小學教師評鑑機制規劃之芻議：英國的經驗與啟示。教育研究與發展期刊，2(3)，193-216。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.劉美慧、黃嘉莉、康玉琳(20070900)。臺灣教師評鑑制度之分析。當代教育研究，15(3)，37-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.馮莉雅(20101000)。教師專業發展評鑑的實施與成效：以高雄市國小為例。教育研究學報，44(2)，85-109。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.丁一顧、張德銳(20071100)。臺北市教學輔導教師制度實施成效與問題的三年縱貫研究。臺北市立教育大學學報. 教育類，38(2)，1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.張德銳(20120500)。區別化教師評鑑制度的規劃與實施策略。臺北市立教育大學學報．教育類，43(1)，121-144。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.潘慧玲、陳文彥(20100900)。教師專業發展評鑑促進組織學習之個案研究。教育研究集刊，56(3)，29-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Danielson, C.(2001)。New Trends in teacher evaluation。Educational Leadership，58(5)，12-15。  new window
14.張德銳(2004)。專業發展導向教師評鑑的規劃與推動策略。教育資料集刊，29，169-193。  延伸查詢new window
15.方朝郁(20140600)。初任教師形成性評鑑成效與影響因素之個案研究。教育學刊，42，151-188。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.秦夢群、張嘉原(20070600)。中小學教師成績考核制度與問題分析。教育研究月刊，158，115-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Accomplished California Teachers(2015)。A coherent system of teacher evaluation for quality teaching。Education Policy Analysis Archives，23(17)，1-22。  new window
18.Benedict, A. E.、Thomas, R. A.、Kimerling, J.、Leko, C.(2013)。Trends in teacher evaluation: What every special education teacher should know。Teaching Exceptional Children，45(5)，60-68。  new window
19.Danielson, C.(2011)。Evaluations that help teachers learn。Educational Leadership，68(4)，35-39。  new window
20.Hazi, H. M.、Rucinski, D. A.(2009)。Teacher evaluation as a policy target for improved student learning: A fifty-state review of statute and regulatory action since NCLB。Education Policy Analysis Archives，17(5)，1-22。  new window
21.Kersten, T. A.、Israel, M. S.(2005)。Teacher evaluation: Principals' insights and suggestions for improvement。Planning and Changing，36(1)，47-67。  new window
22.Viviano, T.(2012)。Charlotte Danielson or national board Certification: A comparison and contrasting of two major national frameworks for teaching。Journal of Career and Technical Education，27(2)，114-119。  new window
23.顏國樑(20031200)。從教師專業發展導向論實施教師評鑑的策略。教育資料集刊，28，259-286。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.張德銳(20091000)。中小學教師專業發展評鑑實施問題與解決策略。研習資訊，26(5)，17-24。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Kane, T. J.、Staiger, D. O.、Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation(2012)。Gathering feedback for teaching: combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains。Seattle, WA：Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation。  new window
2.Toch, T.、Rothman, R.(2008)。Rush to judgment: Teacher evaluation in public education。Washington, DC：Education Sector。  new window
3.潘慧玲、王麗雲、張素貞、鄭淑惠、吳俊憲(2010)。試辦中小學教師專業發展評鑑之方案評鑑。臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學教育政策與行政研究所。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Stronge, J. H.、Tucker, P. D.(2003)。Handbook on teacher evaluation: Assessing and improving performance。Larxhmont, N. Y.：Eye On Education。  new window
2.The New Teacher Project(2010)。Teacher evaluation 2.0。Brooklyn, NY：The New Teacher Project。  new window
3.Danielson, C.、McGreal, T. L.(2000)。Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice。Alexandria, Virginia：Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
4.Darling-Hammond, L.(2013)。Getting teacher evaluation right: What really matters for effectiveness and improvement。New York, NY：Teachers College Press。  new window
5.Danielson, C.(1996)。Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching。Alexandria, VA：Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
6.教育部(2016)。教師專業標準指引。臺北巿：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
7.Goldrick, L.(2002)。Improving teacher evaluation to improve teaching quality。Washington, DC：National Governors Association。  new window
8.Jerald, C.(2012)。Ensuring accurate feedback from observations。Seattle, WA：Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation。  new window
9.Hinchey, P. H.(2010)。Getting teacher assessment right: What policymakers can learn from research。Boulder, CO：National Education Policy Center。  new window
10.National Council on Teacher Quality(2015)。State of the states 2015: Evaluating teaching, leading and learnings。Washington, DC：National Council on Teacher Quality。  new window
11.National Board for Professional Teaching Standards(1989)。What teachers should know and be able to do。Detroit, MI：National Board for Professional Teaching Standards。  new window
12.Marzano, R. J.、Toth, M. D.(2013)。Teacher evaluation: That makes a difference。Alexandria, VA：Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
13.Marzano, R. J.、Frontier, T.、Livingston, D.(2011)。Effective supervision: Supporting the art and science of teaching。Alexandria, VA：Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
14.National Council on Teacher Quality(2017)。Running in place: How new teacher evaluations fail to live up to promises。Washington, DC：National Council on Teacher Quality。  new window
15.Council of Chief State School Officers(2012)。Chiefs' research primer: A summary of Measures of Effective Teaching's (MET) recent findings, gathering feedback for teaching--combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains。Washington, DC：Council of Chief State School Officers。  new window
16.The New Teacher Project(2007)。Hiring, assignment, and transfer in Chicago public schools。Brooklyn, NY：The New Teacher Project。  new window
17.Lincoln, Yvonna S.、Guba, Egon G.(1989)。Fourth generation evaluation。Sage Publications。  new window
其他
1.Williamson, R.(2011)。Teacher evaluation，Pittsburgh, PA：Education Partnerships。  new window
2.教育部(2016)。教師專業發展評鑑將於106學年度起轉型為教師專業發展支持系統，http://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=55BD57743E88E277。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育部(2014)。教育部對於推動中小學教師評鑑之說明，http://www.edu.tw/news1/detail.aspx?Node=1088&Page=23186&Index=1&WID=6635a4e8-f0de-4957-aa3e-c3b15c6e6ead。  延伸查詢new window
4.教育部(2013)。中小學教師評鑑相關制度公聽會與問卷調查開始囉！歡迎各界提供建議！，http://www.edu.tw/pages/detail.aspx?Node=1088&Page=19660&Index=3&wid=1112353C-88D0-4BDB-914A-77A4952AA893。  延伸查詢new window
5.Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation(2013)。Ensuring fair and reliable measures of effective teaching: Culminating findings from the MET project's three-year study。  new window
6.Weisberg, D.，Sexton, S.，Mulhern, J.，Keeling, D.(2009)。The widget effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on differences in teacher effectiveness。  new window
7.White, B. R.，Cowhy, J.，Stevens, D. W.，Sporte, S. E.(2012)。Designing and implementing the next generation of teacher evaluation systems: Lessons learned from case studies in five illinois districts，Chicago, IL：Consortium on Chicago School Research。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1423（臺灣：1413，外國：10） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1725833 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67538384
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上