:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從社會認知理論的觀點探討教師參與教師專業發展評鑑之因素
書刊名:教育資料與研究
作者:莊雪華 引用關係黃繼仁 引用關係江佳勳
作者(外文):Chuang, Hsueh-huaHuang, Chi-jenChiang, Chia-hsun
出版日期:2014
卷期:115
頁次:頁223-251
主題關鍵詞:社會認知理論教師專業發展評鑑專業成長Social cognitive theoryTeacher evaluation for professional developmentProfessional growth
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:161
  • 點閱點閱:71
本研究係從社會認知理論的觀點探討教師參與教師專業發展評鑑 的過程中,影響其專業成長的關鍵因素及彼此的交互關係。為達成研 究目的,本研究採用質性研究的方法,以曾參與過教師專業發展評鑑 的九位國小教師為研究對象,實施深度訪談的方式,並使用不斷分析 比較法進行資料的分析。本研究發現,在社會期待、學校內部的壓力、 評鑑計畫,以及成長需求與預知評鑑走向等交互作用下,受訪教師因 而有了參與教師專業發展評鑑之行為;此外,受訪教師透過觀察學習 而訂定的評鑑計畫與被評鑑的壓力,不僅促使受訪教師出現參與評鑑 之行為,亦須展現成長動機、觀察學習和轉化外在經驗以驅使、維 持其行為,從中獲得同儕激勵,激發更深層的教學調整與自省能力, 以利進行後續的專業成長作為,故在個人、環境與行為三因素的交互 作用下,受訪教師才得以透過教師專業發展評鑑而獲得專業成長。最 後,本研究也針對教師專業發展評鑑的實施提出相關的建議。
Based on the social cognitive theory, this study explored the interaction of environment, person, and behavior factors to understand what could affect elementary school teachers’ professional growth through teacher evaluation for professional development. The qualitative method design was used. The individuals participated in this study were nine elementary school teachers. Data were mainly collected from semi-structured interviews. The constant comparative method was used to analyze the data. Our findings revealed that it was through the interaction between societal expectations, stress from the school, evaluation requirements, and anticipated professional growth that these teachers decided to participate in teacher evaluation for professional development. Besides, the stress of evaluation and the constructive evaluation guidelines also stimulated their motivation to seek professional growth, to learn from observations, and to transform their external experiences into consistent behaviors. These behaviors in turn provided peer motivation for them and aroused their deep self-reflective capability. Thus, teachers’ professional growth was affected not by the behavior factor alone but rather the interactions among environment, person, and behavior factors. Discussion and suggestionsfor teachers and policy makers on teacher evaluation programs were also provided.
期刊論文
1.Wood, R. E.、Bandura, A.(1989)。Social Cognitive Theory of Organization Management。The Academy of Management Review,14(3),361-384。  new window
2.張素貞、吳俊憲(20110600)。教師專業發展評鑑與教學精進之個案研究。教育行政與評鑑學刊,11,89-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.余泰魁(20070900)。科技媒介學習環境之學習成效比較研究。教育心理學報,39(1),69-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.朱彩馨、彭虹綾(20090100)。提昇科技中介學習成效--從個人內在認知因素探討合作學習的學習成效。資訊管理學報,16(1),135-162。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳嵩、蔡青曄、陳光偉(20110600)。組織環境對員工目標取向及數位學習成效之影響。電子商務研究,9(2),199-221。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Benbunan-Fich, R.、Hiltz, S. R.(2003)。Mediators of the effectiveness of online courses。IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication,46(4),298-312。  new window
7.Craig, C. J.(2010)。"Evaluation gone away": The teacher experience of the summative evaluation of a school reform initiative。Teaching and Teacher Education,26(6),1290-1299。  new window
8.Lee, Elinda Ai-Lim、Wong, Kok Wai、Fung, Chun Che(2010)。How does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? A structural equation modeling approach。Computers and Education,55(4),1424-1442。  new window
9.Wu, X.、Gao, Y.(2011)。Applying the extended technology acceptance model to the use of clickers in student learning: Some evidence from macroeconomics classes。American Journal of Business Education,4(7),43-50。  new window
10.Wang, Shu-Ling、Lin, Sunny S. J.(2007)。The application of social cognitive theory to web-based learning through NetPorts。British Journal of Educational Technology,38(4),600-612。  new window
11.郭峰淵、曾繁絹、劉家儀(20060600)。從社會認知觀點探討醫師專業知識分享。圖書資訊學刊,4(1/2),97-114。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.顏國樑、洪劭品(20070700)。國民小學教師對 "教育部試辦教師專業發展評鑑" 意見之研究--以臺北縣為例。學校行政,50,1-26。  延伸查詢new window
13.Vaughan, W.(2002)。Effects of cooperative learning on achievement and attitude among students of color。Journal of Educational Research,95(6),359-345。  new window
14.Lim, Doo Hun、Kim, Hyunjoong(2003)。Motivation and learner characteristics affecting online learning and learning application。Journal of Educational Technology Systems,31(4),423-439。  new window
15.馮莉雅(20101000)。教師專業發展評鑑的實施與成效:以高雄市國小為例。教育研究學報,44(2),85-109。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Bandura, A.(1978)。The Self-System in Reciprocal Determinism。American Psychologist,33(4),344-358。  new window
17.鄭進丁(20070700)。應用方案理論進行評鑑之研究--以高雄市試辦教師專業發展評鑑為例。國民教育研究學報,19,29-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Goudas, M.、Biddle, S.、Underwood, M.(1995)。A prospective study of the relationship between motivational orientations and perceived competence with intrinsic motivation and achievement in a teacher education course。Educational Psychology,15(1),89-96。  new window
19.潘慧玲、陳文彥(20100900)。教師專業發展評鑑促進組織學習之個案研究。教育研究集刊,56(3),29-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.鄭淑惠(20110900)。教師專業發展評鑑之個案研究:促進組織學習的觀點。教育研究與發展期刊,7(3),37-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Bernard, R. M.、Abrami, P. C.、Borokhovski, E.、Wade, C. A.、Tamim, R. M.、Surkes, M. A.、Bethel, E. C.(2009)。A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education。Review of Educational Research,79(3),1243-1289。  new window
22.毛國楠、程炳林(19930700)。目標層次與目標導向對大學生自我調整學習歷程之影響。教育心理學報,26,85-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.張德銳、李俊達、周麗華(20101200)。國中實施形成性教師評鑑歷程及影響因素之個案研究。教育實踐與研究,23(2),65-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.吳金香、陳世穎(20080100)。國小教師對試辦教師專業發展評鑑態度之調查研究--以臺中縣市為例。學校行政,53,211-253。  延伸查詢new window
25.Venkatesh, Viswanath、Morris, Michael G.、Davis, Gordon B.、Davis, Fred D.(2003)。User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View。Management Information Systems Quarterly,27(3),425-478。  new window
26.Bandura, Albert(1989)。Human agency in social cognitive theory。American Psychologist,44(9),1175-1184。  new window
27.周麗華(20101200)。臺北市國小教師專業發展評鑑實施效應之研究。市北教育學刊,37,103-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.孫志麟(20080900)。學校本位教師評鑑的實踐與反思。教育實踐與研究,21(2),63-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Green, J. R.(2001)。The development of a meaningful teacher evaluation process in a Catholic elementary school(博士論文)。Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,Blacksburg, Virginia。  new window
2.賴慧真(2009)。臺北市國民中學組織學習與教師評鑑接受度關係之研究(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.呂永財(2005)。「國民中小學教師教學專業能力指標」應用於專業發展導向教師評鑑之個案研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
4.江惠真(2009)。教師專業發展評鑑促進學校革新之個案研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.沈靜濤(2009)。教師專業發展評鑑與專業學習社群之個案研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Lincoln, Yvonna S.、Guba, Egon G.(1985)。Naturalistic Inquiry。Sage。  new window
2.Strauss, Anselm L.、Corbin, Juliet、徐宗國(1997)。質性研究概論。巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Bandura, Albert(1986)。Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
其他
1.教育部(2009)。教育部補助辦理教師專業發展評鑑實施要點,http://140.111.34.34/docdb/files/dma7da0a07101604054.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
2.Sawa, R.(1995)。Teacher evaluation policies and practices: A summary of a thesis,http://www.ssta.sk.ca/research/instruction/95-04.htm。  new window
圖書論文
1.Chen, L. K.(2004)。Experiences of students participating in a computer-assisted language learning environment: an example of chinese language learning。Athens, OH。  new window
2.林本炫(2003)。紮根理論研究法評介。質性研究方法與資料分析。嘉義:南華大學社會科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
3.潘慧玲(20020000)。反思與展望--我們從學校革新中學到了什麼?。學校革新:理念與實踐。臺北:學富文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE