:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:老人非正式和正式照顧體系關係之初探:從家人和日託中心工作員協助項目的比較分析出發
書刊名:社會政策與社會工作學刊
作者:呂寶靜 引用關係
作者(外文):Lu, Pau-ching
出版日期:1998
卷期:2:1
頁次:頁3-38
主題關鍵詞:非正式和正式照顧老人和社會照顧日間照護服務暫代照顧服務歇息服務Informal and formal careAging and social careDay care servicesRespite care
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:80
  • 點閱點閱:164
     本文試圖從家人和日託中心工作員對老人提供協助項目的比較分析,來檢證有關 老人非正式和正式關係之三種理論模式: 層級補償模式( hierarchical compensatory model )、 職務取向模式( task specific model )、及補充模式( supplemental )。 資料的蒐集方式為面訪問卷調查,計訪問了六所日託中心的 92 名老人使用者。 研究發現可歸納為下列四項結論:(一)使用日託服務的老人仍從家人獲得許多協助,這也 意味著日託中心工作員不能完全替代家人,故「正式服務會取代家照顧」是一種迷思,此一 發現駁斥了層級補償模式所主張的 " 各要素之相互替代性 "。 (二)非正式照顧體系(家 人)的照顧和正式體系(老人日託中心工作員)的協助項目不是「全然分工」,也不是「完 全重複」,而是「部分重複相同、部分分工不同」,故較符合補充模式的理論。此一發現可 能因本研究的正式服務係以日間照護服務方案為例,而日間照顧方案的目的原就具有補充家 庭照顧的意含。(三)當老人可從家人和工作員獲得相同項目的協助之同時,老人接受家人 的協助感到較自在,此一發現證實家人仍是老人支持要素中的優勢偏好。(四)家人和日託 中心工作員提供相異的工作項目之比較分析顯示:家人提供的協助項目是非技術性的,且這 些協助要求地理上的鄰近性及長期的時間投入;反之,日託中心工作員所提供的服務是可預 測的、例行化的、需要技術性知識,此一結果也部份支持職務分工模式的主張。本文最後並 針對研究發現提出老人福利政策和未來研究方向的建議。
     The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between informal and formal care systems for the elderly. an interview survey of 92 day care users was conducted to collect data. The conclusions can be drawn the findings: First of all, although elderly people use day care service, they still receive lots of assistance from family members. That is, day care workers can not completely substitute family caregivers, and therefore the assumption that formal services will substitute family care is merely a myth. Secondly, the tasks provided by day care workers are not completely different from the assistance given by family caregivers, neither are they totally the same. In other words, the finding suggests that the relationship between informal and formal care is supplemental. In addition, the comparison of different tasks indicated that family members tend to give help which require only everyday knowledge and face-to-face proximity, while day care workers are more inclined to provide predictable tasks which require technical knowledge. Thirdly, when elderly people can receive the assistance both from day care workers and family caregivers, they feel more comfortable with family assistance. The finding, to some degree, support the hypothesis that family is the most preferred. Finally, policy implications and future research directions are discussed.
期刊論文
1.Penning, Margaret J.(1990)。Receipt of Assistance by Elderly People: Hierarchical Selection and Task Specificity。The Gerontologist,30(2),220-227。  new window
2.Stoller, Eleanor Palo(1989)。Formal Services and Informal Helping: The Myth of Service Substitution。Journal of Applied Gerontology,8(1),37-52。  new window
3.Chappell, N.、Blandford, A.(1991)。Informal and Formal Care: Exploring the Complementarity。Aging and Society,11(3),299-317。  new window
4.呂寶靜(19970900)。臺灣地區老人日間照護方案功能之初探:從老人使用者及其家屬的觀點出發。國立政治大學社會學報,27,89-120。  延伸查詢new window
5.Cantor, Marjorie H.(1991)。Family and community: changing roles in an aging society。The Gerontologist,31(3),337-346。  new window
6.Logan, John R.、Spitze, Glenna(1994)。Informal support and the use of formal services by older Americans。Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences,49(1),25-34。  new window
7.胡幼慧、王孝仙、郭淑珍(19950700)。家人照護失能老人的困境:一項質化與量化整合的研究。公共衛生,22(2),99-113。  延伸查詢new window
8.吳淑瓊、江東亮(19950600)。臺灣地區長期照護的問題與對策。中華公共衛生雜誌,14(3),246-255。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Sundstrom, Gerdt(1986)。Family and State: Recent Trends in the Care of the Aged in Sweden。Ageing & Society,6,169-196。  new window
10.呂寶靜(1994)。淺談老人非正式照顧體系。福利社會,44,8-10。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.呂寶靜(1996)。失能老人非正式和正式照顧體系關係之探究 : 以日間照顧服務方案之使用為例 (計畫編號:NSC 85-2412-H-004-002)。行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.吳味鄉(1993)。臺灣地區老人照顧與社會網絡關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Litwak, Eugene(1985)。Helping the Elderly: The Complementary Roles of Informal Networks and Formal Systems。Guilford Press。  new window
2.林松齡(1994)。老人社會支持來源與老人社會需求。社會安全問題之探討。嘉義。  延伸查詢new window
3.Kirwin, Patricia M.(1991)。Adult Day Care。London:Garland Publishing。  new window
圖書論文
1.Hermalin, Albert I.、Ofstedal, Mary Beth、林惠生、李美玲、張明正(1993)。臺灣地區老年支持類型及其政策意涵。臺灣地區老人保健與生活研究論文集。臺中:臺灣省家庭計劃研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.Cantor, Marjorie、Little, Virginia(1985)。Aging and Social Care。Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences \\ Roert H. Binstock ; Ethel Shanas (eds.)。New York:Van Nostrand Reinhold。  new window
3.Travis, S. S.(1995)。Families and Formal Networks。Handbook of Aging and the Family。Westport Conn:Greenwood Press。  new window
4.George, Linda K.(1987)。Easing Caregiver Burden: the Role of Informal and Formal Supports。Health in Aging: Sociological Issues and Policy Direction。New York, NY:Springer。  new window
5.Waerness, K.、Ringer, S.(1987)。Women In The Welfare State: The Case Of Formal And Informal Old-Age Care。The Scandinavian Model: Welfare States and Welfare Research。M. E. Sharp Inc.。  new window
6.Cantor, Marjorie、Little, Virginia(1985)。Aging and Social Care。Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences。New York:Van Nostrand Reinhold。  new window
7.呂寶靜、陳景寧(19970000)。女性家屬照顧者的處境與福利建構。女性‧國家‧照顧工作。臺北:女書文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE