:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:照顧工作對婦女就業的影響:以新竹市為例
書刊名:社區發展季刊
作者:周月清潘淑滿 引用關係
作者(外文):Chou, Yueh-chingPan, Shu-man
出版日期:2017
卷期:160
頁次:頁245-263
主題關鍵詞:婦女就業照顧與工作兼顧兒童照顧老人照顧
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:202
  • 點閱點閱:29
期刊論文
1.孫健忠(20020700)。我國社會福利行政體制現況與問題的初探。社區發展季刊,98,40-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.周月清、王育瑜、林昭文(20090100)。地方制度法施行對中央與地方社會福利制度的影響:以身心障礙福利為例。臺灣社會工作學刊,6,37+39-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.許志雄(20000100)。地方自治的普遍化與國際化。律師雜誌,244,92-102。  延伸查詢new window
4.Eydal, G. B.、Rostgaard, T.(2011)。Gender equality revisited: Changes in Nordic childcare policies in the 2000s。Social Policy & Administration,45(2),161-179。  new window
5.高泉錫(20090300)。育嬰津貼,我國育兒政策的第一步。臺灣勞工季刊,17,6-13。  延伸查詢new window
6.胡幼慧(19930400)。誰來照顧照顧者?醫療福利體系的省思。婦女研究通訊,29,4-6。  延伸查詢new window
7.吳美連、賈文靜、呂純純(19970500)。育有學齡期兒童已婚婦女之勞動再參與研究。中原學報,25(2),1-9。  延伸查詢new window
8.高月霞、陳仕偉(19940400)。臺灣婦女勞動參與行為之因果關係分析。婦女與兩性學刊,5,1-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.劉梅君(20080800)。性別與就業:前瞻與省思--兼檢討部分時間工作、育兒照顧政策及玻璃天花板現象。研考雙月刊,32(4)=266,54-66。  延伸查詢new window
10.Broman, C. L.(1988)。Household work and family life satisfaction of blacks。Journal of Marriage and the Family,50,743-748。  new window
11.Lu, L.、Gilmour, R.、Kao, S. F.、Huang, M. T.(2006)。A cross-cultural study of work/family demands, work/family conflict and wellbeing: The Taiwanese vs. British。Career Development International,11(1),9-27。  new window
12.蔡茂寅(20000600)。地方自治之基礎理論。臺灣本土法學雜誌,11,1-19。  延伸查詢new window
13.官有垣(1999)。地方政府的社會福利角色:理論觀點與英國實例。社會建設,100,72-91。  延伸查詢new window
14.唐文慧(20111200)。為何職業婦女決定離職?結構限制下的母職認同與實踐。臺灣社會研究,85,201-265。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Lewis, Jane(1997)。Gender and Welfare Regimes: Further Thoughts。Social Politics,4(2),160-177。  new window
16.胡愈寧、張菁芬(20031100)。促進婦女就業之研究。育達研究叢刊,56,15-26。  延伸查詢new window
17.Adya, M. P.(2008)。Women at Work: Differences in IT Career Experiences and Perceptions between South Asian and American Women。Human Resource Management,47(3),601-635。  new window
18.Bittman, M.、Hill, T.、Thomson, C.(2007)。The Impact of Caring on Informal Carers' Employment, Income and Earnings: A Longitudinal Approach。Australian Journal of Social Issues,42(2),255-272。  new window
19.Chou, Y. C.、Kröger, T.、Chiao, C.、Pu, C. Y.(2013)。Well-Being among Employed and Non-employed Caregiving Women in Taiwan。International Journal of Social Welfare,22,164-174。  new window
20.Chou, Y. C.、Lin, L. C.、Chang, A. L.、Schalock, R. L.(2007)。The Quality of Life of Family Caregivers of Adults with Intellectual Disabilities in Taiwan。Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities,20,200-210。  new window
21.Chou, Y. C.、Pu, C. Y.、Kröger, T.、Fu, L. Y.(2010)。Caring, Employment and Quality of Life: Comparison of Employed and Nonemployed Mothers of Adults with Intellectual Disability。American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities,115(5),406-420。  new window
22.Emslie, C.、Hunt, K.(2009)。'Live to Work' or 'Work to Live'? A Qualitative Study of Gender and Work-Life Balance among Men and Women in Mid-Life。Gender, Work and Organization,16(1),151-172。  new window
23.De Cieri, H.、Bardoel, E. A.(2009)。What Does 'Work-Life Management' Mean in China and Southeast Asia for MNCs?。Community, Work & Family,12(2),179-196。  new window
24.Chou, Y. C.、Pfau-Effinger, B.、Kröger, T.、Ranci, C.(2017)。Impact of care responsibilities on women's employment: A comparison between European and East Asian welfare states。European Societies,19(2),157-177。  new window
25.Gray, M.、Hughes, J.(2005)。Caring for Children and Adults: Differential Access to Family-Friendly Work Arrangements。Family Matters,70,18-25。  new window
26.Kröger, T.(1996)。Policy-Makers in Social Services in Finland: The Municipality and the Atate。The Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare,5,62-68。  new window
27.Pfau-Effinger, B.(1998)。Gender Cultures and The Gender Arrangement: A Theoretical Framework for Cross-National Comparisons on Gender。Innovation: the European Journal of Social Sciences,11(2),147-166。  new window
28.Rostgaard, T.(2002)。Caring for Children and Older People in Europe: A Comparison of European Policies and Practice。Policy Studies,23(1),51-68。  new window
29.Spector, P. E.、Allen, T. D.、Lapierre, L. M.、Poelmans, S.、Cooper, C. L.、O'Driscoll, M. P.、Sanchez, J. I.(2007)。Cross-National Differences in Relationships of Work Demands, Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intentions with Work-Family Conflict。Personnel Psychology,60(4),805-835。  new window
30.劉香蘭、古允文(20150600)。臺灣照顧分工的重組:兩個女性世代生命歷程的比較。女學學誌:婦女與性別研究,36,49-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.伊慶春、簡文吟(20010600)。已婚婦女的持續就業:家庭制度與勞動市場的妥協。臺灣社會學,1,149-182。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.薛承泰(20001000)。臺灣地區已婚婦女再就業時機的初步分析。人口學刊,21,77-99。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.簡文吟、薛承泰(19960400)。臺灣地區已婚婦女就業型態及其影響因素。人口學刊,17,113-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.Burau, V.、Kröger, T.(2004)。The local and the National in community care: Exploring policy and politics in Finland and Britain。Social Policy & Administration,38(7),793-810。  new window
會議論文
1.張晉芬(1996)。女性勞動者婚育離職原因之探討。第三回臺灣勞動研究小組專題研討會。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃煥榮(2008)。運用友善家庭政策平衡工作與家庭。2008臺灣公共行政與公共事務系所聯合會(TASPAA)夥伴關係與永續發展國際學術研討會。臺中。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.行政院主計總處(2015)。政府統計總覽。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院勞動部(2016)。就業統計。  延伸查詢new window
3.周月清、潘淑滿、傅立葉、梁莉芳、簡家欣(2012)。臺灣地方社會福利體系對婦女勞動參與及社會凝聚之影響:與11個歐盟國家比較 (計畫編號:100-2915-1-010-004)。  延伸查詢new window
4.Jensen, P. H.(2010)。Impact of Local Welfare Systems on Female Labour Force Participation and Social Cohesion (計畫編號:FP7-SSH-2010-2.1-2)。  new window
學位論文
1.蕭玉青(2011)。家庭生命週期對女性就業型態之影響:事件史分析法之應用(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳宗倚(2009)。親子同住對已婚婦女勞動參與關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.詹雅文(2015)。影響婦女生育後勞動參與因素之分析(碩士論文)。國立中央大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.DeVault, Margaret L.(1991)。Feeding the Family: The Social Organization of Caring as Gendered Work。University of Chicago Press。  new window
2.Hooyman, N. R.、Gonyea, J.(1995)。Feminist perspectives on family care: Policies for gender Justice。Sage。  new window
3.Kröger, T.、Yeandle, S.(2013)。Combining Paid Work and Family Care: Policies and Experiences in International Perspective。Bristol:Policy Press。  new window
4.Kutsar, D.、Kuronen, M.(2015)。Local Welfare Policy Making in European Cities: Combines Theoretical Discussions with Empirical Findings。Springer。  new window
5.張晉芬(20130000)。勞動社會學。臺北:政大出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.European Commission(2009)。FP7 Cooperation Work Programme: Socio-Economic Sciences and The Humanities. Work Programme 2010: Cooperation Theme 8 Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities,http://ncp-tw.ntust.edu.tw/ezcatfiles/ncp-tw/img/img/698/Socio-EconomicSciencesandHumanities_wp_201001_en.pdf。  new window
其他
1.內政部統計處(2010)。中老年生活狀況調查,http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/Survey/list.html。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院主計總處(2014)。102年婦女婚育與就業調查,https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/np.asp?ctNode=2841。  延伸查詢new window
3.行政院勞動部(2016)。申請育嬰假人數和性別,http://www.mol.gov.tw/statistics/2461/。  延伸查詢new window
4.衛生福利部統計處(2014)。100年婦女生活狀況調查,http://www.mohw.gov.tw/cht/DOS/Statistic.aspx?f_list_no=312&fod_list_no=4701。  new window
5.衛生福利部(2015)。長期照顧保險法草案總說明(104年6月4日行政院院會通過版),http://www.mohw.gov.tw/mohw_upload/doc/%E9%95%B7%E6%9C%9F%E7%85%A7%E9%A1%A7%E4%BF%9D%E9%9A%AA%E6%B3%95%E8%8D%89%E6%A1%88(1040604%E8%A1%8C%E6%94%BF%E9%99%A2%E9%99%A2%E6%9C%83%E9%80%9A%E9%81%8E%E7%89%88)_0049650001.pdf。  new window
6.European Commission(2010)。Employment Rate by Gender,http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/refreshTableAction.do:jsessionid=9ea7974b30e9c15c72bcca314d82b471c8e027336bfe.e34SbxiOchiKc40LbNmLahiKb3uRe0?tab=table&plugin=1&pcode=tsiem010&language=en。  new window
7.OECD(2016)。Employment rate (indicator),https://data.oecd.org/emp/employment-rate.htm。  new window
8.(2010)。Labour Force Statistics (MEI): Harmonised unemployment rates and levels (HURS),http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=251。  new window
9.Zaiontz, C.(2016)。Statistical Power and Sample Size for Multiple Regression,http://www.real-statistics.com/multiple-regression/statistical-power-sample-size-multiple-regression/。  new window
圖書論文
1.Jones, B.(1993)。Sweden。Local Government in Liberal Democracies: An Introductory Survey。London:Routledge。  new window
2.王舒芸、王品(2014)。臺灣照顧福利的發展與困境:1990-2012。臺灣婦女處境白皮書:2014年。臺北:女書文化。  延伸查詢new window
3.Kröger, T.(1997)。Local Government in Scandinavia: Autonomous or Integrated into the Welfare State?。Social Care Services: The Key to The Scandinavian Welfare Model。Aldershot:Avebury。  new window
4.Kröger, T.、Anttonen, A.、Sipilä, J.(2003)。Social care in Finland: Weak and strong universalism。The Young, the Old and the State: Social Care Systems in Five Industrial Nations。Cheltenham:Edward Elgar。  new window
5.Kröger, T.、Yeandle, S.(2013)。Reconciling Work and Care: An International Analysis。Combining Paid Work and Family Care: Policies and Experiences in International Perspective。Bristol:Policy Press。  new window
6.Ranci, C.、Sabatinelli, S.(2014)。Long term and child care policies in Italy between familism and privatisation。The Transformation of Care in European Societies。Basingstoke:Palgrave。  new window
7.呂寶靜、陳景寧(19970000)。女性家屬照顧者的處境與福利建構。女性‧國家‧照顧工作。臺北:女書文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE