臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：公私混合執法理論之建構：從美國證券集團訴訟改革看臺灣投保中心團體訴訟
書刊名：東海大學法學研究
作者：趙冠瑋
作者(外文)：Chao, Guan-wei
出版日期：2020
卷期：60
頁次：頁43-86
主題關鍵詞：證券詐欺；公權力執法；私人訴訟；吹哨者；私人檢察官；私人檢察官公益訴訟；Securities fraud；Public enforcement；Private enforcement；Whistleblower；Private attorney general；Qui tam litigation
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:1573
  • 點閱點閱:45
期刊論文
1.Thel, Steve(1991)。The Genius of Section 16: Regulating the Management of Publicly Held Companies。Hastings L. J.，42。  new window
2.Stephenson, Matthew C.(2005)。Public Regulation of Private Enforcement: The Case for Expanding the Role of Administrative Agencies。Va. L. Rev.，91，93-173。  new window
3.Freeman, J.(2000)。The Private Role in Public Governance。N.Y.U. L. Rev.，75，543。  new window
4.Park, James J.(2010)。Rule 10B-5 and the Rise of the Unjust Enrichment Principle。Duke Law Journal，60，345-409。  new window
5.Macey, Jonathan R.、Miller, Geoffrey P.(1991)。The Plaintiffs' Attorney's Role in Class Action and Derivative Litigation: Economic Analysis and Recommendations for Reform。University of Chicago Law Review，58(1)，1-118。  new window
6.Shao, Ching-Ping(2013)。Representative Litigations in Corporate and Securities Laws by Government-Sanctioned Nonprofit Organizations: Lessons from Taiwan。Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal，15(1)，58-93。  new window
7.Langevoort, Donald C.(1996)。Capping Damages for Open-Market Securities Fraud。Arizona Law Review，38，639-664。  new window
8.Coffee, John C. Jr.(2006)。Reforming the Securities Class Action: An Essay on Deterrence and its Implementation。Columbia Law Review，106(7)，1534-1586。  new window
9.邵慶平(20150300)。投保中心代表訴訟的公益性：檢視、強化與反省。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，44(1)，223-262。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Coffee, John C. Jr.、Sale, Hillary A.(2009)。Redesigning the SEC: Does the Treasury Have a Better Idea?。Va. L. Rev.，95，707-783。  new window
11.Coffee, John C. Jr.(2007)。Law and the Market: The Impact of Enforcement。University of Pennsylvania Law Review，156，229-312。  new window
12.Pritchard, Adam C.(1999)。Markets as monitors: a proposal to replace class actions with exchanges as securities fraud enforcers。Virginia Law Review，85(6)，925-1020。  new window
13.Walsh, John H.(2008)。Institution-Based Financial Regulation: A Third Paradigm。Harvard International Law Journal，49(2)，381-383。  new window
14.王文宇、張冀明(20070300)。非營利組織主導的證券團體訴訟--論投資人保護中心。月旦民商法雜誌，15，5-33。  延伸查詢new window
15.Schlag, Pierre J.(1985)。Rules and Standards。UCLA Law Review，33，379-430。  new window
16.邵慶平(20130700)。金融管制與私人執行--國際金融危機後管制發展的反省。國立中正大學法學集刊，40，95-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.林仁光(20140800)。西風東漸--談內線交易Civil Penalty制度之發展。月旦法學，231，80-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Grundfest, Joseph A.(1994)。Disimplying Private Rights of Action Under the Federal Securities Laws: The Commission's Authority。Harvard Law Review，107(5)，961-1024。  new window
19.Langevoort, Donald C.(2009)。Basic at Twenty: Rethinking Fraud-on-the-Market。Wisconsin Law Review，2009(2)，151-198。  new window
20.Mahoney, Paul G.(1992)。Precaution Costs and the Law of Fraud in Impersonal Markets。Virginia Law Review，78(3)，623-670。  new window
21.Rose, Amanda M.(2008)。Reforming Securities Litigation Reform: Restructuring the Relationship between Public and Private Enforcement of Rule 10b-5。Columbia Law Review，108(6)，1301-1364。  new window
22.Scott, H. S.、Silverman, L. N.(2013)。Stockholder Adoption of Mandatory Individual Arbitration for Stockholder Disputes。Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy，36，1187-1230。  new window
23.Velikonja, U.(2015)。Public Compensation for Private Harm: Evidence from the SEC's Fair Fund Distributions。Stanford Law Review，67，331-395。  new window
24.殷若瑛(20111200)。「證券投資人及期貨交易人保護法」之發展及演變。證券暨期貨月刊，29(12)，24-34。  延伸查詢new window
25.邵慶平(20160900)。證券團體訴訟中因果關係構成要件的比較研究--兼論投保中心制度的改革方向。臺北大學法學論叢，99，137-186。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Alexander, Janet Cooper(1996)。Rethinking Damages in Securities Class Actions。Stanford Law Review，48(6)，1487-1537。  new window
27.Lin, Yu-Hsin(2007)。Modeling Securities Class Actions outside the United States: The Role of Nonprofits in The Case of Taiwan。New York University Journal of Law and Business，4，143-221。  new window
28.Bratton, William W.、Wachter, Michael L.(2011)。The Political Economy of Fraud on the Market。University of Pennsylvania Law Review，160，69-168。  new window
29.Clopton, Z. D.(2016)。Redundant Public-Private Enforcement。Vanderbilt Law Review，69，285-332。  new window
30.Coffee, J. C. Jr.(1983)。Rescuing the Private Attorney General: Why the Model of the Lawyer as Bounty Hunter Is Not Working。Maryland Law Review，42，215-288。  new window
31.Don, M. E.、Wang, J.(1990)。Stockbroker Liquidations under the Securities Investor Protection Act and Their Impact on Securities Transfers。Cardozo Law Review，12，509-556。  new window
32.Engstrom, David Freeman(2013)。Agencies as Litigation Gatekeepers。Yale Law Journal，123，616-713。  new window
33.Lemos, M. H.(2012)。Aggregate Litigation Goes Public: Representative Suits by State Attorneys General。Harvard Law Review，126，486-549。  new window
34.Park, J. J.(2012)。Rules, Principles, and the Competition to Enforce the Securities Law。California Law Review，100，115-182。  new window
35.Winship, Verity(2008)。Fair Funds and the SEC's Compensation of Injured Investors。Florida Law Review，60，1103-1144。  new window
36.Rapp, Geoffrey C.(2012)。Mutiny by the Bounties? The Attempt to Reform Wall Street by the New Whistleblower Provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act。Brigham Young University Law Review，2012(1)，73-152。  new window
37.Evans, Alicia Davis(2007)。The Investor Compensation Fund。Journal of Corporation Law，33，223-296。  new window
38.李聖傑(20180100)。吹哨者保護的法制建構。月旦法學，272，155-164。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.張步洪(20180200)。論檢察公益訴訟。檢察新論，23，170-179。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.陳俊元(20150828)。論保險詐欺之吹哨者法制--以美國法之經驗為中心。臺灣法學雜誌，278，99-108。  延伸查詢new window
41.Alexander, Charlotte S.(2010)。Would an Opt In Requirement Fix the Class Action Settlement? Evidence from the Fair Labor Standards Act。Miss. L. J.，80。  new window
42.Broderick, Christina Orsini(2007)。Qui Tam Provisions and the Public Interest: An Empirical Analysis。Colum. L. Rev.，107。  new window
43.Bucy, Pamela H.(2007)。Federalism and False Claims。Cardozo L. Rev.，28。  new window
44.Bucy, Pamela H.(2002)。Private Justice。S. Cal. L. Rev.，76。  new window
45.趙冠瑋(20180300)。Saying Is One Thing; Doing Is Another? Analyzing the Chinese Nonprofit Organization Model in Investor Protection through the Taiwanese Experience。National Taiwan University Law Review，13(1)，53-110。new window  new window
46.Cox, James D.、Thomas, Randall S.(2005)。Letting Billions Slip through Your Fingers: Empirical Evidence and Legal Implications of the Failure of Financial Institutions to Participate in Securities Class Action Settlements。Stan. L. Rev.，58，411+414。  new window
47.Cox, Prentiss(2016)。Public Enforcement Compensation and Private Rights。Minn. L. Rev.，100。  new window
48.Cunningham, Lawrence A.(2007)。A Prescription to Retire the Rhetoric of Principles-Based Systems in Corporate Law, Securities Regulation and Accounting。Vand. L. Rev.，60。  new window
49.Davis, Seth(2014)。Implied Public Rights of Action。Colum. L. Rev.，114。  new window
50.Engstrom, David Freeman(2012)。Harnessing the Private Attorney General: Evidence from Qui Tam Litigation。Colum. L. Rev.，112。  new window
51.Engstrom, David Freeman(2013)。Public Regulation of Private Enforcement: Empirical Analysis of DOJ Oversight of Qui Tam Litigation under the False Claims Act。Nw. U. L. Rev.，107。  new window
52.Frankel, Tamar(2010)。Let the Securities and Exchange Commission Outsource Enforcement by Litigation: A Proposal。Journal of Business & Securities Law，11，111-126。  new window
53.Glover, J. Maria(2012)。The Structural Role of Private Enforcement Mechanisms in Public Law。William & Mary Law Review，53，1137+1162-1167。  new window
54.Hamburger, Philip(2015)。The Inversion of Rights and Power。Buff. L. Rev.，63。  new window
55.Hittinger, Carl W.、Bona, Jarod M.(2009)。The Diminishing Role of the Private Attorney General in Antitrust and Securities Class Action Cases Aided by the Supreme Court。Journal of Business & Technology Law，4(1)，167-186。  new window
56.Karmel, Roberta S.(2008)。Should Securities Industry Self-Regulatory Organizations Be Considered Government Agencies?。Stan. J. L. Bus. & Fin.，14。  new window
57.Kwok, David(2013)。Evidence from the False Claims Act: Does Private Enforcement Attract Excessive Litigation?。Pub. Cont. L. J.，42。  new window
58.林仁光(20160300)。The Challenges and Contemporary Issues of Taiwan's Investor Protection System: A Model to Learn or to Avoid。National Taiwan University Law Review，11(1)，129-217。new window  new window
59.Matthew, Dayna Bowen(2007)。The Moral Hazard Problem with Privatization of Public Enforcement: The Case of Pharmaceutical Fraud。U. Mich. J. L. Reform，40。  new window
60.Minzne, Max(2015)。Should Agencies Enforce?。Minn. L. Rev.，99。  new window
61.Morris, Matthew Scott(1993)。The Securities Enforcement Remedies and Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990: By Keeping up with the Joneses, the SEC's Enforcement Arsenal Is Modernized。Admin. L. J. Am. U.，7。  new window
62.Park, James J.(2007)。The Competing Paradigms of Securities Regulation。Duke L. J.，57。  new window
63.Rabkin, Jeremy A.(1998)。The Secret Life of the Private Attorney General。Law & Contemp. Probs.，61。  new window
64.Rose, Amanda M.(2014)。Better Bounty Hunting: How the SEC's New Whistleblower Program Changes the Securities Fraud Class Action Debate。Nw. U. L. Rev.，108，1235+1249。  new window
65.Rosenberg, David(2002)。Response, Mandatory-Litigation Class Action: The Only Option for Mass Tort Cases。Harv. L. Rev.，115。  new window
66.Rubenstein, William B.(2004)。On What a Private Attorney General Is--and Why It Matters。Vand. L. Rev.，57，2129+2140。  new window
67.Stewart, Richard B.、Sunstein, Cass R.(1982)。Public Programs and Private Rights。Harv. L. Rev.，95。  new window
68.Winship, Verity(2013)。Policing Compensatory Relief in Agency Settlements。U. Cin. L. Rev.，82。  new window
69.Black, Bernard、Cheffins, Brian、Klausner, Michael(2006)。Outside director liability。Stanford Law Review，58(4)，1055-1159。  new window
70.林郁馨(20140600)。投資人的諾亞方舟--投資人保護中心與證券團體訴訟之實證研究。月旦法學，229，75-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
71.林郁馨(20080900)。從美國證券集體訴訟談證券詐欺訴訟的填補損害及嚇阻功能。月旦財經法雜誌，14，173-193。  延伸查詢new window
72.Erichson, Howard M.(2000)。Coattail Class Actions: Reflections on Microsoft, Tobacco, and the Mixing of Public and Private Lawyering in Mass Litigation。University of California Davis Law Review，34。  new window
73.Fisch, Jill E.(1997)。Class Action Reform, Qui Tam, and the Role of the Plaintiff。Law and Contemporary Problems，60，167-202。  new window
74.Gordon, James D. III(2004)。Acorns and Oaks: Implied Rights of Action under the Securities Acts。Stanford Journal of Law, Business and Finance，10(1)，62-97。  new window
75.Coffee, John C. Jr.(2010)。Litigation Governance: Taking Accountability Seriously。Columbia Law Review，110，288-351。  new window
研究報告
1.Doyle, Charles(2009)。Qui Tam: The False Claims Act and Related Federal Statutes。  new window
圖書
1.吳庚(2015)。行政法之理論與實用。台北：三民書局股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Boettrich, Stefan、Svetlana Starykh(20180129)。Recent Trends in Securities Class Action Litigation: 2017 Full-Year Review。NERA Economic Consulting。  new window
圖書論文
1.林志潔(2017)。面對財經犯罪--檢察權行使之回顧、比較與展望。白領犯罪與財經刑法--從立法、偵審到執行。臺北：元照。  延伸查詢new window
2.許恒達(2016)。揭弊者保護制度的刑事政策省思。貪污犯罪的刑法抗制。元照。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：503（臺灣：496，外國：7） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1908780 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67716085
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上