:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:親屬、實踐與漢人宗族觀:以宜蘭秀才村為例的歷史人類學探討
作者:朱家嶠 引用關係
作者(外文):Chia-Chiao Chu
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:人類學研究所
指導教授:謝繼昌
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2007
主題關鍵詞:自我實現與超越儒學實踐文化置換歷史人類學集體記憶the self-realization and surmountingConfucianismpracticestructure of the conjuncturehistorical anthropologycollective memory
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:159
不論從人類學之學科理論發展史、人類學核心概念與論題的轉化過程上,還是分析將之移植到漢人社會文化的運用演變情形,都不難發現在問題意識與檢視角度上,有著「結構功能」、「文化象徵」不同偏向的態度。本研究一開始即對這樣的人類學親屬研究之發展情況做出分析,隨之則力圖以漢人社會「宗族現象」的例子,使用「雙主軸」的架構來表達問題意識 —「歷史人類學」的概念,以及延續Malinowski對於人類學親屬研究的提示:若以「漢人宗族現象」做為對象,探討漢文化中的親子社會關係與生殖之間的對應,而這種對應關係又靠什麼樣的介質來實踐,以及這種對應關係如何成為漢人社會文化中獨特的秩序、象徵關係。本研究在方法的使用上,不但採用參與觀察式的傳統人類學田野,同樣重視文字資料的累積成果,如正史、地方志、古文書、族譜與野史等可資瞭解研究對象村落的宗族團體,在移民與發展歷程中的相關文獻,並運用了歷史人類學的觀點來檢視該宗族古往今來的整體脈絡。
在民族誌材料的分析上,則由秀才村宗族的發展歷程、生業經營表現與經濟模式、地方上的宗教信仰與對祖先崇拜的某些特色、社會關懷程度與社會教化的熱衷等各面向,做為切入點來分析秀才村的親屬組織與宗族表現,並且在人類學的「整體觀」(holistic)凝視下,處理臺灣漢人對於親屬、宗族的認識議題,指出了以往「結構功能」與「文化象徵」各有偏向的處理方式,皆有其限制與不足;並在過往研究的成果如「氣」、「父骨母肉」等概念的基礎上,加以考量power的因素如儒學在漢人的親屬、宗族觀中的滲透,而強調以實踐論之「agent」與「practice」、歷史人類學之「structure of the conjuncture」的觀點來看的話,「血脈」可以視為一種宗族結構的表象,「氣」則是宗族結構的文化內涵,與「血脈」實為一體兩面,而更為重要的是「自我實現與超越」的動態修煉過程,則不但是一種反饋的機制,也是實踐施為的關鍵 — 象徵「血脈」之文化內涵的「氣」,由「自我實現與超越」在上承下傳的實踐過程裡完成兩者的構連。
本研究所呈現的論證,在秀才村漢人宗族的發展繁衍過程部分,顯示了在實踐「自我實現與超越」的動態修煉較為完滿的房支,對於親屬與宗族的意識感較為強烈,參與度也較高;在宗族興盛、衰敗又試圖以「社區營造」來重建宗族意識的實踐方面,則表現出宗族意識的失落與復興、房支間的互動,同樣與「自我實現與超越」的動態修煉有關;在經濟與生業上、文治教化與社會參與度上,甚至是嵌合了與土著互動的自我族群識別、宗教信仰、政治的表現,「自我實現與超越」的動態修煉,都以實踐過程的方式構連了「血脈」與「氣」這種一體兩面的結構表現,如生業上的成功與堅持「自我實現與超越」有正相關,而生業上的失敗若非「自我實現與超越」的不良因素造成,則將之轉化為其它解釋,若屬「自我實現與超越」的失敗,則用之說明;而在宗族房支的繁衍上,同樣的「自我實現與超越」失敗因素造成人口偏少,則視為理所當然,反之則用非「自我實現與超越」解釋 — 如「體質」、「血脈」來置換。此即展現出做為漢人「文化秩序」的「親屬」概念與實踐,或以歷史人類學而言,這種可以置換與安排歷史的文化結構,是有一定的結合機制。當然,本研究最後指出,「集體記憶」(collective memory)在「血脈」與「氣」之於漢人親屬觀與宗族觀的結合與持續上,有其關鍵地位。
No matter what the transformation of the key concept of anthropology and the history of anthropological theory have displayed, and no matter how they have been used to the anthropological analysis of Chinese society, it is not difficult to find out that in consciousness of problem and the perceiving angle, there are ”structure functional” approaches in contrast to “cultural symbolic” ones. This research from the very beginning makes an analysis of such paradigms shift in anthropological kinship studies , and then tries to take the expression of “Chinese lineage”(宗族現象) as an example to denote “the double axes” of this research - the consciousness of concept of historical anthropology, as well as the extension of B. Malinowski’s concept of kinship. Briefly speaking, Malinowski’s most important contributions in anthropological kinship studies are the detailed analysis of discrepancy between the corresponding parent-child social relations and biological relations. In the study of Chinese lineage, in examining the discrepancy, some fruitful discussions and results of social practice could be made in Chinese cultural symbol between the parent-child social relations and the corresponding of this kinning progress in reproduction. And some kinds of corresponding relations depend on in the progress of practice, as well as how this kinds of corresponding relations, may be considered an unique culture order, or the symbolic relations. But it is to be regretted that the state of anthropological kinship study mentioned above still within sight but beyond reach. The aim of this research is to suggest those who do kinship study in anthropology that it’s time to consider the synthetic paradigms and use the better research approach.
The method used in my research is not only participant observation - like traditional anthropological field studies, but also takes the plenty writing material, such as official histories, biographies, local gazetteers or the local chronicles, the paleography writings, the genealogies, the unofficial history…etc., which can offer the help for understanding the immigration and construction of a patrilineal surname village. In the ethnographical analysis of my research object - Xiucai village, Yilan, I used an anthropological holistic view in dealing with several main dimensions of life practices, such as the developments and segments of lineage, lineage’s business management and performance, the types of economic actions, the forms of belief, the ways of ancestor worship, as well as social education and social care. And I point out that although many past works of anthropological studies in Chinese kinship may contribute a lot, most of them still enmeshed in arguing the significance and difference of “structure functional” and ”cultural symbolic” respectively. From the view of consciousness of the problem, I try to explain that the “structure functional” and the “cultural symbolic” ways has deviated processing directions from the past till now, and they offer nothing good for anthropology but also have limitations and the insufficiencies in kinship studies.
On the concept foundations of passing research achievements like the “Qi”(氣) or “the father plants the bone and the mother adds the flesh”(父骨母肉), I take other factors into consideration such as “power” under the Confucianism’s affections. Through the view of practical theory and the structure of the conjuncture in the context of historical anthropology, the concept of “blood vessels”(血脈) may be regarded as the most important kind of performative structure in the representation of “the Qi”, which is the prescriptive structure and cultural significance in Chinese culture. And in this research I propose that “self-realization and surmounting” is not only the dynamic practice process which is some kind of feedback mechanism to reshape the structure, but also is the key cultural symbol that can articulate the practice actions, which is the “blood vessels” and the cultural significance, which is “Qi”.
The expounding presented here demonstrates that no matter what dimensions of social practices in Xiucai Village – economics, subsistence, belief and religion, etc., the more succeessful in dynamic practicing of “the self-realization and surmounting”, the more perfect manifestation of Chinese lineage consciousness is. Besides, when the concept of dynamic practicing of “the self-realization and surmounting” is stronger, the lineage segment has higher position in village and can have more lineage members. Of course, there must be one or more key factors to make the articulation continue. At end, this research points out that “collective memory” is a key factor which has vital status in replacing or rearrange the cultural order to make historical structure change
撰人不詳
2004[?] 大明玄天上帝瑞應圖錄。北京:華夏出版社。

王世慶
1994a 十九世紀中葉臺灣北部農村金融之研究。刊於清代臺灣社會經濟,頁1~71,王世慶著。臺北:聯經出版事業。new window
1994b 談清代臺灣蘭陽地區之農田水利開發史料。刊於清代臺灣社會經濟,頁217~242,王世慶著。臺北:聯經出版事業。new window
1994c 日據初期臺灣之降筆會與戒煙運動。刊於清代臺灣社會經濟,頁415-473,王世慶著。臺北:聯經出版事業。new window
王志宇
1997 臺灣的恩主公信仰:儒宗神教與飛鸞勸化。臺北:文津出版社。
2003 台灣民間信仰的鬼神觀 — 以聖賢堂系列鸞書為中心的探討。逢甲人文社會學報第 7:117-140。
王見川
1996 臺灣的齋教與鸞堂。臺北:南天書局。
王明珂
1994 過去的結構:關於族群本質與變遷的探討。新史學 5(3):119-140。
1997 華夏邊緣:歷史記憶與族群認同。臺北:允晨文化實業公司。
2003 羌在漢藏之間:一個華夏歷史邊緣的歷史人類學研究。臺北:聯經出版事業。
2006 英雄祖先與弟兄民族:根基歷史的文本與情境。臺北:允晨文化實業公司。
王建民
1997 中國民族學史上卷。昆明:雲南教育出版社。
王崧興
1967 龜山島:漢人漁村社會之研究。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。
1981a 漢學與中國人類學:以家族聚落型態之研究為例。刊於中央研究院國際漢學會議論文集(民俗文化組),頁399-412。臺北:中央研究院。
1981b 論地緣與血緣:濁水、大肚兩流域漢人之墾殖與聚落。刊於中國的民族、社會與文化,李亦園、喬建合編,頁21-32。臺北:食貨出版社。
1989 漢人的家族制 — 試論「有關係、無組織」的社會。刊於中央研究院第二屆國際漢學會議論文集•民俗與文化組,中央研究院編,頁271-279。台北:中央研究院。
王銘銘
1996a 逝去的繁榮:一座老城的歷史人類學考察。杭州:浙江人民出版社。
1996b 歷史、人情與互惠。刊於臺灣與福建社會文化研究論文集(三),頁61-107,莊英章、潘英海編。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。
1997a 村落視野中的文化與權力:閩台三村五論。北京:三聯書店。
1997b 社會人類學與中國研究。北京:三聯書店。
2004 溪村家族:社區史、儀式與地方政治。貴陽:貴州人民出版社。
2006 談歷史人類學。刊於沒有後門的教室:人類學隨談錄,王銘銘著,頁157-163。北京:中國人民大學出版社。
內田嘉吉編
1915 南薰集。臺北:編者自行刊印。
木下新三郎、館森萬平、羅秀惠編
1906 鳥松閣倡和集。臺北:臺灣日日新報社。
石奕龍
2004 20世紀初的中國人類學。刊於文化理論與族群研究,石奕龍、郭志超主編,頁67-111。合肥:黃山書社。
石磊
1971 影響親屬制度的幾個基本因素。思與言 9(2):21-24。
1982 儀禮喪服篇所表現的親屬結構。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊 53:1-43。
1989 從爾雅到禮記:試論我國古代親屬體系的演變。刊於中央研究院第二屆國際漢學會議論文集•民俗與文化組,中央研究院編,頁127-140。台北:中央研究院。
1991 田野歷史與經典:台灣漢人社會研究的省思。中央研究院台灣史田野通訊 21:13-16。
1992 房與宗:兩種不同結構類型的繼嗣體系。刊於陳奇祿先生七秩榮慶論文集,頁377-391。臺北:聯經出版事業。
朱宏壬
2002 進士社區的原住民。刊於Kavalanㄟ花蕊,宜蘭社區大學月訊,2002年6月號,頁8~9。宜蘭:宜蘭社區大學。
朱家嶠
1999 漢人宗族意識與宗族表現。國立臺灣大學人類學研究所碩士論文。
2004 宜蘭擺厘陳家與地方信仰。國立宜蘭大學人文及管理學報 1:91-127。
呂美玉、林英賢、林正芳
2001 宜蘭市志:地理篇。宜蘭:宜蘭市公所。
吳毓琪
1999 南社研究。臺南:臺南市立文化中心。
吳燕和
1986 中國宗族之發展與其儀式之興衰條件。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊 59:131-142。
李世偉
2000 日據時期臺灣鸞堂的儒家教化。刊於臺灣的民間宗教與信仰,王見川、李世偉著,頁95~121。蘆洲:博揚文化事業。new window
李亦園
1981 臺灣傳統社會的結構。刊於臺灣史蹟源流,臺灣省文獻會編,頁209-226。南投:臺灣省文獻會。
1992 文化的圖像。臺北:允晨文化實業。
杜正勝
1991 形體、精氣與魂魄:中國傳統對「人」認識的形成。新史學2(3):1-65。
杜維明 Tu Wei-ming
1992 人性與自我修養。臺北:聯經出版事業。
1997 儒家思想 — 以創造轉化為自我認同。臺北:東大圖書公司。
2002 儒教,陳靜譯。麥田出版。
2006 儒家傳統與文明對話,彭國翔編譯。石家庒:河北人民出版社。
宜蘭縣文獻委員會
1983 宜蘭縣志,卷九,革命志。臺北:成文出版社。
宜蘭縣政府
1979 宜蘭縣寺廟專輯。宜蘭:宜蘭縣政府。
宜蘭擺厘陳氏鑑湖堂(陳喬岳 手抄)
1937 宜蘭擺厘陳氏族譜。宜蘭:擺厘陳氏鑑湖堂。
宜蘭鑑民堂(清代)
[出版年不詳] 鑑民堂龍鳳圖全集。宜蘭:宜蘭鑑民堂。
宜蘭廳(日治時期) 編
1905 宜蘭廳管內埤圳調查書。宜蘭:宜蘭廳。
岡田謙
1960[1938] 臺灣北部村落之祭祀範圍,陳乃蘖譯。臺北文物9(4):14-29。
卓克華
2003 宜蘭碧霞宮 — 一場論戰的平息。刊於從寺廟發現歷史,卓克華著,頁273~300,臺北:揚智文化事業。
周大鳴
2006 鳳凰村的變遷:《華南的鄉村生活》的追蹤研究。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。
金耀基
1992 人際關係中人情之分析。刊於中國社會與文化,金耀基著,頁17-40。香港:牛津大學出版社。
林美容
1987 由祭祀圈來看草屯鎮的地方組織。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊62:53~114。
1988 由祭祀圈到信仰圈 — 臺灣民間社會的地域構成與發展。刊於中國海洋發展史論文集,第三輯,張炎憲主編,頁95~125。臺北:中央研究院三民主義研究所。
2000 鄉土史與村庄史 — 人類學者看地方。臺北:臺原出版社。
2003 媽祖信仰與漢人社會。哈爾濱:黑龍江人民出版社。
林素娟
2005 先秦至漢代禮俗中有關厲鬼的觀念及其因應之道。成大中文學報第13期:59-94。
林富士
2000 歷史人類學:舊傳統與新潮流。刊於學術史與方法學的省思 — 中央研究院歷史語言研究所七十周年研討會論文集,中央研究院歷史語言研究所七十周年研討會論文集編輯委員會編,頁365-399。臺北:中央研究院歷史語言研究所。
林開世
2003 人類學與歷史學的對話?一點反省與建議。臺大文史哲學報59:13-29。
林瑋嬪
2001 漢人親屬概念重探。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊 90:1-38。
2002 血緣或地緣:台灣漢人的家、聚落與大陸的故鄉。刊於社群研究的省思,陳文德、黃應貴編,頁93-151。臺北:中央研究院民族學研所。
林曜同
2000 “Sharing of Substance”、過程與反省民族誌思潮:論蘭嶼雅美人「親屬」研究的一些新趨勢。臺灣大學考古人類學刊 56:130-157。
林耀華 Lin Yao Hua
1986[1947] 金翅,宋和譯。臺北:桂冠圖書公司。
2000[1935] 義序的宗族研究。北京:三聯書店。
洪敏麟
1980 臺灣舊地名之沿革,第一冊。南投:臺灣省文獻委員會。
胡適
1947[1919] 中國哲學史大綱。上海:商務印書館。
胡鴻保 主編
2006 中國人類學史。北京:中國人民大學出版社。
施振民
1975 祭祀圈與社會組織:彰化平原聚落發展模式的探討。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊 36:191-208。
施添福
1996 蘭陽平原的傳統聚落:理論架構與資本資料。宜蘭:宜蘭縣立文化中心。
段江麗
2006 禮法與人情 — 明清家庭小說的家庭主題研究。北京:中華書局。
段義孚 Yi-Fu Tuan
1990[1974] Topophilia:A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes, and Values. New York:Columbia University Press.
1998[1977] 經驗透視中的空間和地方,潘桂成譯。臺北市:國立編譯館。
科大衛 David Faure
1986 The Structure of Chinese Rural Society:Lineage and Village in the Eastern New Territories, Hong Kong. Hong Kong:Oxford University Press.
1989 The Lineage as A Cultural Invention:The Case of the Pear River Delta. Modern China:15(1):4-36.
1999 國家與禮儀:宋至清中葉珠江三角洲地方社會的國家認同。中山大學學報(社會科學版) 39(5):65-72。
科大衛、劉志偉
2000 宗族與地方社會的國家認同 — 明清華南地區宗族發展的意識型態基礎。歷史研究 第3期:3-14。
唐羽
2001 雙溪鄉誌。臺北縣雙溪鄉:雙溪鄉公所。
唐美君 Tang, Mei-Chun
1978 Urban Chinese Families:An Anthropological Field Studies in Taipei City. Taipei:National Taiwan University Press.
1981 臺灣傳統的社會結構。刊於臺灣史蹟源流,臺灣省文獻會編,頁227-241。南投:臺灣省文獻會。
唐達、嚴建平、趙人俊
1991 文化傳統與婚姻演變。上海,新華書店。
凌濛初(明代)
1957[?] 拍案驚奇三十六卷。臺北:世界書局。
徐雨村
1996 宗族與宗教組織的轉換與並存:以雲林六房天上聖母的祭祀組織為例。思與言:34(2):175-198。
徐復觀
1974 中國思想史論集。臺北:學生書局。
祝瑞開
1999 中國婚姻家庭史。上海:學林出版社。
梁永佳
2005 地域的等級:一個大理村鎮的儀式與文化。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。
梁漱溟
1987 中國文化要義。上海:學林出版社。
范純武
1996 清末民間慈善事業崇鸞堂運動。嘉義:國立中正大學歷史學研究所碩士論文。
張小軍
2003 歷史的人類學化和人類學的歷史化:兼論被史學「搶註」的歷史人類學。歷史人類學學刊1(1):1-28。
張宏明
2004 宗族的再思考 — 一種人類學的比較視野。社會學研究2004年第6期。
張佩國
2002 近代江南鄉村地權的歷史人類學研究。上海:上海人民出版社。
張政亮
2003 游移於蘭陽平原上的蟠龍:從平原特性談宜蘭河河道的變遷。刊於故鄉的河.慢慢的流:宜蘭河生命史研討會論文集,宜蘭縣文化局編,頁139~163,宜蘭:宜蘭縣政府文化局。
張珣
2002 祭祀圈研究的反省與後祭祀圈時代的來臨。臺灣大學考古人類學刊 58:78-111。
陳玉美
1994 論雅美人的社會組織:從當地人的一組概念Nisoswan(水渠水源)與Ikauipong do soso(喝同母奶)談起。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊 65(4):1029-1052。
陳宏謀(清代)編
1966[?] 五種遺規,四部備要叢書子部,中華書局聚珍仿宋版影印本。臺北:中華書局。
陳其南
1985 房與中國傳統家族制度:兼論西方人類學的中國家族研究。漢學研究3(1):127-182。
1986 文化的軌跡(上):婚姻、家族與社會。臺北:允晨文化實業。
1990 家族與社會:台灣和中國社會研究的基礎理念。臺北:聯經出版事業。
1991 漢人宗族制度的研究:弗里曼宗族里論的批判。臺灣大學考古人類學刊 47:51-77。
1994[1987] 臺灣的傳統中國社會。臺北:允晨文化實業。
陳其南、邱淑如
1985 方志民族誌體例的演變與中國宗族發展的研究。漢學研究 3(2):797-843。
陳奕麟 Allen Chun
1984 重新思考Lineage Theory與中國社會。漢學研究2(2):403-446。
1996a 由土著觀點探討漢人親屬關係和組織。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊 81:1-18。
1996b The Lineage-Village Complex in Southeastern China:A Long Footnote in the Anthropology of Kinship. Current Anthropology 37(3):429-450.
陳淳(南宋)
1998[?] 諸子集成續編(五),北溪字義二卷。成都:四川人民出版社。
陳祥水
1975 公媽牌的祭祀。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊 36:141-164。
1978 中國社會結構與祖先崇拜。中華文化復興月刊 11(6):32-39。
1995 台灣傳統農村的社會結構。刊於社會學導論,羅鳳珠編,頁108-125。台北:正中書局。
陳紹馨
1979 臺灣的人口變遷與社會變遷。臺北:聯經出版事業。
陳淑均(清代)
1993[1852] 噶瑪蘭廳誌。南投:臺灣省文獻委員會據民國53年臺灣銀行臺灣文獻叢刊本第160種重印。
陳進傳
1989 清代噶瑪蘭古碑之研究。鹿港:左羊出版社。
1995 宜蘭傳統漢人家族之研究。宜蘭:宜蘭縣立文化中心。
2003a 大坑罟的民間宗教(上)。蘭陽博物 10:34-54。
2003b 大坑罟的民間宗教(下)。蘭陽博物 11:31-38。
2004 宜蘭擺厘陳家的婚姻網絡,刊於海峽兩岸臺灣史學術研討會論文集,廈門大學臺灣研究中心編,頁374-398。廈門:廈門大學臺灣研究中心。
陳進傳、朱家嶠
2005 宜蘭擺厘陳家發展史。南投:國史館臺灣文獻館。
陳盛韶(清代)
2000[1833] 問俗錄。四庫未收書刊輯道光刊本,卷六分類械鬥,拾輯。北京:北京出版社。
陳緯華
2004 人類學漢人親屬研究回顧與批評。漢學研究通訊 23(1):1-12。
許地山
1999 扶箕迷信的研究。北京:商務印書館。
許烺光 Francis L. K. Hsu
1999 My life As A Marginal Man:Autobiographical Discussion with Francis L. K. Hsu. Interviewed and recorded by George L. T. Hsu and Francis Hsu''s Family. 臺北:南天書局。
2001[1971] 祖蔭下,王芃、徐隆德譯。臺北:南天書局。
許雪姬
1990 龍井林家的歷史。臺北:中央研究院近代史研究所。
許嘉明
1975 彰化平原福佬客的地域組織。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊 36:165-190。
1978 祭祀圈之於居臺漢人社會的獨特性。中華文化復興月刊 11(6):59~68。
常建華
2003 歷史人類學的理論與在中國的實踐。刊於人文論叢2002卷,馮天瑜主編,頁404-427。武昌:武漢大學出版社。
費孝通 Fei Xiao-tong
1987[1939] 江村經濟。戴可景譯。香港:中華書局。
1991[1947] 鄉土中國。香港:三聯書店。
2004[1947] 生育制度。北京:商務印書館。
馮友蘭
1992 中國哲學史。香港:三聯書店。
馮夢龍(明代)
1978[?] 警世通言。香港:中華書局。
滋賀秀三
1968 中國固有家產均分制度與傳統社會結構之相互關係,楊日然譯。刊於中國法制史論集,謝冠生、查良鑑主編,頁449-465。臺北:中華法學協會中國文化學院法學研究所。
2003[1967] 中國家族法原理,張建國、李力譯。北京:法律出版社。
揚文會(日治時期詩社) 編
1902 揚文會策議。臺北:臺灣總督府。
黃富三
1987 霧峰林家的興起:從渡海拓荒到封疆大吏(1729—1864)。臺北:自立晚報。
黃雯娟
2004 日治時代宜蘭三星地區的區域發展。臺北:國立臺灣師範大學地理學研究所博士論文。
黃應貴
2002a 對於「人文學及社會科學方法的哲學反思」之我見。刊於人類學的評論,黃應貴著,頁270-275。臺北:允晨文化實業。new window
2002b 歷史學與人類學的會合。刊於人類學的評論,黃應貴著,頁295-333。臺北:允晨文化實業。new window
2004 歷史與文化:對「歷史人類學」之我見。歷史人類學學刊2(2):111-129。
黃樹民 Huang Shu-Min
1981 從早期大甲地區的開拓看臺灣漢人社會組織的發展。刊於中國的民族、社會與文化,李亦園、喬建合編,頁33-56。臺北:食貨出版社。new window
1994[1989] 林村的故事:一九四九後的中國農村變革,素蘭譯。臺北:張老師出版社。
莊孔韶
1996 銀翅:中國的地方與社會文化變遷。臺北:桂冠圖書公司。
2004 時空穿行:中國鄉村人類學世紀回訪。北京:中國人民大學出版社。
莊英章
1975 臺灣漢人宗族發展的若干問題:寺廟宗祠與竹山的墾殖形態。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊 36:113-140。
1977 林圯埔:一個臺灣市鎮的社會經濟發展史。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。
1984 台灣宗族組織的形成及其特性。刊於現代化與中國化論集,李亦園、
楊國樞、文崇一等編著,頁93-124。臺北:桂冠圖書公司。
2004a 移墾社會的宗族發展特色。刊於田野與書齋之間:史學與人類學匯流的人類學研究,莊英章著,頁24-46。臺北:允晨文化實業。
2004b 闢草萊為樂土:新竹林姓宗族的拓墾與發展。刊於田野與書齋之間:史學與人類學匯流的人類學研究,莊英章著,頁47-73。臺北:允晨文化實業。
2004c 糖廓經營與社會發展:兼論家族社會地位提昇的個案研究。刊於田野與書齋之間:史學與人類學匯流的人類學研究,莊英章著,頁120-180。臺北:允晨文化實業。
莊英章、陳其南
1982 現階段中國社會結構研究的檢討:臺灣研究的一些啟示。刊於社會及行為科學研究的中國化,楊國樞、文崇一編,頁281-309 。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。new window
莊英章、許書怡
1995 神、鬼與祖先的再思考。刊於臺灣與福建社會文化研究論文集(二),莊英章、潘英海編,頁215-229。臺北:中央研究院民族學究所。
溫振華
1980 清代一個臺灣鄉村宗教組織的演變。史聯雜誌:91~107。
詹素娟
2001 有加有留:清代噶瑪蘭的族群土地政策。刊於平埔族群與臺灣歷史文化論文集,潘英海、詹素娟編,頁113~138。臺北:中央研究院臺灣史研究所籌備處。
楊美惠 Mayfair Mei-hui Yang
2005[1994] 禮物、關係學與國家:中國人際關係與主體建構,趙旭東、孫珉譯。臺北:南天書局。
楊緒賢
1980 臺灣區姓氏堂號考。臺北:臺灣新生報社出版部。
楊聯陞 Lien-sheng Yang
1976[1957] 報 — 中國社會關係的一個基礎。刊於中國思想與制度論集,段昌國、劉韌尼、張永堂譯,頁349-372。臺北:聯經出版事業。
1987 中國文化中報、保、包之意義。香港:中文大學出版社。
楊慶堃 C. K. Yang
1959 Chinese Communist Society:The Family and the Village. Cambridge:M. I. T. Press.
1976 儒家思想與中國宗教之間的功能關係。刊於中國思想與制度論集,段昌國、劉紉尼、張永堂譯,頁321-347。臺北:聯經出版事業。
2007[1961] 中國社會中的宗教:宗教的現代社會功能與其歷史因素之研究,范麗珠等人譯。上海:上海人民出版社。
楊懋春 Martin C. Yang
2001[1948] 一個中國村庒:山東台頭,張雄、沈煒、秦美珠譯。南京:江蘇人民出版社。
碧霞宮(廟宇自刊善書)
1903 九天東廚司命灶王真君護宅天尊真經。宜蘭:碧霞宮。
趙世瑜
2004 歷史人類學:在學科與非學科之間。歷史研究2004年第4期:22-24。
劉文三
1981 臺灣神像藝術。臺北:藝術家出版社。
劉志偉
1992 祖先譜系的重構及其意義 — 珠江三角洲一個宗族的個案分析。中國社會經濟研究 1992年第4期:18-30。
1999 附會、傳說與歷史真實 — 珠江三角洲族譜中宗族歷史的敘事結構其及意義。刊於中國譜牒研究 — 全國譜牒開發與利用學術研討會論文集,上海圖書館編,頁149-162。上海:上海古籍出版社。
劉枝萬
1963 清代臺灣之寺廟。臺北文獻4-6期抽印合訂本。
廖風德
1990 清代之噶瑪蘭。臺北:正中書局。
廖英杰
2002 宜蘭近山地區發展過程之研究(1796—1920) — 樟腦、泰雅與叭哩沙平原。臺北:中國文化大學史學研究所碩士論文。
葉春榮
1995 再思考Lineage Theory:一個土著論述的批評。臺灣大學考古人類學刊 50:13-37。
2005 左鎮歷史圖像。臺南:臺南縣政府。
2006 厝、祖先與神明。刊於臺灣本土宗教研究:結構與變異,張珣、葉春榮合編,頁19-59。臺北:南天書局。new window
鄭志明
1998 臺灣新興宗教現象:扶乩鸞篇。嘉義:南華管理學院宗教文化研究中心。
蒲松齡(清代)
2004[1691] 聊齋誌異。臺北:正展出版社。
蒲慕州
2000 生活史與人類學。刊於學術史與方法學的省思—中央研究院歷史語言研究所七十周年研討會論文集,中央研究院歷史語言研究所七十周年研討會論文集編輯委員會編,頁317-333。臺北:中央研究院歷史語言研究所。
閻雲翔 Yan Yun-xiang
2000[1996] 禮物的流動:一個中國村莊中的互惠原則與社會網絡,李放春、劉瑜譯。上海:上海人民出版社。
2006a[2003] 私人生活的變革:一個中國村庒�堛熒R情、家庭與親密關係1949-1999,龔小夏譯。上海:上海書店。
2006b 差序格局與中國文化的等級觀。社會學研究2006第4期:201-213。
瞿同祖
1981[1947] 中國法律與中國社會。北京:中華書局。
戴炎輝
1979 淸代台灣之鄉治。臺北:聯經出版事業。
謝國雄
2003 茶鄉社會誌。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所。
2007a 以身為度、如是我做:田野工作的教與學。刊於以身為度、如是我做:田野工作的教與學,謝國雄主編,謝國雄、高穎超、李慈穎等人著,頁3-35。臺北:群學出版公司。
2007b 四位一體的田野工作。刊於以身為度、如是我做:田野工作的教與學,謝國雄主編,謝國雄、高穎超、李慈穎等人著,頁37-90。臺北:群學出版公司。
謝劍
1981 志願社團組織原則。刊於中國的民族、社會與文化,李亦園、喬建合編,頁127-146。臺北:食貨出版社。
謝繼昌 Jih-chang Chester Hsieh
1975 水利和社會文化之適應:籃城的例子。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊 36:57-78。
1979 Structure and History of A Chinese Community in Taiwan. 臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。
1982 中國家族研究的檢討。刊於社會及行為科學研究的中國化,中央研究院民族學研究所專刊乙種第10號,楊國樞、文崇一合編,頁255-280。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。new window
1984a 中國家庭在現代化的角色。臺灣大學考古人類學刊 44:1-13。
1984b 仰之村的家族組織。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。
1985 輪伙頭制度初探。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊 59:91-110。
1986 Reciprocity in the Chinese Family:The Taiwan Case. New Asia Academia Bulletin VI:131-146.(Special Issue on Anthropological Studies of China).
鷹取田一郎
1916 臺灣列紳傳。臺北:臺灣總督府。

Ahern, Emily Martin
1973 The Cult of the Dead in a Chinese Village. Stanford:Stanford University Press.
Allan, Sarah
1981 The Heir and the Sage:Dynastic Legend in Early China. San Francisco:Chinese Materials Center.
Augé, Marc
1995 Non-places:Introduction to An Anthropology of Supermodernity. translated by John Howe. London:Verso.
Bachofen, Johann Jakob
2003[1861] An English Translation of Bachofen''s Mutterrecht (Mother right)(1861):A Study of the Religious and Juridical Aspects of Gynecocracy in the Ancient World. translated and abridged by David Partenheimer. Lewiston:Edwin Mellen Press.
Baker, Hugh D. R.
1968 A Chinese Lineage Village:Sheung Shui. Stanford:Stanford University Press.
1979 Chinese Family and Kinship. New York:Columbia University Press.
Barnard, Alan
2003 A Reflection of History. Journal of Cognition and Culture 3(4):305-309.
2006[2000] 人類學歷史與理論,王建民、劉源、許丹譯。北京:華夏出版社。
Barnard, Alan & Anthony Good
1984 Research Practice in the Study of Kinship. London:Academic.
Barnes, John Arundel
1961 Physical and Social Kinship. Philosophy of Science 28(3):296-299.
1962 African Models in New Guinea. Man 52:5-9.
1980 Kinship Studies:Some Impressions of the Current State of Play. Man 15(2):293-303.
Barth, Fredric
1969 Introduction. In Ethnic Groups and Boundaries. Fredric Barth ed., pp.9-38. London:George Allen & Unwin.
Bedford, Susan
2001 A Remembrance of Kinship Studies Past:A Call for Their Rebirth. History and Anthropology 12(4):315-341.
Bellah, Robert Neelly
1991[1970] Beyond Belief:Essays on Religion in A Post-traditional World. Berkeley:University of California Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre
1977 Outline of A Theory of Practice. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
1984 Distinction:A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. translated by Richard Nice. London:Routledge.
2003[1980] 實踐感,蔣梓驊譯。南京:譯林出版社。
Boyer, Pascal
2003 Science, Erudition and Relevant Connections. Journal of Cognition and Culture 3(4):344-358.
Carsten, Janet
1991 Children in Between:Fostering and the Process of Kinship on Pulau Langkawi, Malaysia. Man 26(3):425-443.
1995 The Substance of Kinship and the Heat of the Hearth:Feeding, Personhood, and the Relatedness among Malays in Pulau Langkawi. American Ethnologist 22(2):223-241.
1997 The Heat of the Hearth:The Process of Kinship in a Malay Fishing Community. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
2000a Knowing Where You’ve Come From:Ruptures and constitutes of the time and kinship in narratives of adoption reunions. Journal of Royal Anthropological Institute 6:687-703.
2000b Introduction. In Cultures of Relatedness. Janet Carsten ed., pp.1-36. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
2001 Substantivism, Antisubstantivism, and Anti-antisubstantivism. In Relative Values:Reconfiguring Kinship Studies. Sarah Franklin and Susan McKinnon ed., pp.29-53. Durham:Duke University Press.
2004 After Kinship. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Clark, Hugh R.
2007 Portrait A Community:Society, Culture, and the Structures of Kinship in the Mulan River Valley(Fujian) from the Late Tang through Song. Hong Kong:The Chinese University Press.
Climo, Jacob J. and Maria G. Cattell
2002 Social Memory and History:Anthropological Perspectives. Walnut Creek:AltaMira Press.
Cohen, Myron L.
1969 Agnatic Kinship in South Taiwan. Ethnology 8:167-182.
1970 Development Process in the Chinese Domestic Group. In Family and Kinship in Chinese Society. M. Freedman ed. pp.21-36. Stanford:Stanford University Press.
1976 House United, House Divided:The Chinese Family in Taiwan. New York:Columbia University Press.
Connerton, Paul
1989 How Societies Remember. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Cresswell, Tim
2006[2004] 地方,徐苔玲、王志弘譯。臺北:群學出版公司。
Crissman, Lawrence William
1976a Specific Central-Place Models for An Evolving System of Market Towns on the Changhua Plain, Taiwan. In Regional Analysis vol. I, Carol A. Smith ed., pp.183-218. New York:Academic Press.
1976b Spatial Aspects of Marriage Patterns as Influenced by Marketing Behavior in West Central Taiwan. In Regional Analysis vol. II, Carol A. Smith ed., pp.123-148. New York:Academic Press.
Davenport, William
1959 Nonunilinear Descent and Descent Groups. American Anthropologists 66:29-40.
Diamond, Norma
1969 K’un Shen:A Taiwan Village. New York:Holt, Rinehart & Winston Inc. Dousset, L.
2002 Accounting for Context and Substance:The Australian Western Desert kinship system. Anthropological Forum 12(2):193-204.
2005 Structure and Substance:Combining “Class” and “Modern” Kinship Studies in the Australian Western Desert. Anthropological Forum 16(1):1-30.
Duara, Prasenjit
1988 Culture, Power, and the State:Rural North China,1900-1942. Stanford:Stanford University Press.
Dumont, Louis
1983 Affinity As A Value:Marriage Alliance in South India, with Ccomparative Essays on Australia. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
2006 An Introduction to Two Theories of Social Anthropology:Descent Groups and Marriage Alliance. Robert Parkin edited and translated. New York:Berghahn Books.
Durkheim, Emile
1995[1912] The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. New York:Free Press.
2000[1902] 社會分工論,渠東譯。北京:三聯書店。
Ebrey, Patricia
1996 Surnames and Han Chinese Identity. In Negotiating Ethnicities in China and Taiwan. Melissa Brown ed. pp.19-36. Berkeley:Institute of East Asian Studies, Center for Chinese Studies, University of California Press.
Eggan, Frederick Russell
1950 Social Organization of the Western Pueblos. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
1972 Lewis Henry Morgan’s Systems:A Reevaluation. In Kinship Studies in the Morgan Centennial Year. Priscilla Reining ed., pp.1-16. Washington:The Anthropological Society of Washington.
Evans-Pritchard, Edward Evan
2002[1940] 努爾人:對尼羅河畔一個人群的生活方式和政治制度的描述,褚建芳、閻書昌、趙旭東譯。北京:華夏出版社。
Fabian, Johannes
1983 Time and the Other:How Anthropology Makes Its Object. New York:Columbia University Press.
Fairbank, John King ed. 費正清編
1993[1978] 劍橋中國晚清史,上卷,中國社會科學院歷史硏究所編譯室譯。北京:中國社會科學出版社。
Faubion, James D.
1996 Kinship is Dead. Long Live Kinship. Comparative Studies in Society and History 37(1):67-91.
2001 Introduction:Toward an Anthropology of the Ethics of Kinship. In The Ethics of Anthropology:Ethnographic Inquires. James D. Faubion ed., pp.1-28. Lanham:Rowan & Littlefield.
Feinberg, Richard
1979 Schneider’s Symbolic Culture Theory:An Appraisal. Current Anthropology 20(3):541-549.
2001 Introduction. In The Cultural Analysis of Kinship:The Legacy of David M. Schneider. Richard Feinberg and Martin Ottemnheimer ed., pp.1-31. Chicago:University of Illinois Press.
Feuchtwang, Stephan
1998 What Is A Village? In Cooperative and Collective in China’s Rural Development:Between State and Private Interests. Vermeer, E. B., F. N. Pieke & W. L. Chong ed., pp.46-74. New York:Sharpe.
Finkler, Kaja
2000 Experiencing the New Genetics:Family and Kinship on the Medical Frontier. Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press.
2001 The Kin in the Gene:The Medicalization of Family and Kinship in American Society. Current Anthropology 42(2):235-263.
2005 Family, Kinship, Memory and Temporality in the Age of the New Genetics. Social Science & Medicine 61(5):1059-1071.
Firth, Raymond William
1963[1936] We, the Tikopia:Sociological Study of Kinship in Primitive Polynesia. Boston:Beacon Press.
2004[1951] Elements of Social Organization. London:Routledge.
Firth, Raymond William ed.
1956 Two Studies of Kinship in London. London:Athlone Press.
Fortes, Meyer
1959a Descent, Filiation and Affinity:A Rejoinder to Dr. Leach. Part I. Man 59:193-197.
1959b Descent, Filiation and Affinity:A Rejoinder to Dr. Leach. Part II. Man 59:206-212.
1969a[1945] The Dynamics of Clanship among the Tallensi. London:Oxford University Press.
1969b[1949] The Web of Kinship among the Tallensi. London:Oxford University Press.
1969c Kinship and the Social Order. Chicago:Aldine Publishing Company.
1987 Religion, Morality, and the Person:Essays on Tallensi Religion. edited and with an introduction by Jack Goody. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Fortes, Meyer and E. E. Evans-Pritchard ed.
1970[1940] African Political Systems. London:Published for the International African Institute by Oxford University Press.
Foucault, Michel
1983 The subject and Power. In Michel Foucault, Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Hubert Dreyfus L. and Paul Rabinow ed., pp.208-226. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
Fox, Kate
2006[2004] 瞧這些英國佬:英格蘭人的人類學田野報告,黃中憲譯。臺北:貓頭鷹出版。
Fox, Robin
1967 Kinship and Marriage:An Anthropological Perspective. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Freedman, Maurice
1958 Lineage Organization in Southeastern China. London:Athlone.
1966 Chinese Lineage and Society:Fukien and Kwangtung. London:Athlone.
Freedman, Maurice ed.
1970 Family and Kinship in Chinese Society. Stanford:Stanford University Press. Stanford:Stanford University Press.
Fried, Morton
1970 Clans and Lineages:How to Tell Them Apart and Why–with Special Reference to Chinese Society. 中央研究院民族學研究所刊 29:11-36。
Fustel de Coulanges, Numa Denis
2006[1864] 古代城邦:古希臘羅馬祭祀、權利和政制研究,譚立鑄等譯。上海:華東師範大學出版社。
Gallin, Bernar
1979[1966] 小龍村:蛻變中的臺灣農村,蘇兆堂譯。臺北:聯經出版事業。
Galvin, Kathey-Lee
2001 Schneider Revisited:Sharing and Ratification in the Construction of Kinship. In New Directions in Anthropological Kinship. Linda Stone ed., pp. 109-124. Lanham:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Gamble, Sidney D.(assisted by John Stewart Burgess)
1921 Peking:A Social Survey. New York:George H. Doran Company.
Geertz, Clifford
1973 The Interpretation of Cultures:Selected Essays. New York:Basic Books.
1983 Local knowledge:Further Essays in interpretive Anthropology. New York:Basic Books.
Gell, Alfred
1992 The Anthropology of Time. Oxford:Berg.
Giddens, Anthony
1984 The Constitution of Society:Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley:University of California Press.
Gifford, E. W.
1926 Miwok Lineages and the Political Unit in Aboriginal California. American Anthropologist 28:389-401.
Goody, Jack
1983 The Development of the Family and Marriage in Europe. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
de Groot, Jan Jakob Maria
1989[1910] The Religious System of China:Its Ancient Forms, Evolution, History and Present Aspect, Manners, Customs and Social Institutions Connected therewith. 臺北:南天書局。
Halbwachs, Maurice
1992[1952] On Collective Memory. Translated by L. A. Coser. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
Harrell, Stevan
1982 Ploughshare Village:Culture and Context in Taiwan. Seattle:University of Washington Press.
Hatch, Elvin
1994[1983] 文化與道德,于嘉雲譯。臺北:時報文化出版企業。
Ho Ping-ti 何炳棣
1959 Studies on the Population of China. Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
Holy, Ladislav
1996 Anthropological Perspectives on Kinship. London:Pluto Press.
Howell, Signe
2001 Self-conscious kinship:Some Contested values in Norwegian Transnational Adoption. In Relative Values:Reconfiguring Kinship Studies. Sarah Franklin and Susan McKinnon ed., pp.203-223. Durham:Duke University Press.
2003 Kinning:The Creation of Life Trajectories in Transnational Adoptive Families. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 9(3):465-484.
Hsiao, Kung-chuan 蕭公權
1960 Rural China:Imperial Control in the Nineteenth Century. Seattle:University of Washington Press.
Hu, Hsien Chin 胡先縉
1985[1948] The Common Descent in China and Its Functions. 臺北:南天書局。
Hunt, Robert C.
2007 Beyond Relativism:Comparability in Cultural Anthropology. Lanham:Altamira Press.
Johnson, David, Andrew J. Nathan & Evelyn S. Rawski ed.
1985 Popular Culture in Late Imperial China. Berkeley:University of California Press.
Jordan, David K.
1972 Gods, Ghosts, and Ancestors:The Folk Religion of A Taiwanese Village. Berkeley:University of California Press.
Keesing, Roger M.
1970 Shurines, Ancestors and Cognatic Descent:The Kwaio and Tallensi. American Anthropologist. 72:755-775.
Kelly, Raymond Case
1993 Constructing Inequality:The Fabrication of a Hierarchy of Virtue among the Etoro. Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press.
Kemper, Robert V. & Anya Peterson Royce ed.
2002 Chronicling Cultures:Long-term Field Research in Anthropology. Walnut Creek:Altamira Press.
Kipnis, Andrew B.
1997 Producing Guanxi:Sentiment, self, and subculture in a North China village. Durham:Duke University Press.
Kroeber, Alfred L. & Talcott Parsons
1958 The Concepts of Culture and of Social System. American Sociological Review 23:582-583.
Kuhn, Thomas S.
1994[1962] 科學革命的結構,程樹德等譯。臺北:遠流圖書公司。
Kulp, Daniel Harrison
1925 Country Life in South China:The Sociology of Familism. New York:Bureau of publications, Teachers college, Columbia University.
Kuper, Adam
1982 Lineage Theory:A Brief Retrospect. Annual Review of Anthropology 11:71-95.
1996 Anthropology and Anthropologists:The Modern British School. London:Routledge.
2003 What Really Happened to Kinship and Kinship Studies. Journal of Cognition and Culture 3(4):329-335.
Leach, Edmund Ronald
1971[1962] Rethinking Anthropology. London:Athlone Press.
Leaf, Murray J.
2001 Schneider’s Idealism, Relativism. And the Confusion of Kinship. In The Cultural Analysis of Kinship:The Legacy of David M. Schneider. Richard Feinberg and Martin Ottemnheimer ed., pp.60-77. Chicago:University of Illinois Press.
di Leonardo, Micaela
1992 The Female World of Cards and Holidays:Women Families and the Work of Kinship. In Rethinking the Family:Some Feminist Questions. Thoren B. & Yalom M. ed., pp.246-261. Boston:Northeastern University Press.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude
1969[1949] The Elementary Structures of Kinship. London:Eyre & Spottiswoode.
Liu, Hui-chen Wang 劉王惠箴
1985 [1959] The Traditional Chinese Clan Rules.臺北:南天書局。
Loizos,Peter & Patrick Headay
1999 Introduction. In Conceiving Persons:Ethnographies of Procreation, Fertility, and Growth. Peter Loizos & Patrick Headay ed., ,pp.1-17. London:Athlone Press.
Lubbock, Sir John
1970[1870] The Origin of Civilisation and the Primitive Condition of Man. ed. and with an introduction by Peter Rivière. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
Maine, Sir Henry Sumner
1986[1861] Ancient Law:Its Connection with the Early History of Society, and Its Relation to Modern Ideas. Tucson:University of Arizona Press.
1996[1861] 古代法,沈景一譯。北京:商務印書館。
Malinowski, Bronislaw
1922 Argonauts of the Western Pacific:An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. London:George Routledge & Sons, Ltd.
1929 The Sexual Life of Savages in North-Western Melanesia:An Ethnographic Account of Courtship, Marriage and Family Life among the Natives of the Trobriand Islands, British New Guinea. London:George Routledge & Sons, Ltd.
1971[1930] Kinship. In Readings in Kinship and Social Structure. Nelson Graburn ed., pp.95-105. New York:Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.
1991[1922] 南海舡人,于嘉雲譯。臺北:遠流圖書公司。
2002[1944] A Scientific Theory of Culture and Other Essays:Selected Works. London:Routledge.
Marx, Karl
1991[1867-1910] 資本論,吳家駟譯。臺北:時報文化出版企業。
Mauss, Marcel
1989[1970] 禮物:舊社會中交換的形式與功能,汪珍宜、何翠萍譯。臺北:遠流出版事業。
McLennan, John Ferguson
1998[1865] Primitive Marriage. Routledge/Thoemmes Press.
Morgan, Lewis Henry
1970[1871] Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity of the Human Family. Oosterhout:The Netherlands Anthropological Publications.
1992[1877] 古代社會,楊東蒓、馬雍、馬巨譯。北京:商務印書館。
1998[1877] Ancient society:Or, Researches in the Lines of Human Progress from Savagery through Barbarism to Civilization. Routledge/Thoemmes Press.
Murdock, George Peter
1965[1949] Social Structure. New York:Free Press.
Naquin, Susan & Evelyn S. Rawski
1989 Chinese Society in the Eighteenth Century. New Haven:Yale University Press.
Needham, Rodney
1962 Structure and Sentiment:A Test Case in Social Anthropology. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
1974 Remarks on the Analysis Kinship and Marriage. In Remarks and Inventions:Skeptical Essays about Kinship. Needham, Rodney ed., pp.38-71. London:Tavistock Publications.
2004[1971] Remarks on the analysis of kinship and marriage. In Rethinking Kinship and Marriage. Needham, Rodney. ed., pp.1-34. London:Routledge.
Nivison, David S.
2006[1996] 儒家之道:中國哲學之探討,周熾成譯。南京:江蘇人民出版社。
Ohnuki-Tierney, Emiko 大貫惠美子
1990 Introduction, In Culture Through Time:Anthropological Approaches. Emiko Ohnuki-Tierney ed., pp.1-25. Stanford:Stanford University Press.
1995 Structure, Event and Historical Metaphor:Rice and Identities in Japanese History. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 1(2):227-253.
2001 Historicization of the Culture Concept. History and Anthropology 12(3):213-254.
Ortner, Sherry B.
2003 New Jersey Dreaming:Capital, Culture, and the Class of ''58. Durham:Duke University Press.
2006 Anthropology and Social Theory:Culture, Power, and the Acting Subject. Durham:Duke University Press.
Ottenheimer, Martin
2001 Relativism in Kinship Analysis. In The Cultural Analysis of Kinship:The Legacy of David M. Schneider. Richard Feinberg and Martin Ottemnheimer ed., pp.118-130. Chicago:University of Illinois Press.
2003 The Seasons of Kinship. Journal of Cognition and Culture 3(4):335-341.
Parkin, Robert with Linda Stone
2004 General Introduction. In Kinship and Family:An Anthropological Reader. Robert Parkin & Linda Stone ed., pp.1-23. Oxford:Blackwell Publishing.
Parsons, Talcott
1949 The Structure of Social Action. Illinois:The Free Press.
2003[1951] 社會行動的結構,張明德、夏翼男、彭剛譯。南京:譯林出版社。
Pasternak, Burton
1972 Kinship and Community in Two Chinese villages. Stanford:Sanford University Press.
Pehrson, Robert N.
1954 Bilateral Kin Groupings as A Structural Type. Journal of East Asiatic Studies 3:199-202.
Peletz, Michael, G.
1995 Kinship Studies in Late 20th Century Anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology 24:343-372.
Pieke, Frank N.
2003 The Genealogical Mentality in Modern China. The Journal of Asian Studies 62(1):101-128.
Potter, Jack M.
1968 Capitalism and the Chinese Peasant. Berkeley:California University Press.
1970 Land and Lineage in Traditional China. In Family and Kinship in Chinese Society. M. Freedman ed., pp.112-138. Stanford:Stanford University Press.
Potter, Sulamith Heins and Jack M. Potter
1990 China''s Peasants:The Anthropology of A Revolution. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred Reginald
1950 Introduction. In African Systems of Kinship and Marriage, A. R. Radcliffe-Brown and Daryll Forde ed., pp.1-85. London:Published for the International African Institute by the Oxford University Press.
1952 Structure and Function in Primitive Society. New York:The Free Press.
1991[1958] 社會人類學方法,夏建中譯。臺北:桂冠圖書公司。
2005[1922] 安達曼島人,梁粵譯。桂林:廣西師範大學出版社。
Rivers, William Halse Rivers
1910 The Genealogical Method. Sociological Review 3:1-11.
1966[1924] 社會的組織,胡貽穀譯。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。
1998[1914] Kinship and Social Organization. London:Routledge/Thoemmes Press.
Sahlins, Marshall David
1981 Historical Metaphors and Mythical Realities:Structure in the Early History of the Sandwich Islands Kingdom. Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press.
1985 Islands of History. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
1995 How "Natives" Think:About Captain Cook, for example. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
1999 What Is Anthropological Enlightenment ? Some Lessons of the 20th Century. Annual Review of Anthropology 28:Ⅰ-XXⅢ.
2000[1996] 甜蜜的悲哀,王銘銘、胡宗澤譯。北京:三聯書店。
2003[1985] 歷史之島,藍達居等人譯。上海:上海人民出版社。
2004 Apologies to Thucydides:Understanding History as Culture and vice versa. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
2005 Structure Work:How microhistories become macrohistories and vice versa. Anthropological Theory 5(1):5-30.
Sangren, Paul Steven
1987 History and Magical Power in A Chinese Community. Sanford:Stanford University Press.
2000 Chinese Sociologics:An Anthropological Account of the Role of Alienation in Social Reproduction. London:Athlone.
Dos Santos, Gonçalo Duro
2006 The Anthropology of Chinese Kinship. A Critical Overview. European Journal of East Asian Studies. 5(2):275-333.
Scheffler, Harold W.
1976 The “Meaning” of Kinship in American Culture:Another View. In Meaning in Anthropology. Keith H. Basso and Henry A. Selby ed., pp.57-91, Albuquerque:University of New Mexico Press.
1991 Sexism and Naturalism in the Study of Kinship. In Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge, Micaela di Leonardo ed., pp.361-382. Berkley:University of California Press.
2001 Filiation and Affiliation. Boulder:Westview Press.
2003 Observation on The Fall of Kinship. Journal of Cognition and Culture 3(4):341-343.
Schneider, David Murray
1965 Some Muddles in the Models:Or How the System Really Works. In The Relevance of Models for Social Anthropology. Michael Banton ed., pp. 25-85. London:Tavistock.
1968 American Kinship:A Cultural Account. Englewood Cliffs:Prentice-Hall.
1972 What is Kinship All About? In Kinship Studies in the Morgan Centennial Year. Priscilla Reining ed., pp.32-63. Washington:Anthropological Society of Washington.
1980 American Kinship:A Cultural Account. 2d ed. Chicago:University of Chicago Press. (original ed.:Englewood Cliffs:Prentice-Hall.)
1984 A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press.
1995 Schneider on Schneider:The Conversion of the Jews and Other Anthropological Stories. edited, transcribed, and with an introduction by Richard Handler. Durham:Duke University Press.
Schneider, David Murray and Kathleen Gough
1961 Matrilineal Kinship. Berkeley:University of California Press.
Schweitzer, Peter P.
2000 Introduction. In Dividends of Kinship. Peter P. Schweitzer ed., pp.1-32. London:Routledgre.
Service, Elman R.
1997[1985] 人類學百年爭論,賀志雄等譯。昆明:雲南大學出版社。
Sewell, William Hamilton
2005 Logics of History. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
Shimizu, Akitoshi
1991 On the Notion of Kinship. Man 26(3):377–403.
Skinner, G. William
1998[1993] 中國農村的市場和社會結構,史建雲、徐秀麗譯。北京:中國社會科學出版社。
Sousa, Paulo
2003 The Fall of Kinship:Towards an Epidemiological Explanation. Journal of Cognition and Culture 3(4):265-303.
Stafford, Charles
1995 The Roads of Chinese Childhood:Learning and Identification in Angang. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
2000 Chinese Patriliny and the Cycles of Yang and Laiwang. In Cultures of Relatedness. Janet Carsten ed., pp.37-54. Cambridge:University Press.
Stewart, Pamela J. and Andrew Strathern
2003 Landscape, Memory, and History:Anthropological Perspectives. London:Pluto.
Strathern, Marilyn
1992 After Nature:English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
2001 親屬關係的重構,刊於二十一世紀:文化自覺與跨文化對話(一),頁65-87。北京:北京大學出版社。
Szonyi, Michael
1997 The Illusion of Standardizing the Gods:The Cult of Five Emperors in Late Imperial China. The Journal of Asian Studies 56(1):113-135.
2002 Practicing Kinship:Lineage and Descent in Late Imperial China. Stanford:Stanford University Press.
Tonnies, Ferdinand
1999[1926] 共同體與社會:純粹社會學的基本概念,林榮遠譯。北京:商務印書館。
Trautmann, Thomas R.
1987 Lewis Henry Morgan and the Invention of Kinship. Berkeley:University of California Press.
Truex, Gregory F.
2005 Two Cheers for Kinship. Reviews in Anthropology 34:119-144.
Wagner, Roy
1972 Incest and Identity:A Critique and Theory on the Subject of Exogamy and Incest Prohibition. Man 7:601-613.
1974 Are There Social Groups in the New Guinea High-lands? In Frontiers of Anthropology:An Introduction to Anthropological Thinking. Murray J. Leaf ed., pp. 95- 122. New York:D. Van Nostrand Company.
Waltner, Ann
1990 Getting An Heir:Adoption and the Construction of Kinship in Late Imperial China. Honolulu:University of Hawaii Press.
Watson, James L.
1975 Emigration and the Chinese Lineage. Berkeley:University of California Press.
1977 Hereditary Tenancy and Corporate Landlordism in Traditional China:A Case Study. Modern Asian Studies. 2(2):161-182.
1982 Chinese Kinship Reconsidered:Anthropological Perspectives on Historical Research. The China Quarterly 92:589-622.
1985 Standardizing the Gods:The Promotion of Tien Hou(Empress of Heaven) along the South China Coast, 960-1960. In Popular Culture in Late Imperial China. David Johnson, Andrew J. Nathan & Evelyn S. Rawski ed., pp.292-324. Berkeley:University of California Press.
Watson, James L. & Evelyn S. Rawski ed.
1991 Death Ritual in Late Imperial and Modern China. 臺北:南天書局。
Watson, Rubie
1982 The Creation of a Chinese Lineage:The Teng of Ha Tsuen, 1669-1751. Modern Asian Studies. 16(1):69-100.
Weber, Max
1999[1922] 社會科學方法論,韓水法、莫茜譯。北京:中央編譯出版社。
Weismantel, Mary
1995 Making Kin:Kinship Theory and Zumbagua Adoptions. American Ethnologist 22(4):685-704.
Westmarck, Edward
1971[1922] The History of Human Marriage. 5th ed., rewritten. New York:Johnson Reprint Corp.
White, Leslie A.
1957 How Morgan Came to Write Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity. Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters. 42:257-268.
Wolf, Arthur P.
1970 Chinese Kinship and Mourning Dress. In Family and Kinship in Chinese Society. M. Freedman ed., pp.189-207. Stanford:Stanford University Press.
Yanagisako, Sylvia Junko
1978 Introduction. American Ethnologists 5(1):1-4.
Yu, Kuang-hong 余光弘
1990 Making A Malefactor A Benefactor:Ghost Worship in Taiwan. 中央研究院民族學究所集刊 70:39-66。

二、網路資源
(一)、中央研究院漢籍電子文獻資料庫,http://www.sinica.edu.tw/~tdbproj/handy1/ :
朱子語類•卷第三•鬼神
列女傳
孟子•公孫丑上
孟子•滕文公上
孟子•離婁上
洗冤集錄校譯
通典
春秋•左傳正義•僖公
春秋•穀梁傳
春秋•公羊傳
風俗通義
漢書•元帝本紀
春秋繁露
論語•學而
顏氏家訓集解
禮記•昏義
禮記注疏•祭儀
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE