:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:再現西安—都市發展策略與實踐的空間辯證
作者:洪醒漢
作者(外文):Hung Hsing Han
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:地理學系
指導教授:潘朝陽
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2009
主題關鍵詞:空間的表徵再現的空間都市治理Representation of spaceRepresentational spaceUrban Governance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:107
若對當代中國都市與經濟的發展進行基本觀察,大多會同意中國在都市化過程中,常以發展型國家的意識形態干預市場經濟,導致文化資產受到忽視與破壞。這種情況究竟是一種刻板印象,還是當代中國都市所共同面臨到的真實問題?本文以當代都市理論對古都西安作個案的分析與探討。西安悠久的歷史文化傳統,不僅僅是西安人的驕傲,政府當局更是以這樣的歷史深度作為重要的都市特色,將西安塑造成為世界歷史文化名城,是政府當局一直以來希望能夠達成的理想與目標。從都市實體建築來看,延續自隋唐,而改建於明代的城牆一直是西安的象徵。在舊城區中,也不乏歷史文化街區與仿古建築等文化象徵。這些歷史建築所構築出的現代都市地景,在當代西安都市的發展策略上,應該透過什麼樣的角度來詮釋呢?這是本研究的問題意識起點。
自中華人民共和國建國以來,儘管每一次的城市發展總體規劃都將古城保護作為一項重要的內容,但環顧西安都市空間現狀,古城仍然遭到極大地破壞。本文試圖理解傳統的歷史文化,在西安的都市空間發展策略中,究竟扮演著什麼樣的角色?意即政府規劃單位,要如何使西安達到其宣稱的世界文化歷史名城的理想目標?並分析相關城市規畫的背景與實行狀況。
再現(representation)的概念是本文作為新都市文化地理學中空間分析的背景理論(background theory)。主要焦點放在探討西安都市空間營造過程中,空間的表徵(如城市規劃)與空間實踐(具體空間建設)之間的落差,並以再現的觀點理解與批判都市文化所展現出來的多元性。
儘管空間宰制者不斷宣稱歷史文化的重要性,但在具體的空間實踐上是一些飽受批判的”仿古”建築群與街道,這樣的空間實踐是構築在擬象(simulation)的基礎上,加上菁英政治的想像與國族主義意識形態的展現。同時,空間規劃者的理念在實踐時也受到多重干預,包含各種規劃年限、範圍的重疊與混淆;中國經濟發展與中產階級的崛起;受到市場與開發商的吸引等等,導致在西安的都市營造過程中,促進經濟發展還是首要的目標。面對上而下的都市治理模式,一般而言居民無力正面抵抗,但從居民的日常生活實踐中,卻可以看到另外一種抵抗形式的可能性,居民透過對於空間作不同的使用方式(way of use)來挪用既定的空間歷史想像。也就是對於空間的規訓,即使以不正面衝突的方式進行”抵抗”(resistance),也可能生產出不同的空間性意涵。
Ardono提出文化產業的概念,認為消費文化只不過是資本家,以更精緻的方式包裝他們對消費者的剝削。歷史文化的保護,也只是地方政府在追求經濟發展之下的表面包裝,對於將西安恢復為歷史文化名城的願景,若停留在論述與受到爭議的空間實踐上,不但無法再現(representation)歷史文化的豐富內涵,更不可能形成都市具體的風格與特色。因此導致都市光韻(aura)逐漸流失,經濟主導空間發展的惡性循環,將不斷在都市空間營造的過程中上演。這種現象在當代中國的都市空間營造上,已經成為共同面臨的問題。
透過歷史脈絡的分析與當代理論的對話,要回應當代都市空間發展中經濟與文化所面臨到的矛盾,必須回歸到都市空間所表徵的地方性意義上來探討。地方性的意義,是構築在歷史文化脈絡與居民日常生活的實踐上。因此,必須挖掘出都市空間的光韻(aura),彰顯出都市空間的區域特色,不僅可以透過這樣的觀點回應空間中文化經濟的矛盾,也是建構永續都市的另一種思考面向。
Those who make an observation of the economic and urban development in China will agree that the strategy of urbanization was usually dominated by the developmentalism, which resulted in the destruction of many cultural heritages. Is this a bias or a basic issue that should be dissolved in modern China? This essay tends to take the city Xian for example. The venerability and the tradition in Xian was not only the proud of the people here but the goal which the authority concermed wants to achieve to construct a famous historical city in the world. There were many historical constructions in the city, such as the city wall which was built since Ming dynasty, and some antiqued streets and buildings as well. But how to interpret such landscapes under the urban strategy will be the main issue which this essay tends to discuss.
Since 1949, it was an important target to preserve the ancient city under the urban planning, but many heritages were detroyed inevitably. So it is important to comprehend the role of the historical tradition in the urban strategy nowadays and to realize how the authority concerned achieve the goal to shape the city into a worldwide historical city. The present work is to analyze the background and the practice of the urban planning in Xian.
The keyword and the perspectives of this essay is “representation”, which would be the background theory of the critical analysis in Urban Culture Geography. It is important to realize the gap between “representation of space”(such as urban planning) and “spatial practice”(such as the constructions and creations of the space), and to interpret the diversity of the modern city with the viewpoint of the “representational space”.
Although the authority concerned declare the importance of history and tradition. In fact, the copy of the antiqued buildings and the historical streets as the spatial practice was criticized. Such spatial practice was constructed as the “simulacra” and the imaginary of the elite and the nationalism. In the meanwhile, the idea of the urban planner would be intervened by some aspects, such as the confusion of the boundary and time limit of the planning, the sharply rise of the bourgeoisie under the economic development in China, and the attraction of the capital and the market, etc. The increase of the economic still plays the key role in the strategy of the urban development. The people “used” the history and the culture in a different way by the practice of everyday life. They “resisted” the discipline of the space, but did not conflict directly, which produced the different meanings in spatiality.
Ardono brought up an idea of the cultural industry, which viewed the cultural consumption as the more detail way to exploit the consumers by the capitalists. The preservation of the historical traditions was only the appearance of the economic development by the authority concerned. The prospect to rebuild the Xian city could not merely make efforts in such “copied” historical space, which was neither the representation of the history, nor the formation of the particularity of the city. The “aura” of the city might disappear and the domination the urban space would be the economic development continuously. This is the common issue on the construction of the city in China nowadays.
By the dialogue between the analysis of the historical context and the contemporary urban theory, it is important to discuss the representation of the locality in urban space in order to response the contradiction of the urban development between the economy and the cultural history. The significance of the placeness was set up under the historical context and the practice of the everyday life. In order to manifest the regional particularity of the urban space, it is necessary to explore the “aura” of the urban space, which helped response the contradiction between the culture and the history and offered another perspectives of the sustainable city.
報紙部份
光明日報,1997/01/29
文 摘 報,2004/03/08
西安日報,2004/10/27
西安日報,2006/7/21
陝西日報,2005/01/24
西安晚報,2006/5/15(電子報)
中國建設報,2006/9/25
西安日報,2006/10/26
華 商 報,2006/10/31
西安日報,2007/03/14
西安晚報,2007/10/12
史料與官方文獻
國家統計局编(2007),2007年《中國統計摘要》,中華人民共和國家統計局。
劉慶柱輯注(2006),三秦記輯注‧關中記輯注(辛氏撰,王謨輯本),陜西:三秦出版社。
何清谷撰(2005),三輔黃圖校證(不著撰人,陳直校證),中華書局。
中華人民共和國,《城市規劃法》,第一章 總則,第六條規定。
西安市人民政府(1980),西安市第二次總體規劃(1980年-2000年),西安市規劃局。
西安市人民政府(2003),西安市第四次總體規劃(2004年-2020年),西安市規劃局。
西安市人民政府(2005),西安市城市規劃管理條例,西安市人民代表大會常務委員會公告第72號。
西安市人民政府(2005),西安國際化、市場化、人文化、生態化發展報告。
西安市地方誌編輯委員會(1996),西安市志,第一卷,總類.大事記,西安出版社。
西安市政府統計室編,《西安市政統計報告(1947~1948)》,西安市檔案局。
不著撰人,西安府志,建治篇
西安科技大學編製(2004),西安皇城復興計畫,西安市城市規劃局。
作者、時間不祥,收錄於西安市檔案局,〈西京市區計劃第一次會議紀錄(節錄)〉,《籌建西京陪都檔案史料選輯》。
不著撰人,收錄於西安市檔案管編(1994),籌建西京陪都檔案史料選輯,〈西京籌備委員會工作報告(節錄)〉(1921年7月到1922年6月),頁154~163。
陝西師範大學地理系(1988),西安市地理志,西安:陜西人民出版社。
陝西銀行經濟研究室編(1942),十年來之陜西經濟(1931~1941),陜西銀行經濟研究室。
中文部分
Anderson, B.著,吳叡人譯(1999),《想像的共同體:民族主義的起源與散布》(Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism),臺北:時報出版社。
Cloke, P等編,王志弘等譯(2007),人文地理概論,臺北:巨流出版社。
Cresswell, T. (2004) Place: A Short Introduction,徐苔玲、王志弘譯(2006)地方:記憶、想像與認同,臺北:群學出版社。
Foucault, M. (1980),陳志梧譯,不同空間的正文與上下文(脈絡),《空間的文化形式社會理論讀本》,臺北:明文出版社。
Foucault, M.(1977) Discipline and Punish, New York:Vintage.另參見劉北成譯(1997),規訓與懲罰,臺北,桂冠書局。
Harvey, D. 王志弘譯(2003),地租的藝術:全球化、壟斷與文化的商品化,城市與設計學報,第15&16期,台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所,頁1~19。new window
Jacobs, J著,吳鄭重譯(2007),偉大城市的誕生與衰亡:美國都市街道生活的啟發,臺北:聯經出版公司。
Johnson, L. ed, 成一農譯(2005),揚州:清帝國的一作中心城市,翻譯收錄在《帝國晚期的江南城市》一書中,上海:人民出版社。
Mumford, L. 宋峻嶺等譯(1989),城市發展史:起源、演變和前景,北京:中國建築工業出版社。
Relph, .E謝慶達譯 (1987/1998) 現代都市地景,臺北: 田園城市出版社。
Roger, T.謝慶達譯 (1986/1996).找尋失落的空間:都市設計理論,臺北: 田園城市出版社。
Savage, M & Warde, A. 王志弘譯(2000),都市社會學、資本主義與現代性,臺北:譯者自行出版。
Schulz, C. N.,施植明譯(1979) 場所精神,臺北:田園城市出版社。
Soja, E. W.著,王志弘、張華蓀、王玥民譯(2004),第三空間---航向洛杉磯以及其他真實與想像地方的旅程,臺北:桂冠書局。
Stuart, H. (Ed),陳光興等譯(1994).文化,社會與媒體(Culture, Society and the Media) by Michael Gurevitch,臺北:遠流出版社。
Throsby D.著,張維倫、潘筱瑜、蔡宜真、鄒歷安譯,2003(2001),文化經濟學(Economics and Culture)。臺北:典藏出版社。
Wallerstein, I. 等著,劉鋒譯(1997),開放社會科學,北京:三聯 & 香港:牛津大學出版社
Weber, M.,康樂、簡惠美譯(1958/2005),非正當性的支配:城市類型學,臺北:遠流出版社。
于海 (2005) 主編,城市社會學文選,上海:復旦大學出版社。
仇保興(2003),戰略規劃要注重城市經濟研究,城市規劃,第27卷,第1期,頁6~11。
王志弘(1998),後現代的空間思考—愛德華.索雅思想評介,《流動、空間與社會》,臺北:田園城市出版社。
王志弘(2003),都市社會學、資本主義與現代性,臺北:自印。(原著:Mike Savage and Alan Warde, Urban Sociology, Capitalism and Modernity)。
王軍(2005),《城記》-看不見的北京城,臺北:高談文化出版
王偉強(2005),和諧城市的塑造—關於城市空間形態演變的政治經濟學實證分析,北京:中國建築工業出版社。
王聖學、劉科偉(1995),陝西城市發展研究,西安:西安地圖出版社。
王毅(2007),以西安為中心,打造中經濟增長第五級,陝西省國際城市發展研究會2007年會主題演講稿,陝西中際國際城市發展研究院。
王靜(2006),民國時期隴海鐵路對咸陽城市化的影響,洛陽師範學院學報(哲社版),第25卷第1期,頁122~124。
史念海、辛德勇(1991),西安-載於中國七大古都,西安:中國青年出版社。
史念海主編,(1996),西安市歷史地圖集,西安:西安地圖出版社。
史紅帥(2008),明清时期西安城市地理研究,北京:中國社會科學出版社。
石崧、寧越敏(2005),人文地理學“空間”內涵的演進。地理科學,第25卷,第3期,頁340~345。
任雲英、朱士光(2005),從隋唐長安城看中國古代都城空間演變的功能趨向性特徵,中國歷史地理論叢,第20卷,第2期,頁48~56。
成一農譯(2005),揚州:清帝國的一作中心城市,翻譯收錄在林達.約翰森所主編《帝國晚期的江南城市》一書中,上海:人民出版社。
朱士光編,古都西安叢書編纂委員會,(2003),古都西安--西安的歷史變遷與發展,陜西:西安出版社。
朱翔主編(2003),城市地理學,湖南:湖南教育出版社。
余英時(1987),中國近世宗教倫理與商人精神,臺北市:聯經出版社。new window
吳宏歧(2001),抗戰時期的西京籌備委員會及其對西安城市建設的貢獻,中國歷史地理論叢,第16卷,第4期,頁43~56。
吳良鏞(2003),從戰略規劃到行動計畫—中國城市規劃體制初論。城市規劃,第12期,頁13~18。
吳幸玲(2007),全球化上海的懷舊與現代化景觀:跨國菁英與全球城市都市論,台大地理環境資源學研究所博士論文。
吳寧(2007),日常生活批判︰列斐伏爾哲學思想研究,北京:人民出版社。
呂怡儒(2001),臺北近郊森林地方感之研究,台大森林學研究所碩士論文。
宋郁玲(2006)地方感的生產與再生產—上海市中心城區拆遷戶棲居歷程之研究,國立台灣大學地理環境資源學研究所博士論文。
李令福(2006),龍脈、水脈與文脈:唐代曲江在都城長安的地位,唐都學刊,第22卷,第4期,頁14~19。
李政亮(2005),臺北、上海與中國小資,2005華文文化研究年會論文。
汪原(2005),亨利.列斐伏爾研究,建築師期刊(the architect),北京:中國建築工業出版社。
和紅星主編(2006),古都西安特色都市,北京:中國建築工業出版社。
周天勇主編(2005),城市發展戰略:研究與制定,北京:高等教育出版社。
季平(1934),西京市區分劃問題當議,《籌建西京陪都檔案史料選輯》
岳瓏(1989),抗戰期間的陜西工業,西北大學學報(哲學社會科學版),1989年,第二期。
林毅夫、蔡昉、李周著(2000),中國經濟改革與發展,臺北:聯經出版社。
宓汝成(2002),中華民國鐵路史資料(1912~1949),北京:社會科學文獻出版社。
侯仁之(1959),城市歷史地理學的研究與城市規劃,地理學報,第4期。
侯仁之主編(2000),北京城市歷史地理,北京:北京燕山出版社。
俞孔堅、李迪華(2003),城市景觀之路:與市長們交流,北京:中國建築工業出版社。
施添福(1990),地理學中的空間觀點,師大地理學報,第16期,頁115~137。new window
倪進誠譯(2000),地理學的本質和謝佛-哈茲宏的論戰(The Nature of Geography and the Schaefer-Hartshorne Debate)。地理思想讀本,臺北:唐山出版社。
倪鵬飛(2006),中國城市競爭力報告No.4,北京:中國建築工業出版社。
夏鑄九、張景森(1997),理論城市歷史—從戴奧斯.考斯多夫到柯斯特,《城市與設計學報》,第1期,頁51~73。new window
徐勇(2003),中國農村研究,北京:中國社會科學出版社。
徐進鈺(1998),邁向一個學習型的區域?臺北—新竹高科技廠商的聚集與技術學習。台灣師範大學地理研究報告,第29期,頁143-169。
海默(2005),中國城市臉譜,臺北:好讀出版社。
馬正林(1998),中國城市歷史地理,山東教育出版社。
高相鐸、李誠固、高豔麗、韓守慶(2005),西部大學城對未來西安市城市空間擴散的影響,人文地理,總85期,頁62~65。
高鑒國(2006),新馬克思主義城市理論,北京:商務出版社。
國家統計局城市社會經濟調查總隊與中國統計學會城市統計委員會編(2004),《2003中國城市發展報告》,北京:北京商務印書館。
張乃劍(2004),中國造城運動的冷思考,西部觀察,第2期。
張兵(1998),城市規劃實效論,北京:中國人民大學出版社。
張庭偉(2001),1990年代中國城市空間結構及其動力機制,城市規劃,第25卷,第7期,頁7~14。
張馭寰(2003),中國城池史。天津:百花文藝出版社
張頌賢(2004),賈平凹小說的城鄉嬗變—從《商州三錄》、《廢都》、《土門》到《懷念狼》,香港嶺南大學學士碩論。
張澤群(2006),城市靈魂—電視主持人張澤群談論城市文化,河南教育出版社。
許學強、周一星等(2001),城市地理學(6版)。北京:高等教育出版社。
許寶強 (2002),資本主義不是什麼,香港:牛津大學出版社
許耀桐(2004),中國行政體制改革的發展與啟示,《中國國情與制度創新》,北京:華夏出版社。
郭捷主編(2005),曲江大略,西安:陜西人民出版社。
郭湖生(2003),中華古都—中國古代城市史論文集,臺北:空間出版社。new window
陳小瑋(2005),最後的老宅院,《新西部》2005年第10期,民族與社會工作-國際古跡遺址理事會第15屆大會特別策劃,陝西省社會科學院。
陳光興(1991),布希亞的後現代(媒體)社會學,當代,第65期,頁18~30。
陳其南(1999),臺灣地理空間想像的變貌與後現代人文地理學--一個初步的探索(上),師大地理學報,第30期,頁175~219。new window
陳聖安(2004),鄧小平南巡談話對中國改革開放的歷史性貢獻 — 學習鄧小平南巡談話的體會,中國經濟評論,總第四卷,第一期(總第26期),頁75~78。
賀少昆主編(2005),家住西安,西安:三秦出版社。
鈕則謙(2007),上海市的城市治理與空間佈局之分析,國家與社會,第3期,頁119~182。new window
馮驥才(2000),搶救老街(紀實文學),北京:西苑出版社。
黃宗儀(2004),都市空間的生產:全球化的上海。台灣社會研究季刊,第53期,頁61~84。new window
黃孫權主編(2005),隱逸的城市靈魂,臺北市政府文化局。
黃惠琴(2005),女教師與女學生的空間識覺研究—以高雄市的高中為例,女學學誌:婦女與性別研究,第19期,頁47~103。new window
楊保軍(2003),直面現實的變革之途——探討近期建設規劃的理論與實踐意義,城市規劃,第27期,第3卷,頁17~25。
楊寬(1993),中國古代都城制度史研究,上海:古籍出版社。
萬毓澤(2007),從日常戰術到“新革命主體”:論de Certeau、Holloway與Negri筆下的權力與抵抗,政治與社會哲學評論,第20期,頁57~131。new window
葛慧(2005),三秦史話—西安地名趣談,西安:三秦出版社。
寧越敏(1998),新城市化進程—90年代中國城市化動力機制和特點探討,地理學報,第53期,第5卷,頁470~477。
趙茜(2007),古都西安的保護與更新,華中建築,第25卷,頁138~139。
趙燕菁(2004),高速發展與空間演進—深圳城市結構的選擇及其評價,城市規劃,第6期,頁32~42。
劉士林(2006),都市化進程論,學術月刊,第38卷,第12期,頁5~13。
劉慶柱(1987),漢長安城布局結構辨析——與楊寬先生商榷,考古期刊,第10期。
劉慶柱、李毓芳(1987),西漢十一陵,西安:陝西人民出版社。
劉懷玉(2003),列斐伏爾與20世紀西方的幾種日常生活批判傾向,求是學刊,第30卷,第5期,黑龍江大學。
潘朝陽(2005),心靈、空間、環境:人文主義的地理思想,臺北:五南出版社。
練玉春(2004),論蜜雪兒•德塞都的抵制理論—避讓但不逃離,河北學刊,第24卷,第2期,頁19~23。
蔡靜瑜(2002),地方營造形構過程之研究—臺北縣柑園之個案,國立台灣大學地理環境資源研究所碩士論文。
鄧小平(1993),在武昌、深圳、珠海、上海等地的談話要點,《鄧小平文選第三卷》,北京:人民出版社。
黎少平(2007),西安市大雁塔北廣場及周邊區域改造規劃與設計,建築創作,2007年第5期。
樸寅星(1997),西方城市理論的發展和主要課題,城市研究,1997年第1期,中國人民大學出版社。
錢穎一(2003),現代經濟學與中國經濟改革,北京:中國人民大學出版社。
顏亮一(2005),全球時代的文化遺產—古蹟保存理論之批判性回顧,地理學報,第四十二期,頁1~24。new window
龐博(2008),陝西省西安市積極推動絲綢之路申遺工作,陝西省文物局。
羅鋼、劉象愚主編(2005),文化研究讀本,北京:中國社會科學出版社。
蘇淑娟(1997),發展地理學的西方起源與本土基礎,環境與世界,第1期,頁137~155。new window
蘇碩斌(2002),臺北近代都市空間之出現:清末至日治時期權力運作模式的變 遷,臺北:台灣大學社會學研究所博士論文。new window
蘇碩斌(2005),看不見與看得見的臺北,臺北:左岸出版社。
顧忠華(2005),《韋伯〈新教倫理與資本主義精神〉導讀》,廣西師範大學出版社。
顧朝林主編(2005),概念規劃—理論、方法、實踐,北京:中國建築工業出版社。
西文部份
Baudrillard, J. (1998). Simulacra and Simulations,Jean Baudrillard: Selected Writings, University of Michigan Press.
Boyer, M. C.(1995) The great frame-up: appearance in contemporary spatial politics. In: Liggett, H. and Perry, D. C. (eds.) Spatial Practice: Critical Explorations in Spatial Theory, Thousand Oaks: Sage publication, pp 81~109.
Bourdiue, P.(1989). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.
Buck-Morss (1995) Envisioning Capital: Political Economy on Display, in Lynne Cooke and Peter Wollen eds. Visual Display – Culture Beyond Appearances, Seattle: Bay Press.
Cacciari, M. (1993): "Metropolis" In Architecture and Nihilism: On the Philosophy of Modern Architecture. Yale University Press, New Haven.
Castells, M. (1977) “Afterward 1975” in his Urban Question, Cambridge, Mass:The MIT press.
Castells, M. (1983) The City and the Grassroots: A Cross-Cultural Theory of Urban Social Movements. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
Chatterjee, P.(1986) Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World: A Derivative Discourse? Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Cook, I. G. & Murray, G. (2001),China’s Third Revolution: Tensions in the Transition towards a Post-Communist China, London: Curzon Press.
de Certeau, M. (1984) The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Donald, J. (1992), Metropolis: The city as text, in Robert Bocock and Kenneth Thompson (eds), Social and Cultural Forms of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
du Gay, P. & Pryke, M. (2002): Cultural economy : cultural analysis and commercial life, London : Sage Press.
du Gay, P. ed. (1997) Introduction, Production of Culture/Cultures of Production, London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publications, pp 1~10.
Dubrow, G. L. (1998) Feminist and multicutural perspectives on preservation planning. In: Sandercock, L.(ed) Making the Invisible Visible: A Multicutural Planning History, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Dumont, L. (1977) From Mandeville to Marx – The Genesis and Triumph of Economic Ideology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Elden, S. (2004) Understanding Henri Lefebrve, London and New York: Continuum Press.
Entrikin, J. N. (1976) Contemporary humanism geography, Annals of the American Geographers, 66(4).
Feagin, J & Parker, R., (1990), Building American Cities, The Urban Real Estate Game, 2nd ed., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice Hall.
Foucault, M.(1967/1986) Text/Context of Other Spaces. Diacritics 16.1, pp 22~27.
Garnham, N. (1995) Political Economy and Cultural Studies: Reconciliation or Divorce? Critical Studies in Mass Communication 12, pp 62~71.
Garnham, N. (1997) Political Economy and the Practice of Cultural Studies,” in Marjorie Ferguson and Peter Golding eds. Cultural Studies in Question, London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publications, pp56~73.
Garreau, J. (1991), Edge City: Life on the New Frontier. New York: Doubleday
Gary, B. (1976) The Economic Approach to Human Behaviour, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gaubatz, P. (1999) “China’s urban transformation: patterns and processes of morphological change inBeijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou.” Urban Studies 36(9), pp 1495~1521.
Gauthier, H. L.& Taafe, E. J. (2000), Three20th century ”Revolution” in American geography, Urban geography, 23(6), pp503~527.
Gronlund, B.(1999) Urbanity:Lived space and diference, Urbanity&Aesthetics, Copenhagen University, Seminar.
Grossberg, L. (1995) Cultural Studies vs. Political Economy: Is Anybody Else Bored with this Debate? Critical Studies in Mass Communication 12, pp72~81.
Hall, S. (1999). Cultural studies and its theoretical legacy. The Cultural Studies Reader. S. During. London: Routledge.
Hall, P. G. (2002) Cities of tomorrow:an intellectual history of urban planning and design in the twentieth century, Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell.
Hartshorne, R. (1939). The Nature of Geography. A Critical Survey of Current Thought inLight of the Past. Lancaster, PA: AAG.
Hartshorne, R.(1959) Perspective on the Nature of Geography. Chicago: Published by Rand McNally and Company as Monograph No. 1.
Harvey, D. (1973) Social Justice and the City. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
Harvey, D.(1985) The Urbanization of Capital. Oxford UK: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
Harvey, D.(1989) The Urban Experience. Oxford UK & Cambridge: Blackwell.
Harvey, D.(1996) Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell
Harvey, D. (2002) The art of rent: globalization, monopoly and the commodification of culture, in Leo Panitch & Colin Leys (eds.), A World of Contradictions, The Socialist Register 2002。
Harvey, D. (2003) Paris:capital of modernity. New York: Routledge.
Hayden, D. (1995) The Power of Place: Urban Landscapes as Public History, Cambridge: MIT press.
Held, D. & McGrew, A. (1999) Global Transformations, Politics, Economics and Culture. CA: Stanford University Press.
Hewison, R. (1987) The Heritage Industry: Britain in a Climate of Decline, London: Methuen London.
Hillier, B. & Hanson, J. (1984) The Social Logic of Space, Cambridge University Press.
Huff, L. A. (2006) Sacred Sustenance: Maize, Storytelling, and a Maya Sense of Place, Journal of Latin American Geography: 5(1), pp 79~96.
Huyssen, A. (2000) Present Pasts: Media, Politics, Amnesia. Public Culture, 12(1), 21-38.
Illich, I. (1982) Shadow Work, in Shadow Work, Marion Boyars/Boston/London: Open Forum, pp 99~116.
James, C. (1998) “Abstraction in Western Economic Practice,” in Virtualism – A New Political Economy, ed. James Carrier and Daniel Miller, Oxford and New York: Berg.
Jessop, B. (1995) “The Regulation Approach, Governance and Post-fordism: Alternative Perspectives on Economic and Political Change?”, Economiy and Society, 24(3).
Johnson, C. (1982) MITI and the Japanese Miracles: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925-1975. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Johnson, L.C.(1987). (Un)Realist perspectives: patriarchy and feminist challenges in geography. Antipode 19(2), pp210~215..
Johnston, R.J. J. Hauer and Hoekveld, G. A.. (1990) Regional Geography: Current Developments and Future Prospects. London: Routeldge.
Kellner, D. (1997) Overcoming the Divide: Cultural Studies and Political Economy, in Marjorie Ferguson and Peter Golding eds. Cultural Studies in Question, London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publications.
King, A. D. (1996),RE-presenting the City:ethnicity, capital and culture in the 21st-century metropolis,New York University Press.
Kostof, S. (1986) Cities and Turfs,Design Book Review, No. 10, Fall, pp35~39.
Kostof, S. (1991) The City Shaped:Urban Patterns and Meanings through History, London: Thames Hudson.
Kostof, S. (1992) The City Assembled: The Elements of Urban Form through History, London: Thames and Hudson.
Krier, L.(1977) The City Within the City, A + U, Tokyo, Special Issue, November 1977, pp69~152.
Lefebvre, H. (1968/1993). The right to the city, in Joan Ockman (ed.), Architecture Culture 1943-1968: A Documentary Anthology (pp. 428-436). New York: Rizzolo International Publications.
Lefebvre, H. (1991a/1974), The Production of Space, Translated by Donald Niclmlson Smith, Oxford: Basil Blackwell
Lefebvre, H. translated by Bononno,R (1970/2003). The Urban Revolution Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Lefebvre, H. translated by Bononno,R.(1976/2003).The Urban Revolution. Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press
Lefebvre, H. Translated by Frank Bryant. (1976), The Survival of Capitalism, reproduction of the Relations of Prodution. London: Allison & Busby Ltd.
Lefebvre, H. Translated by John Moore (1991b/1958) Critique of Everyday Life,Vol. 1.
Lowenthal, D. (1985) The Past is a Foreign Country, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ma, L. J. C.(2006) The state of the field of urban China:A critical multidisciplinary over view of the Literature, China Information, 20(2), pp363~389.
Machimura, T.(1998) "Symbolic use of Globalization in Urban Politics in Tokyo", Journal of InternationalUrban and Regional Studies, 22(2), pp183~194.
Magnusson, P.(1996) The Search for Political Space. Globalization, Social Movement and the Urban Political Experience, Toronto and London: University of Toronto Press.
McCloskey, D. (1985) The Rhetoric of Economics, Madison, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Mckeown, K. (1987), Marxist Political Economy and Marxist Urban Sociology. London: Macmillan Press.
Mitchell, D. (2003). The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space . New York: Guilford Press.
Mort, F. (2000): “The Commercial Domain: Advertising and the Cultural Management of Demand,” in Peter Jackson, Michelle Lowe, Daniel Miller, Frank Mort ed. Commercial Cultures – Economies, Practices, Spaces, Oxford/NY: Berg.
Nelson, R. H. (2001): Economics as Religion : from Samuelson to Chicago and beyond; foreword by Max Stackhouse. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Nora, P. (1989), Between memory and history: Les Lieux de Memoire, 26.
Park, R.(1967/1925), The City: Suggestions for the Investigation of Human Behavior in the Urban Environment, in Robert Park et al.(Eds.)The City. Chicago: The Chicago University Press.
Passavant, P. A.(2004) ,Postmodern Republicanism, in Passavant, Paul A. and Jodi Dean ed., Empire’s New Clothes: Redding Hardt and Negri. New York:Routledge.
Paul, D. G. (ed) (1997) “Introduction”, Production of Culture/Cultures of Production, London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Paul, D. G., and Pryke, M. (2002) Cultural economy : cultural analysis and commercial life, London : Sage Publications.
Paul, D. G..; Hall, S. ; Janes, L.; Mackay, H.; & Negus, K. (1997) Doing Cultural Studies – The Story of the Sony Walkman, London: Sage publications..
Peet, R. (1998). Modern Geographical Thought. Oxford: Blackwell.
Perry, C. (1929) “The Neighbourhood Unit,” in The Regional Plan of New York and Its Environs. Vol. 7. New York:
Peter, (2001): Consumerism in world History – The Global Transformation of Desire, London and New York: Routledge.
Pred, A(1983). Structuration and Place: On the Becoming of Sense of Place and Structure of Feeling. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 13(1).
Ray, L. and Sayer, A. (ed.)(1999) Culture and Economy after the Cultural Turn. London: Sage
Relph, E. (1976) Place and placelessness , London: Pion.
Rosenau, J. (1996) Governance without Government: Order and change in world politico, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Samuel, R.(1994) Theatres of Memory, New York: Verso Press.
Sassen, S. (1996) Whose city is it? globalization and the formation of new claims. Public Culture, No.8, pp 205~223.
Scott, A. J.(2000). The Cultural Economy of Cities. London: Sage
Sennett, R (1971) The uses of disorder: Personal identity & city life Vintage Books
Shaefer , F. K. (1953) Exceptionalism in Geography:A Methodological Examination, A. A. A. G., No. 43.
Shaw, G. & Williams, A. M.(1994) Critical Issues in Tourism: a Geographical Perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.
Shields, R. (1999) Lefebvre, Love & Struggle: Spatial Dialectics. New York: Routledge.
Simmel, G. (1971) On Individuality and Social Forms, ed. Donald N. Levine, Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.
Skinner, G. W. (1965) Marketing and Social Structure in Rural China, Journal of Asian Studies, No.24.
Slater, D. (2002): “Capturing Markets from the Economists,” in Paul du Gay and Michael Pryke eds, Cultural Economy – Cultural analysis and Commercial Life, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
Smith, D. A. (1996), Third World Cities in Global Perspective, Westview Press.
Soja, E. W.(1996),Postmetropolis: critical studies od cities and regions, Blackwell Publishing.
Sorkin, M.(1992) Variations on a Theme Park: The New American City and the End of Public Space, New York: Hill and Wang.
Stoker, G. (1998) “Public-private parternships and urban governance” , in Pierre J. ed. Partnership in Urban Governance: European and American Experience, Great Britan: Macamilan Press.
Thompson, E.P. (1967): “Time, Work Discipline and Industrial Capitalism,” Past and Present 38.
Thrift, N. (1997): “The Rise of Soft Capitalism”, Cultural Values, Vol. 1 No.1,
Thrift, N. (1998): “Virtual Capitalism: The Globalisation of Reflexive Business Knowledge,” in Virtualism – A New Political Economy, ed. James Carrier and Daniel Miller, Oxford and New York: Berg.
Thrift, N. (2002): “Performing Cultures in the New Economy,” in Paul du Gay and Michael Pryke eds. Cultural Economy – Cultural Analysis and Commercial Life, London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Urry, J. (1990) The Tourist Gaze: Leisure and Travel in Contemporary Societies, Newbury Park: Sage publications.
Ward, G. (2000) The Certeau Reader, Blackwell Publishers.
Weber, M. (1992) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, London and New York: Routledge.
Weiss, L. & J. Hobson (1995) States and economic development. Cambridge: Polity.
Werlen, B.(1993/1988) Society, Action and Space. London: Routeledge
Wirth, L. (1938) Urbanism as a way of life, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 44.
Yi-Fu, T. (1977): Space and Place-The Perspective of Experience, London: Edward Arnold.
Yi-Fu, T. (1979). "Fear in the city," in Landscapes of Fear. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Zukin, S. (1982) Loft Living: Culture and Capital in Urban Change, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Zukin, S. (1995) The Cultures of Cities. Oxford: Blackwell.
Zygmunt, B. (1998) “Prospects for the New Poor,” in Work, Consumerism and the New Poor, Buckingham/Philadelphia: Open University Press.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE