:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣地區大專學生公民發展之研究
書刊名:公民訓育學報
作者:沈六呂啟民 引用關係周亞貞
作者(外文):Sheen, LiowLu, JimmyChou, Ya-chan
出版日期:2000
卷期:9
頁次:頁1-34
主題關鍵詞:CitizenshipCitizenship developmentCitizenship education臺灣大專學生公民發展公民教育
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:60
  • 點閱點閱:26
公民教育的目的乃在幫助學生與成人,以信心與決心勇敢地承擔他們的責任,以及幫助他們本乎民主原則,實現國家的和諧統一與達成國家的理想。今日公民教育教師所面臨的挑戰,就在於創作、設計與選擇公民教育課程及方法。而此種公民教育課程及方法要與學生成長和發展相配合,並符合社會的需要與期望。 本乎此項認識,本研究採理論分析法與調查研究法。首先從學術觀點,探究公民發展階段的理論模式。本研究的基本假設在於公民發展階段的理論模式,可以作為建構所欲發展的公民教育課程與方法的基礎與準則,以達成公民教育的目的。繼之在調查臺灣北、中、南、東部等四個不同地區與社經背景的大專學生,探討影響他們公民發展的社會因素,以驗證公民發展階段理論模式的適切性,以及明白其影響因素;並調查分析公民教育課程是否影響上述學生的公民發展,同時探求對上述學生公民發展有貢獻的其他教育因素。 本研究結果將對公民發展階段理論模式的建構,具有學術性貢獻,且研究結果將對公民教育課程與方法的創作與設計,具有實用的參考價值。獲致如下的發現: 一、影響我國大專學生公民發展的人物,層面廣泛,分呈高、中、低影響程度。 二、影響公民發展的人物,對不同背景的大專學生之影響程度,部份存有差異;但不影響其排序。 三、我國大專學生之公民發展普遍受大學共同科課程內容的影響,且分呈高、中影響程度。 四、大學共同科課程內容,對不同背景的大專學生之影響程度,存有差異性;但不影響其排序。 五、我國大專學生之公民發展,普遍受公民活動的影響,呈中度影響程度。 六、公民活動,對不同背景的大專學生之影響程度,呈顯著差異性;但不影響其排序。 七、我國部份的大專學生,其公民發展處於垂直的社會關係的階段(第六階段)
The purpose of citizenship education is to help students and Adults face their responsibilities with confidence and determination and help them realize a degree national unity and purpose in light of democratic principles. So citizenship education has been considered one of the constraint educational goals since the founding of our country and the concomitant need to educate youth and students for their democratic responsibilities. But citizenship education now has a low or no priority in our educational systems. The challenge facing educators and teachers toady in regard to citizenship education is to produce, design, and select the course programs and approaches to citizenship. It is the belief of this study that a theoretical model that explains the sequence of events that occurs in children's lives as they evolve an internalized schema of citizenship can become the basis for structuring and developing a sound citizenship education programs and approaches. Therefore, the main goals of this study are to analyze the theoretical model of citizenship development and to come an understanding of the dynamic social processes that influence its development and to come an understanding of the dynamic social processes that influence its development. This study consists of an exploratory study of opinions and practices of students who are about to be graduate from senior high schools in four different geographic areas and socioeconomic backgrounds both the social and educational influence of citizenship, their opinions and concerns are an important source of information regarding the citizenship development in Taiwan. In questionnaire survey, we finally obtained responses from effective samples. The findings, through statistical analysis, brought up highlights of conclusions: 1. The citizenship of college students were greatly influenced by peoples and courses. 2. The citizenship of college students were influenced by activities, programs of teachers, and experiences in elementary school or in secondary school. 3. Most of college students in Taiwan was in vertical social relationships.
期刊論文
1.陳舜芬、王昱峰(19961000)。國中公民與道德教育的檢討與展望--焦點討論精華。國立編譯館通訊,9(4)=33,27-35。  延伸查詢new window
2.林火旺(19940800)。對當前我國公民道德教育的一些看法。人文及社會學科教學通訊,5(2)=26,11-17。  延伸查詢new window
3.Wineman, Shelia A.、Hammond, Rosalind、張秀雄(19891000)。網狀的公民教育途徑。中等教育,40(5),55-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Dynneson, Thomas L.、Gross, Richard E.(1985)。An eclectic approach to citizenship: Development stages。The Sorial Studies,76,23-27。  new window
5.沈六(19960600)。公民發展與教育方法。公民訓育學報,5,7-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.瞿海源(19961000)。國中師生對公民與道德教育意見之分析。國立編譯館通訊,9(4)=33,36-47。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳文俊(19821200)。臺灣地區中學生的政治態度:因子分析的設計。東吳政治社會學報,6,68-119。  延伸查詢new window
8.Kymlicka, Will、Norman, Wayne(1994)。Return of the Citizen: A Survey of Recent Work on Citizenship Theory。Ethics,104(2),352-381。  new window
9.Ehman, L. H.(1980)。"Change in High School Students' Political Attitudes as a Function of social stzudies classroom climate"。American Education Research Journal,17(2),253-265。  new window
研究報告
1.台灣省政府教育廳(1987)。推展公民教育發揮訓導功能實驗研究報告。南投:台灣省政府教育廳。  延伸查詢new window
2.廖添富(1996)。高中師自我觀念、現代公民性及其家庭因素之研究。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育廳(1996)。八十四學年度台灣省中等學校統計表。台北:教育廳。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.余霖(1985)。影響國中生政治社會化的學校因素(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳秋燕(1994)。北、高兩市國中學生政治認知與態度之研究(碩士論文)。國立師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.彭瀧森(1985)。國中生政治社會化之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊順富(1989)。台北市高職公民教育內涵與教學效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃景裕(1994)。台北市高中職學生現代公民性及其家庭因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉美琳(1995)。台北市高中職學生自我觀念與法治態度的關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.羅瑞玉(1989)。國民中小學生政治社會化態度傾向之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hess, R.、Tomey, J. V.(1967)。The Development of Political Attitude in Children。N. Y.:Double & Company Inc.。  new window
2.Center for Civic Education、單文經(1996)。美國公民與政府科課程標準。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
3.林惠雅、幸曼玲、蘇建文、林美珍、程小危、陳李綢、吳敏而、柯華葳、陳淑美(1991)。發展心理學。臺北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Dynneson, Thomas L.、Gross, Richard E.(1987)。The Citizenship Development Framwork: A six stage socio - cultuer Theory。  new window
5.Dynneson, Thomas L.、Gross, Richard E.(1995)。Desugnung effective instruction for secondary social studies。Coiumbusm Ohio:Merrill。  new window
6.Flathmann, Jony(1987)。The General Education Function of the curriculum for Democratic Citizenship。  new window
7.Grinder, Robert E.、Dynneson, Thomas L.(1991)。Social science perspective on citizenship education。N. Y.:Teacher College press。  new window
8.Guidera, George(1991)。Citizenship Education: A Field study of its practice in two high school。  new window
9.教育部(1996)。中華民國教育統計。台北:教育部統計處。  延伸查詢new window
10.Almond, Gabriel A.、Verba, Sidney(1963)。The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations。Princeton University Press。  new window
11.郭生玉(1989)。心理與教育測驗。臺北市:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.張秀雄(1993)。民主法治教育之研究。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
13.張秀雄(1996)。各國公民教育。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
14.Gardner, Howard、陳瓊森、汪益(1995)。超越教化的心靈。臺北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
15.Smith, Zachary A.(1992)。The Environmental Policy Paradox。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall。  new window
16.沈六(19910000)。道德發展與行為之研究。臺北:水牛。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.林清江(1980)。教育社會篇新論。台北:五南出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.國立編譯館(1996)。高級中學公民教科書。台北:國立編譯館。  延伸查詢new window
19.教育部中等教育司(1996)。台灣地區中等學校概況--高級中學部份。台北:教育部中等教育司。  延伸查詢new window
20.Sally Wendkos Olds、Diane E. Papalia、黃慧真(1991)。發展心理學。台北:桂冠圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
21.Coleman, J.(1972)。Policy Research in Social Science。Morristown, N. J.:General Learning press。  new window
22.Colman, Jame S.(1990)。Loosening the Tie that Bind, in Educators Around the World Share their Vision of a Design for School Year 2020。  new window
單篇論文
1.Block, Alfred(1988)。Application of organization development theory and practice to improve citizenship education(DAO TD (8819160))。  new window
其他
1.Dynneson, Thomas L.,Gross, Richard E.(1988)。An Exploratory Suvey of Cufa Member's Opinions and Practices pertaining to Citizenship Education in the Social studies(ERTC ED 301509)。  new window
2.Engle, S. H.(1977)。The Search for a more Adequate Definition of Citizenship Education(ERIC ED 48720)。  new window
3.Hahn, C. L.(1988)。The Effects of the Schools, Nedua, and Family on the Civic value and Behaviors of Yout(ERIC ED 314291)。  new window
4.McGowan, Thomas,Godwin, C. M.(1986)。Citizenship Education in the Early Grades: A plan for Action(ERIC EJ 346223)。  new window
圖書論文
1.Turie, Elliot(1973)。Stage Transition in Moral Development。Second Handbook of Research on Teaching。Chicago:Rand McNally & Company。  new window
2.Armstrong, David G、Savage Tom V(1983)。The Senior High School。Secondary Education。Macmillian Publishing Co., Inc.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE